# http://TheValueatRisk.blogspot.

com  October 19, 2009

Evaluate Operating Performance: Net  Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
Although I'm partial towards the use of Operating Cash Flow (OCF) as a primary basis for performance measurement, investors should nonetheless be familiar with Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT). NOPAT is completely derived from the income statement, subjecting itself to the usual non-cash adjustments dictated by GAAP. However, NOPAT is useful because, as the name implies, it is strictly a measure of operating performance. Calculation of NOPAT is relatively straightforward, you're simply multiplying Income From Operations Before Taxes by the corporation's effective tax rate. To calculate the tax rate, divide income tax expense by net income before taxes(NIBT); make sure you place NIBT, also known as Pretax Income in the denominator, and not Operating Income. Once you've determined the total taxes owed, you just subtract it from Operating Income to arrive at NOPAT. The two step process is delineated below: Tax Rate = Net Income Before Taxes / Income Tax Expense Net Operating Profit After Taxes = Income From Operations Before Taxes X (1-Tax Rate) *Note that a company's annual reports and 10-Q's will not always show a neatly constructed income statement that spoon feeds you the Operating Income, Pretax Income, and Income Tax Expense lines. GAAP doesn't require the income statement to be constructed in any special sort of way, thus you may have to occasionally deploy some common sense. Nearly all of the time however, websites like Yahoo!Finance and (if you have a subscription) S&P's NetAdvantage will go ahead and break out the necessary line items. The point is, pay attention.

http://TheValueatRisk.blogspot.com  October 19, 2009
I'll use Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) to illustrate an example calculation of NOPAT: HPQ NOPAT - Year Ended October 31st 2009 Tax Rate = \$2144M / \$10,473M = 20.47% Net Operating Profit After Taxes = \$10,802M X (1-.2047) = \$10,802M X 0.7952 =\$8,590M Hewlett-Packard's NOPAT of \$8590M compares with net income of \$8329M for fiscal year 2008; at only 3% less than NOPAT, 2008 net income is indicative of only a modest amount of interest expense for the year (\$329M). The disparity between NOPAT and net income isn't always so minimal, as can be seen in the chart below:

General Electric (GE)'s large disparity between NOPAT and net income is an obvious first observation to make. The primary driver of this phenomenon is the \$26,209M worth of interest expense incurred by the company during 2008. The second result of such a massive interest expense is that GE's 2008 effective tax rate was only 5.3% (interest is deductible). The

http://TheValueatRisk.blogspot.com  October 19, 2009
relationship between these two variables will change based upon the industry, and circumstances specific to the company.    *long GE    Copyright 2009 ‐ The Value at Risk
For additional analysis of financial markets and politics, or to view information about the author, please visit  http://TheValueatRisk.blogspot.com  The content contained within this newsletter, as well as The Value at Risk website, is provided as general information only and  should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any  security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site  are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The  author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein. Any action that you take as a result of information  or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment  decisions.