P. 1
Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)

Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)

|Views: 351|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further consideration where the immigration judge issued a removal order at the respondent’s first master calendar hearing and conducted a cursory and minimal inquiry into his assertion that he feared he would be killed by gangs in El Salvador. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole and joined by Member Hugh Mullane and Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case for further consideration where the immigration judge issued a removal order at the respondent’s first master calendar hearing and conducted a cursory and minimal inquiry into his assertion that he feared he would be killed by gangs in El Salvador. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole and joined by Member Hugh Mullane and Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 25, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/30/2013

pdf

text

original

MONGE, RONY VLADIMIR

A205-503-682
Î.b. Ûcg8Y¡mcu¡ 0ÍðH8¡Ícc
Executive Offce fr Immigration Review
BcnrJcf ImmignlicnAppcnls
O¿cccf/hcClcrk
JÎJ¯Lccãh0rgIikc, òvi/c2JJJ
IuÍ/sChurch, |rgtntu 2JJJJ
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - KRO
18201 SW 12th St.
GLADES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
P.O. BOX 39
Miami, FL 33194
MOOREHAVEN, FL 33471
Name: MONGE, RONY VLADIMIR A 205-503-682
Date of this notice: 10/3/2013
Enclosed is a copy of the Boad's decision and order in the above-refrenced case.
Enclosure
|ðDeÍ MeDDet9:
NUÍÍ8DB, MUgD L.
Î8UÍBy, HDgBI
LDÍB, Î8lI|C|8 P.
Sincerely,
DC t O
Donna Car
Chief Clerk
5chuckÐc
U9etIeðD: LDCKBl
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
Í.b. Û6g8tÍm6R¡ 0Íð08¡Í66
Executive Ofce å|Imigation Review
Decision of the Boad of Imigation Appeals
Falls Chuch,Virginia ZZÛ41
File: A205 503 682 - Miai, FL Date:
VÍÎ •.. ð Î0l$
7
In re: RONY VLADIMIR MONGE
Û REMOVAL PROCEEDIGS
APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RSPONDENT: Pro se
ON BEHALF OF DHS: Margait I. Cimadevilla
Assistant Chief Counsel
CHARGE:
Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), I&N Act [8 U.S
.
C
. ) l 182(a)(6)(A)(i)] -
Present without being admitted or paoled
Sec. 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), I&N Act [8 U.S.C.
) l 182(a)(7)(A)(i
)(I)] -
Immigrant
-
no valid immigant visa or enty document
Sec. 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), I&N Act [8 U.S
.C. { l 182(a)(2)(A)(i
)(I)] -
Crime involving moral turitude
APPLICATION: Remad
The respondent, a native ad citizen of El Salvador, has appealed the Immigration Judge's
decision dated May ̪, 2013, which ordered him removed fom· the United States. The
Depament of Homeland Security ("DHS") ha argued that the Immigration Judge's decision
should be afred. The record will be remanded to the Imigration Cou fr fher
proceedings.
We review fndings of fct, including the Immigration Judge's determination of credibility,
under a clealy eroneous standad. 8 C.F.R.
)
1003.l(d)(3)(i). We review all other issues,
including whether the paies have met the relevant buden of proof, and issues of discretion,
under a de novo standard. ö C.F.R. { 1003.l(d)(3)(ii).
The issue befre us on appea is whether the respondent was accorded his due process n¿t
to a fll ad tuhearing. ò08 Í0IOhÎm V. ÍÌO, 821 F.2d 1547, 1550 (11th Cir. 1987). As best
that ca be sumised fom the respondent's pro se fling, he appeas to ague, inter alia, that he
was not on notice that his frst heaing was also his fnal heaing, that he was not given enough
time to represent himself ad comprehend his circustances, including his ties in te United
We note that the record befre us does not indicate that the respondent waived his rght to
appeal, d suggested by the DHS in its brief (DHS's Br. at 2 D, S00 Tr. at 8).
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
' A205 503 682
States and his far of retuing to El Salvador, and that his convictions were based on
"questionable infactions."
Upon review of the record, we conclude that fher proceedings in this case are appropriate
in view of the specifc circumstances of this case. During te respondent's one ad only
immigation heang on May 14, 2013, the respondent opted to represent himself, and admited
that he is residing in the United States as an immigrat witout proper documents (Tr. at 2-3).
When the Immigration Judge asked the respondent if there is any reason why he can ot ret to
El Salvador, the respondent indicated that he fared he will be killed by gangs (Tr. at 5-6).
Although the Immigation Judge infrmed the respondent that he can make an application
explaining his fa of retng to El Salvador, this statement was preceded and fllowed by the
Immigration Judge's suggestion to the respondent that the heaing was "not the proper frum" to
address his fa and that his claim was probably not suffcient enough, to which the respondent
responded with, "Well, if not, then just depor me" (Tr. at 6).
The transcript shows tat inquiry into the respondent's expressed fea was cursory and
minimal. Tere is also a concer that the Immigration Judge's comments may have had an
unintended efect of dissuading the respondent fom submiting an application fr relief fom
removal based on his fa of returing to El Salvador, in contravention of the regulations in
8 C.F.R. { 1240.ll(c)(l). Accordingly, to ensure that the respondent has a reasonable
opportity to present evidence on his behalf, we will remand the record to te Immigration
Court fr fher proceedings. The fllowing order shall be entered.
ORER: Te record is remanded to the Immigration Court fr fher proceedings.
FOR J BOARD
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
ÜT¬1¯¬ZÛ1Û
_ ��

``
·• •_ ·
IÜ1Ûb 1O1Ühů1Ûh ÛÛÜh¯

U
· •_ ·
t.ÛÛÛ
. � º
U ..
f
'

¸¸
¸
, t : ´

: ,". . ·� �
_
: �
.
I*

, _
·

· ·
¸ -
` \,¸

·
·
.-:·.·
.'.
t
·
·
: ¸·
• ø
·
·
-
«
_ � ,�· . . .
.
.
··:
'
.



:
/
·
.
;
¸

� ,r• a ' * ;•
. :-
. '·"·
• ,•
tætout:ca �0UT
1820I· Ü�R. 13¯

Þ¯
mz,
·
P · 33l94
;
/

·
.
.
.
¯
·:.
,
.
,
� · :' ,
·
•'
`
" ' .
J CD0 Wttcz o£
«
, ¡
,
,
,
· :1
�ae ·N�.: Ao8¯ ä¤1-6�7 ,

2W R&W �R0CDO0S
·
N038. ÅÜÑ VzxIR
Reso

denr
..
·
=
·
ÜÑà ÜÝ ¯Ü Lwtæt10� J
· This 1a a a¾çot tm �-.i ±e:a׬ Enteied 00 1 'J
)is nem zandm 1� ao1o1y£ov tb convenience of th Qt1 0+ Î
_

CDÐ
·
.
· prooee n¿o' Ôhouldbe·appealed or.reopened, tb oral deeis D WLJJ �come
·
tbO fìcx¤ og1n1on
·
1n tbo �aBeø
·
·
: : . :
.
·
·
.
|
·
·
Te re.sponcnt·
·
.�as ·ordered x�=��

6 from
·
CD0 �ced ÜCBCOB CO
º
"or:" 1Þ

t .
.
d.�crti:e
_
t% ø
·

º
:_ º
º ¤

-
+
·
·¸
� _J ¸X���ndeoc'e applic�tion tor volutar departure was deied.ad
·: ���poncent

WðB ozdqxOd · xoWO=d

co· O� , JD rho
·
at·e:t:ve VO · ¹ ª º

´
`
:
.
·
.
¸
,
|

¸
|

·
RcaQ�mwt'6 �ppJ1c«t:on.tor·vo1mnap .depar�ure: Wao 9ra�ted· mri1
t
'pon::posting. B D0Þ0 in tÞc �Q C of $

· .
WLth BD ðJLeXnRCB

ordr of reoal vo•
-
• ¸þ

gødøm',B.¸@g\CðL10u for:
·
· ·
·
'
| ¸J
º
æyJv¤,��e (
'
, ïg:ated1; · | . !mod( .· }wJrhmam•
. · .
| : |

'
' ¤1choJdng ot·veava: vaa (· )yræced ( )donJed ( ` lV1 tbmaw•

I 1 Å ¤aIve�m�
, SOOt1on � WB ( · )gcæted Í |±e¡ed ¹ ( }=itbxam.
·

,
_
θ¸ J


MޤI4

�¤�Þ� +?f
:
r�¤¤v¤1

Wd�Þ¸ .�-u-- z÷¤6¸í¤)` , W8 I
·
. ìçr

¤r«d ( ìÞ�Þ4¤¸

`
. .
· ,
.
., .. ( ·. IW1tbdxðw

.
.
,
, . .. . ·,,
.
,

, ¸ ,

¸ : -
-
. · . , ¸ ,

' ·:

-
. - � ; . ,··
:
:.:
,
\
·
:
.
�·
_
.
,
.
·

'
��
¸
ß ¸¤¤»4��r�·� =pµ\���r:»�:»×·
·
¸
º
.. ::


· ·
: .
¡
¡
¡ _
; . º
.
,


º ` - ªY
[ ca�ellation ·under
,
`oecci¤n 240A�b!(1) Wð0 .( ) gnted·: , . ( ì�c¤1ed .
|
_ ( )
·
withdaw. J1 gæced, ±c
·
±a o:de:e tht· che resonent

be issued·
·:
a�1 �Pr�priate
·
do�ents. necessU to. g1Vo¸

etteo� to.· ¥ÞB O¥d0¥ , +
_
· .. ·"
J, :�accllatiOi wdoX Boot1on¸ z+0A�b)¸ |2) W88 .-
:
| ¸ )g¥ætod ( ìd�uLð4:,
.
.
·
.
.
«
·
1¬t��m�m. It g:ant�d ·it· �s 'ordered. �a�· t¤ respondent b=

I�sued
+
BJI ·
.
appropriated .doument$ mccaoag t�
.
g1 VO· effect to tÞ1ð o¤0X-
Adjuernenc· oz�_S.tatus·
·
mder.Section

wa:· ( ) granted ( ) denied
(

ìvvh�e�• ¿
-
,

1L
,
grated
·

ta ozdd �tt the ·respndet be Lðau=d
aJ1 eppt�pviated·docmcocð neoeeoap co giv
.
e .eff�ct CO CDB orde2.
l· R�spgndent·•s·applic�tio�"of ( .")
·
wi.tholdig'�f zonoI ( ) detem8L of
remQval. uder At·i�l_e

·
TT

Ot·t���caeveot:ea Agaist. ToÂtue Wôñ
,
| ]
. _' _¸
Í l

�=�Þ0

·
( ¸I d'eried ( )
·
: withraw..
.
t
RoaQndnc,¹W
º
0¥�¥UO �o¸zeocLndod wdex ÐOCC2OD 246• º
8ospmo¤t.±8¤Wttod to wo Tited· Statea· aa &
·
ucil

.
Å B conition o£ a±iae�,

�e�onent. 4& CO ia¯

�nd.
·
| Ï
, , _
¸
_
·Roug0Þdeu1

Jo:ingly filed Æ
_
trJv1ou»ðsyIw applicat:on aft�r proper
WÌJO#+ ·Þ· · , · . :
xecpon�enc Nð6 «dv1eed,Of·
"
t
.
i: e·; J

ieLcacL��ondìzc zotiomp :elief
ta�1me co
.
'

appear «� ordore� JD ¸TDB TenLgacLoo idie ,.: or�l deci
|. � P¥ÞCoðd1 gÐ

×exe�e~Jmted·
·
:. .:·
·
¸
·
.
[ J 0tba¥:

º

° ¯
·
· ·
·
0ðto: , ZÛÅ4 .
¸+ • •
App»«� ÜU0 ¶:
• ´ \ .
.

.
·
·

`�'

·
·
.
· · '
:':4:
:'
·
.
·: _
·
¸¸�

··.
• a • ':_;.� `

`
-
_
.
¸
·' ..
.


•- ¿

_

`
+
r
,

__´•
» • •. *
;.�. º
' ³·
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->