=
1
2
, (2.1)
where
(, ) can be
obtained from wind turbine manufacturers.
2.6.2 Drive train modeling
The mechanical construction of the wind turbines is simply modeled as a lumpedmass
system with the lumped combined inertia constant of the turbine rotor and the generator
rotor. The shaft dynamic equation is [15]:
2
) (2.2)
2
) (2.3)
) (2.4)
where J
T
and J
G
are the inertia constant of the turbine rotor and the generator rotor,
respectively, K
s
and D
s
are the shaft stiffness and damping constant respectively,
TG
is
the electrical twist angle of the shaft,
o
is the base value of angular speed,
T
and
G
are
the angular speeds of shaft at the ends of turbine and generator, respectively, T
T
and T
E
are the mechanical and electrical torque, respectively.
2.6.3Generator modeling
As mentioned earlier, there are three types of generators used in wind turbines: one is
induction generator, the second one is doubly fed induction generator, and the other is
permanent magnetic synchronous generator.
1) Induction generator (IG)
The equivalent circuit of the induction generator is shown in Fig.2.3, and the electric and
magnetic equations of the model are described by equations (2.5)(2.10) [20].
Fig.2.3 Equivalent circuit of the induction generator
Stator Voltage is given by:
+
d
ds
dt
(2.5)
+
d
qs
dt
(2.6)
Rotor Voltage is given by:
+
d
dr
dt
(2.7)
+
d
qr
dt
(2.8)
Flux Linkage is given by:
(2.9)
+

jws
+
rdq
Vsdq
Rs Rr
Ls Lr
Lm
V
+
rdq
J(sr)
+
rdq
Electronicmagnetic Toque is:
(2.10)
where v
s
, i
s
and
s
are stator voltage, current and flux respectively; v
r
, i
r
and
r
are rotor
voltage, current and flux respectively;
s
is the angular velocity of the chosen frame of
reference; d and q represent d and q axis, respectively. L
m
is the mutual inductance; L
sl
and L
rl
are the stator and rotor leakage inductances, respectively.
2) Doubly fed induction generator (DFIG)
Doubly fed induction generator is a modified version of IG where two rotor windings
receive electrical excitation from external sources. As a result, the rotor equations are
modified as presented in section D below. Rests of the equations are same as IG.
3) Permanent magnet synchronous generator
The generator for a direct drive wind turbine is different from the other types. It is a
permanent magnet synchronous generator, and using Parks transformation, can be
expressed by the following equations [20] and [18].
+
d
ds
dt
+
d
qs
dt
(2.11)
(2.12)
where
r
is the mechanical angular velocity of the rotor at any instant, d and q represent d
and q axis respectively,
m
is the flux produced by the permanent magnets.
Electronicmagnetic Toque is given by:
= (
3
2
)(
2
)(
) (2.13)
Where p is the number of poles.
2.6.4 Converter modeling and control
With the assumption that the converters are lossless, the equations of converters are as
follows:
1) DFIG converter
The power at the rotor side (also called slip power) is given by:
(2.14)
And the power at the stator side is given by:
(2.15)
So the total output power is:
=
(2.16)
2) Frequency converter
For a direct drive system, all the power produced by the generator goes from the stator
and pass through the converter.
=
2.7 WIND ENERGY BACKGROUND
The amount of power captured from a wind turbine is specific to each turbine and
is governed by [1].
(2.17)
Where:
P
t =
the turbine power(W),
= the air density (kg/m),
A= the swept turbine area (m^3),
C
P
= the coefficient of performance
v
w =
is the wind speed(m/s).
The coefficient of performance of a wind turbine is influenced by the tipspeed to
wind speed ratio or TSR given by
(2.18)
Where w is the turbine rotational speed and r is the turbine radius. A typical
relationship, as shown in Fig. 2.4, indicates that there is one specific TSR at which the
turbine is most efficient. In order to achieve maximum power, the TSR should be kept at
the optimal operating point for all wind speeds. The turbine power output can be plotted
versus the turbine rotational speed for different wind speeds, an example of which is
shown in Fig. 2.4. The curves indicate that the maximum power point increases and
decreases as wind speed rises and falls [4, 22, 23],
3
2
1
w p t
v AC P =
,
w
v
wr
TSR =
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Cp
12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Tip Speed Ratio
Fig. 2.4: Typical coefficient of power curve
P1 max
P2 max
P (W)
e (rad/s)
V2 > V1
Fig. 2.5: Turbine output power characteristic
CHAPTER 3
PRNCIPLE OF DOUBLY FED INDUCTION GENERATOR
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Variable speed ac drives have been used in the past to perform relatively
undemanding roles in application which preclude the use of dc motors, either because of
the working environment limits. Because of the high cost efficient, fast switching
frequency static inverter. The lower cost of ac motors has also been a decisive economic
factor in multi motor systems. However as a result of the progress in the field of
power electronics, the continuing trend is towards cheaper and more effective power
converters, and a single motor ac drives complete favorably on a purely economic basis
with a dc drives. Among the various ac drive systems, those which contain the cage
induction motor have a particular cost advantage. The cage motor is simple and rugged
and is one of the cheapest machines available at all power ratings. Owing to their
excellent control capabilities, the variable speed drives incorporating ac motors and
employing modern static converters and torque control can well complete with high
performance four quadrant dc drives [27].
The induction motors were evolved from being a constant speed motors to a
variable speed. In addition, the most famous method for controlling induction motor is by
varying the stator voltage or frequency. To use this method, the ratio of the motor voltage
and frequency should be approximately constant. With the invention of Field Orientated
Control, the complex induction motor can be modeled as a DC motor by performing
simple transformations. In a similar manner to a dc machine, in induction motor the
armature winding is also on the rotor, while the field is generated by currents in the stator
winding. However the rotor current is not directly derived from an external source but
results from the emf induced in the winding as a result of the relative motion of the rotor
conductors with respect to the stator field. In other words, the stator current is the source
of both the magnetic field and armature current. In the most commonly used, squirrel
cage motor, only the stator current can directly be controlled, since the rotor winding is
not accessible. Optimal torque production condition are not inherent due to the absence of
a fixed physical disposition between the stator and rotor fields, and the torque equation is
non linear. In effect, independent and efficient control of the field and torque is not as
simple and straightforward as in the dc motor [27, 28].
The concept of the steady state torque control of an induction motor is
extended to transient states of operation in the high performance, vector control ac drive system
based on the field operation principle defines condition for decoupling the field control
from the torque control. A field oriented induction motor emulates a separately exited dc motor
in two aspects [27].
I  Both the magnetic field and torque developed in the motor can be controlled
independently.
II  Optimal condition for the torque production, resulting in the maximum torque per unit
ampere, occurs in the motor both in steady state and in transient condition of operation.
3.2 DC MOTOR ANALOGY
Fig3.1 DC motor analogy
Where torque (T) Ia.If
And where Ia represents the torque component and If the field.
The orthogonal or perpendicular relationship between flux and mmf axes is
independent of the speed of rotation and so the electromagnetic torque of the dc motor is
proportional to the product of the field flux and armature current. Assuming negligible
magnetic saturation, field flux is proportional to field current and is unaffected by armature
current because of the orthogonal orientation of the stator and rotor field. Thus in a
separately excited dc motor with constant value of field flux, torque is directly proportional
to armature current [27, 28].
Ia
If
Ia
If
o
Fig. 3.2: Separately excited
The principle behind the field oriented control or the vector control is that the
machine flux and torque are controlled independently, in a similar fashion to a separately
excited DC machine. Instantaneous stator currents are transformed to a reference frame
rotating at synchronous speed aligned with the rotor stator or air gap flux vectors, to
produce a daxis component current and a qaxis component current. (SRRF).In this work,
SRRF is aligned with rotor mmf space vector, the stator current space vector is split into
two decoupled components, one controls the flux and the other controls the torque
respectively [27, 28].
3.3 INDUCTION MOTOR ANALOGY
An induction motor is said to be in vector control mode, if the decoupled
components of the stator current space vector and he reference decoupled components
defined by the vector controller in the SRRF match each other respectively. Alternatively,
instead of matching the two phase currents (reference and actual) in the SRRF, the close
match can also be made in the three phase currents (reference and actual) in the stationary
reference frame. Hence in spite of induction machines non linear and highly interacting
multivariable control structure [28].its control has becomes easy with the help of FOC.
Therefore FOC technique operates the induction motor like a separately excitedly DC
motor.
The transformation from the stationary reference frame to the rotating reference
frame is done and controlled by with reference to specific flux vector (stator flux linkage,
rotor flux linkage) or magnetizing flux linkage). In general, there exits three possibilities
for such selection and hence, three vector controls. They are stator flux oriented control,
rotor flux oriented control and magnetizing flux oriented control. As the torque producing
component in this type of control is controlled only after transformation is done and is not
the main input reference, such control is known as indirect torque control. The most
challenging and ultimately, the limiting feature of field orientation is the method whereby
the flux angle is measured or estimated. Depending on the method of measurement, the
vector control is sub divided into two sub categories: direct vector and indirect vector
control. In direct vector control, the flux measurement is done by using flux sensing coils
or the hall devices [27, 28].
FOC uses a dq coordinates having the daxis aligned with rotor flux vector that
rotates at the stator frequency. The particular solution allows the flux and torque to be
separately controlled by the stator current dq components. The rotor flux is a flux of the d
axis component stator current i
ds
.The developed torque is controlled by the q axis
component of the stator current i
qs
. The decoupling between torque and flux is achieved
only if the rotor flux position is accurately known. This can be done using direct flux
sensors or by using a flux estimator [28].
3.3.1 Vector control techniques of induction motor
The synchronously rotating reference frame (SRRF) can be aligned with the stator
flux or rotor flux or magnetizing flux (field flux) space vectors respectively. Accordingly,
vector control is also known as stator flux oriented control or rotor flux oriented control or
magnetizing flux oriented control. Generally in induction motors, the rotor flux oriented
control is preferred. This is due to the fact that by aligning the SRRF with the rotor flux,
the vector control structure becomes simpler and dynamic response of the drive is observed
to be better than any other alignment of the SRRF.
The vector control can be classified into (i) Direct vector control and (ii) indirect vector
control [28].
Fig. 3.3: Vector controlled induction motor
In vector control the dynamic performance of the induction motor improves to a
great extent. The squirrel cage induction motor behaves similar to a separately excited dc
motor with control of field and torque being independent of each other. Therefore the drive
exhibits quick starting response, fat reversal response and quick change over from one
operating point to another. With proper choice of speed controller, the drive can be further
improved in terms of performance indices such as starting time, reversal time, and dip in
speed on load application, overshoot in speed on load removal, steady state speed error on
load etc [27, 28].
3.3.2 DYNAMIC DQ MODEL
R.H. Park in 1920's proposed a model for synchronous machine with respect to
stationary reference frame. H.C. Stanley in 1930's proposed a model for induction
machine with respect to stationary reference frame. Later G. Bryons proposed a
transformation of both stator and rotor variables to a synchronously rotating reference
frame that moves with the rotating magnetic field. Lastly Krause and Thomas proposed a
model for induction machine with respect to stationary reference frame.
Transformation:  the stator winding axes asbscs with voltage with respect
to stationary reference frame, the voltages are referred as [29].
cs bs as
v v v & ,
qs ds
v v &
Fig. 3.4: Stationary frame abc to dq.
Fig. 3.5: Stationary frame to synchronous rotating frame
3.3.2.1 Synchronously rotating reference frameDynamic model (Kron's equation)
The dynamic model of DFIG is derived from the twophase synchronous
reference frame in which the qaxis is 90 ahead of the daxis with respect to the direction
of rotation. The electrical model of DFIG in the synchronous reference frame, here the
quantities on the rotor side have been referred to the stator side. The model is composed
of two groups, i.e. the first one is the voltage equations and the other is the flux ones. The
general model for wound rotor induction machine is similar to any fixedspeed induction
generator [12].
The DFIG system consists of stator, rotor and turbine. So the model design according
these, the followings parameters are used to modeling the DFIG:
3.3.2.2 Voltage equations
Stator Voltage Equations:
(1)
(2)
Fig. 3.6: daxes transform
Rotor Voltage Equations:
(3)
(4)
Fig. 3.7: qaxes transform
3.3.2.3 Power Equations:
(5)
(6)
3.3.2.4 Torque Equation:
qs s ds qs qs
i R P V + + = e
ds s qs qs ds
i R P V + = e
qr r dr qr qr
i R r P V + + = e e ) (
dr r qr dr dr
i R wr w P V + = ) (
) ( 2 / 3
qs qs ds ds s
i V i V P + =
) ( 2 / 3
qs ds ds qs s
i V i V Q =
(7)
3.3.2.5 Flux Linkage Equations:
Stator Flux Equations:
(8)
(9)
Rotor Flux Equations:
(10)
Then, the daxis of reference frame to be along the stator flux linkage (stator flux oriented
control) will be
(11)
And hence from stator flux equation:
(12)
Substituting for in torque equation will result in:
(13)
For to remain unchanged at zero, must be zero. Substituting for using
stator voltage equation we get
(14)
Neglecting stator resistance will lead to ; substituting this, the power equation
simplified as
) (
2 2
3
ds qs qs ds e
i i
p
= T
qr m qs m ls qs
i L i L L + + = ) (
dr m ds m ls ds
i L i L L + + = ) (
ds m dr m lr dr
qs m qr m lr qr
i L i L L
i L i L L
+ + =
+ + =
) (
) (
0 =
e
qs
e
qr
m ls
m e
qs
i
L L
L
i
+
=
e
qs
i
e
qr
e
ds
m ls
m
e
i
L L
L p
+
= T
2 2
3
e
ds
e
ds
p
e
ds
p
e
ds s
e
ds
i r V =
0 =
e
ds
V
(15)
Therefore, the above equations show that active and reactive powers of the stator can be
controlled independently.
In terms of rotor current component
(16)
Where =
CHAPTER4 CONTROLLER FOR DOUBLY FED INDUCTION
GENERATOR
4.1 DFIG WITH BACK TO BACK CONVERTER
A double fed induction generator is a standard, wound rotor induction machine
) (
2
3
) (
2
3
e
ds
e
qs
e
s
e
qs
e
qs
e
s
i V Q
i V
=
= P
) (
) (
s
s
e
dr m e
m
e
s
e
qr
s
m e
m
e
s
L
i L
V Q
i
L
L
V
+
=
= P
s
L
m ls
L L +
with its stator windings is directly connected to grid and its rotor windings is
connected to the grid through an AC/DC/AC converter. AC/DC converter connected to
rotor winding is called rotor side converter and another DC/AC is grid side converter.
Doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) ability to control rotor currents allows for
reactive power control and variable speed operation, so it can operate at maximum
efficiency over a wide range of wind speeds [43].
Fig. 4.1: Wind Energy System.
In modern DFIG designs, the frequency converter is built by selfcommutated
PWM converters, a machineside converter, with an intermediate DC voltage link.
Variable speed operation is obtained by injecting a variable voltage into the rotor at slip
frequency. By controlling the converters, the DFIG characteristics can be adjusted so as
to achieve maximum of effective power conversion or capturing capability for a wind
turbine and to control its power generation with less fluctuation. The DFIG is a WRIG
with the stator windings connected directly to the three phases, constantfrequency grid
and the rotor windings connected to a backtoback voltage source converter. Thus, the
term doublyfed comes from the fact that the stator voltage is applied from the grid and
the rotor voltage is impressed by the power converter [5, 41].
Vector control of a doubly fed induction generator drive for variable
speed wind power generation is described. The control scheme uses stator fluxoriented
GEAR
BOX
3~
DOUBLY FED INDUCTION
GENERATOR
AC
DC
DC
AC
TRANSFORME
R
GRI
DDD
D
control for the rotor side converter bridge control and grid voltage vector control for the
grid side converter bridge. The purpose of the grid side converter is to maintain the dc
link voltage constant. It has control over the active and reactive power transfer between
the rotor and the grid, while the rotor side converter is responsible for control of the flux,
and thus, the stator active and reactive powers. A complete simulation model is
developed for the control of the active and reactive powers of the doubly fed generator
under variable speed operation [6, 9, 43].
Fig. 4.2: DFIG with converter control signal.
The wind turbine and the doublyfed induction generator (DFIG) is shown in the
Fig. 4.2. The AC/DC/AC converter is divided into two components: the rotorside
converter (C
rotor
) and the gridside converter (C
grid
).A capacitor connected on the DC side
acts as the DC voltage source. A coupling inductor L is used to connect C
grid
to the grid.
The threephase rotor winding is connected to C
rotor
by slip rings and brushes and the
threephase stator winding is directly connected to the grid. The power captured by the
wind turbine is converted into electrical power by the induction generator and it is
transmitted to the grid by the stator and the rotor windings. The control system generates
the pitch angle command and the voltage command signals V
r
and V
gc
for C
rotor
and C
grid
respectively in order to control the power of the wind turbine, the DC bus voltage and the
reactive power or the voltage at the grid terminals.[6, 9, 43].
4.2 POWERSPEED CHARACTERISTIC
control
Sign Vc,Vg
Pitch angle
From previous discussion it is clear that the controller, i.e C
rotor
and C
grid
have the
capability of generating or absorbing reactive power and control the reactive power or the
voltage at the grid terminals. The power is controlled is follow the powerspeed
characteristic (Fig. 4.3).
Fig. 4.3: Powerspeed characteristic.
The above ABCD curve shows the power characteristics. The actual speed of the
turbine
r
is measured and the corresponding mechanical power of the tracking
characteristic is used as the reference power for the power control loop. The tracking
characteristic is obtained over four points. From zero speed to speed of point A the
reference power is zero. Between point A and point B the characteristic is a straight line,
the speed of point B must be greater than the speed of point A. Between point B and
point C the tracking characteristic is the locus of the maximum power of the turbine. The
tracking characteristic is a straight line from point C and point D. The power at point D is
1 pu and the speed of the point D must be greater than the speed of point C. Beyond point
D the reference power is a constant equal to 1 pu [43].
4.3 WINDTURBINE MODEL.
Wind turbines convert aerodynamic power into electrical energy. In a wind
turbine two conversion processes take place. The aerodynamic power is first converted
into mechanical power. Next, that mechanical power is converted into electrical power.
Wind energy conversion systems are systems that generate electrical power from
mechanical power derived from the wind. The major components of a typical wind
energy conversion system include a wind turbine, a generator and control systems as
shown in Fig. 4.2.
Cp is the power coefficient which, in turn, is a function of tip speed ratio and
blade angle .i.e. Cp = Cp (, ) and = (*r)/ v; One common way to control the
active power of a wind turbine is by regulating the value of the rotor turbine. In the
model, the value of the turbine rotor is approximated using a nonlinier function [7,
15].
(4.1)
Where the tip is speed ratio and is the pitch angle. The value is given
according to the following relation.
(4.2)
The maximum value of can be found using a graphical method, this tip speed value is
assigned as the optimum tip speed. Based on this value, the optimum turbine speed curve
at any given wind speed can be obtained. This curve is then used as a reference in the
active power control. The variation of Cp as a function of assuming constant pitch
angle = const [43].
The out put power from turbine: (4.3)
Torque is
p
c
p
c
r
e C
i
P


5 . 12
) 5 4 .
116
( 22 . 0 ) , (
=

i
1
035 .
08 .
1 1
2
+
+
=
 
i
p
c
3
2
1
w p t
v AC P =
r t m
P T e / =
Fig. 4.4: simulation model of turbine.
4.4 PITCH ANGLE CONTROL
The pitch angle control is a common control method to regulate the aerodynamic
power from the turbine. Pitch angle controller controls the wind flow around the wind
turbine blade, thereby controlling the toque exerted on the turbine shaft. If the wind speed
is less than the rated wind speed of the wind turbine, the pitch angle is kept constant at its
optimum value. It should be noted that the pitch angle can change at a finite rate, which
may be quite low due to the size of the rotor blades. Small change in pitch angle can have
a dramatic effect on the power output. The maximum rate of change of the pitch angle is
in the order of 3 to 10 degrees/second. In this controller a slight overspeeding of the
rotor above its nominal value can be allowed without causing problems for the wind
turbine structure. The relationship between the pitch angle and the wind speed is shown
Tm (pu)
1
wind_speed^3
u(1)^3
pu>pu
K
pu>pu
K
lambda_nom
K
cp(lambda,beta)
lambda
beta
cp
Scope1
Scope
Product
Product
K
Avoid division
by zero
Avoid division
by zero
1/wind_base
K
1/cp_nom
K
Wind speed
(m/s)
3
Pitch angle (deg)
2
Generator speed (pu)
1
Pwind_pu
Pm_pu
lambda
cp_pu
cp_pu
lambda_pu
wind_speed_pu
in Figure 4.6.[11,43].
Fig. 4.5: Pitch Angle control
Fig. 4.6: Relationship between Pitch Angle and Wind Speed
The pitch angle controller employs a PI (proportional integral) controller as
shown below.
In Fig.4..5. When the wind turbine output power P
measured
is lower than the rated power
P
ref
of the wind turbine, the error signal is negative and pitch angle is kept at its optimum
value. When the wind turbine output power P
measured
exceeds the rated power P
ref
, the
error signal is positive and the pitch angle changes to a new value, at a finite rate, thereby
reducing the effective area of the blade resulting in the reduced power output. The PI
controller inputs are in perunit.
4.5 ROTOR SIDE CONVERTER
The rotorside converter is used to control the wind turbine output power and the voltage
or reactive power measured at the grid terminals.
Fig. 4.7: Rotor side and Grid _side converter control circuit.
The actual electrical output power, measured at the grid terminals of the wind turbine, is
added to the total power losses (mechanical and electrical) and is compared with the
reference power obtained from the tracking characteristic. A ProportionalIntegral (PI)
regulator is used to reduce the power error to zero. The output of this regulator is the
reference rotor current Iqr_ref that must be injected in the rotor by converter C
rotor
. This is
the current component that produces the electromagnetic torque T
em
. The actual Iqr is
compared to Iqr_ref and the error is reduced to zero by a current regulator (PI). The
output of this current controller is the voltage Vqr generated by C
rotor
. The current
regulator output is Vqr [8, 13].Reactive and Active Power at grid terminals is controlled
by the reactive and active current flowing in the converter C
rotor
The output of the voltage regulator or the var regulator is the reference daxis
current Idr_ref that must be injected in the rotor by converter C
rotor
. The same current
regulator as for the power control is used to regulate the actual Idr. The output of this
regulator is the daxis voltage Vdr generated by C
rotor
. The current regulator output is
Vdr. Vdr and Vqr are respectively the daxis and qaxis of the voltage Vr [8, 30].
Fig. 4.8: Rotor side converter control.
4.5.1 MATLAB SIMULATION MODEL
VAR
MEASUREMENT
TRACKING CHA
POWER
MEASUREMENT
Var
CURRENT
POWER
REGULATOR
CURRENT
REGULATOR
V
I
V
I
Wr
P
Pref
Q
Qref
I
Id
Iq
Id ref
Iq ref
+

+

+


+
Fig. 4.9: Simulation Model of RotorSide Controller.
4.6 GRID SIDE CONVERTER
The converter C
grid
is used to regulate the voltage of the DC bus capacitor. In this
thesis , this model C
grid
converter to generate or absorb reactive power. In this control
system ,measuring the d and q components of AC currents to be controlled as well as the
DC voltage Vdc. The output of the DC voltage regulator is the reference current Idgc_ref
for the current regulator. The current regulator controls the magnitude and phase of the
voltage generated by converter C
grid
(Vgc) from the Idgc_ref produced by the DC voltage
regulator and specified Iq_ref reference. The current regulator give the C
grid
output
voltage [6, 43].
The magnitude of the reference grid converter current Igc_ref is equal to
.The maximum value of this current is limited to a value
defined by the converter maximum power at nominal voltage. When Idgc_ref and Iq_ref
rotor side control voltage
Vabc_r
1
turbine power charecteristics
wr
idqs
Vdqs
Freq
Iqr *
reactive power
Q_ref
Q
Idr *
dq 2 abc
Vdq*
Vdc
Angle
Uctrl _r
abc_dq
Theta
Iabc _s
Idq _s
abc to dqr
In1
angle _rotor
Iabc _r
Idq _r
r_angle
abc to dq
Theta
Vabc
Vdq
Vq calculation
f(u)
Vd calculation
f(u)
1/z 1/2
F
50
PI
Discrete
3phase PLL
Vabc (pu)
Freq
wt
Sin _Cos
Demux
Demux
Demux
Demux
Vdc
8
angle _rotor
7
Q
6
Iabc_r1
5
Iabc_s
4
wr
3
Q_ref
2
Vabc
1
Idr *
wwr
Idr
Iqr
vd'
vq'
Iqr*
2 2
_ _ ref Iq ref Idgc +
are such that the magnitude is higher than this maximum value the Iq_ref component is
reduced in order to bring back the magnitude to its maximum value [9].
Fig. 4.10: Grid side converter control.
4.6.1 MATLAB SIMULATION MODEL
DC VOLTAGE
REGULATOR
CURRENT
MEASUREMENT
CURRENT
REGULATOR
Ig
Idg
Iqg
Idg ref
Iqg ref
Vq
+
+


+

Vd
Vdc ref
Fig. 4.11: Simulation Model of GridSide controller and Power.
dq2abc
converter voltage
P
3
Q
2
Vabc_g
1
curent to volatge tf
Idq
Idq_ref
vdq ref
active and reactive power
Vabc
Iabc
T_F
Q
P
abc to dq 1
Iabc
Theta1
Idq
abc to dq
Theta
Vabc
Vdq
Vdcref
Vdc_nom
1/z
Theta
Vdq*_g
Vdc
control _g
K
Discrete
3phase PLL
Vabc (pu)
Freq
wt
Sin_Cos
Demux
Demux
DC to Idq ref
Vdc_ref
Vdc
Iq_ref
Idq_ref
Iabc
5
Iq_ref
4
Vdc
3
Iabc_g
2
Vabc
1
vd'
vq'
Icr
10
Ibr
9
Iar
8
Ics
7
Ibs
6
Ias
5
Q1
4
P1
3
Te
2
Nr
1
dq to abc 1
Iq
Id
WeWr
Ia
Ib
Ic
dq to abc
Iq
Id
We
Ia
Ib
Ic
abc 2 dq
Va
Vb
Vc
Vq
Vd
We
Subsystem
Vds
Ids
Vqs
Iqs
P1
Q1
IM model
Vqs
Vds
We
Vqr
Vdr
TL
Iqs
Ids
Iqr
Idr
Wr
Te
Gain
K
Constant 1
0
Constant
0
Add
Vcs
4
Vbs
3
Vas
2
TL
1
Fig. 4.12: Induction machine model
CHAPTER5 MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING AND
POWER SMOOTHING
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In this thesis different way to track the maximum power were implemented. All
these tracking characteristic process are previously implemented, but here these processes
are compared and new one is implemented in different way. The variable speed control is
Te
6
Wr
5
Idr
4
Iqr
3
Ids
2
Iqs
1
Subsystem2
Iqs
Ids
Iqr
Idr
TL
Te
Wr
Subsystem1
Fqs
Fds
Fqr
Fdr
Iqs
Ids
Iqr
Idr
Subsystem
Vqs
Vds
Vqr
Vdr
Iqs
Ids
Iqr
Idr
We
Wr
Fqs
Fds
Fqr
Fdr
TL
6
Vdr
5
Vqr
4
We
3
Vds
2
Vqs
1
done based on the optimal power curve that shows the relation between the maximum
output of the system (output) and the generator speed (input), namely maximum power
point tracking (MPPT). The wind speed control or the generator speed control is adopted
for MPPT.
At a given wind velocity, the mechanical power available from a wind
turbine is a function of its shaft speed. To maximize the power captured from the wind,
the shaft speed has to be controlled. For a given shaft speed turbine power increases with
increase in wind velocity v. Also peak power points of turbine power occurs at
different turbine speed for different wind velocity and shaft speed corresponding to
maximum power increases with increase in wind speed. To trap maximum power from
the wind some control algorithm should be incorporate such that rotational speed of
the wind turbine adapts the to the wind speed v automatically leading to maximum
power point operation. This is known as maximum power point operation of wind
turbine, and the process of keeping track of peak Power points with change in wind speed
is Maximum Power Point Tracking MPPT [17, 22].
The conventional method is to generate a control law to produce the target
generator torque T
e
, which provides wind turbine with sufficient acceleration or
deceleration torque to attain particular angular velocity leading to maximum power point
operation. Irrespective of the generator used for a variable speed wind energy
conversion system the output energy depends on the method of tracking the peak
power points on the turbine characteristics due to fluctuating wind. The generator is
operated in speed control mode with the speed reference being dynamically modified in
accordance with the magnitude and direction of change of active power. If we operate
at a peak power point a small increase or decrease in turbine speed would result in
no change in output power because necessary condition for the speed to be a
maximum power point is dP/dw =0 [14].
5.2 First Method using Power Point Tracking Characteristics
The ABCD curve shows the power characteristics (Fig. 5.1). The actual speed of
the turbine
r
is measured and the corresponding mechanical power of the tracking
characteristic is used as the reference power for the power control loop. The tracking
characteristic is obtained over four points. From zero speed to speed of point A the
reference power is zero. Between point A and point B the characteristic is a straight line,
the speed of point B must be greater than the speed of point A. Between point B and
point C the tracking characteristic is the locus of the maximum power of the turbine. The
tracking characteristic is a straight line from point C and point D. The power at point D is
1 pu and the speed of the point D must be greater than the speed of point C. Beyond point
D the reference power is a constant equal to 1 pu [43].
Fig. 5.1: Power Point Tracking Characteristics.
5.2.1 MATLAB MODEL
Fig. 5.2: Simulation of Power Point Tracking Characteristics.
5.3 Second Method using MPPT curve implemented as lookup table
From the above discussion it can be conclude that for the maximum power
characteristic divided in different region, then using slop equation manipulates the value
of power which is used as reference power for the simulation. Here same characteristics
is used as lookup table ,where the power only measured only some few wind velocity
like at A,B,C & D. at other point it is not implemented i.e. other velocity inbetween
these point.
power
1
wm^3
u(1)^3
speed _Aspeed_B
Switch
Product 3
Product 2
Product 1
Product
Gain
power _C
speed_A
speed_B
power _A
power _B
speed_C
speed_D
power _C
power _D
Constant 1
speed_A
Constant
speed_C
wr
1
5.3.1 LOOK_UP Table:
Fig. 5.3: Lookup Table.
5.4 MPPT corresponding to the optimum power for particular velocity.
In this method the power is obtained from the different wind velocity by
comparing the rotor speed and the active power. The proposed algorithm is explained
with the help of Fig. 5.4, where the P vs. curves corresponding to three wind velocities
v1, v2 & v3. The algorithm initiates the maximum power searching process by rotor
speed
r
. Here the power varies according the variation of wind velocity. So this method
helps to get the maximum power from the wind at different velocities [14].
Fig. 5.4: Tracking Characteristics for Different Velocity [14].
Let the present wind velocity be v1. The generator is run in the speed control
mode with a speed reference of 1.The generator output power and speed are sampled at
regular intervals of time. If the wind velocity is steady at v1, the difference between
successive samples of active power P (i.e., P) will be very small and no action is taken.
Now, let there be a step jump in wind velocity from v1 to v2. Since the turbine shaft
speed cannot change instantaneously (the reference for the speed controller is not yet
changed and the inertia of the system is extremely high), this would result in a change of
operating point from P1 to P2. Therefore, P would be large and positive. Corresponding
to this change in P, a positive change in speed reference is commanded. The change in
speed reference Wr* is made proportional to P. This shifts the operating point from P2
to P3, resulting in a smaller positive change in P. Since this change in Wr* is due to a
positive change in P, it implies that the peak power point is further to the righthand
side on the curve. Thus, a further positive change in Wr* is commanded in proportion to
P. In this process, when P becomes very small (within some defined band), no further
change in speed command is given and the system keeps operating at P4 . Now, if the
wind velocity again changes from v2 to v1 , the operating point shifts to P5, resulting in a
large negative change in P. Thus, a negative change in speed reference in proportion to
P is applied. However, this results in a positive change in P as the operating point
shifts to P6 . Since the positive change is due to a negative change in speed command, the
peak power point is to the left of P6 . Therefore, the speed reference is further reduced.
The algorithm continues until P is within the predefined band and the operating point
again slides back close to P1 [14].
5.4.1 MATLAB MODEL
Fig. 5.5: Simulation Model of Tracking Method for Step by Step Procedure.
The algorithm is implemented in following manner [14]:
1 The algorithm initiates the maximum power searching process by setting an arbitrary
speed reference Wr*.
2 The active power is sampled at a particular rate and the incremental change is
computed as P(k) = P(k) P(k1).
3The magnitude of W* is given by Mag (Wr(k)*) = Mag(Kt*P(k)), where Kt is
constant and is needed to be selected carefully.
w
dw
w
w(n1)
p
p(n1)
abs(P)
wref
1
wstep
signdet
sign
C
kstep1
0
kstep
C
is_dw(n1)=0
is_dp<0.5
delw
Unit Delay 2
z
1
Unit Delay 1
z
1
Unit Delay
z
1
Sign 1
Sign
Abs
u
wr
2
P
1
4The reference speed is sampled at same speed as power.
5 If P(k) >= P(k1), the maximum power point is not attained, so the speed reference
Wr* is increased by Wr
*
. This process is repeated according to flowchart shown in Fig.
5.5 until maximum power point is reached.
6If P(K) < P(K1), the speed reference is decreased by Wr
*
. This process is repeated
according to flowchart shown in Fig. 5.5 until maximum power point is reached.
7 If the magnitude of P(k) is within prescribed tolerance band Pband, then the speed
reference is not changed else it is to be changed by (Wr(k)).
5.5 Pitch Angle Controller
In this chapter, a new logical pitch controller equipped with a fuzzy logic controller
(FLC) has been proposed that can enhance the transient performance of a WTGS during
severe network disturbance .Moreover , it can maintain the output power at the rated level
when the wind speed is higher than the rated speed .To evaluate the effectiveness of the
proposed controller in improving the transient stability ,simulation has been carried out
for severe network disturbances and severe wind condition, considering the the
mechanical dead zone of the pitch actuation system.[1]
1. Conventional Pitch Controller
The conventional pitch controller shown in Fig(5.6). Can be used to maintain the output
power of a wind generator at its rated level when the wind speed is over the rated speed.
The pitch servo is modeled with a first order delay system with a time constant,
Td.Beacuse the pitch actuation system cannot control, in general, respond instantly, a rate
limiter is added to obtain a realistic response.
s T
d
+ 1
1
90
0
K
p
T
i
x/s
+

P
IG
e
1
Fig.(5.6) Conventional Pitch Controller
2. Wind Generator Power Smoothing by Using the New Pitch Controller[1]
For wind generator output power smoothing, the most important part is to determine the
pitch controller input power command , P
IG
REF
.
The following steps explain the generation of the pitch controller input power command ,
P
IG
REF
(i)The wind turbine captured power , P
WT
, can be obtained from
1
2
3
(ii)The average value of wind power, P
,
can be calculated from the
EMA(C) = [(CP) xK] +P
Where
C=the current value,
P=the previous periods EMA and
K=Weighting factor
(iii)The slandered deviation can be calculated from the following equation
(iv) Finally the controllers revised input power command,
5.5.1 Proposed Fuzzy Pitch Controller
Ke Fuzzy
Logic
controller K
1/Z
s T
d
+ 1
1
90
0
MDZ Block
x/s
+

+

P
IG
P
IG
RE
F
e
e
n
cmdn
cmd
e
e
n
K
e
Fig. (5.7) Fuzzy Pitch Controller Block diagram
5.6 Fuzzy logic system
Zadeh introduced Fuzzy sets in his landmark paper in 1965. The main difference
between fuzzy and conventional sets is in the definition of membership of a given set. For
conventional set theory, a number either is or is not a member of any given set. The
membership can then be represented as a binary quantity: either 1 or 0. On the other
hand, the membership of a number in a fuzzy set is defined in terms of a membership
function, which generally varies between 0 and 1. The membership function represents a
degree of membership of the value in the particular fuzzy set.
Fuzzy control uses fuzzy set theory to define a nonlinear controller and was first
developed by Mamdani in 1975. A fuzzy controller has three components: a fuzzifier, a
rule base and a defuzzifier as shown in Fig.5.8 [25] [29]. The inputs to the controller are
crisp numbers and the outputs are also crisp numbers, but all processing inside the
controller is done using fuzzy variables. The first step is to convert the crisp inputs to
memberships of each fuzzy set defined for the inputs. This operation is called
fuzzification and the block that performs this operation is called a fuzzifier. These
membership functions are used in the rule base which relates fuzzy values of the inputs to
the output of the rule base. The output of the rule base is also a set of membership values
of the fuzzy sets defined for the output variable. To interface with the physical world, this
fuzzy variable has to be converted back to a crisp number. This is done by the defuzzifier.
Fuzzifier Rule base Defuzzifier
Crisp
inputs
Crisp
output
Fig.5.8 Components of a fuzzy controller
(1) Fuzzifier
To design the proposed FLC ,the error signal ,e(k),ans the change of error signal,
e(k),are considered the controller inputs .The angle ,
cmd ,
is considered the controller
output,which is actually the pitch angle command signal for the mechanical servo
system.For convenience, the inputs and the out puts of the FLC are scaled with
coefficient Ke, K
e
, K
e,
respectively.In this work ,these scaling factor can be constants or
variables and play an important role in the in the FLC design to achieve a good response
in both transient and steady states.In this work , these scaling factors are considered
constant for simplicity of the the controller design and selected by trial and error .The
values of Ke, K
e
, K
e
are chosen as 1.0,1000and 100 respectively.In fig 5.7 Z
1
represent one sampling time delay.The triangular membership functions with overlap
used for the input and output fuzzy sets are shown in Fig.(5.11) in which linguistic
variables are represented by NB, NM, NS,ZO,PS,PM,PB .The grade of input membership
function can be obtained from the following equation.
= 2 /
where , (x) is the value of grade of membership, w is the width ,m is the coordinate of
the point at which the grade of membership is 1, and x is the value of the input variable.
[1]
(2) Rule base
The rule base maps the fuzzy sets for the inputs to the fuzzy sets for the output and
constitutes the core of a fuzzy controller. Table 5.1 shows a rule base. NB, NM,
NS,ZO,PS,PM,PB are notations for fuzzy sets Negative Big ,Negative Medium ,
Negative Small ,Zero, Positive Small ,Positive Medium Positive Big respectively. The
rule base has two dimensions corresponding to a fuzzy controller with two inputs and one
output. Each row gives the resultant output fuzzy set for each combination of input fuzzy
sets. The entire rule base can be described in terms of such IFTHEN statements or rules,
which are AND and OR together.
NB NM NS ZO
PS
PM
PM
PM
PM
PB
PM
PM
PM
P
M
P
M
PB
PB
PB
PB
e
n
cmdn
e
n
NB
NM
PM
NB
NB
NB
NM NM
NM NM
NM
NM
NS NS
NS
NS
NS
PS
ZO
NS
NS
ZO
NM
NS
NS
ZO
PS
ZO
PS
PS
NM
ZO
PS
PS
NS
ZO
PS
PS
PS
PS
ZO
ZO
PS
PS
Table 5.1 Rule base for a fuzzy pitch controller
The fuzzy mapping of the input variables to the output is represented by IFTHEN rules
of the following forms:
IF IF< e
n
is NB> and < e
n
is NB >THEN< cmd is NB>
IF< e
n
is ZO> and < e
n
is ZO >THEN< cmd is ZO>
IF< e
n
is PB> and < e
n
is PB >THEN< cmd is PB>
The advantages of this characteristic are:
The rule base can be tuned very easily, since for some given inputs, depending on the
performance of the controller, only the active rules need to be adjusted. This is in
contrast to linear controllers, where changing any gain affects the system performance
over its entire range of operation.
The output of the rule base is converted to a crisp value using the defuzzifier. This
provides for inherent smoothening of the controller output. Thus, a fuzzy controller is a
true nonlinear controller.
(3) Defuzzifier
The output of the rule base is a fuzzy variable which is converted to a crisp value by the
defuzzifier. Many defuzzification methods have been proposed, of which the centre of
area or centroid defuzzification is most common. Using this method, the crisp output is
given by:
cmd =
=1
=1
(4.11)
Where, i = membership value of control input for the i
th
fuzzy set of the output
ci = centroid of the membership function for the i
th
fuzzy set of the output
N = number of fuzzy sets for the output
If the areas of all membership functions for the output are the same, the Ai term drops
out of the defuzzification equation.[1]
5.7 Fuzzy logic Control Block
Fig (5.9) Block diagram of pitch controller to which fuzzy controllers are applied.
Fig.5.10. FIS structural characteristics, used in simulation system
Fig(5.11) Inputs, and their membership functions appear to the left of the FIS structural
characteristics, while outputs and their membership functions to the right side of FIS
CHAPTER6 DFIG SIMULATION AND
RESULTS
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The DFIG model uses the power electronic IGBT converters for controlling the
signals which is generated by the discrete PWM generators. This converters are achieve
an acceptable accuracy with the 1620 Hz switching frequency used in this model, the
model must be discretised at a relatively small time step . This model is well suited for
observing harmonics and control system dynamic performance over relatively short
periods of times. A 9 MW wind turbines connected to the 575 V generation bus. . Wind
turbines using a doublyfed induction generator (DFIG) consist of a wound rotor
induction generator and an AC/DC/AC IGBTbased PWM converter modelled by voltage
sources [43].
6.1.1 The DFIG Simulation Model is grouped in four groups:
Generator, Converters, Turbine, and Control
Fig. 6.1: Simulation Model of DFIG.
The simulation of DFIG is done in order to predict the results theoretically, prior to the
experimental verification.
wind
V
stator_curent
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
rotor _ccurent
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
rotor side control
Vabc
Q_ref
wr
Iabc _s
Iabc _r1
Q
angle _rotor
Vdc
Vabc_r
reactive power
[Q]
pitch angle
0
grid _curent
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
active power
[P]
Wind Turbine
Generator speed (pu)
Pitch angle (deg)
Wind speed (m/s)
Tm (pu)
Vph _grid
[Va]
Vo
v
+

Vin_meas
v
+

Vdcref
Vdc_nom
[Q]
[P]
Va_ph
[Va]
V_cap
[Vdc]
Universal Bridge
g
A
B
C
+

Universal Bridge
g
A
B
C
+

Scope 5
Scope 4
Scope 3
Scope 2
Scope 1
Scope
R_l
A
B
C
A
B
C
Qref (pu)
0
m
wm
thetam
Iq_ref (pu)
0
I_grid _phase
[Ia]
Grid voltage and current
Vabc
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
Grid side control
Vabc
Iqref
Iabc _g
Vdc
Iabc
Vabc_g
Q
P
[Iabc _s]
[Iabc _g]
[Vabc]
[Iabc _r]
[wr]
[Iabc ]
[T]
[vcr]
[vcg ]
[angle ]
Gen _speed2
[T]
Gen _speed1
[wr]
[wr]
[Iabc _r]
[Iabc _s]
[wr]
[Vdc]
[Vdc]
[vcr]
[vcg]
[Iabc _g]
[Vabc]
[Vabc]
[Iabc ]
[angle ]
[Q]
From
[Vdc ]
Filter
0.9 Mvar
Q=50
A B C
Discrete
PWM Generator 1
Uref Pulses
Discrete
PWM Generator
Uref Pulses
C1
Asynchronous Machine
pu Units1
Tm m
A
B
C
a
b
c 575 voltage source
N
A
B
C
2
i
+

Vph_grid Vph_grid
Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec)
Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec)
active power (pu) active power (pu) active power (pu)
reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu) reactive power (pu)
Vdc
Vdc*
Fig. 6.1.1: Simulation Model of DFIG with mppt and fuzzy pitch controller.
6.1.2 Doubly Fed Induction Generator Control parameter initialization
Name of parameter Variable name Value taken
Capacitance DC_link 0.060
Inertia constant J 0.010
Frequency[Hz] Fnom 60
Friction factor F 5.040
R_L inductance L_Rl 0.300
Rotor inductance Llr 0.156
Stator inductance Lls 0.171
Mutual inductance Lm 2.9
PWM Frequency[Hz] PWM_freq 1620
Rated output[W] Pmec 9000000
Base output[W] Pnom 10000000
R_L resistance[ohm] R_RL 0.003
Vw
wi nd
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
stator_curent
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
rotor_ccurent
Vabc
Q_ref
wr
Iabc_s
Iabc_r1
Q
angle_rotor
Vdc
P
Vabc_r
rotor si de control
[Q]
reacti ve power
Discrete,
Ts = 5e005 s.
powergui
i s_dp<0.2
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
gri d_curent
[P]
acti ve power2
[P]
acti ve power1
[P]
acti ve power
Generator speed (pu)
Pitch angle (deg)
Wind speed (m/s)
Tm (pu)
Wi nd Turbi ne
[Va]
Vph_gri d
v
+

Vo
v
+

Vin_meas
Vdc_nom
Vdcref
[Q]
[P]
[Va]
Va_ph
[Vdc]
V_cap
g
A
B
C
+

Uni versal Bri dge
g
A
B
C
+

Uni versal Bri dge
[T]
Torque P Pitch (deg)
Speed & Pi tch Control
Scope5
Scope4
Scope3
Scope2
Scope1
Scope
A
B
C
A
B
C
R_l
0
Qref (pu)
m
wm
thetam
P
wr
wref
MPPT_Control l er
0
Iq_ref (pu)
[Ia]
I_gri d_phase
Vabc
Iabc
A
B
C
a
b
c
Gri d vol tage and current
Vabc
Iqref
Iabc_g
Vdc
Iabc
Vabc_g
Q
P
Gri d si de control
[Iabc_s]
[Iabc_g]
[Vabc]
[Iabc_r]
[wr]
[Iabc]
[T]
[Pi tch_deg]
[vcr]
[vcg]
[angl e]
[wr1]
[wr]
Gen_speed1
[wr]
[Iabc_r]
[Iabc_s]
[Pi tch_deg]
[P]
[wr1]
[Vdc]
[Vdc]
[vcr]
[vcg]
[Iabc_g]
[Vabc]
[Vabc]
[Iabc]
[angl e]
[Q]
[wr]
[Vdc]
From
ABCFi l ter
0.9 Mvar
Q=50
Uref Pulses
Di screte
PWM Generator1
Uref Pulses
Di screte
PWM Generator
Cl ock1
C1
Tm m
A
B
C
a
b
c
Asynchronous Machine
pu Units1
N
A
B
C
575 vol tage source
i
+

2
Vph_grid Vph_grid
Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec) Wr (rad/sec)
Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec) Torque (rad/sec)
activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu) activ e power(pu)
Vdc
Vdc*
reactiv e power(pu)
Rotor resistance[ohm] Rr 0.005
Stator resistance[ohm] Rs 0.00706
sampling time Ts_power 5.0e05
Rated dc Voltage Vdc_nom 1200
Rated Voltage Vnom 500
no of pole pair P 3
Tracking power at c Power_c 0.730
Tracking speed at c Speed_c 1.20
Table 6.1 DFIG Control parameter
6.2 RESULTS
This chapter also gives the results that obtained in this thesis, along with their
description. The MATLAB/ SIMULATION provide a convenient tool for the electrical
systems. The DFIG control scheme being studied has been simulated using matlab.
Previously the basic structure of wind energy conversion system WECS
employing for DFIG was discussed. The aerodynamic characteristics of the wind
turbine and control and operation of various power electronic blocks for DFIG based
variable speed constant frequency generation system were also discussed. In this
chapter the proposed scheme of variable speed constant frequency wind generation
system in which the stator windings of DFIG are connected to the utility grid directly and
the rotor connected through PWM converter. This model is suitable for various wind
velocity. Here also various MPPT scheme applied and the result taken for conclusion.
6.2.1 First Method using Power Point Tracking Characteristics
These simulation results give the information about the active and reactive power
control. Here objective is to achieve zero reactive power, maximum active power and
constant DC link voltage. Based on this report it is flexible to extend the design.
Simulation result shows the controlled reactive power and active power, and constant DC
link voltage.
Fig. 6.2: First Simulation results.
Detailed results of simulations performed are given in Fig.6.2. It can be seen from
the Fig.6.2 that in the case of 1
st
method the maximum active power (pu) cannot be
achieved but zero magnitude of reactive power (pu) is achieved. Here the simulation of
Va shows the phase voltage (469.48 volt). This simulation shows the speed of the
generator remains constant and DC link voltage response is strongly varying for 0.1
seconds then becomes stable near to reference voltage (1200 Volts).
6.2.2 Second Method using MPPT curve implemented as lookup table
Simulation results of DFIG shows that the second method gives the controlled
reactive power and active power, and also maintains the DC link voltage constant. The
second method achieves the reactive power output zero faster than the first method but
this method works only for some particular wind velocities.
Fig. 6.3: Second Simulation results.
It can be seen from the Fig.6.3 that in the case of 2
nd
method the maximum active
power (pu) cannot be achieved but zero magnitude of reactive power (pu) is achieved.
DC link voltage response is highly varying whereas it remains fairly stable after few
seconds in the 1
st
method.
6.2.3 MPPT method.
The main advantage of this method is that it is applicable for different wind
velocity. Here the active power also controlled and gives the maximum power output i.e.
nearly 50% of the rated power which is shown in the MPPT curve for 10 m/s wind
velocity. First and Second method shows that controlled reactive power (pu) and constant
DC link voltage achieved, but active power (pu) cannot be achieved.
Fig 6.4: Third Simulation results.
Fig. 6.4 shows that in the case of proposed method the maximum active power
achieved. The simulation result shows that accuracy of this method is better than the
previous methods. In this case also the DC link voltage remains constant at 1200 volts
after 0.27 second which shows the better output than the previous two methods.
6.2.4 Proposed method for MPPT corresponding to the fuzzy pitch controller:
In this method fuzzy pitch controller is used . Here the active power also
controlled and gives the maximum power output i.e. nearly 60% of the rated power which
is shown in the MPPT curve for 10 m/s wind velocity. First and Second method shows
that controlled reactive power (pu) and constant DC link voltage achieved, but active
power (pu) cannot be achieved. In this proposed method more active power is achieved
and smoothing of power output of WECS is superior than the conventional methods.
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Time(sec)
P
r
e
f
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Time(sec)
S
m
o
o
t
h
A
c
t
i
v
e
P
o
w
e
r
(
p
.
u
.
)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Time(sec)
D
C
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
(
V
o
l
t
)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Time(sec)
P
i
t
c
h
A
n
g
l
e
(
D
e
g
r
e
e
)
Fig. (6.5) Proposed Fuzzy pitch controller Simulation
Results
Fig. 6.5 shows that in the case of proposed method the maximum active power
smoothing is achieved. The simulation result shows that accuracy of this method is better
than the previous methods. In this case also the DC link voltage remains constant at 1200
volts after 0.20 second which shows the smooth output than the previous three methods.
This Fig. also shows the variation of pitch angle in the range of (0 to 5 degrees). The
comparative simulation result show that the active power is increased from 0.4 to nearly
0.55 p.u. and the output power is smoother as compared to other method.
CHAPTER7
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time(sec)
A
c
t
i
v
e
P
o
w
e
r
(
p
.
u
.
)
With fuzzy pitch controller
With conventional pitch controller
7.1 CONCLUSION
Due to winds unpredictable nature, power management concepts are necessary to
extract as much power as possible from the wind when it becomes available. The work
presented in this thesis studied peak power tracking in WECS using fuzzy logic
controlled based pitch controller for power smoothening. The variable speed constant
frequency (VSCF) wind generation system is being simulated in MATLAB/ Simulink
software with an algorithm to track peak power points of wind turbine and a control
scheme has been implemented to control active and reactive power injected in to the
grid. The knowledge of the wind turbine aerodynamic characteristics is unnecessary in
order for the maximum power point tracking algorithm to work.
In the proposed wind energy conversion system (WECS) a DFIG converts the
mechanical energy derived from wind turbine into electrical energy. As the voltage
and frequency of generator output maintain along the wind speed change, PWM
converter is utilized to maintain constant dc link voltage. The proposed scheme has been
tested with the variable wind speed signal and the peak power tracking as well as smooth
power is observed. Proposed scheme gives a low cost and high quality power conversion
solution for variable speed WECS. The proposed method is compared with other
conventional MPPT methods which show its effectiveness for extracting the maximum
power as well as smoothing the power output of wind energy conversion system.
7.2 FUTURE WORK
DFIG modelling and control system helps to increase the use in electrification.
So fuzzy logic controller can be developed for implementation in DFIG. The Maximum
power point tracking scheme helps in proper exploitation of the wind power available at
any site thus leading to increased annual energy capture. As the wind speed is always
fluctuating, improved control concepts are needed for proper tracking process. Vector
control with application adaptive control techniques can be developed for proper
implementation of maximum power point tracking scheme. As a next step of this
dissertation work, one can experimentally implement the algorithm on a low power
wind turbine using field programming gate array (FPGA) techniques or using digital
signal processors (DSP), also implementing these techniques for fault ride through. In
addition to this, the proposed work MPPT in WECS may be extended to hybrid DG
system consisting of wind and photovoltaic energy resources.
REFERENCES
[1] S.M. Muyeen,Junji Tamura Toshiaki MurataStability Augmentation of Grid
connected Wind Farm Springer 2009
[2] Malcom Barnes, Practical variable speed drives and power electronics,
Newness press, Elsevier, Oxford, Burlington, 2003.
[3] Chichester, UK. Hindmarsh, J., Grid Integration of Wind Energy Conversion
Systems, John Wiley and Sons, England, 2005
[4] Ackermann Thomas, Wind Power in Power Systems, John Wiley and Sons,
England, 2005.
[5] Boldea, I, Variable Speed Generators , Taylor and Francis, 2006.
[6] .R. Pena, J.C. Clare, G.M. Asher, "Doubly fed induction generator using back
toback PWM converters and its application to variablespeed windenergy
generation," IEEE Proc.Electr. Power Appl., Vol. 143, No. 3, May 1996.
[7] A. Beugniez, T. Ghennam Centralized supervision of reactive power
generation for a wind farm Power Electronics & Application European
conference on 25 sep 2007. On page(s): 110 ISBN: 9789275815108.
[8] Jamal A. Baroudi, Venkata Dinavahi, Andrew M. Knight, A review of power
converter topologies for wind generators, Renewable Energy, vol.32, No. 14,
pp. 23692385, Nov. 2007.
[9] SeungHo Song, Shinil Kang, Nyeonkun Hahm, Implementation and control
of grid connected ACDCAC power converter for variable speed wind energy
conversion system, vol. 1, pp. 154158, Feb 2003.
[10] A. Miller, E. Muljadi, and D. S. Zinger, A variable speed wind turbine power
control, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol. 12, pp. 181187,June 1997.
[11] Ekanayake, J.B, Holdsworth, L, Wu, X., Jenkins, N. Dynamic modelling of
Doubly Fed Induction generator wind turbines. IEEE Transaction on Power
Systems, 2003, 2:803809.
[12] S. K Salman and Babak Badrzadeh School of Engineering, The Robert Gordon
University, IEEE paper on New Approach for modelling DoublyFed Induction
Generator (DFIG) for gridconnection studies.
[13] R. Datta, V.T. Ranganathan, Variable speed wind power generation using
doubly fed wound rotor induction machine a comparison with alternative
schemes, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 17 (3) (2002) 414421.
[14] R. Datta, V.T. Ranganathan, A method of tracking the peak power points for a
variable speed wind energy conversion system. IEEE Transactions on Energy
Conversion, vol. 18, pp. 163168, No. 1, March 2003.
[15] H. Joanne, An Adaptive Control Algorithm for Maximum Power Point
Tracking for Wind Energy Conversion Systems, MS Thesis, Queens
university, Department of Electrical and computer Engg. , Canada, December
2007.
[16] H. E. M. Lopez, Maximum power tracking control scheme for wind
generator systems, MS Thesis, Texas A&M university, Department of
Electrical Engg. , Texas, December 2007.
[17] Jamal A. Baroudi, Venkata Dinavahi, Andrew M. Knight, A review of power
converter topologies for wind generators, Journal of Renewable Energy,
vol.32, No. 14, pp. 23692385, Nov. 2007.
[18] L.Szabo, K.A.Biro, C.Nicula and F.Jurca, Useful Simulation Tool for Induction
Generators Used In Wind Power Plants IEEE Conference on clean electrical
power (ICCEP). Page(s) 574579; 2123 May 2007.
[19] Eftichios Koutroulis and K. Kalaitzais, Design of maximum power point
tracking system for windenergyconversion applications, IEEE
Transactions on industrial electronics, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 486494, April 2006.
[20] Q. Wang and L.C. Chang, An intelligent maximum power extraction
algorithm for inverterbased variable speed wind turbine systems, IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 19, pp. 12421249, September 2004.
[21] K.V.V. Suresh, Performance investigations of wind energy conversion
system, M.tech Thesis, IIT Roorkee, Department of Electrical Engg. , IIT
Roorkee, June 2004.
[22] G. Moor and H. Beukes, Power point trackers for wind turbines, Power
Electronics Specialist Conference (PESC), pp. 20442049, 2004.
[23] A. B Raju, K. Chatterjee, B. G. fernandes, A Simple Maximum Power Point
Tracker for Grid connected Variable Speed Wind Energy Conversion System
with Reduced Switch Count Power Converters, power electronics
specialist conference, vol. 2, pp. 748753, June 2003.
[24] J.G.Slootweg, H.Polinder and W.L. Kling, Dynamic modeling of a wind
turbine with doubly fed induction generator IEEE PES, Vol. 1, Page(s):644
649,July 2001
[25] R. Hilloowala and A. M. Sharaf, A rulebased fuzzy logic controller for a
PWM inverter in a stand alone wind energy conversion scheme, IEEE
Transactions Industrial Applications, vol. IA32, pp. 5765, Jan. 1996.
[26] M. Ermis, H.B. Ertan, E. Akpinar and F. Ulgut, Autonomous wind energy
conversion system with a simple controller for maximum power transfer,
IEE PROCEEDINGSB, Vol. 139, No. 5, pp. 421428, September 1992.
[27] Shiri, A.; Vahedi, A.; Shoulaie, A. The effect of parameter variations on the
performance of indirect vector controlled induction motor drive Power
Electronics and Motion Control 5thInternationalConference Vol 2, Page(s):1
5. 1416 Aug. 2006.
[28] Tahami, F.; Shojaei, A.; A Novel Fault Tolerant Reconfigurable Concept
for Vector Control of Induction Motors Power Electronics and Motion Control,
12th International Conference. Page(s):1199  1204 .Aug. 2006.
[29] Hu, Y. He, Lie Xu and B. W. Williams, Improved Control of DFIG Systems
During Network Unbalance Using PIR Current Regulators IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 439451, Feb. 2009.
[30] F. Mei and B. Pal, Modal Analysis of GridConnected Doubly Fed Induction
Generators, IEEE Trans. on energy conversion, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 728736,
September 2007
[31] A. Tapia, G. Tapia, J. X. Ostolaza, and J. R. Senz, Modeling and
Control of a Wind Turbine Driven Doubly Fed Induction Generator, IEEE
Trans. on energy conversion, vol. 18, no. 2, pp.194204 June 2003.
[32] H. K.Davijani, A. Sheikholeslami, H. Livani and M. K.Davijani, Fuzzy
Logic Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generator Wind Turbine, World
Applied Sciences Journal, vol.6, no. 4, pp.499508, 2009
[33] Wei Qiao, Ganesh K. Venayagamoorthy,and R. G. Harley, Design of Optimal
PI Controllers for Doubly Fed Induction Generators Driven by Wind Turbines
Using Particle Swarm Optimization. 2006 IEEE International Joint
Conference on Neural Networks, Canada ,July 1621, pp.19821987, 2006.
[34] R. M. Hilloowala, and A. M. Sharaf, A RuleBased Fuzzy Logic Controller for
a PWM Inverter in a Stand Alone Wind Energy Conversion Scheme, IEEE
Trans. on industry applications, vol. 32, no. 1,pp. 5765, January/February
1996.
[35] R. M. Hilloowala, and A. M. Sharaf, A RuleBased Fuzzy Logic Controller for
a PWM Inverter in a Stand Alone Wind Energy Conversion Scheme, IEEE
Trans. on industry applications, vol. 32, no. 1,pp. 5765, January/February
1996.
[36] Amendola, C.A.M. Gonzaga, D.P. , FuzzyLogic Control System of a
VariableSpeed VariablePitch WindTurbine and a DoubleFed Induction
Generator, Seventh IEEE International Conference, I ntelligent Systems
Design and Applications, 2007. I SDA 2007, pp. 252 257, 2024 Oct. 2007.
[37] Z. Yongchang and Z. Zhengming, Comparative study of PI, sliding mode and
fuzzy logic controller for rotor field oriented controlled induction motor
drives,IEEE International Conference, Electrical Machines and Systems, 2008.
ICEMS 2008, pp. 1089 1094, 1720 Oct. 2008
[38] B.Chitti Babu , K.B.Mohanty DoublyFed Induction Generator for Variable Speed
Wind Energy Conversion SystemsModeling & Simulation International Journal of
Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, February, 2010 17938163
[39] G.D Rai , NonConventional Energy Sources, Khanna Publication, 1988
[40] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1994.
[41] M. Godoy Simoes and F.A.Farret, Renewable Energy Systems: Design and
Analysis with Induction generators, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004
[42] Renewable Energy Sources, Available online: http://www.teachers.ash.org.au
/jmresources/energy/renewable.html#general. (date: 10, Jan 2010).
[43] The Math works Inc.. Matlab and Simulink Documentation, Available online:
http://www.mathworks.com
[44] http://www.windpowerindia.com