You are on page 1of 4

Investment Outlook

November 2013
Bill Gross Your Global Investment Authority

Scrooge McDucks
With the budget and debt ceiling crises temporarily averted, perhaps a future economic priority will be to promote economic growth; one way to do that may be via tax reform. How to proceed depends as always on the view of the observer and whether the glasses are worn by capital, labor or government interests.
Having beneted enormously via the leveraging of capital since the beginning of my career and having shared a decreasing percentage of my income thanks to Presidents Reagan and Bush 43 via lower government taxes, I now nd my intellectual leanings shifting to the plight of labor. I often tell my wife Sue its probably a Kennedy-esque type of phenomenon. Having gotten rich at the expense of labor, the guilt sets in and I begin to feel sorry for the less well-off, writing very public Investment Outlooks that dis the success that provided me the soapbox in the rst place. If your immediate reaction is to nod up and down, then give yourself some points in this intellectual tte--tte. Still, I would ask the Scrooge McDucks of the world who so vehemently criticize what they consider to be counterproductive, even crippling taxation of the wealthy in the midst of historically high corporate prots and personal income, to consider this: Instead of approaching the tax reform argument from the standpoint of what an enormous percentage of the overall income taxes the top 1% pay, consider how much of the national income youve been privileged to make. In the United States, the share of total pre-tax income accruing to the top 1% has more than doubled from 10% in the 1970s to 20% today. Admit that you, and I and others in the magnicent 1% grew up in a gilded age of credit, where those who borrowed money or charged fees on expanding nancial assets had a much better chance of making it to the big tent than those who used their hands for a living. Yes I know many of you money people worked hard as did I, and you survived and prospered where others did not. A fair economic system should always allow for an opportunity to succeed. Congratulations. Smoke that cigar, enjoy that Chateau Late 1989. But (mostly you guys) acknowledge your good fortune

Percent (%)

at having been born in the 40s, 50s or 60s, entering the male-dominated workforce 25 years later, and having had the privilege of riding a credit wave and a credit boom for the past three decades. You did not, as President Obama averred, build that, you did not create that wave. You rode it. And now its time to kick out and share some of your good fortune by paying higher taxes or reforming them to favor economic growth and labor, as opposed to corporate prots and individual gazillions. Youll still be able to attend those charity galas and demonstrate your benevolence and philanthropic character to your admiring public. Youll just have to write a little bit smaller check. Scrooge McDuck would complain but then hes swimming in it, and can afford to duck paddle to a shallower end for a while. If youre in the privileged 1%, you should be paddling right alongside and willing to support higher taxes on carried interest, and certainly capital gains readjusted to existing marginal income tax rates. Stanley Druckenmiller and Warren Buffett have recently advocated similar proposals. The era of taxing capital at lower rates than labor should now end. There was a time in Pimcoland long, long ago; so long ago that it now seems like a fairytale except it wasnt. I had criticized a large Fortune 500 company about its balance sheet and use of commercial paper. It wasnt really meant to be company-specic but more indicative of the growing amount of leverage that our credit system was accommodating. The company took it personally. Sorry about that. I mention it now in the age of the golden Scrooge McDuck because another large company I shall name it Company X to be safe is again representative of an excess that may haunt Americas future. X is a well-known corporation that, to put it simply, has grown earnings and earnings per share accompanied by nearly atline revenues. This troubling trend began nearly a decade ago sales having increased by only 9% since 2003 barely a percentage point a year. Its most recent quarter in 2013, as a matter of fact, showed no improvement, with revenues actually declining by 1% instead of moving up.
2 NOVEMBER 2013 | INVESTMENT OUTLOOK

Prots, however, increased because the company cut expenses along the way. Earnings per share (EPS) did even better, because X used some of its cash ow to buy back stock instead of reinvesting much of it in new plant and equipment. What struck me was not this unmasking of company Xs secret sauce to elevate its stock price, but the similarity of this corporation to the plight of the broader U.S. and even global economy. Never have American companies sent a greater share of their sales to the bottom line. Even when S&P 500 companies have witnessed a decline in corporate earnings, as shown in Chart 1, they have still experienced EPS gains. X and many companies in the S&P 500 are remarkably similar. CHART 1: FINANCIAL ALCHEMY
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 Dec Mar 10 11 Jun 11 Sep Dec Mar Jun 11 11 12 12 Sep Dec Mar 12 12 13 Jun 13 S&P 500 net income vs. EPS growth rate

S&P 500 net income growth rate (YoY) S&P 500 EPS growth rate (YoY) Source: Bianco Research, L.L.C.

The U.S. economy and Company X are lookalikes as well, perhaps even twins. Revenue growth in the U.S., for instance, can best be shown by national income or its proxy, more commonly known as nominal GDP. While our annualized nominal GDP growth rate has been a tad better than the 1% that Corporation X has shown over the past 10 years, our ve year moving average has slowed from nearly 7% to just above 3% in recent years and struggled to do just that, as shown in Chart 2. Expenses have been cut signicantly as the share of wages to GDP has declined from 47% to 43%

during the past decade. Before-tax prots as a percentage of GDP on the other hand have increased from 10% to 14% over the same period, mimicking what has happened with Company X. And heres a rather incredible kicker to this theoretical comparison. The U.S. economy thanks to the Fed has been operating a 1 trillion dollar share buyback program nearly every year since late 2008, buying Treasuries but watching much of that money ow straight into risk assets and common stocks instead of productive plant and equipment. My goodness! If X cant grow revenues any more, if X companys stock has only gone up because of expense cutting and stock buybacks, what does that say about the U.S. or many other global economies? Has our prosperity been based on money printing, credit expansion and cost cutting, instead of honest-to-goodness investment in the real economy? CHART 2: ECONOMYS REVENUES STALLING
8 YOY percent change 6 4 U.S. GDP nominal dollars 5-year moving average 2 0

CHART 3: SQUIRRELS NOT SAVING NUTS FOR WINTER


16 U.S. net national savings rate 12 Percent (%) 8 4 0 -4 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 Source: Haver Analytics, as of Q3 2013

95

97

99

01

03

05

07

09

Source: Bloomberg, as of 31 December 2009

The simple answer is that long-term growth for each company, and for all countries, depends not on balance sheet alchemy and nancial wizardry, but investment and the ultimate demand for a company or a countrys products. In the U.S. we have had little of that, watching our investment (ex housing) as a percentage of GDP decline from 14.6% to 12.2% over the past 13 years. Similarly, our net national savings rate (total savings after depreciation) has sunk below ground zero over the past few years before rebounding recently, as shown in Chart 3. Without savings there can be no investment. Without investment there can be little growth.

President Obama just this past week nally sounded a faint alarm, mounting a campaign to bolster foreign investment in the U.S. amidst evidence like that presented in Chart 3 that the U.S. is falling far behind less developed nations such as Mexico in the race for investment and future productivity. Its time for folks tofocus on doing everything we can to spur growth and create new, high-quality jobs, he said last Friday. Folks? Ordinary folks, the 99%, dont have money anymore, Mr. President. The rich 1% and corporations do. Perhaps your Administration could focus some attention these next few weeks and months on an effort to engage foreign investors, corporate America and the 1% in investing in the U.S. If theres not a protable new iGIZMO or a dynamic biotechnological breakthrough worthy of investment, how about simply a joint effort between government and private enterprise in an infrastructure bank where our third world airports, third world city streets and third world water systems are modernized? And back to my original point. Developed economies work best when inequality of incomes are at a minimum. Right now, the U.S. ranks 16th on a Gini coefcient for developed countries, barely ahead of Spain and Greece. By reducing the 20% of national income that golden scrooges now earn, by implementing more equitable tax reform that equalizes capital gains, carried interest and nominal income tax rates, we might move up the list to challenge more productive economies such as Germany and Canada.
INVESTMENT OUTLOOK | NOVEMBER 2013 3

Our problems are signicant, Mr. President, and Obamacare and the signing up for it is far down the list of what we need to correct in order to move in the direction of old normal growth rates. Surely a few astute observers in Congress know that as well. Until we can more equitably balance Scrooge McDuck tax rates to rebalance wealth and GINI coefcients, while at the same time focusing on investment in the real as opposed to the nancial economy, then the prospects for markets whatever the asset class are anything but golden. Scrooge McDucks Speed Read 1) Growth depends on investment and investment in part depends on an equitable rebalancing of personal income taxes, capital gains and carried interest. 2) The era of taxing capital at lower rates than labor should end. 3) Investors in the U.S. and elsewhere must look for investment in the real economy, not share buy-back maneuvers that articially elevate stock prices. William H. Gross Managing Director
This material contains the current opinions of the author but not necessarily those of PIMCO and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. PIMCO provides services only to qualied institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacic Investment Management Company LLC, 840 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. | PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517), PIMCO Europe, Ltd Munich Branch (Company No. 157591), PIMCO Europe, Ltd Amsterdam Branch (Company No. 24319743), and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No. 07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS) in the UK. The Amsterdam, Italy and Munich Branches are additionally regulated by the AFM, CONSOB in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act, and BaFin in accordance with Section 53b of the German Banking Act, respectively. PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are available only to professional clients as dened in the Financial Conduct Authoritys Handbook and are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Deutschland GmbH (Company No. 192083, Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany) is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (Marie- Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the German Banking Act (KWG). The services and products provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to professional clients as dened in Section 31a para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd (501 Orchard Road #08-03, Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880, Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence and an exempt nancial adviser. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Asia Limited (24th Floor, Units 2402, 2403 & 2405 Nine Queens Road Central, Hong Kong) is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Australia Pty Ltd (Level 19, 363 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia), AFSL 246862 and ABN 54084280508, offers services to wholesale clients as dened in the Corporations Act 2001. | PIMCO Japan Ltd (Toranomon Towers Ofce 18F, 4-1-28, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-0001) Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No.382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and Investment Trusts Association. Investment management products and services offered by PIMCO Japan Ltd are offered only to persons within its respective jurisdiction, and are not available to persons where provision of such products or services is unauthorized. Valuations of assets will uctuate based upon prices of securities and values of derivative transactions in the portfolio, market conditions, interest rates, and credit risk, among others. Investments in foreign currency denominated assets will be affected by foreign exchange rates. There is no guarantee that the principal amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All prots and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance, period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein. | PIMCO Canada Corp. (199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that purpose. | PIMCO Latin America Edifcio Internacional Rio Praia do Flamengo, 154 1o andar, Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil 22210-906. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO and YOUR GLOBAL INVESTMENT AUTHORITY are trademarks or registered trademarks of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. and Pacic Investment Management Company LLC, respectively, in the United States and throughout the world. 2013, PIMCO.
13-1368-GBL

IO podcast To download Bill Grosss IO podcast, check pimco.com or iTunes.com. Mobile app Download the PIMCO app for iPhone and iPad. Have a question? Email us at outlook@pimco.com

Newport Beach 840 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 +1 949.720.6000 Amsterdam Hong Kong London Milan Munich New York Rio de Janeiro Singapore Sydney Tokyo Toronto Zurich pimco.com

You might also like