P. 1
Energy to 2050, Scenarios for a Sustainable Future, 2003

Energy to 2050, Scenarios for a Sustainable Future, 2003


|Views: 901|Likes:
Published by i-people

More info:

Published by: i-people on Mar 28, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Analysing the intersection between energy and issues of climate change
mitigation requires the adoption of a long-term perspective. Energy
infrastructure takes time to build up and has a useful life that for some
plants is measured in decades. New energy technologies take time to
develop and even longer to reach their maximum market share. Increasing
concentration of greenhouse gases from human activities affects
ecosystems and global climate over a long period -- from decades to
centuries. Policy responses to the threats of climate change manifest
effects on emissions that can be appreciated after an often considerable
delay. An analysis that seeks to tackle energy and environmental issues
needs to look ahead at least to the next thirty to fifty years.

Such a long-term perspective must come to terms with the concept of
uncertainty and with the limitations of our knowledge. The future is
by definition unknown and cannot be predicted. It is not something
predetermined that we simply ignore. How it unfolds is to some extent
determined by the course of actions we decide to take.

For this reason we need to look at the future and its uncertainties in an
articulated fashion, beyond the simple assumption that present trends will
continue tomorrow. Over time horizons of five to ten years the inertia of
the energy/economy system is so strong as to leave little room for change,
but over longer periods the future will almost certainly look different.

Basing our long-term strategic decisions on the assumption of
continuation of present trends presents risks: what if things do not turn out
to be as expected? That possibility must be taken into account if we want
to have a contingency plan at all. In particular, we need to contemplate
the possibility that some critical variables, the ones that have the
potentially largest impact in the success of our plan, take a different
course. What do we do in that case? And, more generally, what strategy or
course of action would maximise our chances of success in a wide range of
different situations?



Furthermore, even assuming continuation of present trends we are often
obliged to see that those trends may not necessarily lead to desirable
outcomes. Trends may be unsustainable under a number of aspects.
Developing through logical reasoning the final consequences of those
trends may point to some clear dangers down the road. Should we not then
try to steer clear of those dangers by modifying our trajectory? The
intellectual exercise of looking farther into the future can be extremely
useful to provide early warnings, in time for us to engage the possibility of
actually modifying our behaviour.

These facts lead to two important considerations:

■over the long term a thorough understanding of the main elements of

uncertainty is the basis for any strategic planning;

■over the longer term an additional element of freedom comes into play

inasmuch as the future can be shaped by political will.

Usually, the way the future is explored is through scenarios. These, in simple
terms, are conjectures about what could happen in the future based on our
past and present experience of the world. Hence, to build scenarios, soft or
hard data about past and present trends are a necessary ingredient.
Plausible conjectures about how these trends may further evolve in the future
are the other element. Unless one believes fatalistically that the future is
predetermined, the fact that all scenarios remain inherently speculative in
nature diminishes neither their role nor their usefulness, which is mainly to
assist in decision-making by offering the possibility of identifying problems,
threats and opportunities. By examining an internally consistent and rational
chain of events and trends that may follow from present actions, they allow
a better assessment of alternative policies. For this reason the exploration of
the future is often referred to in the literature as "scenario planning".

This type of exercise can be conducted at different scales and with
different time horizons in contexts that range from the trivial day-to-day
planning, to the strategic planning of an enterprise, to longer term plans
for a country’s infrastructure development. At the lower end of the scale
we are used to performing this scenario-development process without
giving it much thought: at the high end, considerable time and resources
(both human and equipment) may be required.

While it is clear that scenario work at the scale needed to analyse global
energy and environment futures is likely to require time and intellectual
resources, we should not be satisfied with producing and using only one
type of scenario.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->