Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Source: http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing−Lists/RedHat/2004−12/0511.html
Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:20:41PM −0500, Lew Bloch wrote:
>
>>"O'Neill, Donald \(US − Deerfield\)" :
>>
>>>I just came back from RH300 training..$2400. Passed the RHCE.. I'm
>>>selling the course material they gave us.. It includes 14 chapters plus
>>>labs..
>>>
>>
>>I'm sure enough RH employees are watching this list that if "O'Neill,
>>Donald \(US − Deerfield\)" is wrong, they'll tell him.
>
>
> They are aware of this auction and I'm surprised that eBay hasn't yanked
> the auction yet. As I understand it, this is a violation of the
> copyrights on the materials.
>
> I know at least 2 Red Hat instructors follow taroon−list (Hi Steve &
> Chuck!). I don't know if they follow redhat−list as well.
>
> For the rest of you, you should be aware that the RHCE is a privilege,
> not a right, and Red Hat does have the power to yank your certification
> if you violate any Red Hat training copyrights:
> "Should Participant violate any of Red Hat's copyrights or should
> Participant be a party to use or distribution of training materials that
> violates Red Hat's copyright, this Agreement will immediately terminate,
> and Participant may be subject to other civil claims."
> That's section 6 in https://www.redhat.com/training/certification/rhce/logos/
>
> Yup, if you bought this to get your RHCE, you could potentially be
> stripped of the RHCE honor.
>
Well using the logos is one thing. Selling material which is not bound
by the RHCE agreement is another. This directly from the agreement.
The copyright protects Red Hat's material which only means that someone
purchasing them can not make copies in any form. Selling the original
copy is not expressly forbidden in the agreement unless it contains
anything from this article:
5. Confidentiality
Above it mentions the labs and exam, but makes no mention of the study
kit, and the study kit is a seperate definition from the exam in the
definitions section. Basically the entire agreement can be read here:
https://www.redhat.com/training/certification/rhce_terms.html
Anyways, the best thing is for one to always check with RH if they have
any questions, and for them to read the agreement and decide for
themselves whether they are within the limits of the law and the agreement.
Personally I can not find anything forbidding the original poster from
selling his study guide. He can not sell his notes however as this is
forbidden in the agreement, and if he has written on the material, then
he could be in the wrong, however, I think it's up to Red Hat, and no
other entity to keep any person from selling their material.
Red Hat may change this in the future, or they may make some type of
claim on this issue, but I think we should let them decide, and not
spend so much personal time arguing over their or anyone elses legal
matters.
Wade
−−
redhat−list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat−list−request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat−list