# STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION A N D VARYING WALL THICKNESS LOADED BY INTERNAL PRESSURE

A. AUSTIN '(" J. H. SWANNELL

Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Trent Polytechnic, Burton Street, Nottingham NGI 4BU, Great Britain
(Received: 6 July, 1978)

ABSTRACT

The types of geometrical irregularity arising from the production of pipe bends are briefly discussed and formulae are presented which facilitate the calculation of stresses caused by each individual irregularity, when the pipe is subjected to internal pressure. The individual formulae are combined to enable the stress distribution to be calculated in a pipe bend under internal pressure with all the irregularities discussed. Results given from the formulae for a typical pipe bend are compared with results obtained by the finite element method. The requirements and limitations of British Standards are discussed in comparison with the predictions of the formulae derived in this paper.

NOMENCLATURE

a b D E (E) e (K)
k

Semi-major axis of ellipse, internal dimension. Semi-minor axis of ellipse, internal dimension. Mean internal diameter. Young's modulus. Elliptic integral of second kind. Eccentricity. Elliptic integral of first kind. any b2

Mo

Fixing moment. 167

Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping (7) 0 9 7 9 ) - - © Applied Science Publishers Ltd, England, 1979
Printed in Great Britain

This paper commences by deriving formulae for the hoop stresses in: (i) a straight tube of elliptical cross-section (ii) a straight tube of circular cross-section but with variations in wall thickness (iii) a circular section toroid The solutions obtained from these formulae are compared with the alternative solutions available. 1. OVALITY OF CROSS-SECTION A solution to this problem was suggested by Haigh 1 in 1936. Suppose that the mean radius r I of an oval cylinder can be described by the nominal radius plus a cosine term (see Fig. superpose these independent results to obtain an approximate solution to the problem. 2.e. when considered independently and then. D r 1 = ~.STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 169 t.+ X1 cos 20 . 2). Conclusions are drawn about the accuracy and usefulness of the solutions in comparison with the results which would be obtained by the use of British Standards. the formulae for each individual irregularity are combined to enable stresses to be calculated in a pipe bend having all the geometrical irregularities mentioned. i. Finally. where the effects of ovality are not considered quantitatively.q O . including the results of a finite element analysis. Features of pipe before and after bending.< er I--- J × Cl i.i _z v t Fig. with caution.

This analysis was not found in any other literature. Notationfor Haigh's analysis. X1. When subjected to internal pressure the cylinder will tend to become more circular in shape.~ t" 1+ p(l . H .+ X 2cos20 By considering the equilibrium of an element of the cylinder wall. assumed by Haigh to be: D r e = ~.170 A.cos20 (A full derivation of this formulae is given in reference 2. .X2. 2. S W A N N E L L I Fig.v2) E 3 . In order to check the results obtained from Haigh's method it seemed desirable to seek some alternative method of solution and an obvious choice was to apply Castigliano's theorem using the strain energy of bending. giving a new value for the radius. can be found in terms of the initial ovality. An expression for the bending stress in the cylinder wall obtained by this method is given by: a b . The accuracy of the results obtained by applying Castigliano's theorem to rings and cylinders is well documented and so its application in this particular case provides a useful yardstick against which results from Haigh's method and from finite element calculations can be compared. page 39). Consider the bending moment at section x x as shown in Fig. the change in ovality after pressurisation. 3. The change in curvature evaluated from this can be used to find the bending stress in the cylinder wall by substitution into the simple bendin8 equations. X1 . only. I J. A U S T I N . and for this reason it is given here in full.

( a f r o m t h e e q u a t i o n for a n ellipse. 3 x = r cos 0 f r o m e q n . pa Notation for strain energy analysis. (1): and y = r sin 0 (2) OMx~ OMo by Castigliano's theorem 1 OU OM where: A t the p o i n t 0 = 0. ~ a2b2 (a . x) + p(a . dO riM xx OMx~dSoM o .x) +py.p a . 3. 4' = 0 = --~.Y (1) r2 a 2 sin 2 0 + b 2 cos 2 0 f r o m Fig.x ) . Mxx = M 0 .STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 171 I o:j_ pa Fig. ~ll N o w d s = r . Mx~ = M o a n d 4~ = O.

dO It is now possible to find the value of M o.~.172 A. H. (pa 2) .P 2ar2cosO +--2-sm 0 .k 2 sin /2 1 (1 .(a-x)2+ r. SWANNELL l ~b = 0 = E~ o M o-pa "( a . AUSTIN. This finally gives integrals of the form: 0 = 2Mob (1 - k2 n2~ .p a 2 b ( K ) + pb3 I ( L3 and the unknown fixing moment is found to be of the form: Mo = (constant).pa2r + par 2 cos 0 + Pa2r -t~-COS 3 V .)1/2 d~k . J.~ Mor . respectively. respectively. The final form of the integrals is given as: 0 = 2Mob(K) . by evaluating the three terms of the integral independently.pa2b l I z ~b)1/z d~b (1 .0 and k2 = a 2 _ b2 a2 After inserting the values of k 2 appropriate to the problem the values of the definite integrals may be obtained from tables of complete elliptic integrals under the headings (K) and (E) for the first and second types. d O = 2" Now remembering that r = f ( O ) : M o r . This is done by transforming the first two terms and the last term into complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds.x ) + p ~.dO from eqn. (2): 0= .P a 2 r + P-r3 dO 2 " f: ( a 2 b 2 .k z sin 2 ~b)3/2 d~k + pb3 where: ~b = ~ .i( 0= • pF 2./2 Pa2 ( a2b 2 )1/2 M 0 a2sin2•+-b2cosZO] a2sin2 0 + b2cos2 0 +p( a262 a 2 sin 2 0 + b 2 cos 2 0 )3/2 . the unknown fixing moment.

A. VARIATION OF WALL THICKNESS A tube with the same variation of wall thickness as that found in a pipe bend can be considered as a cylinder with an eccentric bore.p ( s ~ + .cos t/) ~o) + cost/) where any point on the cross-section of the cylinder is defined in terms of the bipolar co-ordinates ~ and t/where: x + iy = ia coth ~/2 and ~ =~. (1) the value of the bending moment.p + . Mxx. + it/ The subscripts i and o refer to the co-ordinates of the inside and outside boundaries. 1. then the distribution of stress around the cylinder wall may be calculated from: pd where t is the actual thickness at any angle 0.s i . (A full analysis of complex potential stress functions and their application to this specific problem is given in reference 2. The results obtained by either method are identical. these are given by: tro = . respectively. as shown in Fig. 4. The maximum stresses in the cylinder wall are the hoop stresses on the inside face.n .~ 2 . may be found for any point on the elliptical wall. and may be found from: t2 + t ( 2 r ~ + 2 e s i n O ) + ( r 2-r 2 + e 2 +2er.) Calculations using Timoshenko and Goodier's approach show that for wall thinning ratios of: tmax/tmin <__3 the bending stresses are small (less than 6 % of the membrane stresses). and consequently the stress.STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 173 Hence. I f the bending stresses are neglected. Using Timoshenko and Goodier's notation. by substituting the value of M o into eqn.(sinh ~ c o t h ( ~ - 2 (cosh ~i . 3. Bending stresses are induced in the wall of the cylinder when it is subjected to internal pressure but the calculation of these stresses is a difficult task and has only been carried out successfully by using the methods of Jefferey3 utilising the bipolar co-ordinates and real stress functions or those of Timoshenko and Goodier 4 using complex potential stress functions. sinO)=O o .~ o ) . Appendix 4.

AUSTIN. although thin shell solutions have been obtained by some workers in the field (see for example reference 5). A membrane solution is obtained by considering the vertical equilibrium of an element of the toroid wall (see Fig. not given in detail in this paper. Lam6's method may be used to calculate the hoop stresses. Part of an eccentric bore cylinder. by assuming. It can be shown that: 7z[(R + a) 2 . J.p = 2n(R + a)t~osinO Simplifying: npa(a + 2R) = 21ttao(R + a)sin 0 pa(a + 2R) go = 2t sin O(a + R) . 4. the problems which are to be encountered in formulating and solving the differential equations in this kind of approach are of such proportions that a membrane solution to this problem is usually regarded as acceptable. The justification of this latter method lies in comparisons with finite element results. that t and r i are correct and the effective ro = r i + t. 4. 5). However. H. SWANNELL I ~. EFFECTS DUE TO TOROIDAL SHAPE The bending stresses present in the wall of a circular section toroid may be evaluated either by solving exactly the governing equations for an element of the cylinder wall or by applying the theory of axisymmetric thin shells in which some of the governing equations are simplified.INSIDE CIRCLE I Fig. Alternatively.174 A. for instance.R 2].

5. R Fig. the values are not easily found. The dimensions and properties of the bend are as shown in Fig. Section of a toroidal shell. It should be noted that the membrane solution leads to a displacement discontinuity at the ends of the diameter which is perpendicular to the plane of bending. COMPARISON OF RESULTS A particular pipe bend was chosen. . This effect is illustrated clearly in Fig. 5. local bending stresses are created in this region but. giving: ae = 2t p. 9. (i) A straight tube of elliptical cross-section and uniform wall thickness: a = 68. Since this discontinuity cannot occur. The three types of geometrical irregularity were then considered individually and the appropriate methods of solution applied to each.5 mm b = 60.STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 175 but a = rsin0. so that comparisons could be made between the various analytical solutions and a finite element solution.9 mm t =tm = 16mm .(:re :(1 n t . using the following data. typical of those found in high pressure steam generating plant. apart from the finite element method. 6. I-: sin O_+_ L v sin 0 + I R J This result is simply a product of the thin shell membrane stress for a straight tube and a factor which may be greater or less than one depending on the sign of 0. .

(iii) A circular section toroid with uniform wall thickness: a -. In the case of cross-section ovality. instead of the internal. SWANNELL R Fig. 7. 8 and 9) show the distribution of hoop stress around the circumference of the section. particularly in the regions where the greatest stresses are to be found. AUSTIN. the respective graphs (Figs. H.5mm t~ = 24 mm to = 8 mm The grossly exaggerated wall thinning was found necessary in order to make a good comparison between the two analytical methods. A closer approximation to the true maximum stress may be obtained if the membrane stress is calculated using the mean.most practical purposes the solution due to Haigh would be considered preferable as it requires less analysis and does not require the use of the rather specialised tables of elliptic integrals. The only exception to this is in the case of the thin shell toroid.68. dimensions.176 A.5mm t . where the analytical solution clearly neglects any bending stresses which may be present.b = 68. (ii) A straight circular tube with varying wall thickness: a = b -. the solutions obtained by Haigh's method and by strain energy methods show a very close agreement. 6. Notation for analysis of a complete pipe bend.t m = 16mm R = 457 mm In each case. but for . In most cases satisfactory agreement is obtained between the various alternative solutions. . J.

where. -%. the displacements may be large enough to modify the linear theory. if membrane forces are present.~STRAIN E N E R G Y ~ 150- O - p.STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 177 200I t~. The inference in the latter case is that the dimensions of the body do not significantly change.~£~ F IN IT E E L E M E N T S I '~E 6100" Z v) I/) LU it- a =68-51mm b = 60-91 rn m t = 1 6 mm p =19N/ mmt 0.. 50" 0 0 -1- _ t . Even with the greatly exaggerated wall thinning ratios of 3 to 1 the membrane solution compares well with the exact stress function solution and it can be seen from Fig. 8 that the bending stresses account for only a small proportion of the total stresses in the cylinder wall. This may not be the case for rod-like or plate-like structures.n r I ~l.. 0 ~- IO =0 l'U 2 T~ Fig. Stresses in a cylinder of elliptical cross-section (inside face).~FIA I OH'S SOLUTION ~'~" '.~. THE EFFECT OF HIGHER ORDER STRAIN COMPONENTS All the methods considered in the other sections of this paper are based on the linear theory of elasticity in which the strains and displacements are assumed small. The classical theory of compression . 7. 6. although the strains are small..

D. A. Stress o n the inside face o f a n e c c e n t r i c b o r e c y l i n d e r . J.. A U S T I N .O tmox. H .) 0 • e _~ 2 Fig. 9.~ "" - "- --- 50- {OUTSIDE FACE ) M E M B R A N E SOLUTION { I N S I D E DIMS. 8. P STRESS FUNCTION SOLUTION = NE SOLUTION =137mm =169mm = 24m rn 8ram = 19 N/ram ~ 50. I0 - T~ 8 2 T~ Fig. 200 - I I. t -MEAN B END R A D =137mm = 16ram =457m m I P ~'~ 150 E z FINITE ELEMENTS I I MEMBRANE (INSIDE FACE) = 19 N / r a m SOLUTION ~ 100 o L-----. train. S W A N N E L L I 150 "E E z u~ 100u') i-- ~ I.. O.D.178 200. . Stresses in a c i r c u l a r t o r o i d ..~ .

A possible approach is to use the finite element method modified to allow for the change in geometry of the cross-section. It is probable that in this case the effects of change of geometry and the higher order strain components are negligible and that the linear elastic solution is accurate. if large deformations due to creep were being considered. Adopting this technique. In the example chosen in Section 5. UNIFICATION OF FORMULAE When the three individual effects are present together. It is obviously useful to be able to estimate the accuracy of a linear solution and a common method of assessment is to compare the lateral displacements with the thickness of the wall. by introducing the higher order strain components. 7. nor indeed is there any reliable method of estimating if the effect of the membrane stresses is appreciable. the only bending stresses considered are those due to ovality of cross-section and so Haigh's result alone . This might not be the case. The technique usually adopted in thin shell analysis is to obtain two individual solutions. some method of combining the individual formulae has to be used. In the case of the wall of an oval pipe the effect is reversed and the tensile membrane stresses will tend to reduce the lateral deflections due to internal pressure. the well known Euler and eccentric struts) takes account of the lateral deflections of the rod or plate. first by increasing the pressure in steps and modifying the section co-ordinates for each step and. A complete solution is then obtained by simply adding the two together.STRESSES IN A P I P E B E N D OF O V A L C R O S S . which may be sutticient to cause appreciable increases in the bending moments due to the external forces. the maximum lateral displacement is of the order of 1 ~ of the pipe wall thickness.S E C T I O N 179 instability (e. although the strains are still small. In the present case this means replacing the expressions: ~Ux t~x = . A simple linear solution is precluded and an iterative approach is necessary. The other higher order strain components are still negligible unless the strains themselves become large. however. secondly. The standard small deflection method has to be modified in two respects. one for membrane stresses only and the other for bending stresses only. which is unlikely in the present application.- ~Uy ~x and ~y = by G=--~-x + 2 \ a x ] and ey=~-y +~\~y} This change allows for the rotations of the elements to be appreciable.g. There appears to be no analytical solution for the case of the oval pipe.

180 A.. If.2 mm 1 6 mm when subjected to an internal pressure of 19 N/ram 2.8 mm 14. = ri + t. AUSTIN.. where an eccentric bore tube was considered. doubts do exist about the location of the greatest stresses it is a fairly simple task to re-arrange the formulae to give stresses on the outside face of the tube.5 mm 60. Let a+ b ri . 0. Then the bending stress due to Haigh is given O'b - - 3p'o E 2 ' t. The membrane stresses may be obtained by using the formula for a thin shell toroid given in Section 4 but the wall thickness used in the calculation will be that given by the formula in Section 3.. 1+ (1 2E \tm/d 3 COS20 while the toroid membrane stress is given by: Prm F2R + r.. however. It has been assumed throughout this analysis that the maximum hoop stresses will occur on the inside face of the tube and in general this is so. SWANNELL provides half of the complete solution.9 mm 457 mm 17.sin01 The addition of these gives a total hoop stress: a°=Pi~o'L-R+r~s-~nO + t~ E l+P(1-2-EV2)(2r')3\-i-m~] cos20 1 1 } Figure 10 shows a comparison of the results obtained by this method and by a finite element analysis for the pipe bend with the following dimensions: a = b = R = ti to = tm = 68. H. 6. . The formulae needed for a complete solution are given below and a pictorial definition of the symbols is given in Fig. 2 and by: to = thickness for a given angle. J.2 r.

consider a system of pipework made up of straight pipes with dimensions similar to those of the pipe bend considered in Section 7 and designed to work at a maximum stress level of 100N/mm 2. For example.STRESSES IN A PIPE BEND OF OVAL CROSS-SECTION 181 t I THEORETICAL SOLUTION NITE ELEMENTS 0k I E100Z w t. particularly if the Standards being used (e. -8 Fig./ . BS806) appear to make no quantitative allowance for the effects of ovality. care must be exercised when calculating the dimensions of a pipe required for producing a safe bend. 8. 7 and l0 that the overall stress distribution is most greatly influenced by the ovality of the pipe cross-section. 10. 0 t.g. 2 Stresses in a complete pipe bend (inside face). DISCUSSION Although all three geometrical irregularities contribute to the variation of stress in pipe bends it can be seen by comparing Figs.') LU re" I-t/) e_ 50O O "-t" . Because of this. BS806 requires that the wall thickness of any pipe used to manufacture a bend for the same pipework system be .

JI/FFEREY. Appl. ASME. Mech. Stressesand deformation of toroidal shells of elliptical cross-section.. when the allowable 5 ~ ovality is included in the calculation.1970.. McGraw-Hill. J.. AUSTIN. (3rd Ed. i. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors are indebted to Dr T..e.125..182 A. within the 100 N / m m 2 design limit. Bond for his original introduction to the problem and for his continued assistance throughout. and REISStqi~R. P. One possible reason is that when stresses do occur which are large enough to be detrimental to the life of the pipe bend. 96-8. the new m a x i m u m stress in the pipe bend rises to over 136 N / m m 2. 1. rapid creep deformation may also take place. 3. Proc.T.. 2. Stresses in pipe bends--Progress report.R. 221(A) (1921) pp. AUSTIN.ENKO. G. Trans. Section 9. An estimate of the stresses induced in a tube that is not initially quite circular. 5. GILROY. 265-93.J. Trent Polytechnic. B.. . SWANNELL greater than that of a straight pipe by a factor of 1. E. Phil. 37-48. 74 (1952) pp. Roy. A. Trans. CLARK. J. with the result that the cross-section becomes more circular and ovality stresses will be less significant. P. May. TXMOS. well outside the design limit. N. 133 (1936) pp. Theory of elasticity. Plane stress and plane strain in bi-polar co-ordinates. S.Mech. In fact. and GOODIER. HAIGH. 1977.. Chapter 6). REFERENCES 1. An investigation into this problem is currently being undertaken. it should be noted that failures attributable to the effects discussed in this paper do not happen as frequently as one would expect. H. B.3 of BS806 requires that the ovality 6fcross-section of a pipe bend shall not exceed 5 ~o but gives no indication of the stresses which will arise for any particular degree of deformation.A. Although it has been shown that high stresses may occur in piping installation.. Engrs. I. J. 4. Soc. This increase in wall thickness satisfactorily allows for the toroidal and wall thinning effects in the pipe bend and an analysis based on these two irregularities alone suggests a stress of not greater than 96 N / m m 2.

Sign up to vote on this title