This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Sentence Law is mandatory in all cases, EXCEPT if the accused will fall in any of the following exceptions: 1. if sentenced with a penalty of death or life imprisonment 2. if convicted of treason, conspiracy, proposal to commit treason 3. if convicted of misprision of treason, sedition, rebellion or espionage 4. if convicted of piracy 5. if the offender is a habitual delinquent 6. those who escaped from prison or evaded sentence 7. those who violated the terms of conditional pardon of the chief executive 8. where the maximum term of imprisonment does not exceed 1 year (important!) 9. if convicted by final judgement at the time of the effectivity of Act No. 4103 10. if penalized with suspension or distierro If accused fall in any of the foregoing exceptions. DO NOT APPLY ISLAW! ISLAW applies to offenses punished by Special Law and Revised Penal Code. Why is ISLAW mandatory? In the application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law the judge will get the maximum penalty and likewise the minimum penalty. If the accused was already able to serve the minimum term of his indeterminate sentence and upon the approval of the Board, the accused now becomes eligible for parole. ISLAW is favorable to the accused. If the accused was granted parole and violated some conditions of the parole, What will happen? A warrant of arrest will be issued by the court and the accused will be made to serve the rest of the remaining or unexpired portion of his sentence. (But in probation you go back to number 1, serving of sentence will be from the beginning)
Application of ISLAW: How to get maximum and minimum penalty in Special Law: 1. The maximum penalty should NOT exceed the maximum provided for by that law. 2. The minimum penalty should NOT fall below the minimum provided by the law. How to get maximum and minimum penalty in Revised Penal Code: Example: In the crime of homicide, under the Revised Penal Code, the offender is sentenced to reclusion temporal. The maximum penalty under the Indeterminate Sentence Law is reclusion temporal. But reclusion temporal is a divisible penalty consisting of maximum, medium and minimum periods. Which period will we place the maximum term of the Indeterminate Sentence? Guide for determining the maximum penalty: 1. Determine the entire range of the penalty 2. Determine if there is mitigating or aggravating circumstance Which period will the maximum penalty be placed? In pursuant to art 64, when there is no mitigating and no aggravating circumstance, it should be placed at the medium period. Thus, the maximum penalty for the example above is reclusion temporal in the medium period. What is the minimum penalty now? In getting the minimum penalty, the rule is to simply get the penalty one (1) degree lower from the maximum penalty without taking into account the mitigating and aggravating circumstance. Thus, the penalty one degree lower from reclusion temporal, without taking into account any mitigating or aggravating circumstance, is prision mayor. Prision mayor is now the minimum penalty for our example. Important: If your maximum penalty is wrong, it follows that the minimum penalty will also be wrong. Again, prision mayor is a divisible penalty.
8 mitigating and 1 aggravating will never become privileged mitigating circumstance. Same rule applies as to the period of the minimum penalty. NO aggravating maximum penalty: prision correctional in the medium period (2 privileged circumstance. Remember: It will never become a privileged mitigating circumstance if there is an aggravating circumstance present. applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law. Thus. Conduct during trial 3. Mental or physical condition Suppose in the example above. Age 2. Thus we lower by 2 degrees) minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period 5 mitigating. if there are 6 mitigating circumstance and NO aggravating: maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period How is Indeterminate Sentence Law applied in complex crimes (Article 48)? A complex crime is punished by the most serious offense and shall be imposed in its maximum period. (More examples) 1 mitigating but NO aggravating maximum penalty: reclusion temporal in the minimum period minimum penalty: prision mayor in any period 2 mitigating. there are 3 mitigating circumstance present and no aggravating circumstance. Example: Estafa through falsification of public documents. falsification of public documents (Article 171) is a more serious offense punished by prision mayor than estafa (Article 315).Which period can it be placed? Under the Indeterminate Sentence Law. we take it into account first in order to obtain the proper maximum penalty. Thus. from that maximum penalty. the minimum penalty is prision mayor in any of its period. If there is a privileged mitigating circumstance. Thus. we obtain the proper minimum penalty by getting the penalty 1 degree lower. but it shall be placed in the maximum period because of the presence of 1 aggravating circumstance. 1 aggravating circumstance was proven. which is prision mayor. NO aggravating maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period At most we can only lower by 2 degrees. The first two mitigating circumstance shall be a privileged mitigating circumstance. 4 mitigating. NO aggravating (privileged mitigating) maximum penalty: prision mayor in the medium period minimum penalty: prision correctional any period The preceding example is an exception to the rule. Factors that could affect the imposition of minimum penalty: 1. NO aggravating maximum penalty: prision mayor in the minimum period minimum penalty: prision correctional any period In the preceding example. Under the Revised Penal Code. the penalty will be reduced by 1 degree from reclusion temporal to prision mayor. the maximum penalty for estafa through falsification of public documents shall be prision mayor in the maximum period. The 3rd mitigating circumstance shall place the penalty in the minimum period. Thus. In which period? It shall be discretionary upon the court. Then. Minimum . punished only by prision correctional. it would depend upon the discretion of the court on which period to place it. What is now the maximum penalty? It would still be reclusion temporal. How about the minimum penalty? It would still be 1 degree lower from reclusion temporal. 3 mitigating.
espionage. Penalties shall not be standardized but fitted as far as is possible to the individual. Dec. COVERAGE A. 5. with due regard to the imperative necessity of protecting the social order (People v. The court has discretion to fix as the minimum term any period of imprisonment within that penaltynext lower to the penalty prescribed EXCEPTION: WHEN THERE IS A PRIVILEGED MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE. Thus. sedition. the maximum of the ISL will end up being lower than the minimum of the ISL. we lower by the penalty by one degree but still place it at the maximum period.Instead of imposing a “straight” penalty. EXCEPTIONS (Sec. 3. 4 mitigating. 48 7. 5. even if there is a mitigating circumstance present. SPL: Min (at least that prescribed) to Max (not exceed prescribed) 1. 5. Consider the privileged mitigating circumstance FIRST before any AC or MC to get the PENALTY PRESCRIBED and then proceed as required by the rule on deriving the minimum term. 1933) III. misprision of treason Convicted of rebellion. PURPOSE Who escaped confinement or evaded sentence or violated the terms of a conditional pardon 8. 6. Derive MAXIMUM term imposable by applying rules for aggravating (AC) and ordinary mitigating circumstances (MC) under Art. APPLICATION A. Persons already sentenced by final judgment at the time this Act was approved (Dec. no MC: Penalty PRESCRIBED maximum period No AC. and prevent unnecessary and excessive deprivation of liberty and economic usefulness. RPC: Min (next lower to prescribed) to Max (imposable) 1. any period. Ducosin. 1 MC: Penalty PRESCRIBED minimum period Several ACs and MCs: OFFSET then apply rules to remainder No AC. 1933 . if it is a privileged mitigating circumstance. Suppose there was 1 mitigating circumstance proven. 2): Law will NOT apply to persons 2. Otherwise. 4103. Convicted of offense punishable with death penalty or life imprisonment Whose maximum term of imprisonment (imposed) does not exceed one year Convicted of treason. Convicted of piracy Who are habitual delinquents . 1. Derive MINIMUM term by getting the penalty one degree lower than the penalty prescribed by the RPC. How about if there are 2 mitigating circumstance and no aggravating? The rule is. GENERAL RULE: All persons convicted of certain crimes under Philippine courts B. it should still be imposed at the maximum period. 64 and for complex crimes under Art. the court must determine two penalties (maximum and minimum) I. without regard to its three periods. B. the maximum penalty shall be prision correctional in the maximum period. No AC or MC: Penalty PRESCRIBED medium period 1 AC. 4. do NOT follow the aforementioned rule. II. 2 or more MCs: Penalty NEXT LOWER IN DEGREE TO THAT PRESCRIBED If COMPLEX CRIME (2 or more grave or less grave felonies OR one offense is a necessary means for committing the other): Penalty for the MOST SERIOUS CRIME maximum period 2. Maximum penalty would still be prision mayor in the maximum period. 2.penalty shall be prision correctional. In pursuant to Article 48. NO aggravating maximum penalty: arresto mayor in its maximum period RA No. MAXIMUM TERM: Court may fix any as long as it does not exceed the penalty prescribed by the special law MINIMUM TERM: Court has discretion so long as it does not exceed the minimum prescribed by the special law To uplift and redeem valuable human material. 59 Phil 109). conspiracy or proposal to commit treason.
 It is such period that the maximum term of the indeterminate sentence should be reckoned from. and one day of reclusion temporal. the court. the addition of one day to the 10 years as the minimum term of the indeterminate sentence of Talampas may occasion a degree of inconvenience when it will be time for the penal administrators concerned to consider and determine whether Talampas is already qualified to enjoy the benefits of the Indeterminate Sentence Law. limiting the maximum term of the indeterminate sentence at only 14 years and eight months contravened the express provision of the Indeterminate Sentence Law. or its amendments. Accordingly. No. With the absence of aggravating or mitigating circumstances. for such penalty was within the minimum period ofreclusion temporal. WHEREFORE. in view of the attending circumstances. is mandated to prescribe an indeterminate sentence the maximum term of which shall be that which. Yet. 2007 finding VIRGILIO TALAMPAS y MATIC guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of homicide. the Court must add one day to the maximum term fixed by the lower courts. and the minimum term shall be within the range of the penalty next lower to that prescribed by the Revised Penal Code for the offense. to 14 years. No. the Court deletes the one-day increment from the minimum term of the indeterminate sentence.R. proper computation of penalty G. It may be true that the increment did not constitute an error. SO ORDERED. in imposing a prison sentence for an offense punished by the Revised Penal Code. in order to simplify the computation of the minimum penalty of the indeterminate sentence.Homicide. Under Section 1 of theIndeterminate Sentence Law. could be properly imposed under the rules of the Revised Penal Code. because the minimum term thus fixed was entirely within the parameters of theIndeterminate Sentence Law. The petitioner shall pay the costs of suit. 180219 G. and IMPOSES the indeterminate sentence of 10 years of prision mayor.R. This is pursuant to Article 64 of the Revised Penal Code. or 14 years. as maximum. Hence. The Court finds to be unnecessary the increment of one day as part of the minimum term of the indeterminate sentence. 180219 "x x x. and one day to 17 years and four months. eight months. eight months. as minimum. the imposable penalty is reclusion temporal in its medium period. Hence. . the Court AFFIRMS the decision promulgated on August 16. The penalty for homicide under Article 246 of the Revised Penal Code is reclusion temporal.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?