Table 1-5: North Dakota Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban (Miles) 1995 Interstate (total reported) 40 Very good

0 Good 5 Fair 17 Mediocre 18 Poor 0 Not reported 0 Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 0 Very good 0 Good 0 Fair 0 Mediocre 0 Poor 0 Not reported 0 Other principal arterial (total reported) 151 Very good 2 Good 9 Fair 75 Mediocre 36 Poor 29 Not reported 13 Urban minor arterial (total reported) N Very good N Good N Fair N Mediocre N Poor N Not reported N Urban collector (total reported) N Very good N Good N Fair N Mediocre N Poor N Not reported N KEY: N = data do not exist.

1996 40 0 9 17 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 2 14 73 33 29 13 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

1997 40 13 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 6 36 75 22 24 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

1998 40 14 17 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 7 38 72 23 24 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

1999 40 14 20 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 9 37 74 21 22 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

2000 40 10 15 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 4 32 86 30 12 0 16 0 5 11 0 0 N 8 0 1 6 1 0 N

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating. NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful