P. 1
5 Dec 2011_vfinal

5 Dec 2011_vfinal

|Views: 2|Likes:
Published by Nicole Hanson
DEZVOLTAREA LUNCII DUNARII”
FLOODPLAIN REDEVELOPMENT ,
Dolj County, Romania
DEZVOLTAREA LUNCII DUNARII”
FLOODPLAIN REDEVELOPMENT ,
Dolj County, Romania

More info:

Published by: Nicole Hanson on Nov 21, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/21/2013

pdf

text

original

PROIECT “DEZVOLTAREA LUNCII DUNARII” FLOODPLAIN REDEVELOPMENT , Dolj County, Romania

Final seminar December 5th 2011
Suan Tie Pwa – project manager Joep de Roo

procedure decision making
long preparation interests and money many stakeholders clear process decision making

problem exploration

plan development

tendering implementation

spatial plans land owners; purchase and expropriation technical feasibilty cost estimates cost benefit analysis environmental impact assessment socio economic effects tender documents

MMEDIU (MINISTER/ SECR/ DIR) ANAR MADR County councils Inter-ministerial Council for Waters

Benefits
• systematic approach  programme & project manageble

• during project : no arguments about process focus upon the issues
• steps and decisions are clear to everybody involved • transparency  better chance EU fund application accepted

Scenario study

Demonstration application procedure preparation of decision point “ choice of alternatives” Demonstration project approach • WFD • National strategy on Flood risk management

Floodplain Dolj county between Ghidici and Zavalu

Scenario study objectives
• consultation local stakeholders
• integrated solutions

• wide range of possibilities
• Room for river concept

Issues / objectives
1. safety vrs floods 2. flood plains 3. renaturation (WFD / river basin management plan) 4. agriculture: increase activity and production level

Dike breach April 14
18000 16000 14000
discharge [m /s]

Drainage-breach on May 3

12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 01/01/2006 05/03/2006 07/05/2006 09/07/2006 date 10/09/2006 12/11/2006

3

safety vrs floods (movie)

Scenario 1

Status quo maintained

Advantages: •simple intervention •agricultural area preserved and better protected
Disadvantages: no compliance with WFD and River Basin Management Plan  it does not serve one of the objectives

Scenario 2
Floodplain exposed to Danube regime
development of Natura2000 habitats.

Construction of by-pass channel
flood risk reduction by giving room to Danube river

37.0 36.0

max. water level [ref+m]

35.0 34.0 33.0 32.0
Reference no flood

inflow flood channel

31.0 30.0 0 Calafat 10

Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Project area

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

distance along Danube [km]

Bechet

Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and with flood channels

0.0

difference in max. water level [cm]

-6.0 -12.0 -18.0 -24.0 -30.0 -36.0 -42.0 0 Calafat 10 20 30 40 50
difference scen 2a difference scen 2b

inflow flood channel

Project area

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

distance along Danube [km]

Bechet

Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due to the flood channels

Advantages: • smaller flood risk up to Calafat • WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan • most important agricultural area will be preserved • Natura 2000 area demarcated and open for floods • opportunities for (eco) toursim and fishing
•Disadvantages: • very large scale measures - expensive • loss of some agricultural land

Scenario 3
Renaturation of Floodplain
development of Natura2000 habitats.

Floodplain participates in discharge
flood risk reduction by giving room to Danube river

37.0 36.0

max. water level [ref+m]

35.0 34.0 33.0 32.0
Reference no flood

31.0 30.0 0 Calafat 10

Scenario 3 Project area

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

distance along Danube [km]

Bechet

Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and with inundation of the floodplain

0.0

difference in max. water level [cm]

-6.0 -12.0 -18.0 -24.0 -30.0 -36.0 -42.0 0 Calafat 10 20 30 40 50 60
difference scen 3 Project area

70

80

90

100

110

120

distance along Danube [km]

Bechet

Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due to flooding of the floodplain

Advantages: • WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan • Natura 2000 area extended and open for floods • smaller flood risk up to Calafat Disadvantages: •major loss of agricultural land & farm income •major land purchase / expropriation •drainage of villages - technical issue

Preliminary evaluation scenarios
Scenario
Total cost Excavated material market value

1
24 (0)

2
133 (++)

3
69 (0)

Effectiveness
Flood risk reduction Value of nature (+) (-) (++) (+) (++) (++)

Side effects / consequences
Loss of agricultural production area Accelerated commercial crop production Fishing Navigation (Eco) Tourism (0) (++) (0) (0) (0) (-) (+) (+) (0/-) (+) (--) (0) (+) (0) (++)

Public participation and involvement local stakeholders
Set up • stakeholder analyses • workshop (including pre visit) • feedback session Experiences • much interests in the process and scenarios • workshop provided basis for scenarios • appreciation consultation and feedback • local interest in renaturation and tourism; more than safety floods and agriculture

Results & conclusions (1)
General • new concepts (in line with EU dir.) • step ward approach in complicated issues Procedure • procedure further acknowledgement  RvR Netherlands • structure & outline  solid basis for elaboration  further discussion

Results & conclusions (2)
Scenario study • demonstration of approach, public participation and integrated solution • room for the river  effective measure

• elaboration River Basin Management Plan • frontrunner Natura 2000 Management Plan
• impact agriculture and land owner ship • large scale measures • order of magnitude of costs

What next?

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->