Hotfile Warnerperj3cbecf3c 1b4b 45ea b81e 1d958d38dc2f
|Views: 97
|Likes: 0
Published by torrentfreak
er
er
More info:
Availability:
See more
See less
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Plaintiffs
, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10.
Defendants
. ____________________________________/ HOTFILE CORP.,
Counterclaimant
, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Counterdefendant
. ____________________________________/
MOTION IN LIMINE AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT REGARDING “PERJURY” IN CONNECTION WITH COUNTERCLAIM [FILED UNDER SEAL] [HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL]
Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 615-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2013 Page 1 of 14
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................1 ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................2 I.
HOTFILE’S “PERJURY” ARGUMENT MISREADS THE DMCA .................................2
II.
HOTFILE’S “PERJURY” ARGUMENT IS CONTRARY TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATIONS IN THIS CASE ...................................................................................... 4 III. ARGUMENTS THAT WARNER COMMITTED “PERJURY” ARE IRRELEVANT TO THE MERITS OF THE COUNTERCLAIM AND SHOULD BE EXCLUDED UNDER RULE 402 ............................................................................................................................5 IV. ACCUSATIONS OF “PERJURY” WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY PREJUDICE WARNER’S DEFENSE BY CONFUSING THE JURY AND SHOULD BE EXCLUDED UNDER RULE 403 .......................................................................................6 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................6
Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 615-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2013 Page 2 of 14
iii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES S
TATUTES
17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(ii) ....................................................................................................1, 3, 4 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(iii) .......................................................................................................1, 3 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(iv) ...........................................................................................................1 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(v) ........................................................................................................1, 3 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A)(vi) ...................................................................................................1, 3, 4 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) ............................................................................................................................5 18 U.S.C. § 1621(2) .........................................................................................................................6
O
THER
A
UTHORITIES
Fed. R. Evid. 402 .............................................................................................................................5
Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 615-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2013 Page 3 of 14
