You are on page 1of 7

Choothia Akbar

Shameful Hindus who throng to watch Jodhaa-Akbar, a film which glorifies Hindu
hater Cruel Akbar, are worthy of getting killed by Terrorists! Hindus boycott 'Jodha
Akabar' Movie

Even historians have not realized piety signified in ‘marriage’ ceremony To show

Failure to understand the word ‘marriage’ mentioned in Islamic chronicle, Shri. Oak
writes, “Shrivastava says that King Raval Hariraya of Jaisalmer married his daughter to
Akbar. Here, he never realized that the word ‘marriage’ used by him is most

Raja Bhagawandas went to Jaisalmer to bring his daughter. He took this helpless princess
to harem of Akbar. This shows that nobody from Jaisalmer’s royal family took her to
Akbar. It was like sending a man and a cartful of food for demon Bakasur to eat
everyday. Every Hindu or Muslim king or Nawab had to offer his daughter to Akbar
irrespective of his surrendering to or giving a fight to Akbar since Akbar was extremely
lascivious. Kings like Bhagawandas and Mansingh, who had surrendered to Akbar, used
to advise other Rajputs that it was better to provide Akbar with their women and wealth
rather than fight with the powerful Emperor. As per their advice, except Maharana of
Udaypur, all the other kings and princes had surrendered to Akbar either by giving a fight
or without fight. After their surrender, they did not get away with sending just one
princess; but they had to send a carriage-full of women. How in a wedding, presents are
distributed to the people from one’s family as per their status, these Hindu women used to
be sent to army personnel of Akbar as gifts. Children of these Hindu women used to get
grow up hating Hindus since very young age and after growing up, they used to carry on
the legacy of killing Hindus, converting them and raping Hindu women.

On page 213-215, Shri. Shrivastava says, “King Ravalpratap of Banswada and King
Raval Asakarna of Dongarpur were induced to surrender to Akbar and since then, they

Even during the journey. On 26th June 1586 daughter of Rayasinh of Bikaner too entered the harem of Salim (Jehangir). the ruler of Tibet was asked to send his daughter for Akbar’s son Shahajada Salim (Jahangir). the ceremony would have taken place in the palace of Bikaner. Whole of Bikaner would have strongly condemned if such ceremony would have taken place in there. therefore. Bhagawandas and Mansinh. sacrifice his daughter. The princess of Dongarpur was sent to the harem of Akbar. Lunkarna and Birbal induced both the kings to conciliate with Akbar. Hindu princesses had to even take abuses hurled at them for being Hindus as Hindus were treated inferior. “Akbar used to ask for women belonging to his enemies’ families defeated by him and he used to call for Hindu women even for his relatives and friends. Akbar used to demand Hindu women for providing to relatives and friends Shri.were known as subjugates of Akbar. He says in the book that on 2nd February 1584. Rajputs refused to perform ‘kshour’ rites . there was a grand celebration of Salim’s wedding with daughter of King Bhagawandas in Lahore and in the year 1596. she went to the harem in Lahore on 1st January 1572. they used to avoid going and used to send their daughters through Bhagawandas and Mansinh with a little satisfaction that their daughter was sent (to hell) through a Hindu Rajput so that the daughters would be able to hear at least a few Hindu words in that hell. Akbar destroyed the sanctity of marriage. On Jodhbai’s death. Historians are describing these incidents as marriages which is totally wrong. Akbar was on his way to Fattehpur Sikri. He had to therefore. There is a reference of Akbar marrying two Hindu princesses to Salim (Jahangir) in a book authored by Shallot. e. but it was a matter of grief for Hindus. the two princes became agents of Akbar and they used mediate and send other Rajput princesses to Mughal harems. Salim was wedded to the daughter of Rayasinh. Hindu ladies from royal families were supplied to satiate Akbar’s sexual desires. It was a hell for Hindu women to spend the rest of their lives in dark prison like harems along with their co-wives with such dissipated and immoral Muslim husbands. Oak writes. In Hinduism. however. Oak has shown how to surmise the descriptions written by fanatic chronologists who were refugees of Akbar and who believed in keeping him happy. ‘marriage’ is a rite. Shri. Accordingly. Who will be ready to send his daughter willingly to a dissipated lustful Mughal king? This shows that the king of Tibet could not have sent his daughter along with his wealth unless he was threatened of getting his kingdom destroyed. It was natural to celebrate for Muslims as it was their policy to defile Hindu princesses. Both the kings brought princess of Dongarpur to Akbar’s camp. The princess of Dongarpur was taken to Akbar from her father’s shelter to Akbar’s camp. Moreover.g. Had it been ‘marriage’. It used to be deathly for the parents of such girls to sacrifice their daughters to Mughals.

Hindi film industry has this bad habit of showing all Muslim characters as very chivalrous. They took out their swords and planned to revolt. Akbar was bent upon insulting Rajputs in every possible way and wanted to make them helpless. page 385) by Colonel James Todd that Akbar ordered all Rajputs to perform ‘kshour (cut hair and beard)’ after Jodhbai’s death. pride and manliness. to make Rajputs perform the rites. He had no other option but to stay in the camp along with other Hindu Rajaput as a hostage. As Akbar heard about Bhoj’s resistance. The crux in this incident was that Jodhabai was from Jaipur’s royal family. they refused to get their hair cut and beat up the barbers. Finally. Even today. a Hindu father would not be ready to marry of his daughter to a Muslim. Rajputs were not ready to perform rites even after her death or observe mourning. He. Now even a very depraved king like Akbar is being glorified. even he did not dare to touch a hair of Rajputs. It has been 402 years since Akbar’s death.Now we shall study an incident that took place after Jodhabai’s death from the book written by Shri. by hook or by crook. Akbar had to personally go there and made peace with them. For every Rajput. Akbar’s name was actually Jalaluddin Mohamad and as the name suggests he was fiery. the very man who had brought him . He was the son of Rao Surajan whose capital was Fort Ranathambore. there was Raja Bhoj. They used to be ready to even sacrifice their lives to save their mustaches. Those against Raja Bhoj. but even now. Oak. Akbar thought it very insulting that Rajputs were not ready to perform rites for Jodhabai as she was his slave. the thought of marrying one’s daughter to a Muslim is loathsome For the past 60 years. It is given in the book titled ‘Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan’ (Part 2. On the other hand. How bad it must have been even earlier? Hindus have to now decide whether they want to believe in a so-called love story produced by a film producer with his eyes only on earning money or have faith in the proven history told by a virtuous person and protect our women folk. King Bhoj thought that what right did Akbar has to force upon us such rites and ask us to cut our hair. tried. but his plan did not succeed. informed Akbar about the incident that the barbers sent by him were beaten up by Hada Rajput and they refused to observe mourning for Jodhabai. mustaches was a sign of his honour. he ordered that Raja Bhoj should be fettered and his mustache should be cut. Bhoj Raja was a valiant king. Among the protesters. When barely 18-19 years of age he got Behramkhan. Akbar was very particular about others obeying his orders and their bowing before him. Therefore. When the barbers reached the camp of Hada Rajput. The news reached Hada camp and all the occupants were enraged. Her name was written off by Rajput since she was taken to his harem by Akbar and as such she was ostracized by the Rajputs and they felt that she was not a Rajput and did not deserve to be honoured in any manner. therefore. Such thought is very loathsome for a Hindu even today.

N. whether they were engaged formally. This is their ultimate objective. whether the wedding was held in the Hindu style with the antarpat and akshata. The monarch of Jaipur Bhagwandas accepted his sovereignty and gave the hand of his sister. murdered because he was lusting for Behramkhan’s wife. Shri P. Akbar the brute who molested several Hindu princesses ! The great India historian who can be equated to a sage. There is also some confusion regarding the words Jodhbai and and Jodhabai. One of them is associated with Akbar and the other with his son Salim (Jahangir). Islam teaches its followers that a Muslim has every right to snatch away everything from a kafir.’ . They abduct the Hindu girl and oppressing the kafirs force them to embrace Islam. One of the reasons for the deadly hatred of the Kshatriya kings for Akbar was his lust for their beautiful women. And it does not end at that. To save the honour of their women Rajputs even gave up their lives. the names of the Rajput power. Oak has written a well researched book titled ‘Akbar Thor nhavtaach’ meaning Akbar was certainly not great. In this way Akbar began to fill his harem with Rajput women. So Jodha Akbar is only one aspect of misdeeds of Akbar of grabbing Hindu women. Akbar being a powerful Muslim he thought it was his duty to use as many women from Hindu kingly families as possible. whether the wedding procession had taken the chief royal road and whether banquets were being organised for months together to entertain people of all levels from the groom’s darbar ? It is absolute foolishness that without even little evidence the claim is made that a Hindu princess married Akbar. Akbar had also developed the superiority complex that he would become the emperor by abducting their women and by way of his being a Muslim. So it is absurd to say that a Rajput king chose Akbar belonging to another country and who always remained in his harem drinking wine and smoking opium. whether the bride’s family had sent out invitations. Even the most ordinary Hindu man would prefer Hindu women to die instead of them being captured by Muslims. whether families of both the bride and groom were invited to the wedding.They think this is a praiseworthy act. In fact he was convinced that he was entitled to abducting Hindu women more than other women firstly because he was an emperor and secondly because he was a Muslim. who it is said was named Jodhabai in marriage to Akbar. Is it not important to substantiate whether the bride had formally accepted the groom. whether the bride’s relatives attended the wedding. ‘Even an ordinary person with no knowledge of Indian history could say that it was impossible for Akbar to marry a Rajput princess. as an ideal suitor for his daughter. Oak writes. So with his murder the path was clear to take Khan’s wife to his harem. This book elucidates many misdeeds of Akbar. In fact every Muslim youth even if he be poor always dreams of abducting a Hindu girl.

even threatened to kill them. Rajsingh and Jagannath who retaliated this attack and imprisoned them. However even the average reader will be able to substantiate the falsity of the above untrue story. “I would be elated if you would accept my daughter as your bride. Sangar. King Bharmalla had to finally surrender unto Akbar as he had no alternative and could no longer bear the destruction of his kingdom. even wage wars or kill their women to prevent them from being captured by the Muslims! Let us see why King Bharmalla had to surrender to Akbar. Falling prey to such attacks Bharmalla had to accept defeat.” And it is projected that Akbar married her as a favour on the king (actually he oppressed her in his harem). Then I will no longer remain in her debt. It is sheer madness to believe that a Rajput king got his daughter married to Akbar ( or for that matter that other Rajput princesses married Muslim emperors/sultans) when it is well known how Rajputs would do anything. In his book in some places Shri Oak has already made a reference to this book. At Sambhar using Islamic tactics of attack they treated them cruelly.Usually men were not allowed to see even the hands or feet of the beautiful Rajput women . It was not a wedding.Here King Bharmalla of Jaipur came to greet him and pleaded with him to marry his daughter as if it were a great opportunity that he seized to grab this excellent Muslim youth emperor crossing his territory. He was the head of department of history at the Agra University and has three doctorates to his credit . Sharfuddin attacked Bharmalla’s kingdom time and again and created terror. Bharmalla is believed to have pleaded with him saying. The average reader and historian both think that the above story is true.Threat of destroying the Hindu kingdom if the princess was not handed over to him ! How false and deluding the historical claim that the monarch of Jaipur happily consented to the marriage of his daughter to Akbar is is described by Shri Oak thus.” Let us now acquaint ourselves with the credentials of Shri Ashirvadilal Srivastav. To save these princes King Bharmalla was compelled to sacrifice his daughter to these sex- lorn Muslims. as a suitor for his daughter. Because this was akin to a man handing over his family cow to a Muslim butcher. Only then were the three captive princes released . The lesson in Ashirvadilal Srivastav’s book (pg 61 -63) says :-“ A commander from Akbar’s army. the author of ‘Akbar the Great’. cruel Muslim ? Certainly not. Sharfuddin captured three Rajput princes. rather a dacoity ! . When they were given so much protection by their men would a Rajput father hand over his own daughter to an unjust. Bharmalla was compelled to submit to all the conditions laid down by Akbar and handing over his daughter to Akbar was a part of that treaty.the 19 year old poor Akbar who had come to pay homage at the dargah of the fakir Moinuddin Chisti with pure. ‘An average history book narrates this incident as . religious emotion halted on the way to Ajmer at the Sambhar village .

If these were talks regarding marriage then would the Rajput king select a Muslim mediator for such an auspicious cause ?After Bharmalla’s surrender in this manner Akbar commanded Sharfuddin to attack another Rajput kingdom of Medta. They had lost their valour to give up their lives to protect the chastity of these women. in the Muslim darbar the Hindu girl would be projected as a Muslim by changing her name. As even uttering the name of a kafir was a sin for the fickle. etc. They would give up the woman and then out of shame never utter her name again saying that now “she was dead for them”. thousand horses. perpetrator.’ Why are details on the marriage of a Hindu girl not available ? When giving the causes for inability to trace the names of Rajput princesses along with Jodhabai . The abducted princesses were not only oppressed in the Muslim harems but also to prevent the Rajput . No details about their names . So they had no alternative but to let go of their women. silver. Kalyanmalla was the monarch of Bikaner. mothers. It was done only so that Akbar would not kill the three princes.But he was so obese that he could not even ride a horse because of which he was permitted to return to Bikaner. This alone is sufficient to testify that this was not a marriage. If this were a marriage then would he attack another Rajput kingdom in the same way ? By abducting Rajput princesses and taking them to his harem Akbar certainly did not insist on calling it a wedding.daughters. ‘Along with the daughter as per the treaty Bharmalla was compelled to gift Akbar with hundred elephants. This proves that Akbar’s army had unleashed terror by looting. In his book Srivastav has also recorded that when Akbar’s army was approaching Sambhar the entire village of Devsa on the way was deserted and fear-ridden. ‘It was impossible to call this abduction a marriage from the side of Rajputs because no religious ritual was performed. Jodhpur and other kingdoms to the harems of so-and-so Muslim sultan or emperor. etc.minded Muslims. the sanskar of Vivaha with the abductors was next to impossible.Shri Oak writes. jewels. sisters. are on record. A Muslim called Chagatikhan was nominated by Bharmalla to strike a compromise with Akbar. In this way these unfortunate Hindu women’s names were wiped out from both sides and never remained on record That is why history only has records of abduction of Hindu princesses from Basvada. His brother Kahan’s daughter had to be gifted to Akbar and him as a darbar hostage. In fact he could not care less whether the darbar recorded it as a wedding or not. etc. The Rajputs did not realise where down the line they lost their courage. See how useless our historians who have studied this history are. Besides. etc. Yet Muslim protagonist teachers and professors from the very beginning have quietly fed this falsity down the generations in such a way that none has dared to oppose this. This army was certainly not a happy marriage procession with music. Jaipur. plundering and murdering the villagers and raping their women. date of abduction. their warrior radiance.Further Shri Oak says. family. Till date historians have not dared to project to the world how all this was a type of slavery. Dongarpur. In this way like hungry crocodiles the Muslim attackers held the kings to ransom . gold . The kings had no option but to let go of their daughters akin to one caught in a crocodile’s jaw be it by head or foot.

’ .kings from revolting against them their Muslim perpetrators would keep those kings and their sons in the Muslim capital darbar under strict vigilance.