IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION

INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES
LLC,

Plaintiff,
v.

CANON U.S.A., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

LEAD CASE:
Innovative Display Technologies, LLC v.
ZTE Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 2:13-CV-00527-JRG

MEMBER CASE
Case No. 2:14-cv-142-JRG



ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

On this day, Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants
Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) announced to the Court that they
have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants and Defendants’ claims, defenses
and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case. Plaintiff and Defendants
have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants
with prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff
without prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party
incurring same. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for
dismissal (Dkt. No. 120) should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants are
dismissed with prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief
against Plaintiff are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all
attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

1
Case 2:14-cv-00142-JRG Document 21 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 344
2
Case 2:14-cv-00142-JRG Document 21 Filed 08/26/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 345
.

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of August, 2014.