P. 1
ICE Approach to Motion to Suppress

ICE Approach to Motion to Suppress

|Views: 4|Likes:
Published by J Cox

More info:

Published by: J Cox on Nov 04, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/27/2014

pdf

text

original

[Prepaced by Kcw yqrk Cily ICE Attorneys March 2009

]
Department)s Proposed Framework to Address l\llotions to Suppress Evidence
I) D:d Governr.lent Introduce
Un re I ated,1 n de pen den t
Evidence (e.g. admission5, prior
applications)?

If No, then move to Step 2
!
( -------
, If Yes?

• Ylotioll is 1\1oot
• No Need to Analyze
lv'rotion to Exclude
Evidence under Either
4th or SLlI Amenc!.mems
• Determine if
Government evidence
establishes alienage
and removability
2) Docs tl,c
meet fundamentn] ""\-I----,-----rIII ...
fairness, due process If! Ca:1't Admit 1'\0 need fUrL1er anaJyze
standards under the S!h i'o?, Evider.cc under the 41h Ameadment


If then move to Step 3
:.----
3) Did GovtTnJl}.cnt
"'"
to. ..
introduce Evidellct; )
from ,my alleged
41h Amendment per
Hudson/Harris?



If
i
Admit Evidence Move 01' ... detennining
Yes?
rcmovabHity
I
/
(
If No) then move to Step 4
4) Is the c" ide nee credi ble and waS it
gathered in connection with a pcaceflll
arrest? Iu other words, is the 4
111
Amendment violation comparable to
Lopez-Mendoza?
If yes, then not egregious, move on to
detcrmi n ing cemovabi!i ty.

then n10ve to Step 5 J

5j Ifviola!ion not comparable to
an nighttime enforcement action iJIVoh,jng dweflings )
would r.ot be) then presume DHS evidence is
and move fon.vard iJ) dcterminir.g
removability, willi both panics preserving illly ;ttl-.
issu:: for oou::nlial federal coUrl review,
----

In all scenados if
removability is \
not established
\
then termination ,.1
1
']
may be

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->