You are on page 1of 2

Sub-Contract

Selection of EoT Analysis
Method
Is There A
Baseline
Programme
No
Is there a
schedule of
Main Contract
Interface
Milestones?
No
An Interface
Programme
will have to
be created
which will be
challenged
Yes
Create a Simple Barchart
Spanning Sub Con Works
between Contractor Milestones
Yes
Is It a
Contract
Document –
Bound into
the Contract
Yes
EoT Rules do NOT
Apply – Instruction
to Vary the Contract
Programme has to
be issued
No
Is It the True
Baseline
Programme?
Don’t Know
Check 1
Is it the
Earliest
Version
Yes
Check 2
Has It Been
Approved /
Agreed
No
Search for
An Earlier
Version
Yes
No
Not A Problem if it shows
the Contractor’s Original
Intentions –
Check any Method
Statements
Are the Main
Contract Interface
Milestones Clearly
Defined
Use AP v AB
Analysis
No
Yes
No Forensic Delay
Analysis is Possible
Can the Interface Milestones be
placed in the Baseline Programme
by reference to the ALAP date of
the Start of the Sub Con works for
each section.
No
Are there any
delay events
after the Sub
Contract works
started?
Use an Impacted
as Planned
analysis within
the AP v AB
analysis
Main Contract
Selection of EoT Analysis
Method
Is There A
Baseline
Programme
No
Are the As
Built Records
Complete
No
No Delay
Analysis Can
Be Done
Yes
Use
Collapsed As
Built
DO NOT use
AP v AB
Yes
Is It a
Contract
Document –
Bound into
the Contract
Yes
EoT Rules do NOT
Apply – Instruction
to Vary the Contract
Programme has to
be issued
No
Is It the True
Baseline
Programme?
Don’t Know
Check 1
Is it the
Earliest
Version
Yes
Check 2
Has It Been
Approved /
Agreed
No
Search for
An Earlier
Version
Yes
No
Not A Problem if it shows
the Contractor’s Original
Intentions –
Check any Method
Statements
Q1 Is the
Work in
Progress
Yes
Use
Impacted as
Planned
Q2 Is the
Work
Complete
No
Yes
Use Time
Impact
Analysis
Are the As
Built Records
Complete
Yes
No
No Forensic Delay
Analysis is Possible