You are on page 1of 4

Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions

Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts





A1.
lnLake 8asellne
uaLa
A2.
lnLake 8evlew
81.
lall Mld-1erm
LvenL uaLa
uevelopmenL
82.
lall Mld-1erm
LvenL uaLa
8evlew
C1.
lall Lnd-1erm
uaLa
uevelopmenL
C2.
lall Lnd-1erm
uaLa 8evlew
u1.
Sprlng Mld-
1erm LvenL
uaLa
uevelopmenL
u2.
Sprlng Mld-
1erm LvenL
uaLa 8evlew
L1.
Sprlng Lnd-
1erm uaLa
uevelopmenL
L2.
Sprlng Lnd-
1erm uaLa
8evlew
l.
Annual AssessmenL 8evlew &
8eporL on llndlngs & Acuons
1aken 8ased Cn SLudenL Learnlng
CuLcomes
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts
SOA Degree Program (please enter degree program name): Bachelor of Music in Performance

A1. Intake Data (Audition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): various audition dates in January, February, March and April
Activity: listening to and evaluating music auditions
Method of Documentation Used: audition rating sheets
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinators
A2. Intake Review (Degree Program Faculty):
Date Of Review: varying dates in late Spring Term
Data Used: audition rating sheets
Key Observations: musical ability
Actions Taken: rate audition and determine qualification for desired major
Participants: music scholarship committee
Responsible Party: Director of the PSOM
B1. Fall Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): within a week after the end of mid-term exams
Activity: area faculty meetings
Method of Documentation Used: verbal discussion
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinators
B2. Fall Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other)
Date of Review: within a week after the end of mid-term exams
Data Used: notes taken during lessons; observation of student performances in general recitals
Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student
Actions Taken: recommendations for improvement
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinators
C1. Fall End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Fall End Term Report, Surveys, External Reviews, Course Evaluations, Other)
Date(s): exam week
Activity: area juries
Method of Documentation Used: record juries
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator

Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts
C2. Fall End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other)
Date of Review: exam week
Data Used: student performances in juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, and large and small ensembles
Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student
Actions Taken: pass/fail
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator
D1. Spring Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other):
Date(s): within a week after mid-term exams
Activity: area faculty meetings
Method of Documentation Used: verbal discussion
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator
D2. Spring Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other)
Date of Review: within a week after the end of mid-term exams
Data Used: notes taken during lessons; observation of student performances in general recitals
Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student
Actions Taken: recommendations for improvement
Participants: area faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator
E1. Spring End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Event #1 Report, Surveys, External Review Report, Course Evaluations,
Other)
Date(s): exam week
Activity: area/full faculty juries
Method of Documentation Used: record juries
Participants: area/full faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator/ performance department chair
E2. Spring End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office,
Other)
Date of Review: exam week
Data Used: student performances in juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, and large and small ensembles
Key Observations: musical and technical progress of student
Actions Taken: pass/fail
Participants: area/full faculty
Responsible Party: area coordinator/performance department chair
Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions
Department of Music Performance; Petrie School of Music, School of the Arts

F. Annual Assessment Review & Report on Findings & Actions Taken (Degree Program Faculty, Dept/School Faculty, Guest
Faculty, Institutional Research Office, Other)
Date of Review: end of Spring Term exam week
Data Used: results of juries, juried recitals, general student recitals, performances in large and small ensembles, etc.
Key Observations: musical and technical progress of students
Actions Taken:
Curriculum: TBA
Staffing: TBA
Facilities: TBA
Operations: TBA
Procedures/Processes: TBA
Participants: performance department faculty and non-departmental performance faculty
Responsible Party: performance department chair