P. 1
Ramone Borrome, A044 824 479 (BIA Apr. 7, 2014)

Ramone Borrome, A044 824 479 (BIA Apr. 7, 2014)

|Views: 264|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reopened and terminated proceedings sua sponte following the decision in Borrome v. Att’y Gen., 687 F.3d 150 (3d Cir. 2012), which held that the respondent was not removable but did not remand the case for further proceedings. The Board stated that because the respondent was “in the unusual position of having a federal court order which vacated the removal order while simultaneously having a final administrative order of removal,” it would “reopen proceedings sua sponte and terminate proceedings so as to remove any confusion which may result from this situation.” The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins Blanch.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reopened and terminated proceedings sua sponte following the decision in Borrome v. Att’y Gen., 687 F.3d 150 (3d Cir. 2012), which held that the respondent was not removable but did not remand the case for further proceedings. The Board stated that because the respondent was “in the unusual position of having a federal court order which vacated the removal order while simultaneously having a final administrative order of removal,” it would “reopen proceedings sua sponte and terminate proceedings so as to remove any confusion which may result from this situation.” The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins Blanch.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Apr 16, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/29/2014

pdf

text

original

U.S.

Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board ofImmigration Appeals Office of the Clerk
Ft1/ls Ch11rcli. Virginia 22041 5/07 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000

Bryan DiGregory, Esq. 1524 Delancey Street, 4th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102

OHS LIT.Nork Co. Prison/VCR 3400 Concord Road York, PA 17402

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: BORROME, RAMONE

A 044-824-479

Date of this notice: 4/7/2014

Enclosed is a courtesy copy of the Board1s decision in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

DCWtL clYVL)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure Panel Members: Adkins-Blanch, Charles K.

Trane Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Ramone Borrome, A044 824 479 (BIA Apr. 7, 2014)

U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board ofImmigration Appeals Office ofthe Clerk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 20530

BORROME, RAMONE A044-824-479 C/O YORK ICE 3400 CONCORD ROAD YORK, PA 17402

OHS LIT ./York Co. Prison/VCR 3400 Concord Road
York, PA 17402

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: BORROME,RAMONE

A 044-824-479

Date of this notice: 4/7/2014

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

DonnL ca.J\A)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure Panel Members: Adkins-Blanch, Charles K.

Trane Userteam: Docket

Cite as: Ramone Borrome, A044 824 479 (BIA Apr. 7, 2014)

11.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review Falls Church, Virginia 20530

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

File:

A044 824 479

-

York, PA

Date:

APR -7 2014

In re: RAMONE BORROME IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS MOTION ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

APPLICATION: Reopening; termination of proceedings

The Third Circuit issued an order dated July 18, 2012, in which it granted the petitioner's (alien's) petition for review, reversed the Board's March 28, 2011, decision, and vacated the order of removal. A mandate issued on September 10, 2012. Although the Third Circuit granted the petition for review, it did not remand the case to the Board for further proceedings. Thus, the respondent (alien) is in the unusual position of having a federal court order which vacated the removal order while simultaneously having a final administrative order of removal. In light of the above, the Board will reopen proceedings sua sponte and terminate proceedings so as to remove any confusion which may result from this 1 situation. Accordingly, the following orders will be entered: ORDER: The Board reopens proceedings sua sponte. FURTHER ORDER: The respondent's removal proceedings are hereby terminated.

"'

1

A courtesy copy of this decision will be sent to respondent's attorney before the Third Circuit­

Thomas M. Griffin, Esquire.

Cite as: Ramone Borrome, A044 824 479 (BIA Apr. 7, 2014)
.GWMf%
_

qilQ_@&.._......l

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->