. Introduction 1. Identify and state your objects of analysis.

Provide some background to the thesis and reveal the motive for arguing it. The topic or question will often ask you to discuss central texts, key ideas or concepts, issues, or a combination of these. An effective description of the context, situation or problem can demonstrate why the thesis is interesting and worth arguing. Here is your chance to convince your readers (including the marker) that your essay is worth reading— something not to be taken for granted! A thesis is a clearly articulated general idea that expresses the main point you want to argue in your essay. It should be:
• •

2.

3.

Formulate and state your thesis.

sufficiently focused and narrow so that it can be fully discussed in your essay; a position that is debatable, and dependent on the strength of evidence and logical development; not a simple statement of fact, a declaration of belief that cannot be reasonably substantiated, a tautological or circular expression, an obvious point, and so on;

interesting.

4.

Define the key terms, state the assumptions, and describe the methodology.

Key terms: You will often find terms in the question, topic or your thesis itself whose meanings are essentially contested or indeterminate or ambiguous because of colloquial misuse. These terms may be crucial in your larger analysis and, if for no other reason than this, must be defined (even tentatively) before you can hinge your arguments on them. Assumptions: The set of fundamental ‘givens’ that make your arguments consistent, coherent, and meaningful can be stated at the start. This is sometimes done in the interest of intellectual honesty and to indicate to the reader where you might be coming from ideologically.

Research methodology: You may want to describe your main analytical approach (e.g. inter-disciplinary), the sources that you use in your analysis (e.g. archival material, literature reviews, internet forums) and how you obtained them (e.g. interviews, opinion surveys, regression analysis). 5. Sketch a roadmap. If your thesis tells the readers where you want to take them in the journey that is your essay, a roadmap will tell them how they will get there— which main roads, turning points, and detours they can expect to take.

B. Body 1. Construct your arguments. To develop your thesis, you will need to construct a series of smaller supporting arguments that are relevant to the thesis. While every argument should be directed to the thesis, the individual arguments should not simply be linked together as a random chain of implicitly related but distinct reasons. Instead, they should follow a coherent and logical sequence that builds up, often dramatically, to a convincing and satisfying restatement of the thesis in the conclusion. Using clear topic sentences that state the main point of each paragraph can help you to be sensitive to the shape of your arguments. You should also think about how the arguments can come together to produce a dramatic build-up, going through various twists and turns, and allowing for conflicts, negotiations, and resolutions to play out. Other related considerations include a sense of timing (e.g. when to reveal certain arguments or facts, for dramatic effect) and proportion (e.g. how much space should be given to each argument). 2. Support your arguments with evidence. Broadly speaking, you can support your arguments with empirical evidence in the form of facts, data, statistics, examples, controlled observations, and so on. You should not simply mention them; you should instead elaborate on

them by giving details to be connected deliberately with the arguments being made. Also, you should try to give an indication of the reliability of your evidence. You can also support your arguments with academic and professional expertise that you cite or quote directly. To avoid plagiarism, you must cite your sources. 3. Deal with counterarguments. You will also need to imagine and anticipate reasonable objections to your thesis and the arguments developed around it. You will need to describe these objections fairly (i.e. don’t create straw men to be knocked down effortlessly). And you will then need to deal with them decisively, demonstrating the superiority of your argument (or some adjusted form of your argument). This not only strengthens your arguments, but also makes your essay more complicated and therefore more interesting.

4.

Provide your reader with It is always important to write with a clear sense the necessary orientation. of audience (i.e. ‘Who are you writing this for?’). Knowing who your readers are will give you a good idea of what kind and extent of background information you will need to provide before your ideas, arguments, and evidence can make full sense to the readers. At the start of the journey, you provided readers with a roadmap. During the journey itself, you should provide clear signposts along the way to give readers a good sense of where they are in this journey. You might, for example, pause at critical junctures in the essay to inform readers about what you have done so far, where you are in the overall argument, and what you are going to do next.

C. Conclusion 1. Retrace your steps. Once you have arrived at the conclusion, it is often a good idea to remind readers, in summary, where they have been. This is where your topic sentences can come in handy. If your arguments have been focused, strong and

2.

Restate your thesis.

well developed, you can now confidently reassert your original thesis, or an adjusted or improved version of the thesis that has taken into account the counter-arguments dealt with along the way. 3. Point towards the wider This aspect is not altogether necessary for significance of your essay. writing a good essay, and it may in fact severely weaken your essay if handled without skill. In any case, writers are usually advised not to introduce any ‘new’ ideas in the conclusion. However, if you are indeed confident, you may want to consider including a few lines explaining what further implications your thesis might have for other similar or wider questions. You may even want to make recommendations for further study or for action (e.g. in the case of policy papers). And you may also want to try your hand at ‘scenario-painting’. Once again, be aware of the perils. 4. Make an impact with the final word. Do not end your essay with a sentence that seems to have a ‘nice ring to it’, but in fact means nothing or is completely irrelevant to the arguments. Instead, you might want to end with a witty and relevant detail, illustration, recurring motif, quotation, or anecdote that may keep readers thinking about your essay long after they have read it.

Argumentative Essays - Expressing Your Opinion There are three basic ways of organising an argumentative essay: 1. Set ‘em up and knock ‘em down (present your opponents’ arguments and destroy them with your own stronger points) 2. The balanced approach (present arguments from both sides of the debate, but then say what you think yourself) 3. Problem-Solution (explain the problem/s and then propose solutions)

1. Set ‘em up and knock ‘em down You have already practised writing an opinion essay following the "set-up-and-knockdown" approach. Look also at my model essay on zoos below. Using this approach, you present each of your opponents’ arguments in turn (you "set it up" like a bowling skittle) and then demonstrate that it is false or weak (you "knock it down").

Below you can read an example on the topic of zoos. (Phrases have been highlighted to draw your attention to the way the essay is organised.) Zoos – Sanctuaries or Prisons? Zoos have been popular for hundreds of years, introducing a wide variety of animals to visitors who otherwise would never have seen them. Times change, however, and we must question whether zoos are still relevant in a world where we wish to treat animals humanely. It is often said that zoos are educational. They teach people, especially children, about animal behaviour and encourage an interest in animal welfare. This may be partly true, but does a captive animal behave like its counterpart in the wild? Zoo animals are often confined to a very small area compared with their vast natural habitat. Polar bears, for example, roam for hundreds (even thousands!) of kilometres in their Arctic home whereas in zoos they can only manage about 20 metres. As a result, many animals develop unnatural habits such as pacing back and forth or swaying. Another argument put forward in favour of zoos is that they help to conserve endangered species through breeding programmes. Thus, for example, a rare species such as the orang-utan can be protected and encouraged to reproduce in a zoo environment. In reality, though, breeding programmes often fail because the animals do not benefit from natural selection and successive generations grow weaker. For example, attempts to breed pandas in captivity have been very costly and unsuccessful. Even successful breeding programmes have their limitations. For instance, two rare lynxes released into the wild in Colorado died from starvation even though their natural prey, a hare, was abundant. Evidently zoo life does not prepare animals for the challenges of life in the wild. Supporters of zoos sometimes claim that the inhabitants are even better off than their counterparts in the wild. On the contrary, the zoo is an unnatural environment that exposes animals to numerous dangers. Diseases often spread between species that would never co-exist naturally. For example, many Asian elephants have died in US zoos after catching herpes from African elephants. Zoo animals are often exposed to chemicals, solvents and other toxic substances. Also, in an effort to control their behavior, animals are sometimes forcibly medicated and tranquilized. Furthermore, it is not uncommon for visitors to tease and provoke confined animals. In summary, therefore, the continued existence of zoos cannot be defended. They do not educate people; they do not conserve wildlife; and they do not treat animals humanely. They are cruel prisons and the time has come to abolish them.

2. The Balanced Approach A different approach is to look at both sides of the argument in a more balanced way. In the end, however, you must indicate your opinion. The following is an example of how such an essay might be structured:
o

Introduction: The issue of handgun ownership A. Some people believe individuals should not own handguns B. Others believe ownership is an important personal right

o

Disadvantages of handgun ownership - Adults and children can have accidents - People can use guns for crimes

o

Advantages of handgun ownership + People can protect themselves from intruders + People can use guns for recreational purposes

o

Conclusion - summary & evaluation of arguments presented  Problems of accidents and crime make gun ownership difficult to accept  Gun ownership should not be allowed in the interest of a better society

Now here is the essay itself: A spate of recent murders at American schools has led to a lot of debate about the issue of gun ownership. While some believe that private individuals should not be allowed to own guns, others maintain that gun ownership is an important personal right. Both sides present convincing arguments, but I have little doubt that that the possession of such weapons threatens the safety of society as a whole. One of the strongest arguments against handgun ownership is that accidents can happen when adults use guns carelessly or when children discover them. Statistics also show a relationship between the crime rate and the number of privately owned handguns. The number of deaths by shooting in the USA, where handguns are legal, is far higher than in Britain where they are not. Those in favour of handgun ownership argue that citizens should be able to protect their homes and families from intruders. On the other hand, in a society where guns can be bought over the counter, even petty criminals find it easy to obtain a weapon. Supporters also argue that guns are used for recreational purposes such as hunting. However, such "hobbies" often result in the death or injury of innocent bystanders. Supporters of gun ownership claim that these weapons have been part of our life for centuries. Nevertheless, the problems of increasing crime and family conflict in today’s society make gun ownership difficult to accept. Handguns are too dangerous to be made freely available to just anyone who wants them.

3. Problem-Solution This approach does not work for every topic. However, if you are discussing a problem of some sort (e.g. graffiti, litter, poverty, examination stress), then it makes sense to use it. A Problem-Solution essay or letter has a fairly simple structure: first, you explain the problem (or problems), and then you propose a solution (or solutions). The following example looks at health problems in shanty towns (slums) and suggests a few solutions: There are numerous health problems in shanty towns. Firstly, because the sites are illegal the government does not provide piped water. As a result, drinking and bathing water are usually dirty and this causes diseases such as dysentery, typhoid and hepatitis, as well as skin and eye diseases. Secondly, houses are often overcrowded and have poor air circulation. This makes it easier to catch diseases like flu, TB and diphtheria where infection enters through the throat. Thirdly, there are no drains, sewers or rubbish collection services. The resulting pools of stagnant water and heaps of household waste attract rats and insects, which can pass on diseases. The government could do a lot to solve these problems. For example, they could supply clean, piped water to individual houses or, at least, to neigbourhoods. This would make drinking water safe and reduce infections. In addition, the authorities could provide householders with building materials to improve their conditions and educate them about the importance of ventilation. Lastly, the city council could construct drains and provide a rubbish collection service to reduce the risk of infections spread by rats and insects. If the government took these steps, the result would be a safer, healthier environment. Furthermore, the improvements would also lead to increased employment opportunities in areas such as construction, plumbing and rubbish disposal. It is time for politicians to come to the aid of the people who elected them!