You are on page 1of 2

THE A-76 COST COMPARISON FOR

MOTOR VEHICLE FLEETS


For of this form, see AR 5-20; the proponent agency is ACSIM

A. PERFORMANCE PERIODS (Fiscal Years)

DEVELOPMENT OF
BASE OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL TOTAL
IN-HOUSE COSTS
YEAR YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4
a b c d e f

1. PERSONNEL

2. MATERIAL

3. OTHER DIRECT

4. COST OF CAPITAL

5. OVERHEAD

6. ADDITIONAL

7. CONVERSION DIFFERENTIAL

8. TOTAL IN-HOUSE

B. DEVELOPMENT OF CONTRACT COST

9. CONTRACT PRICE

10. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

11. ONE-TIME CONVERSION

12. GAIN ON DISPOSAL

13. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

14. CONVERSION DIFFERENTIAL

15. TOTAL ADJUSTED CONTRACT PRICE

C. DEVELOPMENT OF IFMS OR IGS COSTS

16. IFMS/ISSA COST ESTIMATE

17. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

18. ONE-TIME CONVERSION

19. GAIN ON DISPOSAL

DA FORM 7385-R, MAY 1997 USAPA V1.00


C. DEVELOPMENT OF IFMS OR IGS COSTS
(CONT'D)

20. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

21. CONVERSION DIFFERENTIAL

22. OTHER SCOPE ADJUSTMENTS

23. TOTAL ADJUSTED IFMS OR ISSA PRICE

D.
COST COMPARISON

24. IN-HOUSE

25. CONTRACT

26. IFMS AND/OR IGS

E.
DECISION (Check one)

RETAIN IN-HOUSE CONTRACT CONSOLIDATE TO GSA/IFMS OR IGS CONVERT FROM CONTRACT TO:
IN-HOUSE, IFMS OR IGS
27a. IN-HOUSE MEO CERTIFIED BY 27b. DATE

27c. OFFICE 27d. TITLE

I CERTIFY TO THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE IN-HOUSE ORGANIZATION REFLECTED IN THIS COST
COMPARISON IS THE MOST EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION THAT IS FULLY CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE
SCOPE OF WORK AND TASKS REQUIRED BY THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I HAVE
OBTAINED FROM THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY CONCURRENCE THAT THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, AS PROPOSED,
CAN AND WILL BE FULLY IMPLEMENTED-SUBJECT TO THIS COST COMPARISON, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE
FEDERAL REGULATIONS.

28a. IN-HOUSE COST ESTIMATE PREPARED BY 28b. DATE

29a. INDEPENDENT REVIEWER 29b. DATE

29c. OFFICE 29d. TITLE

"I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT, MANAGEMENT PLAN, IN-HOUSE, GSA/IFMS OR
IGS COST ESTIMATES AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE PRIOR TO BID, OPENING AND, TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY", HAVE DETERMINED THAT (1) THE ABILITY OF THE IN-HOUSE MEO TO PERFORM THE WORK
CONTAINED IN THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT AT THE ESTIMATED COSTS INCLUDED IN THIS COST COMPARISON IS
REASONABLY ESTABLISHED AND (2) THAT ALL COSTS ENTERED ON THE COST COMPARISON HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CIRCULAR A-76 AND ITS SUPPLEMENT.

30a. COST COMPARISON COMPLETED BY 30b. DATE

31a. CONTRACTING OFFICER 31b. DATE

32a. TENTATIVE COST COMPARISON DECISION ANNOUNCED BY 32b. DATE

33a. APPEAL AUTHORITY (If applicable) 33b. DATE

REVERSE OF DA FORM 7385-R, MAY 1997 USAPA V1.00