You are on page 1of 113
10 uw 2 1B 4 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 3 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (Cal. SBN 36324) jeotchett(@epmlegal. com FRANK M. PITRE (Cal. SBN 100077) fae pepmlegl com ay (Cal. SBN 168009) ENDORSED FILED TENNIS CRU CHRELD (Cal. SBN 275343) SAN MATEO COUNTY SECRETE m9 Cot apr COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP By MaRoues out 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 ‘Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 MICHAEL D. LIBERTY (Cal. SBN 136088) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL D. LIBERTY 1290 Howard Avenue, Suite 303 Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: (650) 685-8085 Fax: (650) 685-8086 Attorneys for Plaintiff Hind Bou-Salman, derivatively on behalf of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas & Electric Company SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO HIND BOU-SALMAN, derivatively on Case No. behalf of PG&E Corporation and Pacific GN 524283 Gas & Electric Company, VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, DERIVATIVE CLAIMS FOR: v 1. BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; PETER A. DARBEE; CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNS; 2, ABUSE OF CONTRO! KENT M. HARVEY; BARBARA L. RAMBO; 3. CORPORATE WASTE; BARRY LAWSON WILLIAMS; C. LEE COX; and DAVID R. ANDREWS; DAVID A. COULTER; 4, UNJUST ENRICHMENT FORREST E. MILLER; LESLIE S. BILLER; LEWIS CHEW; MARY S. METZ; }URY TRIAL DEMANDED MARYELLEN C. HERRINGER; DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT 7 18 19 20 2 2 23 24 25 26 21 28 RICHARD A. MESERVE; ROGER H. KIMMEL; ROSENDO G. PARRA; ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR5 FRED J. FOWLER; RICHARD C. KELLY; THOMAS B. KING; WILLIAM T. MORROW; DINYAR B. MISTRY; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants, -and- PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY; PG&E CORPORATION; Nominal Defendants. DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT 25 26 27 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS, A. B. Cc. D. Doe Allegations ... E. 1amed Participants .. STATEMENT OF FACTS « A is the Primary Energy Provider ern and B. ivi G&E Is Complying with i i ulations .........6 31 C. PG&E Misuppropriated Millions From Customers . 2.36 D. PG&E Consistently Cut Its Budget For Maintenance of Transmission and Distribution Lines and Encouraged Employees Not to Conduct Necessary Repairs and Maintenance . - G. Defendants Exploited Known Conflicts Between PG&E and the CPUC A. ee eee That L ecutive Leadershii hic I We ivized Not to Rey DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT i