Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-24821 October 16, 1970 B N!

O" T#E P#$L$PP$NE $SL N%S, plaintiff-appellee, vs. %E REN& " BR$C $N%USTR$ES, $NC., UROR T. TU&O '() UROR C RCEREN& '*+', UROR C. GON- LES, defendants-appellants. Aviado and Aranda for plaintiff-appellee. S. Emiliano Calma for defendants-appellants.

C STRO, J.:. This is an appeal from the decision of the Court of irst !nstance of Manila orderin" the defendants-appellants to pa# to the Ban$ of the Philippine !slands %hereinafter referred to as the Ban$&, 'ointl# and severall#, the value of the credit it e(tended to them in several letters of credit )hich the Ban$ opened at the behest of the defendants appellants to finance their importation of d#estuffs from the *nited +tates, )hich ho)ever turned out to be mere colored chal$ upon arrival and inspection thereof at the port of Manila. The record sho)s that on four %,& different occasions in -./-, the 0e Ren# abric !ndustries, !nc., a Philippine corporation throu"h its co-defendants-appellants, Aurora Carceren# alias Aurora C. 1on2ales, and Aurora T. Tu#o, president and secretar#, respectivel# of the corporation, applied to the Ban$ for four %,& irrevocable commercial letters of credit to cover the purchase b# the corporation of "oods described in the coverin" 34C applications as 5d#estuffs of various colors5 from its American supplier, the 6.B. 0istributin" Compan#. All the applications of the corporation )ere approved, and the correspondin" Commercial 34C A"reements )ere e(ecuted pursuant to ban$in" procedures. *nder these a"reements, the aforementioned officers of the corporation bound themselves personall# as 'oint and solidar# debtors )ith the corporation. Pursuant to ban$in" re"ulations then in force, the corporation delivered to the Ban$ peso mar"inal deposits as each letter of credit )as opened. The dates and amounts of the 34Cs applied for and approved as )ell as the peso mar"inal deposits made )ere, respectivel#, as follo)s7. 0ate Application Amount Mar"inal 8 34C No. 0eposit

)n the meantime.-.abric )ndustries. @:.. with interest thereon.: T9TA3 . to (/0. dyestuffs of various colors. plus commission thereon./=?.. 9ct. the De -eny .?. <@/. that the goods that arrived in 2anila were colored chalks instead of dyestuffs..9ct. in the aggregate. -. ..greements./-4-. that they have been authori ed to negotiate the latter!s sight drafts up to the amounts mentioned the respectively. presented to and negotiated with these banks. subse$uently discontinued by the corporation when it became established. -. 7n 7ctober 46.:?. <@=.. -..90:./.. Distributing Company.= <-. thereafter./.50/. as each shipment *covered by the above+mentioned letters of credit. -:. at the rate of :< per annum from 7ctober 83.56 up to the filing of its complaint with the court below on December 30.:.>... to pay to the plaintiff+appellee the amount of (4/3. the J. 3/58 the lower court rendered its decision ordering the corporation and its co+defendants *the herein appellants. the J./-4-./. Conse$uently. . as a result of a chemical test conducted by the 1ational Science Development Board. )nc. by a full set of negotiable clean "on board" ocean bills of lading covering the merchandise appearing in the #Cs that is. if accompanied. with uniform instructions for them to notify the beneficiary thereof.. made partial payments to the Bank amounting. that the foregoing banks having failed to perform this duty... -. 3/54.000.B./@-. however. 3/54 until fully paid./-:. and.. <-@. its sight drafts covering the amounts of the merchandise ostensibly being e%ported by it. upon presentation..:>. Distributing Company drew upon.. and collected the full value of the drafts up to the amounts appearing in the #&Cs as above indicated.. 9ct. together with clean bills of lading.B.urther payments were. arrived in the (hilippines.:.?/>. 'hese correspondent banks then debited the account of the Bank of the (hilippine )slands with them up to the full value of the drafts presented by the J. <=>.?? Nov.=?@./?>. as provided for in the #&C .>./-4-. 'he corporation also refused to take possession of these goods./. and for this reason..B.. endorsed and forwarded all documents to the Bank of the (hilippine )slands. @. plus costs. -:. )t is the submission of the defendants+appellants that it was the duty of the foreign correspondent banks of the Bank of the (hilippine )slands to take the necessary precaution to insure that the goods shipped under the covering #&Cs conformed with the item appearing therein. Distributing Company.. -././-4-=/.? P. and. the Bank issued irrevocable commercial letters of credit addressed to its correspondent banks in the United States.>= P.65..... -. ./.>= By virtue of the foregoing transactions.:. the Bank caused them to be deposited with a bonded warehouse paying therefor the amount of (34.

" or for "partial or incomplete shipment. international customas evidence of general practice accepted as law. packing. acceptance and payment of letters of credit are specifically provided for in the Code of Commerce. but deal only with documents... negotiation or acceptance against documents in accordance with the terms and conditions of a credit by a Bank authori ed to do so binds the party giving the authori ation to take up the documents and reimburse the Bank making the payment. . 2 But even without the stipulation recited above. Section 8. whether those who e%ecute them be merchants or not. #ee$ankee. C. having been positively proven as a fact." to which the (hilippines is a signatory nation. it has incurred by virtue of the continued storage of the goods in $uestion up to the time this decision becomes final and e%ecutory. the Fudgment a quo is affirmed. J. / of the 1ew Civil Code (rovides that "1o court or Fudge shall decline to render Fudgment by reason of the silence. no recourse but to comply with their covenant.J. Actg. 'he e%istence of a custom in international banking and financing circles negating any duty on the part of a bank to verify whether what has been described in letters of credits or drafts or shipping documents actually tallies with what was loaded aboard ship. $uantity. the appellants have. $uality.rticle 30 thereof providesB . value. 'he Bank introduced in evidence a provision contained in the "Uniform Customs and (ractices for Commercial Documentary Credits . Makalintal. if any." )t must be noted that certain principles governing the issuance." 'he Code of Commerce. custom must be proved as fact. the ones who tapped the facilities afforded by the Bank in order to engage in international business.J.greements with the Bank. $uantity. at defendants+appellants! cost.. character. Barredo." as well as "for any deviation from instructions. =e can appreciate the sweep of the appellants! argument. 34 of the same Code provides that ". 3 'he power of our courts to accept in evidence.no claim for recoupment against the defendants+appellants. )t was uncontrovertibly proven by the Bank during the trial below that banks. delay. may be said to be derived from both Constitutional as well as statutory sources. do not deal with the property to be e%ported or shipped to the importer.B. arising from the losses incurred for the non+delivery or defective delivery of the articles ordered.rt. condition. . after all. aldi!ar. but we also find that it is nestled hopelessly inside a salient where the valid contract between the parties and the internationally accepted customs of the banking trade must prevail. 'his is without preFudice to the Bank. # Footnotes. 1 Under the terms of their Commercial #etter of Credit . all parties concerned deal in documents and not in goods . $uality. concur.i%ed for the 'hirteenth Congress of )nternational Chamber of Commerce. C." . the appellants cannot shift the burden of loss to the Bank on account of the violation by their vendor of its prestation. in its . the appellants are bound by this established usage." "'hose acts contained in this Code and all others of analogous character. Concepcion.L. . in their absence." Aaving agreed to these terms. JJ." and . or delivery of the property purporting to be represented by documents> for any difference in character. likewise provides that ". in providing financing in international business transactions such as those entered into by the appellants.cts of commerce. 'hey were. %illamor and Makasiar. Dizon. "ernando. obscurity or insufficiency of the law.. . should be governed by the provisions contained init.rticle 4. or failure or omission to ship any or all of the property referred to in the Credit. conditions. is on lea!e. C (ayment. shall be deemed acts of commerce. according to the rules of evidence.rt.rticle )) of the Constitution provides that "'he (hilippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy and adopts the generally accepted principles of international law of the 1ation. could accrue. negotiation or acceptance. the appellants agreed that the Bank shall not be responsible for the "e%istence. or value of the property from that e%pressed in documents. Reyes. In documentary credit operations. default or fraud by the shipper or anyone else in connection with the property the shippers or vendors and ourselves ?purchasers@ or any of us. by the usages of commerce generally observed in each place> and in the absence of both rules. in proper proceedings in the court below in this same case proving and being reimbursed additional e%penses. therefore.CC7-D)1D#E. by those of the civil law.

delay. shall be binding on us and shall not put you or your correspondent under any resulting liability to us> and we make like agreement as to any inaction or omission... for partial or incomplete shipment.rticle 34 of the Commercial #etter of Credit . $uantity. value. )n furtherance and e%tension and not in limitation of the specific provisions hereinbefore set forth. we agree that any action taken by you or by any correspondent of yours under or in connection with the Credit or the relative drafts.. or failure or omission to ship any or all of the property referred to in the Credit> ... default or fraud by the shipper or anyone else in connection with the property or the shipping thereof> . inter aliaB "'he users of the Credit shall be deemed our agents and we assume all risks of their acts or omissions.. $uantity. or value of the property from that e%pressed in documents> . or delivery of the property purporting to be represented by documents> for any difference in character. $uality. for any deviation from instructions. 1either you nor your correspondents shall be responsibleB for the e%istence. packing. documents or property.. condition.greement provides.4 . for any breach of contract between the shipper or vendors and ourselves or any of us> . =e are responsible to you for all obligations imposed upon you with respect to the Credit or the relative drafts. unless in breach of good faith". if taken in good faith.. condition. documents or property. character. $uality. .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful