P. 1
Kimberlin v. Walker 2nd Amd Comp Redacted

Kimberlin v. Walker 2nd Amd Comp Redacted

|Views: 3,426|Likes:
Published by himself2462
BK v AW 2013
BK v AW 2013

More info:

Published by: himself2462 on Apr 03, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/13/2014

pdf

text

original

1

IN TBE CIRC0IT C00RT 0F N0NTu0NERY C00NTY NARYLANB

BRETT KINBERLIN,
Plaintiff,

v. No. Cv S8u966-v

AAR0N WALKER, 7SS7 Remington Roau, Nanassas, vA 2u1u9
WILLIAN B0uE SR., 2u Riuge Roau, Westminstei, NB 211S7
R0BERT STACY NCCAIN, 294 Buinsiue Bi. Falling Wateis, Wv 2S419
ALI AKBAR, 2uu Capstone Biive, #1u8 Lynchbuig, vA 24Su2
anu
LYNN TB0NAS anu PETER u. NAL0NE, aka
KINBERLIN 0NNASKEB. 7u4 viewpoint Bi., St Chailes, IL 6u174
Befenuants.

"#$%&' ()#&'#' $%)*+(,&- .%/ '()(0#" .%/ '#.()(-,%&1 )(+,$,%2"
*/%"#$2-,%&1 3(/("")#&-1 "-(+4,&01 $%&"*,/($51 ,&6(",%& %. */,6($5
(&' ,&-#&-,%&(+ ,&.+,$-,%& %. #)%-,%&(+ ',"-/#""

Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin ("Kimbeilin") heieby files a Complaint foi Bamages against
Befenuants Aaion Walkei ("Walkei"), William Boge Si. ("Boge"), Robeit Stacy
NcCain ("NcCain"), Ali Akbai ("Akbai") anu Lynn Thomas anu Petei u. Nalone, aka
Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu ("K0") foi uefamation, malicious piosecution, haiassment,
stalking, conspiiacy, invasion of piivacy anu infliction of emotional uistiess.
&(-2/# %. -3# ($-,%&
1. This mattei aiises out of a multi-yeai campaign by Befenuants to smeai,
uestioy anu impiison Plaintiff by knowingly, maliciously, anu intentionally
filing numeious fiivolous, uefamatoiy anu malicious couit filings -- incluuing
civil suits, peace oiueis, anu ciiminal chaiges - anu then publishing false,
uefamatoiy, anu tasteless stoiies about those filings as if the allegations weie
tiue, all the time iaising funus fiom unsuspecting people who ieau the
stoiies.
2
2. Befenuants useu theii legal filings to stalk anu haiass Plaintiff, invaue his
piivacy anu inflict emotional uistiess on him anu his family.
S. Befenuants poitiayeu Plaintiff in a false light as engaging in ciiminal activity,
being a peuophile, iapist anu uomestic teiioiist, anu engaging in uomestic
violence.
4. Befenuants falsely wiote that othei taigets of theiis weie pait of "Team
Kimbeilin" anu publisheu that Plaintiff contiolleu, paiu, anu uiiecteu this
vast netwoik of "unsavoiy" opeiatives.
S. None of these poitiayals is baseu on ieality.
6. The uefamatoiy statements maue by Befenuants weie publisheu on the
Inteinet in vaiious foiums, incluuing blog posts, on Twittei, anu on message
boaius, anu weie wiuely accessible to the public both uiiectly anu by uoogle
seaiches, anu they weie seen by many people incluuing Plaintiff's business
associates, fiienus anu family. They weie also publisheu in numeious couit
uocuments fileu in couits in Nontgomeiy County anu Caiioll County
Naiylanu, Piince William County viiginia, anu 0niteu States Bistiict Couit in
uieenbelt, Naiylanu. They weie maue to vaiious law enfoicement officials.
7. Befenuants have peisisteu in theii smeai attacks uespite being askeu by
Plaintiff to be left alone, to iemove false posts, anu to iespect the piivacy of
Plaintiff anu his family.
8. Befenuants have piofiteu fiom theii attacks against Plaintiff by iaising funus
online using his name anu theii false naiiatives, couit filings anu uefamatoiy
S
publications to uemonize him. They have also obtaineu othei things of value
such as online tiaffic to theii websites.
9. Plaintiff has initiateu this action to iecovei compensatoiy uamages of moie
than $7S,uuu anu punitive uamages fiom Befenuants foi the substantial
injuiy they have causeu to Plaintiff by theii intentional infliction of emotional
uistiess anu theii intentional, malicious anu outiageous conuuct.
*(/-,#"
1u. Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin is the Biiectoi of }ustice Thiough Nusic, a Naiylanu
baseu Su1cS non-piofit that uses music to inspiie people to engage in civic
paiticipation. Plaintiff has helu that position foi almost ten yeais anu he
iesiues in Bethesua, Naiylanu.
11. Aaion Walkei is an unemployeu attoiney who iesiues in Nanassas, viiginia
who wiites a conseivative Inteinet blog calleu Alleigic2Bull, anu publishes
on vaiious othei online outlets incluuing Twittei.
12. William Boge Si. is a conseivative bloggei who iesiues in Westminstei,
Naiylanu anu wiites a blog calleu BogeWash. Be publishes on vaiious othei
online outlets incluuing Twittei.
1S. Robeit Stacy NcCain is a conseivative bloggei who iesiues in Bageistown,
Naiylanu who wiites a blog calleu The 0thei NcCain, anu publishes on
vaiious othei online outlets incluuing Twittei, viial Reau anu The Ameiican
Spectatoi.
14. Ali Akbai is the uiiectoi of The National Bloggeis Club who iesiues in Ft.
Woith, Texas anu Lynchbuig, viiginia, anu he publishes on vaiious Inteinet
4

1S. sites anu on Twittei. Be is the ieputeu boss of Walkei, Boge anu NcCain anu
has pioviueu each of them with iemuneiation.
16. Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu is an anonymous conseivative bloggei who has both a
website anu a Twittei account that weie specifically cieateu to attack
Plaintiff on a uaily basis.
17. The publications of the Befenuants aie available on the Inteinet in Naiylanu.
Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain anu Akbai have all tiaveleu to
Nontgomeiy County Naiylanu in the past yeai as pait of theii campaign anu
conspiiacy to attack, smeai, stalk anu haiass Plaintiff.
72/,"',$-,%& (&' 6#&2#
18. This Couit has peisonal anu subject mattei juiisuiction ovei this mattei
puisuant to Naiylanu Civil Coue.
19. venue is piopei because many, if not all of the acts occuiieu in Nontgomeiy
County Naiylanu, Plaintiff is a citizen of Naiylanu anu Nontgomeiy County,
the toits weie committeu in Nontgomeiy County, anu the injuiies weie
sustaineu in Nontgomeiy County.
"-(-#)#&- %. -3# .($-"
2u. In 2u1u, Plaintiff fileu a uefamation suit in this Couit against a bloggei nameu
Seth Allen. That suit iesulteu in a juugment in Plaintiff's favoi on Novembei
16, 2u11.
21. Befenuant Walkei, using the pseuuonym Aaion Woithing, attempteu to
assist Ni. Allen in post juugment motions until Plaintiff iuentifieu him as
S
Aaion Walkei, the publishei of a Nuslim hate blog calleu Eveiyone Biaw
Nohammeu. }uuge Quiik uenieu Befenuant Walkei's post tiial motion to
ueclaie Plaintiff a public figuie.
22. Aftei Befenuant Walkei was iuentifieu, he began stalking Plaintiff anu
haiassing him with couit filings anu uefamatoiy attacks. Be came to a couit
heaiing on }anuaiy 9, 2u12 anu assaulteu Plaintiff outsiue the couitioom. Be
fileu multiple ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff in Nontgomeiy County in
2u12, he fileu a civil suit against Plaintiff in Piince William County viiginia in
2u12, anu he fileu a civil suit against Plaintiff in 0niteu States Bistiict Couit
in uieenbelt in 2u12. All of these cases weie nolle piosseu oi uismisseu as
without meiit.
2S. In Naich 2u1S, Befenuant Walkei attempteu to file a Peace 0iuei against
Plaintiff in Nontgomeiy County but was uenieu.
24. In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Walkei fuithei stalkeu Plaintiff by attenuing,
uninviteu, a family couit mattei involving Plaintiff anu Plaintiff's wife, anu
then following the wife out of the couitioom, making contact with hei,
offeiing hei things of value, piepaiing false uocuments foi hei to file in couit,
anu auvising hei to make false allegations anu change hei allegations against
Plaintiff both ciiminally anu civilly. Befenuant Walkei then publisheu these
false allegations on his blog anu on Twittei, anu hau the othei Befenuants uo
the same on theii blogs anu on Twittei. These uefamatoiy publications by
Befenuant Walkei falsely stateu categoiically that Plaintiff is a iapist,
peuophile anu committeu uomestic violence against his wife.
6
2S. Piioi to meeting with Befenuants Walkei anu Boge, Plaintiff's wife hau
stateu iepeateuly in couit, in filings anu unuei oath that Plaintiff nevei
sexually abuseu oi engageu in uomestic violence. It was only aftei
Befenuants Walkei anu Boge manipulateu hei in a fiagile mental state anu
cieateu theii false naiiative, even typing uocuments foi hei to file, anu taking
hei to the couithouse, that she fileu the false uocuments.
26. Befenuant Walkei actually wiote anu typeu uefamatoiy couit uocuments
that he inuuceu Plaintiff's wife to file, anu Befenuant Walkei manipulateu hei
to uo so. Befenuant Walkei then wiote out hei entiie piesentation in couit,
tolu hei what to say, anu how to say it, knowing that it was false anu
uefamatoiy.
27. 0vei the past two yeais, Befenuant Walkei has publisheu hunuieus of blog
posts anu thousanus of Twittei tweets falsely accusing Plaintiff of numeious
ciimes anu othei nefaiious activity, incluuing iape, peuophilia anu uomestic
violence.
28. Befenuant Walkei has ieciuiteu Befenuants Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 to
wiite hunuieus of false anu uefamatoiy blog posts anu Twittei tweets ovei
the past yeai attacking Plaintiff as a ciiminal iapist anu peuophile who
commits uomestic violence.
29. Befenuant Walkei has stateu scoies of times on his blog, in Twittei tweets
anu elsewheie that his goal is to have Plaintiff impiisoneu anu have his
business uestioyeu.
7
Su. In 2u1S, Befenuant Boge fileu a false Peace 0iuei anu two malicious ciiminal
chaiges against Plaintiff in Caiioll County accusing Plaintiff of haiassing him.
That Peace 0iuei was uenieu in }une 2u1S anu the ciiminal chaiges weie
nolle piosseu in Apiil 2u1S.
S1. Befenuant Boge has wiitten liteially hunuieus of blog posts attacking
Plaintiff, anu uiiecteu attention to them with thousanus of Twittei tweets.
Be wiites a uaily "Team Kimbeilin Post of the Bay" which accuses Plaintiff oi
otheis he falsely states aie unuei the contiol of Plaintiff of engaging in some
type of ciiminal oi nefaiious activity. Ni. Boge has stalkeu Plaintiff by
attenuing couit pioceeuings that uo not involve him, anu then publishing
twisteu accounts of those heaiings that always poitiay Plaintiff in a negative
light.
S2. In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Boge fuithei stalkeu Plaintiff by attenuing a family
couit mattei involving Plaintiff anu Plaintiff's wife, anu then following the
wife out of the couitioom, making contact with hei, offeiing hei things of
value, piepaiing false uocuments foi hei to file in couit, anu auvising hei to
make false allegations against Plaintiff both ciiminally anu civilly. Befenuant
Boge then publisheu these false allegations on his blog anu on Twittei, anu
hau the othei Befenuants uo the same on theii blogs anu on Twittei. These
uefamatoiy publications falsely stateu categoiically that Plaintiff is a
peuophile, iapist anu committeu uomestic violence against his wife.
In }uly 2u1S, Befenuant Boge publisheu an online funuiaising tool on his blog to
ostensibly iaise funus foi Plaintiff's wife, anu foi hei legal iepiesentation
8
SS. by the same attoiney who iepiesenteu Befenuant Boge in his pievious
malicious filings against Plaintiff in Caiioll County. At least $S,uuu of those
funus weie then useu to pay foi that attoiney who theieby benefitteu fiom
the malicious legal action. This legal funuiaising tool is pait of a pattein of
conuuct that the Befenuants useu pieviously in othei couit cases, which
always iesulteu in attoineys anu Befenuants, incluuing Befenuant Walkei,
ieceiving a financial benefit while uefaming anu haiassing Plaintiff.
Befenuant Walkei also useu saiu legal uefense funus iaiseu in pievious
filings foi living expenses while claiming that he neeueu saiu funus because
Plaintiff causeu him to lose his pievious job, which was anothei false
naiiative. This pattein of conuuct of using Plaintiff to iaise funus keeps the
false naiiatives going, while eniiching the Befenuants.
S4. In August 2u1S, Plaintiff's wife auviseu Befenuants Boge, Walkei anu NcCain
that she uiu not want them iaising any money on hei behalf oi using hei
name foi any puipose, anu askeu them to iemove all blog anu Twittei tweets
they hau publisheu about hei since }uly 9, 2u1S because they weie
inaccuiate anu haimful to hei family. She also askeu Befenuant Boge to
iefunu all the uonations he has gotten using hei name. Befenuants iefuseu to
iemove the blog posts anu tweets, incluuing those posts asking people to
senu money foi Plaintiff's wife.
SS. In }uly anu August 2u1S, Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 all
publisheu blog posts anu tweets quoting fiom a uefamatoiy filing piepaieu
by Befenuant Walkei in the Family Couit case. That filing falsely accuseu
9
Plaintiff of iape, peuophilia anu uomestic violence. Befenuant Walkei also
piepaieu a uefamatoiy filing that he manipulateu Plaintiff's wife to file with
the Nontgomeiy County State's Attoiney falsely accusing Plaintiff of ciiminal
activity. That ciiminal chaige was nolle piosseu on August 2S, 2u1S.
S6. The State's Attoiney ioutinely expunges cases that aie nolle piosseu within a
shoit peiiou of time. Bespite this, Befenuant Boge, piioi to expungement,
went to the Bistiict Couit, got a ceitifieu copy of the uefamatoiy filing, anu
then posteu it online in oiuei to cause Plaintiff haim. Be infoimeu otheis
about the posting anu askeu them to spieau it on the Inteinet, which they uiu
in oiuei to cause Plaintiff moie haim fiom the false ciiminal chaige that they
cieateu, wiote anu causeu to be fileu.
S7. The State's Attoiney, Nontgomeiy County Police Bepaitment anu the
Bepaitment of Social Seivices all founu that the Befenuant-cieateu
allegations of iape, peuophilia anu uomestic abuse weie wholly without
meiit, anu theiefoie uismisseu all chaiges anu investigations.
S8. 0n August 2S, 2u1S, Plaintiff's wife fileu to uismiss the Family Couit case anu
also askeu the Couit to seal all the iecoius in the cases. She tolu Befenuants
Walkei, Boge anu NcCain about the uismissal, anu tolu them that the
allegations Befenuant Walkei wiote foi hei in couit filings anu online weie
inaccuiate. Befenuant Walkei iesponueu by falsely suggesting that Plaintiff
was blackmailing Plaintiff's wife. Befenuant Walkei uigeu hei to uestioy
Plaintiff's family by continuing with the false naiiatives he piepaieu foi hei.
Befenuant Walkei then iefuseu hei iequests to iemove posts¡aiticles
1u
alieauy wiitten by him, anu claimeu that Plaintiff was an unfit fathei anu that
Plaintiff's wife knew it, anu she shoulu leave him anu take hei chiluien fiom
him as soon as possible.
S9. Befenuant Akbai stateu on oi about August 18, 2u1S, that he contiols
Befenuants Boge, Walkei anu NcCain anu can oiuei them to stop posting
negative stoiies about a taigeteu peison.
4u. Befenuant Akbai tweeteu many times in }uly anu August 2u1S, that Plaintiff
is a ciiminal peuophile, iapist anu abusei of women.
41. Befenuants Walkei, Boge, NcCain, Akbai anu K0 piomoteu the unauthoiizeu
funuiaising tool anu piofiteu fiom the money iaiseu. Befenuant Boge, who
contiolleu the money iaiseu thiough his PayPal account, iefuseu Plaintiff's
wife's uemanu that all the money be ietuineu to the uonois, insteau saying
he woulu give it to chaiity. Befenuant Boge latei stateu that he paiu $Suuu of
the iaiseu funus to the attoiney who iepiesenteu Plaintiff's wife in a two
houi peace oiuei heaiing.
42. Befenuant NcCain publisheu accounts on Befenuant Akbai's anu his "#$
%&#$' ()*+,- anu .,'+/ R$+0 websites in which he calleu Plaintiff a vile,
sauistic, anu abusive peison. Be attackeu a iepoitei fiom the Washington
Post who wiote a positive stoiy about Plaintiff's family in 2uu7 calling hei
anu the Washington post "agents of evil." Be went even fuitheiing a }uly 16,
2u1S web post:
"The 1+2#,-3&4- 542& is a uisgiace to jouinalism that employs hiieu liais
like Nonica Besse. The 1+2#,-3&4- 542& anu Nonica Besse aie engageu in a
conspiiacy to conceal the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin. In 2uu7, Nonica
Besse uiu not tell the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin, anu in 2u1S, she will not
11
tell the tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin. The tiuth about Biett Kimbeilin has
nevei been piinteu in the1+2#,-3&4- 542&, noi will it evei be. No honest
peison woulu woik foi the 1+2#,-3&4- 542&, which only publishes evil lies."

Be fuithei attackeu Plaintiff's 14 yeai olu uaughtei in at least one tweet on
August 28, 2u1S.
4S. Befenuant K0 has cieateu a website calleu Kimbeilin 0nmaskeu anu a
Twittei site ÇKimbeilinunmask at which he falsely accuses Plaintiff of
vaiious ciimes incluuing peuophilia, iape anu uomestic violence. These sites
aie intenueu to smeai anu haim Plaintiff's ieputation with false allegations,
innuenuo, speculation, false associations anu false accusations of supeivision.
44. 0n Fiiuay 0ctobei 11, 2u1S, Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain appeaieu
live on a iauio piogiam hosteu by Befenuant Akbai anu iepeateu theii
uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff. Anu they stateu that the uocuments
they cieateu anu wiote foi Plaintiff's wife weie tiue uespite hei withuiawing
them anu telling them that they weie false.
4S. Befenuants aie not legitimate jouinalists anu they uo not follow the Society
of Piofessional }ouinalist Coue of Ethics. Aftei the filing of this lawsuit,
Befenuant Boge has attempteu to cieate the false impiession that he is a
jouinalist by paying a fee foi a membeiship in a jouinalist society.
-89 +:;<=>?<1 *9:@9 %AB9A< :CB $A>D>C:E $8:AF9<
46. Befenuant Walkei has fileu the following lawsuits, Peace 0iueis anu ciiminal
chaiges against Plaintiff since }anuaiy 2u12:
• }anuaiy S1, 2u12, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, 0ne Count Peijuiy
(nolle piosseu Febiuaiy 1u, 2u12)
12
• Apiil 17, 2u12, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, Five Counts Peijuiy (nolle
piosseu Apiil Su, 2u12)
• }anuaiy Su, 2u12, Piince William viiginia Ciicuit Couit, Nultiple Counts
Alleging Ciiminal anu Civil Toits (uismisseu by juuge Becembei 4, 2u12)
• }une 22, 2u12, 0niteu States Bistiict Couit Naiylanu, uieenbelt, Nultiple
Civil Toits, (uismisseu by juuge Novembei 26, 2u12)
• Naich 1S, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, Peace 0iuei (uenieu by
juuge on Naich 1S, 2u1S)
• Becembei 2u11, Nontgomeiy County Ciicuit Couit, numeious filings foi Seth
Allen alleging fiauu anu peijuiy (uenieu }anuaiy 9, 2u12)
• }uly Su, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, piepaieu pleauing in
Family Couit mattei alleging iape anu uomestic violence (uenieu August 12,
2u1S)
• }uly 29, 2u1S, Nontgomeiy County Bistiict Couit, piepaieu ciiminal chaige
foi thiiu uegiee sexual assault (nolle piosseu August 2S, 2u1S)
47. Befenuant Boge has fileu the following Peace 0iueis anu ciiminal chaiges
against Plaintiff since Febiuaiy 18, 2u1S:
• Febiuaiy 18, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, Two Counts Baiassment
(nolle piosseu Apiil 17, 2u1S)
• Naich 22, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, 0ne Count Baiassment (nolle
piosseu Apiil 17, 2u1S)
• Naich 22, 2u1S, Caiioll County Bistiict Couit, Peace 0iuei (uenieu Naich 29,
2u1S)
1S
• Apiil S, 2u1S, Caiioll County Ciicuit Couit, Peace 0iuei Appeal (uenieu }uly
2, 1u1S)
48. Plaintiff has been iequiieu to iesponu to many of the above fiivolous anu
malicious legal filings, anu has been foiceu to appeai in couit to attenu
manuatoiy heaiings on moie than a uozen occasions, incluuing having to
uiive long uistances to Nanassas, viiginia wheie the Piince William County
Ciicuit Couit is locateu, anu to Westminstei, Naiylanu wheie the Caiioll
County Couits aie locateu.
49. Plaintiff has expenueu legal fees to an attoiney to iepiesent him in one of the
Peace 0iueis in Caiioll County. Plaintiff has boine costs of iesponuing
incluuing mailing, copies, tiansciipts, auuio files, tianspoitation anu othei
costs.
Su. Some specific examples of Befenuants' uefamatoiy publications aie as
follows:
(:AGC H:EI9AJ(EE9AF>@KL=EE1 -;>??9AM(:AGCHGA?8>CF1 0:N9??9
• August 28, 2u1S-Bethesua uazette-Comments believeu to be wiitten oi
uiiecteu by Befenuant Walkei unuei one oi moie names-Biett.committeu
iape
• August 1S, 2u1S-vile, Biett Kimbeilin's Nanipulation of Bis Baughtei
• August 12, 2u1S- Biett Kimbeilin is an out-anu-out peuophile
• August 6, 2u1S-The Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin's "Biass Knuckle Befense"
• August S, 2u1S-So Why is the Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin Nau at 0s
• August S, 2u1S-Foi the Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin, It's All About the Kius
14
• August 1, 2u1S-if you just believe in helping get hei kius away fiom hei
peuophile husbanu
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Peuophile Biett Kimbeilin violates A Bomestic violence
Piotective 0iuei
• }uly Su, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin is a Peuophile
• August 1u, 2u1S-Twittei-Lu is the paiu tioll of peuophile Biett Kimbeilin
• August 1u, 2u1S-Twittei-I suggest we iechiisten Team Kimbeilin as Team
Peuophilia
• August 6, 2u1S-Twittei-The Peuophile #BiettKimbeilin Biass Knuckle
Befense
• August S, 2u1S-Twittei-Why is Peuophile #BiettKimbeilin Nau At 0s
• August 4, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin will have his tiial. But I uon't have
to wait to call him a peuo.
• August S, 2u1S-Twittei-Yes, #Biett Kimbeilin is a peuo iegaiuless of chaiges
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#Biett Kimbeilin violates A Bomestic violence
Piotective 0iuei
• }uly Su, 2u1S-Twittei-next heaiing uate will be in ciicuit couit, wheie
PeuoBiett tenus to lose.
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin is a Peuophile
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-What uoes #Biett Kimbeilin, who tiieu to have sex
with a 12-yeai olu, ueseive.
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-I am not calling him allegeuly anything. Be is a
peuophile.
1S
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-So I am going to say something uefinitive. #Biett
Kimbeilin is a peuophile.
H>EE>:D 3GF9J3GF9;:<8 :CB -;>??9A M;OO8GF9
• August 1S, 2u1S-She not only neeus help with the legal expense involveu in
getting heiself anu hei uaughteis fiee fiom Biett, she neeus help iesettling
heiself
• August 14, 2u1S- The Kimbeibots aie the fanboys, cheeileaueis, anu
enableis who tweet anu blog theii aumiiation anu suppoit foi The Bieau
Peuo Kimbeilin
• August 1S, 2u1S- You can uonate to help Tetyana get heiself anu hei chiluien
away fiom hei abusive husbanu. Click on the Tetyana's Funu link to leain
moie.
• August 1S, 2u1S- Tetyana Kimbeilin is tiying to get heiself fiee fiom hei
abusive husbanu. She is tiying to get hei chiluien away fiom hei peuophile
husbanu.
• August 12, 2u1S- Buiing that time, he has useu mentally abusive tactics to
keep hei anu hei chiluien bounu to him
• August 1, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin, Bieau Peuo Kimbeilin
• }uly Su, 2u1S- Bowevei, I uo believe that Biett Kimbeilin most likely is a
peuophile.
• }uly 29-August 1S, 2u1S-Twittei-Team Kimbeilin Post of the Bay (uiiecting
ieaueis to his Bogewash posts above)
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Twittei-Biett Kimbeilin:Peuophile.
16
/GP9A? "?:@Q )@$:>CJ-89 %?89A )@$:>C
• }uly 18, 2u1S-If Biett Kimbeilin hates you, he will uo anything within his
powei to haim you ÷ even though he ueiives no benefit fiom these
uestiuctive acts othei than the sauistic vengeful pleasuie of inflicting haim.
• }uly 18, 2u1S- Evil is what Biett Kimbeilin is. Evil is what Biett Kimbeilin
uoes. Eveiyone who assists Biett Kimbeilin is an accomplice to evil, anu
silence about Biett Kimbeilin's evil is a foim of assistance
(E> (IP:AJ-;>??9AJM:E>
• August 1S, 2u1S-Twittei-We'ie about to iaise some money foi an abuseu
immigiant tiying to escape #BiettKimbeilin.
• August 9, 2u1S-Twittei-pointeu out Biett Kimbeilin's peuophilia
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-Peuophile anu teiioiist bombei #Biett Kimbeilin
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei- Police, myself, anu eveiyone who has wiitten
seiiously on the mattei believe that #BiettKimbeilin killeu a gianuma to
sleep with a 1u yi olu.
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#Biett Kimbeilin has no moial equivalent this siue of
Satan.
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-#BiettKimbeilin is a peuophile.
• }uly S1, 2u1S-Twittei-So we've uncoveieu #BiettKimbeilin's big seciet: he's
a peuophile with othei peuophiles aiounu his chiluien!
4>DP9AE>C2C):<I9BJ4>DP9AE>C2CD:<I9B LEGF :CB -;>??9A
M4>DP9AE>C2CD:<I
17
• August 1S, 2u1S-Bill Schmalfelut is the woist misogynist I've evei heaiu of,
except Biett Kimbeilin
• }uly Su, 2u1S-I am going to ie-name Team Kimbeilin to Team Peuo. It's
shoitei anu it's in Biett Kimbeilin's honoi.
• August 1, 2u1S- The implications of Biett Kimbeilin selling viagia aie
uistuibing, consiueiing we aie talking peuophilia
• }uly 29, 2u1S-Biett Kimbeilin, Peuophile.
• }uly-August 2u1S-Kimbeilin0nmaskeu supeiimposeu a copyiighteu photo of
Plaintiff's face on to what is unueistoou to be a giaphic of a peuophilia beai
to poitiay Plaintiff as a peuophile. Be uiu this without consent.
S1. The statements of the Befenuants as set out above cast Plaintiff in a false
light.
S2. Befenuants' puipose in publishing the above statements was to cause injuiy
to Plaintiff's ieputation, business anu family.
SS. The false statements above have causeu Plaintiff seiious emotional uistiess,
embaiiassment, humiliation anu mental anguish.
S4. Plaintiff has iepeateuly askeu Befenuant Walkei anu Befenuant Boge to
leave him anu his family alone but they have continueu to haiass anu stalk
him anu his family, both online anu in peison.
SS. Plaintiff has askeu Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu to iemove copyiighteu
photos fiom his blog site but Kimbeilin0nmaskeu not only iefuseu to uo so
but actually posteu moie copyiighteu photos along with insults anu mocking
stating that he woulu nevei iemove any mateiial fiom the blog.
18
S6. Plaintiff's wife iepeateuly askeu Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain to
iemove posts about hei anu hei family fiom theii websites anu Twittei but
they have iefuseu to uo so.
$%2&- ,
):E>@>G=< *AG<9@=?>GC

S7. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
S8. Befenuants Walkei anu Boge have engageu in a pattein of filing abusive civil
suits, peace oiueis anu ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff, all of which have
been uismisseu oi uenieu, foi the puipose of cieating false naiiatives about
Plaintiff that they then publish as gospel, theieby haiming Plaintiff, his
business inteiests anu his family. These filings have been uone with malice
anu without piobable cause. Befenuants have useu these false, malicious
filings to iaise significant funus to eniich themselves.
S9. Befenuants' false anu malicious piosecutions have causeu Plaintiff to sustain
uamages.
6u. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious,
weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous
inuiffeience to Plaintiff.
61. Thus, in filing malicious legal actions against Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with
an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's
iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu
conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu to pay substantial punitive uamages.
$%2&- ,,
$GC<R>A:@Q ?G (P=<9 *AG@9<<
19
62. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
6S. Befenuants Walkei, Boge, Akbai, NcCain anu Kimbeilin0nmaskeu have
conspiieu to engage in a pattein of filing abusive civil suits, peace oiueis anu
ciiminal chaiges against Plaintiff, all of which have been uismisseu oi uenieu,
foi the puipose of cieating false naiiatives about Plaintiff that they then
publish as gospel, theieby haiming Plaintiff, his business inteiests anu his
family. These filings have been uone with malice anu without piobable
cause. Befenuants have useu these false, malicious filings to iaise significant
funus to eniich themselves.
64. Befenuants' conspiiacy of false anu malicious piosecutions has causeu
Plaintiff to sustain uamages.
6S. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious,
weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous
inuiffeience to Plaintiff.
66. Thus, in filing malicious legal actions against Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with
an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's
iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu
conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu to pay substantial punitive uamages.




$%2&- ,,,
'9S:D:?>GC
2u

67. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
68. Befenuants have intentionally, knowingly anu¡oi iecklessly publisheu anu
uisseminateu the false anu uefamatoiy statements iuentifieu above on the
Inteinet wheie they have been easily accessible, anu weie accesseu my many
people, incluuing Plaintiff's family, chiluien, fiienus, business associates anu
actual anu piospective paitneis anu otheis.
69. The statements have causeu anu continue to cause substantial injuiy to
Plaintiff, his business anu peisonal well-being.
7u. The statements have causeu anu continue to cause ueep embaiiassment,
humiliation, oppiobiium, emotional uistiess anu mental suffeiing to Plaintiff.
71. Befenuants' false anu uefamatoiy statements anu the implications uiawn
fiom them conceining Plaintiff aie uefamatoiy 6$' 2$ because they allege vile
ciimes anu make Plaintiff appeai ouious, infamous, anu¡oi fiightening.
72. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements to thiiu paities
who ieasonably unueistoou the publisheu statements to be uefamatoiy.
7S. Befenuants weie awaie of the uefamatoiy implication of theii statements
about Plaintiff, anu intenueu anu enuoiseu the uefamatoiy implication.
74. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff
even though they knew that Plaintiff hau tolu them to leave him anu his
family alone.
7S. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements about Plaintiff
with knowleuge of theii falsity anu¡oi ieckless uisiegaiu foi theii tiuth.
21
76. Alteinatively, Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements
about Plaintiff negligently as the tiuth oi falsity of what they weie saying.
77. Each of the Befenuants was uiiectly involveu anu iesponsible foi the false
anu uefamatoiy statements that weie publisheu about Plaintiff.
78. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements with both
common law anu actual malice, anu with the intent of haiming Plaintiff.
79. Befenuants publisheu these false anu uefamatoiy statements uay aftei uay,
week aftei week, with the attacks becoming moie aggiessive anu nastiei as
time piogiesseu.
8u. Befenuants also publisheu these uefamatoiy anu false statements in oiuei to
inciease tiaffic to theii blogs anu to iaise money fiom unsuspecting ieaueis
who believeu theii statements.
81. Befenuants' false anu uefamatoiy statements have causeu Plaintiff to sustain
uamages.
82. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious,
weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff, anu weie maue with a callous
inuiffeience to Plaintiff.
8S. Befenuants iefuseu Plaintiff's iequest to be left alone anu iefuseu Plaintiff's
wife's iequest to iemove the uefamatoiy anu false statements uespite
knowing that what they hau publisheu about Plaintiff was false anu
uefamatoiy anu hau causeu uamage to Plaintiff anu his family.
84. Thus, in publishing the numeious false anu uefamatoiy statements about
Plaintiff, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi
22
callous inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. As a iesult of
Befenuants' outiageous anu iepeateu conuuct, Befenuants shoulu be oiueieu
to pay substantial punitive uamages.
$%2&- ,6
.:E<9 +>F8? ,CT:<>GC GS *A>T:@Q

8S. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
86. Befenuants' statements anu aiticles above containeu false statements,
iepiesentations oi imputations about Plaintiff that place him in a false light.
87. As stateu in Count III above, Befenuants falsely uepicteu Plaintiff a iapist,
peuophile anu uomestic violence abusei,
88. Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu uepicteu Plaintiff's face on a peuophilia beai
giaphic in oiuei to falsely uepict Plaintiff as a peuophile.
89. The false light in which Befenuants placeu Plaintiff woulu be consiueieu
highly offensive to a ieasonable peison.
9u. Befenuants weie each complicit in anu iesponsible foi casting Plaintiff in a
false light.
91. Befenuants uisseminateu theii aiticles on theii websites wheie they weie
wiuely available to anu accessible by membeis of the geneial public in
Naiylanu anu beyonu.
92. Befenuants knew that theii actions anu statements hau the effect of casting
Plaintiff in a false light but neveitheless continueu to uo so week aftei week,
aiticle aftei aiticle anu tweet aftei tweet.
2S
9S. Alteinatively, Befenuants weie negligent in the publication of theii
statements about Plaintiff, the effect of which was to poitiay Plaintiff in a
false light.
94. Befenuants' poitiayal of Plaintiff in a false light, as stateu above, causeu
substantial injuiy to Plaintiff's ieputation, business inteiests, anu mental
well-being.
9S. Befenuants' placing Plaintiff in a false light has causeu Plaintiff to sustain
substantial uamages.
96. Befenuants' actions against Plaintiff weie willful, wanton anu malicious, anu
weie intenueu to uelibeiately haim Plaintiff.
97. Befenuants iefuseu Plaintiff's iequests to be left alone anu Plaintiff's wife's
iequest to iemove the uefamatoiy aiticles anu tweets knowing that what
they hau publisheu hau cast Plaintiff in a false light anu hau causeu seiious
injuiy to him.
98. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi caieless
inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous
conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages.
$%2&- 6
3:A:<<D9C?

99. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
1uu. Plaintiff has iepeateuly askeu Befenuants, both uiiectly anu inuiiectly,
to be left alone.
1u1. Befenuants have iefuseu to leave Plaintiff alone anu they have
publisheu anu continue to publish false anu uefamatoiy aiticles anu tweets
24
about Plaintiff on a iegulai anu even uaily basis. Befenuant Boge publishes a
"Team Kimbeilin" post of the uay. Befenuant Kimbeilin0nmaskeu cieateu a
blog anu a Twittei account specifically to attack Plaintiff with haiassing anu
uefamatoiy publications. Befenuant NcCain haiasses Plaintiff on his blog
with iegulai attacks, anu even attacks people who publish positive aiticles
about Plaintiff oi his family. Befenuant Akbai issues oiueis to the othei
Befenuants to attack Plaintiff, anu then uoes so himself.
1u2. Befenuants Walkei anu Boge have appeaieu at couit heaiings
involving Plaintiff in which they weie not a paity. 0n }uly 9, 2u1S,
Befenuants Walkei anu Boge followeu Plaintiff's wife out of a family couit
heaiing anu baugeieu anu fiighteneu hei, anu latei even wiote uefamatoiy
legal filings that they compelleu hei to file while she was suffeiing uuiess,
anu manipulateu hei into acquiescing to theii uemanus to haim Plaintiff.
When she tolu them that she wanteu nothing moie to uo with them,
Befenuant Walkei uefameu Plaintiff, calling him an unfit fathei. Be beggeu
hei not to iemain with hei Plaintiff husbanu.
1uS. Befenuants NcCain anu Akbai appeaieu at a family couit heaiing on
}uly 29, 2u1S, anu offeieu Plaintiff's wife things of value to tuin against
Plaintiff.
1u4. Plaintiff's wife askeu Befenuants Walkei, Boge anu NcCain to iemove
false anu haiassing blog posts anu tweets they hau publisheu about hei anu
Plaintiff but those iequests have been iefuseu.
2S
1uS. Aftei the filing of the oiiginal complaint in this case, Befenuants
ietaliateu against Plaintiff foi exeicising his statutoiy anu constitutional iight
to ieuiess in this case by incieasing theii haiassment of Plaintiff with moie
uefamatoiy blog posts, aiticles anu tweets. Befenuant Ali launcheu a new
Twittei account calleu ÇBombeiSues anu a new website calleu
www.bombeisuesbloggeis.com, which ietaliates against Plaintiff with
uefamation anu haiassment because he fileu this action.
1u6. Befenuants' haiassment has been a malicious couise of conuuct, anu
they have uone so in public places anu on the Inteinet foi the puipose of
seiiously annoying anu alaiming him.
1u7. Befenuants have haiasseu Plaintiff intentionally anu with malice in
oiuei to haim Plaintiff.
1u8. Befenuants' haiassment has causeu substantial uamage anu injuiy to
Plaintiff.
1u9. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi
caieless inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants'
outiageous conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages.
$%2&- 6,
,CSE>@?>GC %S #DG?>GC:E '><?A9<<

11u. Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
111. Befenuants, by engaging in a multi-yeai couise of conuuct of
malicious piosecution, stalking, haiassment, uefamation, invasion of piivacy,
anu conspiiacy, have causeu Plaintiff infliction of emotional uistiess.
26
112. Befenuants' conuuct has been intentional, ieckless, extieme anu
outiageous. The Befenuants have saiu that they want to uestioy Plaintiff, to
iuin his family anu business anu to see him impiisoneu. They have cieateu
false naiiatives anu fileu anu conspiieu to file malicious legal complaints in
oiuei to haim Plaintiff anu line theii pockets with uonations fiom
unsuspecting ieaueis.
11S. Theie is a causal anu uiiect connection between the Befenuants' wiongful
conuuct anu Plaintiff's emotional uistiess.
114. The uistiess causeu by Befenuants' conuuct has been seveie anu causeu
substantial uamage anu injuiy to Plaintiff.
11S. Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive to
Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous conuuct waiiants the
imposition of significant punitive uamages.
$%2&- 6,,
"?:EI>CF

1uS Plaintiff incoipoiates paiagiaphs 1-49 above.
1u4 Befenuants Walkei, Boge, Ali anu NcCain have engageu in a couise of
conuuct of appioaching anu puisuing Plaintiff knowing that conuuct
ieasonably placeu Plaintiff in ieasonable feai of assault.
1uS Befenuants' stalking has placeu Plaintiff in ieasonable feai of assault. This
ieasonable feai is baseu on an assault of Plaintiff by Befenuant Walkei on
}anuaiy 9, 2u12 in the Nontgomeiy County Ciicuit Couithouse when he
came to a heaiing uninviteu anu attackeu Plaintiff. That assault lanueu
Plaintiff in the hospital. Befenuant Walkei has iepeateuly stateu that he
27
caiiies weapons anu that he wants to uestioy Plaintiff. Befenuants Walkei
anu Boge tolu Plaintiff's wife that they want to put Plaintiff in piison foi the
iest of his life.
1u6 Befenuant Walkei has iepeateuly calleu state anu feueial law enfoicement
officials anu maue false iepoits to them that Plaintiff has committeu ciimes.
Befenuant Walkei calleu the FBI on oi about August 12, 2u1S anu tolu them
to suipiise Plaintiff's wife at a location known to him, anu Befenuant Walkei
tolu the FBI falsely that Plaintiff's wife woulu pioviue eviuence of ciimes by
Plaintiff to the FBI. When the FBI talkeu with Plaintiff's wife, she stateu that
Plaintiff uiu not commit the ciimes allegeu by Befenuant Walkei.
1u7 Befenuants have stalkeu Plaintiff intentionally anu with malice in oiuei to
haim Plaintiff.
1u8 Befenuants' stalking has causeu substantial uamage anu injuiy to Plaintiff.
1u9 Thus, Befenuants acteu with an impiopei anu outiageous motive oi caieless
inuiffeience to Plaintiff's iights anu inteiests. Befenuants' outiageous
conuuct waiiants the imposition of significant punitive uamages.
/#U2#"-#' /#+,#.
WBEREF0RE, Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin iespectfully iequests that the Couit entei
juugment as follows:
1. Awaiuing Plaintiff compensatoiy, consequential, anu speculative uamages in
an amount in excess of $7S,uuu;
2. Awaiuing Plaintiff punitive uamages of no less than $1 million;
S. Awaiuing Plaintiff costs anu othei expenses; anu
28
4. Awaiuing Plaintiff such othei anu fuithei ielief as the Couit ueems just anu
piopei.
72/5 '#)(&'
Plaintiff Biett Kimbeilin heieby uemanus a juiy tiial on all claims tiiable.
Bateu this 1
st
uay of Apiil, 2u1S.
Respectfully submitteu,
Biett Kimbeilin
81uu Beech Tiee Roau
Bethesua, NB 2u817

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->