This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

### Publishers

Scribd Selects Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Scribd Selects Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

P. 1

Lag and Lead compensators|Views: 13,055|Likes: 144

Published by HariPriyan

See more

See less

https://www.scribd.com/doc/21946616/Lag-and-Lead-compensators

07/08/2014

text

original

Compensation Techniques

• Performance specifications for the closed-loop system

**Æ T , M (settling time, overshoot) or phase and gain margins • Steady-state response Æ e (steady state error)
**

s s ss

• Stability • Transient response

**• Trial and error approach to design Performance specifications
**

Root-locus or Frequency response techniques

Synthesis

Analysis of closed-loop system

No

**Are specifications met?
**

Yes

D2

Basic Controls

1. Proportional Control

+ E(s) M(s)

K

G(s)

M (s) = K E (s)

m (t ) = K ⋅ e (t )

2.

Integral Control

+ E(s) K s M(s)

G(s)

M ( s) K = s E (s)

m ( t ) = K ∫ e ( t ) dt

Integral control adds a pole at the origin for the open-loop: • Type of system increased, better steady-state performance.

•

Root-locus is “pulled” to the left tending to lower the system’s relative stability.

D3

3.

**Proportional + Integral Control
**

+ E(s)

K Kp + i s

M(s)

G(s)

M ( s) K K p s + Ki = Kp + i = E ( s) s s

m (t ) = K p e (t ) + ∫ K i e (t )dt

− Ki K p

A pole at the origin and a zero at

are added.

4.

**Proportional + Derivative Control
**

+ E(s)

K p + K d s M(s)

G(s)

M ( s) = K p + Kd s E ( s)

m ( t ) = K p e (t ) + K d

de (t ) dt

• Root-locus is “pulled” to the left, system becomes more stable and response is sped up. • Differentiation makes the system sensitive to noise.

D4

5.

**Proportional + Derivative + Integral (PID) Control
**

M(s)

+ -

E(s)

K p + Kd s +

Ki s

G(s)

M ( s) K = K p + Kd d + i E ( s) s

m ( t ) = K p e (t ) + K

d

de (t ) + K dt

i

∫ e (t )dt

• More than 50% of industrial controls are PID. • More than 80% in process control industry. • When G(s) of the system is not known, then initial values for Kp, Kd, Ki can be obtained experimentally and than fine-tuned to give the desired response (Ziegler-Nichols). 6. Feed-forward compensator

D5

+ -

E(s)

Gc (s )

M(s)

G(s)

Design Gc(s) using Root-Locus or Frequency Response

techniques.

D6

**Frequency response approach to compensator design
**

Information about the performance of the closed-loop system, obtained from the open-loop frequency response: • Low frequency region indicates the steady-state behavior. • Medium frequency (around -1 in polar plot, around gain and phase crossover frequencies in Bode plots) indicates relative stability. • High frequency region indicates complexity. Requirements on open-loop frequency response • The gain at low frequency should be large enough to give a high value for error constants. • At medium frequencies the phase and gain margins should be large enough. • At high frequencies, the gain should be attenuated as rapidly as possible to minimize noise effects. Compensators • lead:improves the transient response. • lag: improves the steady-state performance at the expense of slower settling time. • lead-lag: combines both

D7

Lead compensators

1 Ts + 1 T = Kc Gc (s ) = K c a 1 aTs + 1 s+ aT s+

T > 0 and 0 < α < 1

• Poles and zeros of the lead compensator:

−

1 aT

−

1 T

• Frequency response of Gc(jω):

**The maximum phase-lead angle φm occurs at ωm , where: 1−α sin φm = and 1+α
**

1 1 logωm = logT + log 2 aT

Æ

ωm =

1 a T

D8

Since

1 + jω T 1 + jω aT =

ω =ω m

1 a

the magnitude of Gc(jω) at ωm is given by:

Gc ( jωm) = Kc a

**Polar plot of a lead network
**

a ( jω T + 1) ( jωaT + 1)

where 0 < a < 1

is given by

D9

**Lead compensation based on the frequency response
**

Procedure: 1. Determine the compensator gain Kcα satisfying the given error constant. 2. Determined the additional phase lead φm required (+ 10%~15%) for the gain adjusted (KcαG(s)) open-loop system. 3. Obtain α from

sin φ m = 1− a 1+ a

4. Find the new gain cross over frequency c from

**Kc a G( jωc ) = 10 log a
**

5. Find T from c and transfer function of Gc(s)

T = 1 a ωc

and

Ts + 1 aTs + 1

Gc (s ) = K c a

**General effect of lead compensator:
**

• Addition of phase lead near gain crossover frequency. • Increase of gain at higher frequencies. • Increase of system bandwidth.

D10

Example: Consider

+ 4 s (s + 2 )

Gc(s)

G(s)

where

G (s) =

Performance requirements for the system: Steady-state: Transient response: Kv = 20 phase margin >50° gain margin >10 dB

Analysis of the system with Gc(s) = K For Kv = 20 This leads to:

Æ

K = 10 phase margin § 17° gain margin § G%

**Design of a lead compensator:
**

G c (s ) = K c a Ts + 1 aTs + 1

4K a

c 1. K v = lim sGc (s )G(s ) = 2 = 2K c a = 20 s →0

Æ K α=10

c

D11

2. From the Bode plot of KcαG(jω), we obtain that the additional phase-lead required is: 50° - 17° = 33°. We choose 38° (~33° + 15%) 3. 4.

sin φ m = sin 38 , = 1− a 1+ a

Æ α = 0.24

**Since for m, the frequency with the maximum phase-lead angle, we have:
**

1 + jωmT 1 = 1 + jωmaT a

**We choose c , the new gain crossover frequency so that ωm = ωc This gives that:
**

K c aG( jωc ) = 40 jωc ( jωc + 2)

and

G c (s )G (s ) s = jω = 1

c

has to be equal:

1 = −6.2dB a

−1

**From the Bode plot of KcαG(jω) we obtain that
**

40 = − 6 .2 dB at jω c ( jω c + 2 )

c = 9 rad/sec

D12

5.

**This implies for T 1 1 ωc = = = 9rad/ sec aT T 0.24 and
**

Kc = 20 = 41 .7 2a

Æ

1 = 4.41 T

G c (s ) = 41 . 7

s + 4 . 41 s + 18 . 4

**The compensated system is given by:
**

+ 41.7(s + 4.41) s + 18.4

4 s(s + 2)

The effect of the lead compensator is: • • • • Phase margin: from 17° to 50° better transient response with less overshoot. c : from 6.3rad/sec to 9 rad/sec the system response is faster. Gain margin remains \ . acceptable steady-state response. Kv is 20, as required

Æ Æ

Æ

D13

Bode diagram for

K c ⋅ a ⋅ G ( jω ) =

40 jω (jω + 2)

**Bode diagram for the compensated system
**

G c ( j ω )G ( j ω ) = 41 . 7 j ω + 4 . 41 4 ⋅ j ω + 18 . 4 j ω (j ω + 2)

D14

Lag compensators

1 Ts + 1 T G c (s ) = K c β = Kc 1 β Ts + 1 s+ βT s+

T>0, >1

Poles and zeros:

1 T

1 βT

Frequency response:

Polar plot of a lag compensator K.(jT+1)/(jT+1)

D15

Bode diagram of a lag compensator with Kc

1 βT

1 T -20log

Magnitude of (jT+1)/(jT+1)

D16

**Lag compensation based on the frequency response
**

Procedure: 1. Determine the compensator gain Kcβ to satisfy the requirement for the given error constant. 2. Find the frequency point where the phase of the gain adjusted open-loop system (KcβG(s)) is equal to -180° + the required phase margin + 5°~ 12°. This will be the new gain crossover frequency c. 3. Choose the zero of the .425038,947 octave to 1 decade below c .

% ,9 ,-4:9

4. Determine the attenuation necessary to bring the magnitude curve down to 0dB at the new gain crossover frequency

− K c β G ( j ω c ) = − 20 log β

Æ

5. Find the transfer function Gc(s). General effect of lag compensation: • Decrease gain at high frequencies. • Move the gain crossover frequency lower to obtain the desired phase margin.

D17

Example: Consider

+ Gc(s) G(s)

where

G (s ) = 1 s (s + 1 )(0 . 5 s + 1 )

Performance requirements for the system: Steady state: Transient response: Kv =5 Phase margin > 40° Gain margin > 10 dB

**Analysis of the system with Gc(s) = K
**

K v = lim KG (s ) = K = 5

s →0

**for K = 5, the closed-loop system is unstable Design of a lag compensator:
**

1 T = K β Ts + 1 G c (s) = K c c 1 β Ts + 1 s+ βT s+

D18

1. K v = lim Gc (s )G(s ) = K c β = 5

s→0

2. Phase margin of the system 5G(s) is -13° the closed-loop system is unstable. From the Bode diagram of 5G(jω) we obtain that the additional required phase margin of 40° + 12° = 52° is REWDLQHG DW
rad/sec. The new gain crossover frequency will be: c = 0.5 rad/sec 3. 3ODFH WKH ]HUR RI WKH ODJ FRPSHQVDWRU DW %
rad/sec( at about 1/5 of c). 4. The magnitude of 5G(jω) at the new gain crossover frequency c =0.5 rad/sec is 20 dB. In order to have c as the new gain crossover frequency, the lag compensator must give an attenuation of -20db at ωc. Therefore - 20log = - 20 dB

5 = 0 .5 , β

pole :

Æ

Æ

= 10

5. and

Kc =

1 = 0 . 01 βT

G c (s ) = 0 . 5

s + 0 .1 s + 0 . 01

D19

Bode diagrams for: • G1(jω) = 5G(jω) (gain-adjusted KcβG(jω) open-loop transfer function), • Gc(jω)/K = Gc(jω)/5 (compensator divided by gain Kcβ = 5), • Gc(jω)G(jω) (compensated open-loop transfer function) The effect of the lag compensator is: • • • • • The original unstable closed-loop system is now stable. The phase margin § acceptable transient response. The gain margin § G% acceptable transient response. acceptable steady-state response. Kv is 5 as required The gain at high frequencies has been decreased.

Æ

Æ Æ

D20

**Lead-lag compensators
**

1 1 s+ T1 T2 β sT1 + 1 sT2 + 1 Gc (s) = Kc ⋅ = Kc ⋅ 1 γ γ s T1 + 1 sβT2 + 1 s+ s+ aT βT2 γ 1 s+

T1, T2 > 0 , > 1 and γ > 1 Frequency response:

**Bode diagram of a lag-lead compensator given by
**

1 s+ T1 Gc (s ) = K c γ s+ T1 1 s + T2 1 s + βT2

with Kc = 1, = = 10 and T2 = 10 T1

D21

**Polar plot of a lag-lead compensator given by
**

1 s+ T1 Gc (s ) = K c γ s+ T1 1 s + T2 1 s + βT2

with Kc = 1 and =

**Comparison between lead and lag compensators
**

Lead compensator o High pass o Approximates derivative plus proportional control o Contributes phase lead o Increases the gain crossover frequency o Increases bandwidth Lag compensator o Low pass o Approximates integral plus proportional control o Attenuation at high frequencies o Moves the gain-crossover frequency lower o Reduces bandwidth

TCS-Model paper

Smith Chart Part 2

Smith Chart Part 1

Smith Chart (Introduction)

8086 Programming

- Read and print without ads
- Download to keep your version
- Edit, email or read offline

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

CANCEL

OK

You've been reading!

NO, THANKS

OK

scribd

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->