P. 1
Quantitative Feedback

Quantitative Feedback

|Views: 176|Likes:
Published by clemenje

More info:

Published by: clemenje on Dec 10, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/10/2010

pdf

text

original

Quantitative Feedback The following charts detail the categories by which each instructor is evaluated on the left.

The remaining four columns represent (left to right): my ratings, the comparison group’s ratings by college, the comparison group’s rating by university, and the comparison group’s rating by courseoffering unit. The comparison group in each category is based on the size of the class and the predominant reason students indicated they had enrolled. The scores are based on a scale of five (5) to one (1) (“5” being the highest and “1” being the “lowest”). Tables are listed in chronological order and marked by term and course taught. Autumn 2006: English 110.01: First-Year Composition, The Ohio State University
This Instructor
Mean Std.Dev

Comparison Group by College
Mean StdDev

Comparison Group by University
Mean StdDev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean StdDev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students 7. Learned greatly from instructor 8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Communicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.5 4.1 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.8

0.7 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6

4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

Winter 2007: English 110.01: First-Year Composition, The Ohio State University
This Instructor
Mean StdDev

Comparison Group by College
Mean StdDev

Comparison Group by University
Mean Std.Dev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean StdDev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students 7. Learned greatly from instructor 8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Communicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.6 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.7

0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.5

0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

Spring 2007: English 110.01: First-Year Composition, The Ohio State University
This Instructor
Mean Sfd.Dev

Comparison Group by College
Mean Sfd.Dev

Comparison Group by University
Mean Sfd.Dev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean Sfd.Dev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students 7. Learned greatly from instructor 8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Communicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.4 3.6 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.4 3.9 3.6 4.3 3.9

0.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.1 1.1 0.9

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.5

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

Autumn 2007: English 367.01: The American Experience (Intermediate Composition), The Ohio State University
This Instructor
Mean Std.Dev

Comparison Group by College
Mean Std.Dev

Comparison Group by University
Mean Std.Dev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean Std.Dev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students

I. Learneo g,eatly trorn instructor
8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Comrnunicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.8 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.0 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.7

0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5
4.1

4.3 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

4.5 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.5

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4

Winter 2007: English 367.01: The American Experience (Intermediate Composition), The Ohio State University

This Instructor
Mean Sld.Dev

Comparison Group by College
Mean Sld.Dev

Comparison Group by University
Mean Sld.Dev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean Sld.Dev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students 7. Learned greatly from instructor 8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Communicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.2 3.5 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.8 3.6 4.1 3.9 4.1

1.1 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.4 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.1

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.5

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

Spring 2008: English 367.01: The American Experience (Intermediate Composition), The Ohio State University

This Instructor
Mean Sld.Dev

Comparison Group by College
Mean Sld.Dev

Comparison Group by University
Mean SldDev

Course-Offering Unit
Mean Sld.Dev

1. Instructor well organized 2. Intellectually stimulating 3. Instructor interested in teaching 4. Encouraged independent thinking 5. Instructor well prepared 6. Instructor interested in helping students T. Learned greatly from instructor 8. Created learning atmosphere 9. Communicated subject matter clearly 10. Overall rating

4.7 4.3 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.7 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.5

0.6 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8

4.4 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

4.3 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.3

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4

0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5

The following charts detail the categories by which each course and instructor is evaluated on the left. The remaining columns represent (left to right): students’, in my course, responses; the group median, the group mode, the standard deviation, the number in the group sampled, and the group mean. The scores are based on a scale of five (5) to one (1) (“5” being the highest and correlated with “Strongly Agree” and “1” being the “lowest” and correlated with “Strongly Disagree”). Tables are all from the fall of 2008, English 10600: First-Year Composition at Purdue University. Fall 2008, English 10600: First-Year Composition, Purdue University
ENGL10600 PICES course based questions Responses [SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] The content of this course is consistent with the objectives of the course. Course requirements are clear. I am able to set and achieve some of my own goals. Course Grp. Mode S.D. N Mean Med. 4.2 4.3 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.9 4.3 4.0 3.8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 .45 18 .57 17 .62 18 .60 18 1.01 18 .66 18 .47 18 .87 18 .73 18 4.3 4.3 3.9 4.2 3.8 3.9 4.3 3.9 3.7

Q7 Q8 Q9

5 6 3 5 4 3 6 4 2

13 10 11 11 10 10 12 10 10

0 1 4 2 2 5 0 2 5

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Q10 Relationships among course topics are clearly explained. Q11 This course is of practical benefit to me as a student. Q12 Class discussions are helpful to my learning. Q13 When I have a question or comment I know it will be respected.

Q14 This course effectively challenges me to think. Q15 This course improved my ability to read critically.

Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1

ENGL10600 ENGL standard questions about course Responses [SA] [A] [U] [D] [SD] Q16 This course helped me become a better writer. Q17 This course helped me adjust my writing to different audiences and purposes. This course emphasizes revision as an important part of the composing process. 2 6 11 11 4 0 1 1 0 0 Course Grp. Mode S.D. N Mean Med. 3.9 4.2 4 4 .71 18 .71 18 3.8 4.2

Q18

7

9

1

1

0

4.3

4

.79 18

4.2

This course helped me analyze, evaluate, and Q19 respond to my own and other student's writing projects. This course taught me strategies for finding & Q20 evaluating a range of sources for my writing projects. Q21 I did my best work in this class. Q22 I gained experience using technology to create documents.

5

11

1

1

0

4.1

4

.74 18

4.1

5

11

1

1

0

4.1

4

.74 18

4.1

5 4

8 13

1 0

3 1

1 0

4.0 4.1

4 4

1.19 18 .66 18

3.7 4.1

Responses: [SA] Strongly Agree=5 [A] Agree=4 [U] Undecided=3 [D] Disagree=2 [SD] Strongly Disagree=1 Clements, Jessica E Responses PICES instructor based questions Individual

Grp. [SA [A [U [D [SD Mod S.D Mea Med N ] ] ] ] ] e . n . 5 13 0 0 0 4.2 4 .45 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 4.3

Q2 4 Q2 5 Q2 6 Q2 7 Q2 8 Q2 9 Q3 0 Q3

My instructor identifies major or important points in the course. My instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations. My instructor demonstrates the importance and significance of the subject matter. My instructor presents information effectively.

5

11 1

1

0

4.1

4

.74

4.1

8

9

0

1

0

4.4

4

.75

4.3

6

12 0

0

0

4.3

4

.47

4.3

My instructor uses class time effectively.

6

11 0

1

0

4.2

4

.71

4.2

My instructor seems well-prepared for class. My instructor uses various activities that involve me in learning. My instructor is friendly and accessible.

10

7

0

1

0

4.6

5

.76

4.4

5 10

10 2 8 0

0 0

1 0

4.1 4.6

4 5

.94 .50

4.0 4.6

1 Q3 2 Q3 3 Q3 4 Q3 5 Q3 6 My instructor provides adequate opportunity for individual assistance. My instructor provides useful feedback throughout the semester. My instructor shows respect for diverse groups of people. My instructor is open to differences in perspective. My instructor relates reading assignments to writing assignments. 10 8 0 0 0 4.6 5 .50

8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 1 8 4.6

8

10 0

0

0

4.4

4

.50

4.4

11

7

0

0

0

4.7

5

.49

4.6

11

6

1

0

0

4.7

5

.60

4.6

8

10 0

0

0

4.4

4

.50

4.4

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->