Dvd Fab Amend Rep
|Views: 151
|Likes: 0
Published by torrentfreak
dvdfab
dvdfab
More info:
Availability:
See more
See less
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK
ADVANCED ACCESS CONTENT SYSTEM LICENSING ADMINISTRATOR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LANNY SHEN d/b/a DVDFAB AND FENGTAO SOFTWARE INC., SUNREG TECHNOLOGIES LTD. d/b/a DVDFAB AND FENGTAO SOFTWARE INC., FENG TAO d/b/a DVDFAB AND FENGTAO SOFTWARE INC., SHEN XINLAN d/b/a AUDIO-DVD CREATOR, and JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and/or XYZ COMPANY d/b/a DVDFAB, RIPPERBLU-RAY.COM, DVDFABB.COM and DVDFFAB.COM, Defendants.
NO. 14-cv-1112 (VSB) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FENG TAO d/b/a DVDFAB AND FENGTAO SOFTWARE INC.’S MOTION TO AMEND INJUNCTION PURSUANT TO RULE 59(e)
Case 1:14-cv-01112-VSB Document 35 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 32
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................. 3
A.
Defendants’ Circumvention Software and Business Model ................................... 3
B.
Defendants’ Acts in Violation of the Preliminary Injunction Order ....................... 5
ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................ 13
A.
Feng Tao Lacks Standing to Make this Motion and Otherwise Admits Liability ................................................................................................................. 13
B.
Feng Tao Fails to Make the Requisite Showing to Modify the Preliminary Injunction Order Under Rule 59(e) ....................................................................... 15
1.
This Court Did Not Overlook Controlling Decisions Causing Clear Error or Manifest Injustice ........................................................................ 16
2.
This Court Did Not Overlook Factual Matters Constituting Clear Error or Manifest Injustice ........................................................................ 18
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 25
Case 1:14-cv-01112-VSB Document 35 Filed 04/21/14 Page 2 of 32
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases
Arnold v. Geary
, No. 09–CV–7299, 2013 WL 5951489 (S.D.N.Y. Nov.7, 2013) .............................................15
Bose Corp. v. Silonsonnic Corp.
, 413 F. Supp. 2d 339 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ......................................................................................17
Centrifugal Force, Inc. v. Softnet Comm’n, Inc.
, No. 08 Civ. 5463, 2009 WL 1059647 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2009) ............................................16
Chanel Inc. v. Lin
, No. C-09-4996, 2010 WL 2557503 (N.D. Cal. May 7, 2010) ...........................................21, 23
Concrete Mach. Co., Inc. v. Classic Lawn Ornaments, Inc.
, 843 F.2d 600 (1st Cir. 1988) ....................................................................................................19
Curb v. MCA Records, Inc.
, 898 F.Supp. 586 (M.D. Tenn. 1995) ........................................................................................18
CyberMedia, Inc. v. Symantec Corp
., 19 F.Supp.2d 1070 (N.D. Cal. 1998) .......................................................................................18
Directv, Inc. v. Rosenberg
, No. 02 Civ. 2241, 2004 WL 345523 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2004) ..............................................14
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Sanchez
, No. 11-cv-1485, 2012 WL 2090439 (E.D. Cal. June 8, 2012) ................................................14
Dixon v. Ragland
, No. 03 Civ. 826, 2007 WL 4145453 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2007) .............................................13
Elrod v. Busch Entertainment Corp.
, No. 09cv164, 2011 WL 2600461 (E.D. Va. June 1, 2011) ......................................................14
Expediters Int'l of Washington, Inc. v. Direct Line Cargo Mgmt. Servs., Inc.
, 995 F. Supp. 468 (D.N.J. 1998) ...............................................................................................18
Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Petrojam, Ltd.
, 72 F. Supp. 2d 365 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) ........................................................................................15
Gucci America, Inc. v. Wang
, No. C-09-5969, 2011 WL 31191 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2011) ......................................................21
Case 1:14-cv-01112-VSB Document 35 Filed 04/21/14 Page 3 of 32
