P. 1
Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)

Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)

|Views: 162|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge failed to issue a full oral decision in light of his erroneous belief that the respondent waived his right to appeal. The Board found that the unrepresented respondent did not understand his exchange with the immigration judge to constitute a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge failed to issue a full oral decision in light of his erroneous belief that the respondent waived his right to appeal. The Board found that the unrepresented respondent did not understand his exchange with the immigration judge to constitute a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Feb 24, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/04/2014

pdf

text

original

AJCHE,HECTOR

A205-495-095
C/O ICE
Í.b. Ü6§8tÍB6HÍ0Íð09tÎ06
Executive Offce fr Immigation Review
8oardof ImmlgratlonappeaL
ujceoftheC|erk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000
Fall Church, Vrginia 20530
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - NEW
P.O. Box 1898
Newark, NJ 07101
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL 354 DOREMUS
AVENUE
NEWARK, NJ 07105
Name:AJCHE,HECTOR A 205-495-095
Date of this notice: 2/10/2014
Enclosed is a copy of te Board's decision and order lu the above-referenced case.
Enclosure
|ðDBl MBDDSI5.
ÜUBDCB|SDB|gB|, JCDR
Sincerely,
DCc t
Donna Ca 
Chief Clerk
ÌUÎSC@BS
U5BlîSðH. |CCKÐÍ
W . æ.M . .. P -. . +
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
= ¬ Í.b. Î6gBtlÆ6Hl 0ÍJu8fÍC6
�xecutive Offce Ùr Immigation Review
Falls Lhur0h, Virginia 2ÛåJÛ
File: A205 495 095 - Newark, New Jersey
In re: HECTOR AJCHE
Í REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL AND MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se
CHARGE:
Decision of the BOad oflmmigration Appeals
Date:
FEB 1
0 2014
Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), l&N Act [8 U.S.C. § Ì182(a)(6)(A)(i)] -
Present without being admitted or paroled
APPLICATION:
The respondent has appealed fom the Immigration Judge's October 17, 2013, decision,
ordering him removed to Guatemala, and to Mexico, in the alternative. The summary order
issued that date notes that the respondent waived appeal. Nevertheless, on October 30, 2013, the
Board received a Notice of Appeal fom the respondent urging various errors in his proceedings
befre the Immigration Judge and submitting what is styled as a motion to reopen and reconsider
te Immigration Judge's decision. The Immigration Judge's summay order will be vacated, and
the case remanded to the Immigration Cour fr furher proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We have reviewed the transcript of the proceedings and fnd that it does not clearly refect that
the respondent, who was detained ad acting pro se, knowingly and intelligently waived his right
to appeal. See Matter of Rodriguez-Diaz, 22 I&N Dec. 1320, 1322 (BIA 2000) (an unrepresented
alien who accepts a decision as "fnal" does not efectively waive appeal where it was not made
clear that such acceptance constittes a irevocable waiver of appeal rights). Specifcally, at te
conclusion of the October 17, 2013, hearing, the Immigration Judge told the respondent that he
was ordering his deportation to Mexico, and asked the respondent if he wanted "to appeal this to a
higher court or . .. waive appeal and accept the order as fnal?" See Tr. at 17. The respondent
equivocated in his response stating that "it's a fnal decision, because I have no one here to help
me, and only God knows" (Tr. at 17). We ae not persuaded by this exchange that the respondent
clearly wished to waive his right to appeal the decision, nor is there any indication that the
respondent understood their fnal exchange to constitute a waiver of these rights. Thus, we fnd
that the record does not suppor a conclusion that the respondent knowingly and intelligently
waived his right to appeal, ad the appeal is properly befre us.
The record will be remanded, however, fr a fll decision on the merits. It appeas that the
Immigration Judge may have declined to issue a fll oral decision in view of his determination that
appeal had been waived. As we fnd the respondent did not waive his right to appeal, the
Immigration Judge's sum ay decision is inadequate fr appellate review and a remand is
warranted fr prepaation of a fll decision setting frth the Immigration Judge1s fndings of fct
and legal analysis on all relevant issues in this case. See generally Matter of S-H-,
23 I&N Dec. 462 (BIA 2002); Matter of ¬-1-, 22 I&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999). Upon preparation
Æ ~Æ
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
A205 495 095
· -
of the fll decision, the Immigration Judge shall issue an order administratively retuing the
record to the Board. The Immigration Judge shall serve the administrative retu order on the
respondent and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"). The Board will thereafer give
the paries an opportuity to submit briefs in accordance with the regulations.
Accordingly, the fllowing orders will entered,
ORER: The Immigration Judge's summary order of October 17, 2013, is vacated.
FURTHER ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Court fr frther
proceedings consistent with this opinion, and fr the entry of a new decision.
º
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Hector Ajche, A205 495 095 (BIA Feb. 10, 2014)
JN THE �EHOVA CASE OF
AôCHE, HECTOR
RESPONDENT
� 

U1TED STATES JHHJGRAT1ON COURT
3JD BROAD STREET¸ ROOH 12ûD
NEwARK, NJ û²Jû2
CASE NO.: A2Dõ~43õ~û3õ
ORDERS
TD1B 1B ð 0e0OIðDOU0 OÍ LDe COUIL'B DeC1B1OD ðDO OIOeIB eDLeIeO OD
. TD1B 0e0OIðDOU0 1B BO1e1y ÍOI *e
CODVeD1eDCe OÍ LDe gðIL1eB. TDe OIð1 OI wI1LLeD F1DO1DgB¸ �D' 1B1OD
ðDU OIUeIB 1B LDe OÍÍ1C1ð1 Og1D1OD 1D LD1B CðBe ' ( BOXu ðIL1eB
wð1VeO 1BBUðDCe OÍ ð ÍOI0ð1 OIð1 ¿eC1B1OD 1D LDe CðBe. 1 '

/
TD

Ie��

IOeIe

RENO� IO0 LDe
·
UD1LeO SLðLBB LO QR� '
r
�  Í
I D ðDBeDL1ð.
ReBgODOeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI VOLUTAY DEPARTURE wðB DEN1ED ðDO
IeBgODUeDL wðB OIOeIeO Ie0OVeO LO ¸ 1D LDe
ð1LeIDðL1Ve LO
Í
ReBgODUeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI VOLUTAY DEPARTURE wðB GRATED UCL11
��
' UgOD gOBL1Dg ð VO1UDLðIy OegðILUIe DODO 1D LDe ð0OUDL
OÍ $ LO DHS w1LD1D Í1Ve DUB1DeBB OðyB ÍIO0 LDe OðLe OÍ LD1B
OIOeI¸ w1LD ðD ð1LeIDðLe OIOeI OÍ Ie0OVð1 LO
OI ReBgODOeDL BDð11 gIeBeDL LO DHS w1LD1D
} LD1ILy OðyB } B1XLy OðyB ÍIO0 LDe OðLe OÍ LD1B OIOeI, ð1J
DeCeBBðIy LIðVe1 OOCU0eDLB ÍOI VO1UDLðIy OegðILUIe
ReBgODUeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI ASYLU wðB ' } gIðDLeO } OeD1eO
' } w1LDOIðwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
' } BUD_eCL LO LDe ANUAL CAP UDOeI LDe 1NA BeCL1OD 2DJ'ð} (5}.
' } ReBgODOeDL KDOw1Dg1y Í11eU ð FR1VOLOUS ðBy1U0 ðgg11CðL1OD.
ReBgODOeDL`B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI w1THHOLD1NG OÍ Ie0OVð1 UDOeI JNA
BeCL1OD 241'D} (3) wðB ' } gIðDLeO ' } OeD1eU ' } w1LDOIðwD w1LD
gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI w1THHOLD1NG OÍ Ie0OVð1 UDOeI LDe TOILUIe
CODVeDL1OD wðB ' } gIðDLeO ' } UeD1eO ' } w1LDOIðw w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI DEFERRAL OÍ IemOVð1 UDOeI LDe TOILUIe
CODVeDL1OD wðB ' } gIðDLeU ' } OeD1eO ' } w11DOIðwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
ReBgODOeDL'B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI CACELLATJON OÍ Ie0OVð1 UDOeI BeCL1OD
[ } 2û3 'D} OÍ NACAA, ' } 24DA'ð) } 24ûA'D} '1} ' } 24DA'D} '2}
OÍ LDe JNA¸ wðB ' } gIðDLeO ' } OeD1eO } w1LDOIðwD w1LD gIe_UO1Ce.
1Í gIðDLeO¸ 1L wðB OIOeIeO LDðL LDe DHS 1BBUe ð11 ðggIOgI1ðLe OOCU0eDLB
DeCeBBðIy LO g1Ve eÍÍeCL LO LD1B OIUeI ReBgODUeDL ' } 1B ' ) 1B DOL
BUDgeCL LO LDe Æ UAL CAP UDOeI JNA BeCL1OD 24DA'e)
ReBgODOeDL`B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI ð wA1VER UDOeI LDe 1NA BeCL1OD
wðB ' } gIðDLeU ' } OeD1eO ( } w1LDOIðwD OI
) OLDeI
:
!� ( } TDe CODO1L1ODB 1mgOBeU Dy
I�A BeCL1OD 216 OD LDe IegODOCDL•B geI0ðDeDL IeB1OeDL BLðLUB weIe Ie0OveO.
ReBgODUeDL`B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI AJUSTNENT OÍ BLðLUB UDOeI BeCL1OD  �
OÍ LDe ' } JNA ' } NACARA ' ) wðB
' } gIðDLeO ' ) OeD1�O ( } w1LDOIðwD w1LD g�_UOCe JÍ gIðDLeO¸
1L wðB OIOeIeO LDðL DH@B� ð11 ðggIOgI1ðLeOO���B DeCeBBðIy LO
g1Ve eÍÍeCL LO LD1B OIOeI.
CASE NUHBER: 2û5~495~D35 RESPONDENT: AJCHE¸ HECTOR
ReBgODOeDL'B BLðLuB wBB REBCTNDED guIBuðDL LO LDe INA BeCL1OD 246.
ReBgODOeDL`B 0OL1OD LO w1THDRw D1B ðgg11CðL1OD ÍOI ðO01BB1OD wðB
. ,' . - � ;_• •- �. • •.•
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
� �

��
*¯ *
} gIðDLeO ) OeD1eO. JÍ LDe IeBgODOeDL Íð11B LO ðD1Oe Dy ðDy OÍ
LDe CODO1L1ODB O1IeCLeO Dy LDe O1BLI1CL O1IeCLOI OÍ DHS, LDeD LDe
ð1LeIDðLe OIOeI OÍ Ie0OVð1 BDð11 DeCO0e 100eO1ðLe1y eÍÍeCL1Ve w1LDOUL
ÍUILDeI DOL1Ce OI gIOCeeO1DgB: LDe IeBgODOeDL BDð11 De Ie0OVeO ÍIO0
LDe UD1LeO SLðLeB LO
ReBgODOeDL wðB ÆHJTTED
OIOeIeO LO gOBL ð $
ðB ð UDL11
AB ð CODO1L1OD OÍ ðO01BB1OD, LDe IeBgODOeDL wðB
DODO.
CðBe wðB j ) TERNJNATED ) w1LD ) w1LDOUL gIejUO1Ce
ÆNJNJSTRATJVELY CLOSED.
ReBgODOeDL wðB OIð11y ðOV1BeO OÍ LDe LJHJTATJON OD O1BCIeL1ODðIy
Ie11eÍ ðDO CODBegUeDCeB ÍOI Íð11UIe LO OegðIL ðB OIOeIeO.
Í ) JÍ yOU Íð11 LO VO1UDLðI11y OegðIL wDeD ðDO ðB IegU1IeO¡ yOU BDð11
De BUDjeCL LO C1V11 0ODey geDð1Ly OÍ ðL 1eðBL $J¸DDD, DUL DOL 0OIe LDðD
$5¸DDD, ðDO De 1De11g1D1e ÍOI ð geI1OO OÍ JD yeðIB ÍOI ðDy ÍUILDeI
Ie11eÍ UDOeI JNA BeCL1ODB 24DA¸ 24DB¡ 245¡ ðDO 24B \JNA SeCL1OD 24DB\O)).
Í ) JÍ yOU ðIe UDOeI ð Í1Dð1 OIOeI OÍ Ie0OVð1, ðDO 1Í yOU w111ÍU11y Íð11
DðLe:
OI IeÍUBe LO J) OegðIL wDeD ðDO ðB IegU1IeO, 2) 0ðKe L10e1y ðgg11CðL1OD
1D gOOO Íð1LD ÍOI ðDy OOCU0eDLB DeCeBBðIy ÍOI OegðILUIe, OI 3) gIeBeDL
yOUIBe1Í ÍOI IemOVð1 ðL LDe L1me ðDO g1ðCe IegU1IeO, OI, 1Í yOU CODBg1Ie
LO OI LðKe ðDy ðCL1OD OeB1gDeO LO gIeVeDL OI Dð0geI yOUI OegðILUIe¡ yOU
BD�1 De BUDjeCL LO C1V11 0ODey geDð1Ly OÍ Ug LO $5DD ÍOI eðCD Oðy UDOeI
BUCD V1O1ðL1OD. (JNA BeCL1OD 2J4Djð)) JÍ yOU ðIe Ie0OVðD1e gUIBUðDL
LO JNA 23Jjð), LDeD yOU BDð11 ÍUILDeI De Í1DeO ðDO/OI 10gI1BODeO ÍOI Ug
LO JD yeðIB. (JNA BeCL1OD 243jð) (J)}.
OLDeI:
10/r/J
APPEAL: <X wð1VeO
DUE BY:
} IeBeIVeO Dy ) ReBgODOeDL ) DHS � BOLD
CERTJFJCATE OF SERVJCE
THJS UHENT wAS SERVED BY: Í ) HAJL [ �ERSONAL SERVJCE
TO: DHS  
 
�EN j ) A11eD`B ATT/R� j AJEN   CUBL�OÍÍ1CeI
DATE:

BY: Í ) COURT STAFF ) J GE


 
 * � *****
Y2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->