Capitalism

SENIOR PROJECT RESEARCH PAPER

BY JASON GERKEN

CAREER ENGLISH
MRS. CONLON
5/14/95

Today in the United States, a free market system or

capitalism is the
main economic system. I am interested in this subject because I
someday wish to
own my own business. I believe that in the future this topic will be
very
useful to me. Among the topics that I will discuss are the greeks and
romans
early practices of capitalism, the ideas of Joseph Schumpeter, Rush
Limbaugh,
and Karl Marx, corporations, regulation by the government, and
Reaganomics. I
will also discuss the relationship between inflation and unemployment.
In
addition, I will give my own perspective on the economic theories that
I'm
presenting. These are just a few of the things that I will be
discussing in this
paper.

HISTORY OF CAPITALISM

Many of the institutions of capitalism can be traced back to

Greek and
Roman times. Things such as trade, moneylending, and insurance were
well known
practices to them. Unfortunatly, growth of the Roman Empire prevented
further
development of a private business class. As power over economic growth
came
back to the people or lords during the Middle Ages, modern capitalism
started to
evolve. (The Software Toolworks Illistrated Encyclopedia)

In the late Middle Ages, the medieval economy was based on

MANORALISM.
This system said that peasants worked on the land that the lord's
owned, but
everthing that was produced by them was kept in return they had to
perform
services or pay dues to there lord. During this time period, there was
no
incentive to produce large and productive resources. The end of the
midieval
Manoralism was brought about by a larger demand for goods. Kings
competed
against lords, and lords competed with peasants for the rights to what
was
produced. As a result, there was an emergence of merchants and
businessmen who
accumulated large sums of capital. In addition, there was also a large
emergence of banks and the start of corporations. (Galbraith Pg. 58)
The only other economic system that got much attention was a
new idea
called Communism. A person named Karl Marx wrote a book called the
Communist
Manifesto which thought of the state as being the main controller of
economic
growth, unlike capitalism where the people in a free market are the
main
controllers of economic growth. In the 19th century when most of the
world like
Britan, France, Germany, and the United States were in the age of
Laissez-Faire
economic capitalism, other countries like the Soviet Union and China
followed
Karl Marx's Communism. (Galbraith Pg. 97)

Modern Capitalism

The main thing that drives capitalism today is the large

corporations
that are able to finance large operations to promote economic growth.
As
corporations got bigger and bigger, many liberals favored breaking up
corporations and putting them under state control. They pressed for
antitrust
laws to get a competitive economy. This meant that some corporations
that got
too big had to be broken up to make smaller companies in order to
create a
competitive economy. The large corporations fought back by saying that
they
were no less competitive than smaller businesses. An Austrian-American
economist named Joseph Schumpeter who argued in defense of large
corporations
said, "the prime mover in capitalist progress is not the small
businessperson
but the entrepreneur who introduces new technologies and develops
them." He
also said "Capitalism gives creative people the freedom to make
innovations,
unlike state-runned economies which tended to stifle this creative
force." He
also predicted that capitalism would eventually be replaced by some
form of
socialism in order to protect the people and the global environment.
(The
Software Toolworks Illistrated Encyclopedia)

Arguments for and Against

 Capitalism today differs from capitalism of the 19th century
because
of its dependence on the state. Today government is expected to take
measures
in order to stop inflation and unemployment. A British economist named
John
Maynard Keynes said, "government should spend more money in times of
slump, and
also reduce taxes in order to increase aggregate demand for goods and
services,
and in boom times the policies should be reversed to hold down
inflation." Most
liberal economists believed that large corporations ought to be broken
up and
nationalized so that their manager would be responsible to the public
as a whole.
(Lekachman Pg. 51)

Other conservative econimists stated that evan large

corporations were
ultimately controlled by the market where they sold their product and
the market
is subject to the desires of the public. Conservatives also pointed
out that
government spending by federal, state, and local governments amounted
to more
than one-fifth of the gross national product. The same thing seemed to
be
happening in other European countries like Sweeden, and Britain.
(Lekachman Pg.
62)

During the 1980's when Ronald Reagan was elected president it

signaled the return of capitalism as the dominant economic idea in the
United
States. Reagan's two main policies or objectives were to reduce the
size of
government and deregulate the economy. The main benefit of Reagan's new
policies of lower taxes and tax reform was the virtual elimination of
inflation.
As a result, the U.S. economy expanded and new records were set on Wall
Street.
Critics of Reagan favored tax and spend policies that would inflate the
economy
into what we are now seeing in Russia. As our National Debt got
larger, they
blamed it on Reagan, but as I see things it was caused by the Democrats
in
Congress during the 70's who authorized many new spending progams that
were not
able to be paid for. This is why there was such a problem with
inflation during
the 70's. I believe it to be unfair to blame him when we saw some of
the
biggest economic growth in the history of the U.S. during the 1980's.
Reagan,
as well as many other conservatives, believed that if you cut taxes,
it would give incentive to businesses to invest there marginal tax
dollars,causing them to earn more money and pay more taxes on their
earnings.
As a result you get rid of inflation and unemployment at the same time.
Critics
still protest, saying that these policies are unfair to poor people and
minorities. This statement has some truth to it, but in the words of
Rush
Limbaugh, "Capitalism, though not promising prosperity to all, greatly
improves
the lot of most and offers opportunity to all." (Limbaugh Pg. 273-274)

The concept that I talked about in the last page is called

supply-side
economics. Liberals think that if you cut taxes, you get less
revenue. Right?
Wrong! Actual revenues nearly doubled during the 80's from 550 billion
to 991
billion. To go even further I would like to see a flat tax
implemented. A 15-
18 percent flat tax rate would stimulate the American economy greatly.
This
would happen by giving huge incentive to everybody to make more money.
Of
course, some liberal might confuse you by saying that making money is
greedy.
Sure the rich will get richer, but their businesses will grow due to
the fact
that they will have more money to employ more people creating less
unemployment.
Also people currently avoiding taxes either legally or illegally will
be brought
into an evev system where they will not need to avoid taxes through
current
legal loop holes. The reason why people like Bill Clinton get elected
to be
president is because he plays the game of class warfare. Clinton did a
good job
of convincing the poor and the middle class that Reagan did them wrong.
Clinton
believes that the rich should be punished by higher taxes. I ask you,
"why
should you punish prosperity?" The main goal of the liberals and Bill
Clinton
is the reditribution of wealth. The key question to ponder is, " when
do
profits become unfair and excessive?" (Limbaugh Pg. 118-119)

In conclusion, capitalism is the best thing to help the

United States
economy grow. The entrepreneur is the person who makes this economy rum
smoothly and profitably. A creative person at the head of a company
can do alot
more than a person who is at the head of a state-runned bureaucracy.
This is
true because the entrepreneur has incentive to do the job correctly,
but the
bureacrat has none because he knows that his job will still be there
tomorrow no
matter how he performs. I will agree that pure capitalism won't work
because
you still need environmental laws and other laws to protect the
consumer.
However, problems begin when extreme socialistic views like Bill
Clinton's are
imposed.