This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
hat constit"tes# in yo"r opinion# the nee$ to teach Christian ethics%
Spring 2004 Dr.
The most &ormi$a'le opponent to Christian li(ing in the )orl$ to$ay is the inconsistent ethical approach in the ch"rch. *n parenting# one o& the most important r"les &or raising sta'le chil$ren is consistency in parenting. *t ens"res the relationship is soli$ an$ tr"st)orthy. +i,e)ise# the Christian comm"nity nee$s to present a sta'le# soli$# tr"st)orthy &ace to the tension-&ille$ iss"es o& the )orl$ in or$er to represent -o$.s perspecti(e# lea$ing the )orl$ to a relationship )ith Him an$ hol$ing o"t the tr"th that He gi(es / Pet 2012. 3et the Christian comm"nity li(es in one o& inconsistency. !e )ill con$emn stealing# m"r$er# an$ the&t# yet li(e )ith ra$ar $etectors in o"r cars so )e can spee$ )itho"t getting ca"ght. !e $ecry alcoholism '"t say nothing a'o"t the gl"ttony o& materialism or appetite. 4n$ in the mi$st o& this the ch"rch is pic,ing an$ choosing the iss"es it $esires to a$$ress )itho"t any introspection or consistent application o& principle. The ch"rch can not expect to a$$ress the ethical iss"es o& the )orl$ "ntil possessing an ethical &rame)or, itsel&. 2. !hat rele(ance $oes Christian ethics ha(e in a sec"lar )orl$% The Christian ethic )ill pro(i$e a &rame)or, &or the )orl$ to a(oi$ its o)n $estr"ction. 5eca"se -o$ is the a"thor o& tr"th an$ reason# "se o& the $i(ine principle# the 6logos#6 )ill ena'le the )orl$# '"t sa(e$ an$ "nsa(e$# to see the re$emption a(aila'le in &ollo)ing the li&estyle an$ choices &lo)ing &rom a Christian ethic.
to them in a rele(ant manner. The )orl$ cries o"t &or a sol"tion# an$ the Christian ethic can pro(i$e sol"tions i& the ch"rch can spea.e po(erty# &or example..Ta. From a sec"lar stan$point# cheating on assignments is $etrimental to e$"cation# &or there is no more ne) . The primary in$icator on )hether or not a chil$ )ill gro) "p in po(erty $epen$s on the presence o& a &ather in the ho"se. People )ho restricte$ their sex"al acti(ity to a monogamo"s marital relationship )o"l$ en$ this epi$emic )ithin a generation. Schools )o"l$ 'ene&it immensely. !itho"t the &ather# the mother has to )ear t)o hats an$ 'ears a greater '"r$en in 'ring home a paychec. 4 healthy Christian ethic in sex"ality )o"l$ c"r' the 4*DS epi$emic. This &orces the chil$ren to 'e "ns"per(ise$ most o& the time an$ o&ten# thro"gh 'ore$om# they 'ecome in(ol(e$ in gang (iolence an$ ha(e no strong role mo$el in the home. Practically e(ery e$"cational &acility in 4merica &rom high school thro"gh post-gra$"ate instit"tions gi(e $isclaimers an$ )arnings to their st"$ents a'o"t plagiarism. Since His tr"th &lo)s thro"gho"t the connections ma$e 'y common sense# sec"lar instit"tions an$ schools necessarily sho"l$ teach ethics# i& not e(en la'ele$ as 6Christian#6 as part o& their contin"e$ training. The mother has a n"rt"ring capacity "se&"l &or teaching the chil$ ho) to interact )ith others in a lo(ing manner. *ntegrity )ithin aca$emia is a ma8or ethical iss"e. Sho"l$ ethics 'e ta"ght in sec"lar instit"tions an$ schools as part o& a philosophical c"rric"l"m% Ho) sho"l$ it 'e $one% -o$# 'eing the a"thor o& tr"th an$ reason# the Designer an$ the 6logos#6 pro(i$es many )in$o)s to o'ser(e His tr"th. The Christian ethic can a$$ress this iss"e. The Christian ethic teaches that the &ather sho"l$ 'e a 'rea$)inner# ta.ing care o& his &amily. 7.
*t is a critical time# &or the ch"rch# to a$$ress it in a meaning&"l )ay. into the center o& intellect"al $isco"rse.scholarship pro$"ce$. Ethics $eals )ith interpersonal interaction as m"ch as it $eals )ith people in $ilemma sit"ations.. People )o"l$ reali:e that their )aste an$ a'"se o& company reso"rces tr"ly 'rings $o)n the pro&it margin an$ there&ore lo)ers their o)n earnings. There are t)o iss"es )ithin the Christian response to homosex"ality that nee$ to 'e $i(i$e$ an$ $ealt )ith separately.ing cheating to the extreme )o"l$ mean a cessation o& tr"e learning# an$ e(en a loss o& learning 'eca"se &ringe i$eas an$ concepts )o"l$ ne(er 'e thro)n 'ac. The &irst is the nat"re o& homosex"ality )ith respect to sin. *n the history the )orl$# ci(ili:ation a&ter ci(ili:ation has &allen a&ter they em'race$ an$ en$orse$ as )holesome the $eca$ence an$ licentio"sness o& the homosex"al li&estyle. The common sense o& s"ch ethical approaches# in '"sinesses an$ in schools# can ha(e a tremen$o"s impact "pon the )orl$ an$ can 'e $one &rom a philosophical manner appealing to reason# )hich "ltimately &lo)s &rom the throne o& -o$. !rite a'o"t a Christian perspecti(e on homosex"als an$ homosex"ality. !hat a'o"t the 4*DS iss"e% Ho) can )e impact this politically (ocal gro"p% This iss"e lies at the &ore&ront o& o"r c"lt"re. 4. 9any iss"es )ithin the 'i'lical context are calle$ sin&"l# &rom lying to stealing to a$"ltery to . 9ore importantly# '"sinesses co"l$ re$"ce the amo"nt o& )aste an$ a'"se o& company reso"rces i& their personnel )ere ta"ght concerning the ethics o& stealing. To teach a Christian ethic o& ho) to co"nsel# ho) to $isagree# ho) to 6&ight6 peacea'ly o(er an iss"e )o"l$ 'e a $ose o& 6cool )ater6 into the 6$esert6 en(ironment o& o"r corporations. Ta. 5"sinesses nee$ an ethical &rame)or.
This comm"nity is in $esperate nee$ o& s"ch lo(e. . There is a pit&all to this.s in the homosex"al comm"nity# an$ the $e(iant sex"al c"lt"re generate$ &rom this &orm o& interco"rse.e a (al"e assessment o& this 'eha(ior. <"r pro'lem )ith this "n$erstan$ing is that )e $o not "n$erstan$ the social $anger o& homosex"ality in light o& -o$. !e can reach o"t to these people )ho are psychologically marginali:e$ 'y the )orl$ an$ sho) them there is tr"e lo(e# cleansing# an$ rene)al in the arms o& Christ. !e cease to 'e salt an$ light 'y allo)ing it to &lo"rish in the ch"rch.0222 This is one o& the strongest )or$s o& a'horrence that the <l$ Testament gi(es to an act. S"ici$e is an act o& $espair# an$ they nee$ Christ to o(ercome that $espair.ing the lost. Homosex"ality is re&erre$ to as an a'omination. This is the secon$ iss"e. That means it is a social e(il that# &rom the perspecti(e o& li(ing# creates a $isastro"s pro'lem.m"r$er. S"ch congregations ha(e &lagrant promisc"ity o& homosex"ality )ith no response.s re$emption. !e $o no goo$ i& )e c"rse the $ar. S"ici$es among homosex"al men is one o& the lea$ing ca"ses o& $eath.ing )o"n$e$#6 in nee$ o& help. There is e(i$ent in Script"re o& a )eight# or $epth# to the sin&"lness o& an action. They 'elie(e one sho"l$ not 68"$ge6 or ma. . 9any ch"rches ha(e &allen into an anti-nomianism in see. Sin that remo(es "s &rom the presence o& -o$ is 8"st that# sin./+e(. The Christian comm"nity# in hostile reaction to the $e(io"s sex"al nat"re o& homosex"ality# &orgets that )e are in the same comm"nity o& sinners# 6)al. !e can see this &rom the 4*DS epi$emic# &rom the rampant STD.ness o& homosex"ality '"t $o not allo) these people to ha(e a means o& approaching the people o& -o$ in the ch"rch &or help an$ ministry. !e all ha(e it# an$ )e all nee$ re$emption.
Does a Christian ha(e a right to 'e in politics% *& so# ho) can he?she stay "ntainte$% =es"s sai$ (ery little a'o"t the political realm o& his $ay. 5. !e can not# ho)e(er# lo)er the stan$ar$s o& 'eha(ior that Christ ta"ght or that are inherent in Script"re.no)le$ge it as sin# an$ get o(er it# an$ 'egin ministry. 9ore a(en"es o& 4*DS contraction exist an$ &ail to get the attention o& Christians.no)le$ge$ that many )ill not )ant His message# an$ Pa"l )as clear in >omans that sin is a re&"sal to &ollo) -o$. =es"s ac. This pro'lem 6piggy-'ac.s6 on the pro'lem mentione$ earlier# the &ail"re to ac.s. <"r ministry to this politically (ocal gro"p# the homosex"al lo''y# nee$s to 'e t)opronge$. 6Then ren$er to Caesar the things that are Caesar. 200252 . Hemophilia# 'loo$ trans&"sion patients# an$ $r"g "sers s"&&er &rom the stigma o& the 6gay6 comm"nity.s# an$ to -o$ the things that are -o$. Co"nseling the emotional pro'lems o& this comm"nity )ill help them see the lo(e o& Christ that )ants to re$eem them in spite o& their $esires.6 /+. !ith this tr"th# spo.en in lo(e# in the context o& compassionate ministry# )e can impact this gro"p &or Christ.s plan.The 4*DS epi$emic has s"&&ere$ &rom its association )ith homosex"ality. First# )e nee$ to minister to the gro"p )ith all the lo(e )e can. Christian lo(e &lo)ing &rom programs to minister# pray# &ee$# an$ teach go$ly sex"al practice to this comm"nity can alle(iate the s"&&ering that 4*DS patients en$"re prior to $ying. !e nee$ to sho) care &or the pro'lems that homosex"als an$ 4*DS (ictims are s"&&ering. *n &act# the one time that he )as challenge$ into si$ing 'et)een -o$ an$ the sec"lar a"thorities# his ans)er )as "ni@"ely 'alance$. 9e$ical care an$ ministry to people in the hospital can change the perception o& Christians.
He tol$ Christians to 'e s"'8ect to a"thorities in >omans chapter 7. 9ost mo$erates li. He )as not a >oman political &orce# ho)e(er# he $i$ "se his stat"s as a >oman citi:en to appeal to Caesar# p"lling his 6political6 )eight against the lo)er pri(ilege o& non-citi:enship to 'ring the gospel to >ome. They "se the testimony 'y li&estyle o& the early ch"rch &or s"pport# an$ say that at no time $i$ anyone in the early ch"rch get in(ol(e$ in politics. Ho)e(er# the ans)er to this political @"estion is mo$eration.no)n only to Christians to 'e rea$ily accepte$ 'y the )orl$. &ollo)ers# an$ the Hea(en. The other extreme is 8"st as 'a$. -ro"ps to$ay s"ch as the 5ranch-Da(i$ians# the !ea(er &amily in >"'y >i$ge# =im =ones.no)le$ge an$ s"'mission . They expect to create a society that is more o& a theocracy# expecting the spirit"al .This ans)er has p"::le$ Christians# an$ le$ to t)o $i&&erent extremes. Pa"l )or.e$ )ithin the 'alance 'et)een his -o$- . Pa"l himsel& $i$ not try to create a theocracy.s -ate c"lt 'ecame $isengage$ &rom society 'eca"se o& their eschatological 'elie&s that s"ggeste$ the imminence )as so soon o& the a$(ent# that the .e to thin. The &irst extreme )o"l$ 'e the Christian that says they sho"l$ ha(e no interaction )ith the political realm )hatsoe(er. *t is the attempt# thro"gh legislation# to 'ring a'o"t the . that the prima facia e(i$ence &or their rightness is that they are mo$erate. People )ere $isengaging &rom society an$ a)aiting the coming o& Christ.ing$om o& -o$ )as so 6other#6 )e $i$ not nee$ to in(ol(e o"rsel(es in this )orl$. This is not tr"e. *t lea$s to ri$ic"le an$ a '"r$ening o& the lost )ith r"les an$ reg"lations $e(oi$ o& the spirit"al "n$erstan$ing that comes &rom a rene)e$ heart an$ regenerate$ so"l.ing$om o& -o$. The en$ res"lt o& this mo(ement is similar to the Thessalonian pro'lem. Politically min$e$ Christians# in this (ein o& tho"ght# attempt to pass la)s that are only arri(e$ at 'y the min$ o& Christ. This is 8"st as $etrimental as the other extreme.
!ill this $e&ra"$ anyone% *& so# then $o not $o it.ing$om o& -o$ is here# '"t not cons"mmate$. =es"s. !e exist in a sec"lar )orl$. This $ominance then plays o"t in ho) )e impro(e the sec"lar realm )ith Christian insight. 9arriage0 !rite a'o"t the Christian attit"$e to)ar$ it an$ )hether Christ &or'i$s $i(orce an$ remarriage. !ith the integrity procee$ing &rom this pattern o& $ecision-ma. The . The principle has alrea$y 'een a$$ress# that o& the s"periority o& -o$.s realm# ho)e(er# means that )e m"st allo) the lo(e o& Christ to $ominate o"r actions in the lesser realm# that o& the )orl$.es a $ecision# they &ollo) the principles o& Script"re. !e $o not li(e in a theocracy# as =es"s )ill 'ring.ing$om. <"r "ltimate o'e$ience to -o$ means that )e m"st operate in the realm o& the )orl$ accor$ing to Christian principles# )ith$ra)ing &rom neither. !e nee$ to allo) people to see the &r"it o& a Christian ethic applie$ to the pro'lems a$$resse$ in the political arena.s . teaching can 'est 'e "n$erstoo$ as re&erring the @"estioners to the $i&&erent realms o& their @"estion. Hence# Christians sim"ltaneo"sly occ"py t)o $i&&erent realms. !e sho"l$ pass la)s that 'ring the common sense ethics o& Christianity. A.ing# Christians can 'e the salt an$ light that =es"s )ants "s to 'e.gi(en mission to sprea$ the gospel an$ the reality o& li(ing in a )orl$ that# $e(oi$ o& Christian in&l"ence# )o"l$ go &"rther astray e(ery $ay.s as &ollo)s0 !hen a person ma. The inherent s"periority o& -o$. *n application# it )or. !ill this $ecision 'e ma$e )itho"t $ishonest moti(e% *& it is honest# go ahea$. . The other 'ig area in this @"estion is that o& compromise.
s sa) the gro)th o& the &eminist mo(ement# an$ prior to that the cent"ries o& $o)n-tro$$en )omen. Di$ they complain a'o"t not $oing the other role% Bo. The 1A0. !e ha(e $i&&erent roles yet )e are o& e@"al (al"e.s role is to pro(i$e intelligent co"nsel to the h"s'an$ an$# in a s"'or$inate role# to help him lea$. =es"s came to the )orl$ as the re$eemer# the <ne )ho create$ all things /=n 072. The )i&e. He alone $esire$ to restore the e@"al nat"re o& men an$ )omen 'e&ore -o$ 'y His actions in Script"re. The marriage is no $i&&erent.s rights sl"ng the pen$"l"m to the other si$e o& the contin""m once release$ in the &eminist mo(ement. 3et -o$ commissione$ creation# =es"s $i$ the creating# an$ the Holy Spirit )as the agent o& creation. For example# ta.The pro'lems )ithin Christian marriage to$ay are the res"lt# * 'elie(e# o& 'i'lical interpretation 'eing ma$e to achie(e a 6Script"ral6 perspecti(e that is 'orn o"t o& a $esire to please c"lt"re rather than Christ. -o$ the Father# =es"s# an$ the Holy Spirit are all &"lly -o$. The $iminishe$ attit"$e o& )omen ha$ 'een aro"n$ &or millennia# an$ yet =es"s honore$ many )omen )hile on earth. Each o& them ha$ $i&&erent roles. <"r society has &or so long improperly e@"ate$ role an$ (al"e that s"'or$inate roles are $eeme$ to ha(e less (al"e. This mo$el $oes not &it an$ has corr"pte$ o"r "n$erstan$ing o& the marriage. . The c"rrent tren$# ho)e(er# is to $eny the proper &"nctioning o& roles )ithin the marriage 'eca"se o& a &alse notion o& e@"ating role an$ (al"e. -o$ sent =es"s to $ie# )ho then ret"rne$ to Hea(en an$ the Holy Spirit ret"rne$ as the Com&orter.e the concept o& Trinitarian theology. The Sex"al >e(ol"tion p"she$ the i$ea that )e )ere all the same )ith $i&&erent externals# so e&&ecti(ely )e share$ the same roles. *t is 8"st this notion that =es"s so"ght to $ispel. The h"s'an$.s role is to lea$ in a sacri&icial manner.
/9al 20 A2 Some people nee$ a $i(orce in or$er to stay ali(e. There&ore the co"nter-comman$ (ia Pa"l &rom Christ in the BT is to lo(e sacri&icially. The )oman )as c"rse$ )ith $esire &or her h"s'an$. thro"gh pro'lems.en lightly# yet )e $art o"t an$ . Finally# o"r concept o& marriage nee$s to change. *& )e are not to ha(e the same role# then the comman$ )o"l$ 'e $i&&erent. The same $esire is "se$ in the next chapter a'o"t sin. -o$ hates $i(orce# an$ as necessary as it is sometimes it is still sin. !e nee$ to 'e "n$erstan$ing in this regar$ as Christ )as. !e sho"l$ en8oy the time )e share enco"raging one another# ha(ing &ello)ship# an$ li(ing li&e in harmony. These things ma. Foh )rote a 'oo. !hy these $istinct comman$s% !hy are they $i&&erent% *& )e are the same )ith respect to role# the comman$ sho"l$ 'e the same. !e can ha(e healing &rom this# an$ in the manner o& the a$"ltero"s )oman thro)n 'e&ore =es"s# )e can re&rain &rom con$emnation an$ enco"rage people in(ol(e$ in $i(orce to go an$ sin no more. a'o"t 'i'lical marital roles# &oc"sing on 'i'lical &eminism.e)ise is c"rse$ )ith a ten$ency to $ominate or 6lor$6 o(er the )i&e. Hence# in the BT# the re$eeming po)er o& Christ is )or.e all other actions against the )ill o& -o$.s $esire to control Cain. 9inisters tell e(eryone that marriage is not something to 'e ta. !e can reach o"t in co"nseling to people 'e&ore $i(orce 'egins to help them )or.These (ery comman$s exist in Ephesians 5022-77. at things other than role-relate$ &"nctions# )e sho"l$ operate in a marriage li.e people are comman$e$ to in the 'o$y o& Christ. Cn&ort"nately# o"r &allen nat"re contri'"tes to the presence o& $i(orce. !hen )e loo. The h"s'an$ li.ing to re(erse that an$ enco"raging the )oman to respect his position# his role# in the marriage. She sho)s that these comman$s are to co"nter the c"rse o& -enesis concerning lor$ship an$ $esire. S"san T. This sin# ho)e(er# is re$eema'le li.e o"r relationships meaning&"l an$ en8oya'le. !e sho"l$ la"gh an$ cry together. * mysel& got marrie$ perhaps too soon.
s"cc"m' to the 6Holly)oo$6 (ersion o& lo(e that is act"ally l"st.e$ to Christ. . !hen )e &ix the pro'lems going into marriage# an$ then teach the i$ea that it is a li&elong commitment o& t)o people partnere$ )ith $i&&erent# complementary responsi'ilities# the sit"ation )ill change.ing potential partner )ith serio"s personal pro'lems an$ thin. People &in$ a goo$-loo. Pre-marriage co"nseling is 'eginning to &lo"rish# '"t is not as pop"lar as it sho"l$ 'e. *n a$$ition# no-&a"lt $i(orce an$ trial-marriage /coha'itation2 are rampant# contri'"ting to this temporary i$ea o& marriage. they can 6&ix6 them. !e get together )ith people )ho are not o"r spirit"al e@"als or )ho are not e(en spirit"ally yo. Dery little prayer goes into )ho a person sho"l$ marry# an$ that is tragic.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.