P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ - 104 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTIONS FOR THE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE SANKEY FIRM, INC. A/K/A THE SANKEY FIRM IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

LIBERI v TAITZ - 104 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTIONS FOR THE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE SANKEY FIRM, INC. A/K/A THE SANKEY FIRM IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

|Views: 57|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 26, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/25/2009

pdf

text

original

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA LIBERI et al., Plaintiffs, v.

ORLY TAITZ et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1898

O R D E R AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2009, upon consideration of the August 24, 2009 letter from Plaintiffs’ counsel requesting leave to file motions for the entry of default and for the entry of default judgment against The Sankey Firm, Inc. a/k/a the Sankey Firm, it is hereby ORDERED that this request is DENIED without prejudice.1

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Plaintiffs may renew their request for leave to file motions for the entry of default and for the entry of default judgment against The Sankey Firm, Inc. a/k/a the Sankey Firm after this Court has decided the jurisdictional issues raised in its Rules to Show Cause.

1

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->