Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document235-1

Filed10/21/09 Page1 of 3

EXHIBIT A

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document235-1 ofFiled10/21/09 7100548 3 Case: 09-17241 10/20/2009 Page: 1 2 DktEntry: Page2 of

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OCT 20 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, and OUR FAMILY COALITION; et al.,

No. 09-17241 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco

ORDER Plaintiffs-intervenors - Appellees, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; et al., Defendants-intervenors - Appellants.

A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal because this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review discovery orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Truckstop.net, LLC v. Sprint Corp.,

cj/MOATT

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document235-1 ofFiled10/21/09 7100548 3 Case: 09-17241 10/20/2009 Page: 2 2 DktEntry: Page3 of

547 F.3d 1065, 1067 (9th Cir. 2008); KL Group v. Case, Kay & Lynch, 829 F.2d 909, 918, n. 5 (9th Cir. 1987). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 8 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. FOR THE COURT: Molly Dwyer Clerk of Court By: Caroline A. Jacobs Motions Attorney/Deputy Clerk 9th Cir. R. 27-7 General Orders/Appendix A

cj/MOATT

2

09-17241

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful