CHAPTER III DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table No.1
3.1 Age of the employees Sl no Age No of weight Weighted Average 3 2 1 33 36 21 90 1.8 Total

respondents 1 2 3 Below 25 25- 35 Above 35 Total 11 18 21 50

Chart No 1

Age Group 23% 37% 40% Below 25 25-35 Above 35 INTERPRETATION: From the above Table 1 and Chart 1 it is clear that employees are selected at random and almost majority of employees of the company falls between the age group of 25-35 Table No : 2 Gender of the employees Sl No Gender Number respondents 1 2 3 Female Male Total 20 30 50 70 30 100 of percentage Chart No 2 .

3 Qualification of the employees Sl No 1 2 3 4 5 Qualification No of respondents Below SSLC 5 SSLC 10 Pre degree 20 Degree 15 Total 50 weight 4 3 2 1 Rating 20 30 40 15 105 Weighted Average 2.1 .Gender 30% 70% male female INTERPRETATION From the table and chart we can interpret that 70 percent of the workers of KAMCO are male and only 30 percent is female Table No 3 3.

OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 22 110 13 7 4 4 50 52 21 8 4 195 3.9 . 4.4 satisfaction level of salaries SL. 3.Chart no 3 Qualification 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 below SSLC SSLC no of respondents predegree weight Ratings Degree Interpretation From the obtained data it is clear that the majority of the workers are having the qualification of predegree Table No 4 3. 5. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 15 NO. 2.NO. 1.

Table No 5 3.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTERPRETATION: From the above table.5 Employee transport facilities Sl no 1 2 3 4 Chart No 5 opinion satisfied neutral dissatisfied total No of respondents 40 7 3 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 120 14 3 137 Weighted Average 2.CHART 4 250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO.74 . it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the salaries provided by the company.

36 . Transportation is an important factor for the job satisfaction.180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 satisfied neutral no of respondents weight Rating dissatisfied Interpretation From the given data we can interpret that the employees are satisfied with the transportation facilities of the company as the company is in reachable place.5 Infrastructure facility No 1 2 3 4 Chart No 6 opinion good neutral poor total No of respondents 29 10 11 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 87 20 11 118 Weighted Average 2. Table No 6 3.

of Respondents weight Rating Poor Interpretation From the table no 5 and chart no 5 it can be interpreted that the company’s infrastructure facility is good enough that most of the workers are satisfied with it.36 .Infrastructure Facility 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Good neutral No. Table No 7 3.7 Safety measures provided by the company Sl no 1 2 3 4 Chart No 7 opinion good satisfied poor total No of respondents 24 20 6 50 weight 3 2 1 Rating 72 40 6 118 Weighted average 2.

Safety Measures 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Good Satisfied no of respondents weight Series 3 poor Interpretation From the obtained data we can interpret that the employees feel satisfied with the safety measures provided by the company Table No 8 3.8 Working hours of the employees Sl no 1 2 3 4 5 Opinion strongly Agree Agree neutral disagree Strongly No of weight respondents 10 5 8 8 7 17 4 3 2 1 Rating 50 32 24 14 17 Weighted Average .

47 Working Hours 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral weight Disagree Rating Strongly Disagree No of respondents Interpretation It is clear from the table 7 and chart 7 that workers are not comfortable with the working hours of the company as they feels that the working hours are more. The working hour is a major factor that affects the satisfaction level of employees TABLE NO 9. 3. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 NO. 4. 1.9: SATISFACTION LEVEL OF OVERTIME BENEFITS SL. 3.NO.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 12 60 18 8 6 72 24 12 . 2.disagree total Chart No 8 50 137 2.

NO.5. it is clear that majority of workers are satisfied with the overtime benefits provided by the company. TABLE 10 3.48 CHART 9 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 WEIGHT NO.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTERPRETATION: From the above table.10 Relationship with other employees SL. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 NO. 2. 3.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 12 60 18 10 5 72 30 10 . Some of them are highly satisfied with overtime benefits provided by the company. 4. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL 1 15 6 50 6 174 3. 1.

54 CHART 10 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 WEIGHT NO. it is clear that majority of workers are satisfied with the relationship with other employees of the company. 4. Some of them are highly satisfied and some are having fair decision about relationship with other employees of the company.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTERPRETATION: From the above table. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL 1 15 5 50 5 177 3. It will leads to improve the performance of employees and it will create a team spirit and co-operation TABLE 11 3.NO. Performance of employees mainly depends up on relationship with other employees. 3.11: Satisfaction level of refreshment SL.5. OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 NO. 5. 1. 2.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 25 125 15 5 5 0 60 15 10 0 .

GRIEVANCE HANDLING HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL NO.TOTAL 15 50 210 4. TABLE 12 3. 3.NO 1. 33 5 3 .OF RATING WEIGHTED RESPONDENTS WEIGHT AVERAGE 50 10 5 4 132 15 2. Some of them are satisfied and some are having fair decision about refreshments provided by the company.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTERPRETATION: Refreshment and relaxation is necessary for employees in doing their work.20 CHART 11 250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO.12 Satisfaction with the companies’ grievance handling method SL. It will leads to improve the performance and efficiency of workers From the above table. it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the refreshments provided by the company.

If the employees feels the authorities are not giving much attention to their problems there will job dissatisfaction TABLE 13 .4 4. 5. DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL CHART 12 2 0 2 0 1 201 50 4 Grevience Handling 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied no of respondents INTERPRETATION From the given table we can interpret that some of the employees seems to be dissatisfied with the grievance handling process of the company.

2.OF RATING TOTAL RESPONDENTS WEIGHT 20 . OPINION HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL WEIGHT 5 4 3 2 1 15 NO. it is clear that majority of workers are highly satisfied with the assistance and participation of their superiors or other workers. TABLE NO 14 3. 4.14 Satisfaction with the training provided OPINION SL.9 SOURCE: SURVEY DATA CHART NO 13 250 200 150 100 50 0 WEIGHT NO. 3.OF WEIGHTED TOTAL RESPONDENTS AVERAGE AVERAGE 22 110 13 7 4 4 50 52 21 8 4 195 3.3.NO HIGHLY NO.NO. to the work assigned to them. 1. 5.OF RESPONDENTS WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTERPRETATION: From the above table.13 Satisfaction level of work participation of the superiors with employees SL.

TABLE NO 15 3. SATISFIED 4 5 40 2.OF RESPONDENTS 4 RATING WEIGHT 20 5 TOTAL .1.NO 1. 3.15 satisfaction with the job advancement opportunities OPINION SL. 5. SATISFIED NEUTRAL DISSATISFIED 10 16 16 4 48 3 32 2 4 1 144 3 100 4. HIGHLY SATISFIED NO. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL 4 50 CHART NO 14 Training programme 50 40 30 20 10 0 highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied no of respondents Interpretation From the obtained chat and table we can interpret that some of the employees are satisfied with the training provided while few others are not satisfied with the training.

16 Satisfaction with reward and recognitions provided OPINION SL. TABLE 16 3.SATISFIED 2. HIGHLY DISSATISFIED TOTAL 4 4 50 2 10 3 28 4 112 30 8 4 1 174 100 3 CHART NO 15 Job enhancement 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Highly satisfied satisfied neutral weight dissatisfied Rating highly dissatisfied no of respondents Interpretation From the given table we can interpret that majority of the employees are satisfied with the job advancement opportunities provided to them by the company. 5.NO NO. NEUTRAL 3.OF RESPONDENTS 12 WEIGHT 5 RATING 60 TOTAL . DISSATISFIED 4.

1. 5. Some of the employees are highly satisfied with the rewards and recognitions while some feels dissatisfied with it. HIGHLY SATISFIED 18 4 3 2 1 72 24 12 6 SATISFIED 8 NEUTRAL 6 DISSATISFIED 6 HIGHLY DISSATISFIED 174 TOTAL 50 3 2. CHART NO 16 Rewards and recognition 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NO OF RESPONDENTS NEUTRAL WEIGHT RATING DISSATISFIED TOTAL HIISFIEDGHLY DISSATISFIED Interpretation From the table it is clear that the employees are neutrally satisfied with the rewards and recognitions provided. . 3. 4.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful