## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

sm

Sprinkler __irrigation __system __analysis __using __EPANET __2.0 By Gilberto E. Urroz, March 2012 Sprinklers are commonly used to irrigate house yards, parks, or agricultural plots. The network mapped below represents a sprinkler irrigation system for a small park.

The pipes in this network have the following length, diameters, and Hazen-Williams coefficients: ------------------- -------------------Pipe L(ft) D(in) Pipe L(ft) D(in) ------------------- -------------------P1 1000 4 P8 400 2 P2 300 4 P9 400 2 P10 500 4 P3 400 2 P4 400 2 P11 400 2 P5 500 4 P12 400 2 P13 500 4 P6 400 2 P7 400 2 P14 500 4 ------------------- -------------------The pump curve is defined by the following curve: ---------------Q(cfs) hP(ft) ---------------0.00 170 0.67 135 1.00 100 ----------------

All nodes are at zero elevation, while the reservoir R1 has a total head (water surface elevation) of 10 ft. The sprinkler heads located at junctions J6, J7, J8, J9, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, and J16 have emitter coefficients of 0.04 cfs/(psi)^0.5, except for those at J13 and J14, whose emitter coefficients are 0.05 cfs/(psi)^0.5 Sprinkler heads are represented by junctions, some of which are terminal junctions (e.g., J7, J8, J10, J12, J13, J14, and J15). The discharge, Q, produced by a sprinkler head is related to the local pressure, p, by: Q C E p

In entering data for this network, we select CFS (cubic feet per second) as the default unit of discharge, and H-W (Hazen-Williams) as the friction loss equation to use. The emitter coefficients are entered in the node properties in the proper units, i.e., in this case, in CFS/(ft)^0.5. Irrigation systems are typically operated under steady-state conditions for a given period of time. Thus, for the present case a steady-state solution suffices. The figure below shows the hydraulic grade line elevations at nodes and flow discharges in the pipes for the steady state solution.

1/5

The pressures at the sprinklers vary from 1.09 psi 62. in 24.e. in this case.83 cfs to the irrigation system network. whereas the discharge side. basically represent the sprinkler discharges. the pump head. J1. J2.9345 ft . as expected. is: hP 27. i. Since all elevations are set at the same level (zero).08 psi (J7.4483 psi .J8).. The figure also shows the discharge directions in the pipes. The following figure shows the node demands.2 Mar 2012 07:21:04 . hP 118. which. shows a negative pressure.4 lbf/ft^3. 2/5 . shows a positive pressure.sm Notice that the suction side of the pump. while the lbf 62. Taking γ this case.EPANETSprinklerSystemExample. the pressure difference across the pump is related to the pump head as follows: p p J2 J1 hP γ where γ is the specific weight of water.4 3 ft pump supplies a total of 0.25 psi (J10. J12) to 9.

converted from CFS to GPM: 0.4416 gpm 1 2 psi Also. you should repeat this exercise using GPS for the default discharge units. the values to use are: 3 ft gal cfs gpm s min 0. the pump curve needs to have the discharges.0 170 300.sm In most cases.2 Mar 2012 07:21:04 .05 cfs 1 2 psi 22. The following figure shows the pressures and flows for the case in which the pump is removed: The pump. For practice.00 cfs 448. an elevation of 10 ft will produce much smaller pressures at the sprinkler heads if the pump were not present. is at a higher elevation.7169 gpm 1.5. theoretically a pump is not needed to supply water to the system. sprinkler irrigation system discharges are given in GPM (gallons per minute) rather than in CFS (cubic feet per second). in this case.04 cfs 1 2 psi 17. Q.9532 gpm 1 2 psi 0. is referred to as a booster pump because it "boosts" the discharge delivered to the system.7 135 448. The network properties are basically the same except for the emitter coefficient values which should be given in gpm/(psi)^0. 3/5 .67 cfs 300. in this case. the resulting pump curve is: ---------------Q(gpm) hP(ft) ---------------0. R1. However. Thus.8311 gpm Thus.EPANETSprinklerSystemExample.8 100 ---------------__pump Booster Since all the sprinklers are set at a zero elevation and the source reservoir.

sm Calculating __prinkler's __emitter __coefficient Manufacturers provide data detailing the discharge characteristics of sprinkler heads..86 gpm 0.001 cfs psi p Q NOTE: __ __Modeling __free-discharging __pipelines __in __EPANET Consider the following example shown in page 103 of the Spring 2012 CEE 35100 Reader: 4/5 .2 Mar 2012 07:21:04 .4524 gpm psi or 0. The emitter coefficient can be calculated from the discharge and pressure data listed in the table above. For example.48 0.453 Q k C 3.4528 for k 1 . For example. n 2.4525 An average value for the emitter coefficient for this case is n C C E_ave k= 1 n E k => C E_ave 0.452 n length p 2. the p and Q data ar 25 30 35 (psi) 40 45 50 The following code calculates the emitter coefficients: 2.4524 gpm psi 0. the figure below shows performance data for different nozzle sizes fora particular model.EPANETSprinklerSystemExample.68 (gpm) 0.4522 ps E 3. for the 1/8" nozzle size.26 2.4517 0.20 p k k 0.03 C E 0.

385 cf 5/5 . and an elevation of 55 ft for J1. the loss coefficient of 1.0. and a (minor) loss coefficient of 1. However. Pipe P1 has a length of 100 ft.0 is necessary for a complete solutio In setting up the EPANET model we created the following map (here showing the pressures and the flow discharge after running the mode We use a total head of 60 ft for R1. to account for the velocity head at the free-discharging node (2). a Hazen-Williams coefficient of 110.2 Mar 2012 07:21:04 .5.EPANETSprinklerSystemExample.39 cfs. Node J1 uses a emitter coefficient of 1000 cfs/psi^0. In addition. a diameter of 6 inches. then a very large emitter coefficient will ensure that the demand at that node has a reasonable value. point (2) should be represented as a node with a very large emitter coefficient. Since the pressure at that point should be zero (or very close to zero in the EPANET solution).0 must be included in the pipe connecting reservoir (1) with outlet (2). Q = 1. To solve such a system in EPANET. reservoir entrance losses only) are to be ignored.38 cfs. In the problem statement it is indicated that minor losses (in this case.sm The solution for Q found using SMath Studio was Q = 1. After running the program you get a warning that negative pressures were detected in the system. Ignore this message and check the final result. a loss coefficient of 1. very close to the value found using SMath Studio (Q = 1.

- Epanet and Development. How to calculate water networks by computer
- Epanet and Development. A progressive 44 exercise workbook
- Simulation of Water Distribution Networks the Use of EPANET
- Procedure in using EPANET Software
- Hydraulic Modeling With EPA-NET
- Epanet-Training2
- Water Pipeline Design Guidelines
- MIKE NET Methodology
- Water Supply Water Distribution
- Using EPANET for Irrigation System Design
- Water Supply and Sewerage Design
- 07 EPANET Tutorial-Slides
- M4c EPANET2 Example Class Version
- epanet
- Epanet Description
- Irrigation sprinkler
- EPANET Calibrator Manual
- Gravity Flow Water Supply
- Pump Station Design
- Exp. 6
- Green Fire
- Pump Selection and Troubleshooting Field Guide-American Water Works Association (AWWA) (2009)
- Impulse 4.0
- Water Distribution System
- water distribution
- Civil Engineering Hydraulics
- Gardening Basics
- Equipping a borehole
- Introduction to Urban Water Distribution
- Exposicion NFPA 22

- Fonctionnement pompes
- CCTG AEP - Tome 3 - G__nie Civil - Version 1 (Octobre 2012) - OnEE-Branche Eau
- 97-23
- Guide Installation Tuyau Enterre Aps France
- Writing-Ph.D Thesis Using LateX
- VANAR_fra
- Maroc - Approvisionnement en eau de la région de Marrakech - Rapport d’évaluation
- B60-21-1
- avis technique tranchée
- FinalThesisWork Transient
- Note d'examen n0 1_A0
- Calcul de Dalot-1
- Fortran
- Tuyaux Acier AEP - v2 [Mode de compatibilité]
- 3407
- Optimization in Scilab
- Scilab5.4.0_ReleaseNotes
- Modula Ur
- Fortran
- Le+Diagramme+Temps Temps
- Introduction Scilab
- NF04_Cours1
- mecafluide
- CCTG AEP - Tome 2 - Comptage ONEE - Branche Eau (Version 1 - Octobre 2012)
- CCTG AEP - Tome 6 - Traitement ONEE - Branche Eau (Version 1 - Octobre 2012)
- savoirfaire grunfos
- Ped Guidelines Fr
- Hydraulic Systems Toolbox
- 115470641-Coloriage

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading