P. 1
Teams, Leaders and Flexibility: Implications of Flexible Behaviour in a Leadership Context

Teams, Leaders and Flexibility: Implications of Flexible Behaviour in a Leadership Context

4.33

|Views: 3,053|Likes:
Published by Martin Witthoeft
Ashcroft Business School, Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge, United Kingdom
Bachelor Thesis 2008/09

Word Count: 9453

MARK RECEIVED: 75%


First Marker (M1): Dr. Beatriz Acevedo
Second Marker (M2): Steve McDonald

OBJECTIVES
M1: Clear objectives in testing the hypothesis or the assertion regarding flexibility.
M2: The abstract needs to be clearer and more focused.

METHOD
M1: Very good use of primary methods for collecting information. This is a remarkable feature of this dissertation and it demonstrates the student’s awareness and knowledge of research methodologies.
M2: Clear hypothesis, well rounded methodology. Very good primary data.

USE OF LITERATURE/SOURCES
M1: The use of theoretical frameworks is adequate yet it is perhaps a bit wide. The student identifies some frameworks from cybernetics (system thinking) and leadership, however, he needs to go further in clarifying what are the main ‘subjects’ addressed through the research process.
M2: Range suitable, however, more depth of analysis needed in certain areas.

REFERENCING
M1: Excellent referencing process, all the references with pages, etc.
M2: Very good.

ANALYSIS
M1: The student did an excellent job in analysing the data and providing a summary of his findings. However, it is necessary to link this data analysis with the theoretical references mentioned before. This would have enhanced the quality of the research. Having said that, for an undergraduate thesis, his work is good enough.
M2: The information and analysis were linked well for this level of work. Clear depth of analysis has taken place.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
M1: The student offers a number of conclusions and reflections on the potentialities and limitations of his research. This evidences a critical approach and self-examination.
M2: Conclusions line well to the objectives. Limitation addressed well.

PRESENTATION
M1: Excellent presentation. Perhaps some of the results could have been presented in tables aimed to organise and categorise information.
M2: Very good in all areas.

GENERAL COMMENTS
This is a very good dissertation. The student started with a very wide research question and many different theoretical frameworks, and he ended in a relatively coherent dissertation. The topic of leadership is addressed in an appropriate fashion and it remains the core of this paper. However, the structure of the literature review may be a bit confusing. The student starts by introducing some concepts on cybernetics and systems thinking, particularly, Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety. However, later on it seems that the main guideline for the analysis is the issue of leadership and teams.

In the summary of this theoretical chapter, the student highlights the relationship between flexibility and leadership; however the student needs to clarify what exactly are the main points for his analysis in this relationship. This link is not clearly established, thus, the analysis focuses on the findings rather than on the relationship of the findings with the theoretical aspects.

Notwithstanding, the analysis of findings is excellent. Clearly the student did a considerable effort in proposing a question into certain professional forums. In this section, the student may wish to explain the criteria used to select these forums and not others. Although he mentions the ‘voluntary nature’ some other aspects could have influenced his decision that need to be specified.

The question posted in these internet forums produced rich information for the analysis. This is a remarkable aspect of this thesis and it enhances the quality of this research. Further work can be done in identifying variables in the different respondents. For instance, is gender a variable determining certain visions of flexibility and leadership?

In general this is a good base for further research.
Ashcroft Business School, Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge, United Kingdom
Bachelor Thesis 2008/09

Word Count: 9453

MARK RECEIVED: 75%


First Marker (M1): Dr. Beatriz Acevedo
Second Marker (M2): Steve McDonald

OBJECTIVES
M1: Clear objectives in testing the hypothesis or the assertion regarding flexibility.
M2: The abstract needs to be clearer and more focused.

METHOD
M1: Very good use of primary methods for collecting information. This is a remarkable feature of this dissertation and it demonstrates the student’s awareness and knowledge of research methodologies.
M2: Clear hypothesis, well rounded methodology. Very good primary data.

USE OF LITERATURE/SOURCES
M1: The use of theoretical frameworks is adequate yet it is perhaps a bit wide. The student identifies some frameworks from cybernetics (system thinking) and leadership, however, he needs to go further in clarifying what are the main ‘subjects’ addressed through the research process.
M2: Range suitable, however, more depth of analysis needed in certain areas.

REFERENCING
M1: Excellent referencing process, all the references with pages, etc.
M2: Very good.

ANALYSIS
M1: The student did an excellent job in analysing the data and providing a summary of his findings. However, it is necessary to link this data analysis with the theoretical references mentioned before. This would have enhanced the quality of the research. Having said that, for an undergraduate thesis, his work is good enough.
M2: The information and analysis were linked well for this level of work. Clear depth of analysis has taken place.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
M1: The student offers a number of conclusions and reflections on the potentialities and limitations of his research. This evidences a critical approach and self-examination.
M2: Conclusions line well to the objectives. Limitation addressed well.

PRESENTATION
M1: Excellent presentation. Perhaps some of the results could have been presented in tables aimed to organise and categorise information.
M2: Very good in all areas.

GENERAL COMMENTS
This is a very good dissertation. The student started with a very wide research question and many different theoretical frameworks, and he ended in a relatively coherent dissertation. The topic of leadership is addressed in an appropriate fashion and it remains the core of this paper. However, the structure of the literature review may be a bit confusing. The student starts by introducing some concepts on cybernetics and systems thinking, particularly, Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety. However, later on it seems that the main guideline for the analysis is the issue of leadership and teams.

In the summary of this theoretical chapter, the student highlights the relationship between flexibility and leadership; however the student needs to clarify what exactly are the main points for his analysis in this relationship. This link is not clearly established, thus, the analysis focuses on the findings rather than on the relationship of the findings with the theoretical aspects.

Notwithstanding, the analysis of findings is excellent. Clearly the student did a considerable effort in proposing a question into certain professional forums. In this section, the student may wish to explain the criteria used to select these forums and not others. Although he mentions the ‘voluntary nature’ some other aspects could have influenced his decision that need to be specified.

The question posted in these internet forums produced rich information for the analysis. This is a remarkable aspect of this thesis and it enhances the quality of this research. Further work can be done in identifying variables in the different respondents. For instance, is gender a variable determining certain visions of flexibility and leadership?

In general this is a good base for further research.

More info:

Published by: Martin Witthoeft on Jul 06, 2009
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/14/2012

pdf

"Is it the most flexible person that ends up leading a team?"

Dear everyone,

I am currently researching for my dissertation, the topic is:
“How cybernetics can test the following statement: The most flexible
person in a team will end up leading the team.”
I am looking for spontaneous statements to this hypothesis; please share
your view or real life experiences.

A little background to the choice of topic:

1. The original ‘law of requisite variety’ formulated by W.R. Ashby (1956)
states that:
“The larger the variety of actions available to a control system, the larger
the variety of perturbations it is able to compensate.”
http://pcp.lanl.gov/reqvar.html

2. This is adapted to a presupposition of NLP:
“In NLP the ‘Law of Requisite Variety’ in a given physical system, is that the
part of the system with the greatest flexibility of behaviour will control the
system.”
http://www.nlpscotland.com/law-of-requisite-variety.htm

3. Adapted to an actual business context my hypothesis states that:
"The most flexible person in a team will end up leading the team. “

I am currently working on defining the terms of flexibility, leadership and
team in a tangible context.

"Is it the most flexible person that ends up leading a team?"
What do you think?

Thanks a lot and all the best from England,

Author

41

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->