You are on page 1of 5

LBSC744 Fall 2011 –Collaborative Planning Form (adapted from Toni Bueo (200!

""
COLLABORATIVE PLANNING PROCESS RUBRIC
Circle the description that best fts the candidate’s performance.
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify subject goals and objectives to be learned.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
Negotiated lesson topic The candidate discussed and
agreed on a topic with the SLMS
and classroom teacher.
The candidate discussed and agreed
on a topic with the SLMS.
The candidate did not discuss the
topic with partners.
Established purpose of
lesson
The candidate and partners
discussed the purpose of the
lesson. The partners agreed on the
content to be addressed.
The candidate and SLMS discussed
the purpose and content of the lesson
without the classroom teacher. The
purpose is not clear to the teacher.
The candidate did not discuss the
purpose or content with partners.
The purpose is unclear to partners.
dentified lesson
ob!ecti"es
The candidate and partners
connected information literac#
and content learning ob!ecti"es to
the topic.
The candidate and SLMS connected
information literac# learning and
some content ob!ecti"es to the topic.
The candidate independentl#
identified ob!ecti"es and
assessments. t is unclear how the
ob!ecti"es relate to the topic.
LBSC744 Fall 2011 –Collaborative Planning Form (adapted from Toni Bueo (200!""
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify subject goals and objectives to be learned.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
Negotiated lesson topic The candidate discussed and
agreed on a topic with the SLMS
and classroom teacher.
The candidate discussed and agreed
on a topic with the SLMS.
The candidate did not discuss the
topic with partners.
Established purpose of
lesson
The candidate and partners
discussed the purpose of the
lesson. The partners agreed on the
content to be addressed.
The candidate and SLMS discussed
the purpose and content of the lesson
without the classroom teacher. The
purpose is not clear to the teacher.
The candidate did not discuss the
purpose or content with partners.
The purpose is unclear to partners.
dentified lesson
ob!ecti"es
The candidate and partners
connected information literac#
and content learning ob!ecti"es to
the topic.
The candidate and SLMS connected
information literac# learning and
some content ob!ecti"es to the topic.
The candidate independentl#
identified ob!ecti"es and
assessments. t is unclear how the
ob!ecti"es relate to the topic.
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify the learning standard indicator that will facilitate learning content.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
dentified learning
standards for lesson
The candidate and partners
selected both content and
information literac# standards
that ha"e a strong connection to
the ob!ecti"es.
The candidate and the SLMS
selected information literac#
standards that somewhat connect to
the content ob!ecti"es.
The candidate independentl#
selected information literac#
standards that ha"e little or no
connection to the content ob!ecti"es.
Teacher and Candidate identify the learning task and formative assessments that guide the learner.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
$rticulated reading
comprehension strategies
for throughout lesson
The candidate and partners
articulated reading strategies
rele"ant to the lesson ob!ecti"es
The candidate and the SLMS
articulated reading strategies rele"ant
to the lesson ob!ecti"es and student
The candidate independentl#
articulated reading strategies
rele"ant to lesson ob!ecti"es and
LBSC744 Fall 2011 –Collaborative Planning Form (adapted from Toni Bueo (200!""
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify subject goals and objectives to be learned.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
Negotiated lesson topic The candidate discussed and
agreed on a topic with the SLMS
and classroom teacher.
The candidate discussed and agreed
on a topic with the SLMS.
The candidate did not discuss the
topic with partners.
Established purpose of
lesson
The candidate and partners
discussed the purpose of the
lesson. The partners agreed on the
content to be addressed.
The candidate and SLMS discussed
the purpose and content of the lesson
without the classroom teacher. The
purpose is not clear to the teacher.
The candidate did not discuss the
purpose or content with partners.
The purpose is unclear to partners.
dentified lesson
ob!ecti"es
The candidate and partners
connected information literac#
and content learning ob!ecti"es to
the topic.
The candidate and SLMS connected
information literac# learning and
some content ob!ecti"es to the topic.
The candidate independentl#
identified ob!ecti"es and
assessments. t is unclear how the
ob!ecti"es relate to the topic.
and student population. population. student population.
Selected learning
resources to support
lesson
The candidate and partners
collaborati"el# selected
appropriate resources for the
grade le"el with adaptations for
special populations.
The candidate and the SLMS used a
description of the students to select
resources for the grade le"el with
adaptations for special populations.
The candidate independentl# used a
"ague description of the learner
population to select resources and
ma%e adaptations.
&escribed lesson
assessments
The candidate and partners
described formati"e and
summati"e assessments that are
rele"ant and authentic.
The candidate and the SLMS
described formati"e and summati"e
assessments.
The candidate did not describe
formati"e or summati"e
assessments.
LBSC744 Fall 2011 –Collaborative Planning Form (adapted from Toni Bueo (200!""
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify subject goals and objectives to be learned.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
Negotiated lesson topic The candidate discussed and
agreed on a topic with the SLMS
and classroom teacher.
The candidate discussed and agreed
on a topic with the SLMS.
The candidate did not discuss the
topic with partners.
Established purpose of
lesson
The candidate and partners
discussed the purpose of the
lesson. The partners agreed on the
content to be addressed.
The candidate and SLMS discussed
the purpose and content of the lesson
without the classroom teacher. The
purpose is not clear to the teacher.
The candidate did not discuss the
purpose or content with partners.
The purpose is unclear to partners.
dentified lesson
ob!ecti"es
The candidate and partners
connected information literac#
and content learning ob!ecti"es to
the topic.
The candidate and SLMS connected
information literac# learning and
some content ob!ecti"es to the topic.
The candidate independentl#
identified ob!ecti"es and
assessments. t is unclear how the
ob!ecti"es relate to the topic.
Teacher and Candidate facilitate activities to relevant to lesson objectives.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
&esigned lesson
procedures
The candidate and partners
designed acti"ities that build on
prior %nowledge' "ar# teaching
strategies' and are rele"ant to the
ob!ecti"es and students.
(ithout the classroom teacher' the
candidate and SLMS designed
acti"ities that might build on prior
%nowledge' integrate teaching
strategies' and are rele"ant to the
ob!ecti"es and students.
)ased on a population description'
the candidate independentl#
designed acti"ities that might build
on prior %nowledge' integrate
teaching strategies' and are rele"ant
to the ob!ecti"es and students.
The Candidate collaborates with the classroom teacher to use his or her subject goals and objectives as a guide to
choosing the information skills for the lesson.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
LBSC744 Fall 2011 –Collaborative Planning Form (adapted from Toni Bueo (200!""
Teacher and Candidate collaborate to identify subject goals and objectives to be learned.
Target
10
Acceptable
8
Unacceptable
5
Negotiated lesson topic The candidate discussed and
agreed on a topic with the SLMS
and classroom teacher.
The candidate discussed and agreed
on a topic with the SLMS.
The candidate did not discuss the
topic with partners.
Established purpose of
lesson
The candidate and partners
discussed the purpose of the
lesson. The partners agreed on the
content to be addressed.
The candidate and SLMS discussed
the purpose and content of the lesson
without the classroom teacher. The
purpose is not clear to the teacher.
The candidate did not discuss the
purpose or content with partners.
The purpose is unclear to partners.
dentified lesson
ob!ecti"es
The candidate and partners
connected information literac#
and content learning ob!ecti"es to
the topic.
The candidate and SLMS connected
information literac# learning and
some content ob!ecti"es to the topic.
The candidate independentl#
identified ob!ecti"es and
assessments. t is unclear how the
ob!ecti"es relate to the topic.
Lesson plan contained all
of the re*uired elements
The lesson plan included grade
le"el' unit' standards' ob!ecti"es'
time frame' responsibilit#'
resources' product' assessment'
adaptation' and e+tension
information.
The lesson plan included at least , of
the re*uired lesson elements.
The lesson plan included at less than
5 of the re*uired lesson elements.
&esigned learning
product for lesson
The candidate and partners
designed a learning product that
is related to the ob!ecti"es and
pro"ides a clear opportunit# to
chec% for understanding.
The candidate and the SLMS
designed a learning product that is
somewhat related to the ob!ecti"es
and pro"ides a clear opportunit# to
chec% for understanding.
The candidate designed a learning
product that is not related to the
ob!ecti"es and fails to reflect the
ma!or ob!ecti"es.