You are on page 1of 4
U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges EX 1111 20th Street, NW. Washington, D.C. 20006 spt IN THE MATTER OF VAN FLEET ORCHARDS et. al. CASE NO: 84-WPA-19 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on June 18, 1985, the attached show cause order was issued~ complainant did not respond to this order; and the Solicitor filed a response confirming the information I received from ETA. Therefore, 1 find that this case is moot, and it is hereby DISMISSED. IT/ebt SERVICE SHEET Case Name: VAN FLEET ORCHARD Case No: 84-WPA-19 Title of Document: Order of Dismissal William H. DuRoss, IIT Assoc. Solicitor U.S. Department of Labor/ETA Room N2101, FPB 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20210 Jay 8. Berke Acting Regional Solicitor U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor 1515 Boradway New York, NY 10036 Thomas E. Hill Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 1515 Broadway New York, NY 10036 Kenneth Van Fleet Van Fleet Orchards 11332 Wilson Street Wolcott, NY 14590 U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges $141 20th Street, NW. Washington, D.C. 20036 IN THE MATTER OF VAN FLEET ORCHARDS, CASE NO: 84-WPA-19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE on February 7, 1984, Van Fleet Orchards requested a hearing in regard to the Department's determination that it was {Reiigible to apply for temporary labor certification in 1984. 1 ge wecentiy been informed by DOL's Employment and Training wewinfetration that subsequently the complainant was permitted to tite for certification, and pursuant to such application it did in fact hire aliens for the 1984 growing season. under these circumstances, it appears that this case is moot. Therefore, the complainant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, no qeter than July 12, 1985, why this case should not be digpissed. paced: AH 18 8S Washington, D.C. IT/ebft S)