The document discusses different types of test signals that can be used to analyze system dynamics including impulse, step, ramp, and sinusoidal signals. It provides the general comments, advantages, and disadvantages of each signal. An impulse signal provides direct insight into system dynamics but is difficult to apply without saturation. A step signal is most severe but easy to apply and interpret, while a ramp signal is less severe than a step. A sinusoidal signal is useful for investigating steady state frequency domain response but may be time consuming and unrealistic to apply across a range of frequencies.
The document discusses different types of test signals that can be used to analyze system dynamics including impulse, step, ramp, and sinusoidal signals. It provides the general comments, advantages, and disadvantages of each signal. An impulse signal provides direct insight into system dynamics but is difficult to apply without saturation. A step signal is most severe but easy to apply and interpret, while a ramp signal is less severe than a step. A sinusoidal signal is useful for investigating steady state frequency domain response but may be time consuming and unrealistic to apply across a range of frequencies.
The document discusses different types of test signals that can be used to analyze system dynamics including impulse, step, ramp, and sinusoidal signals. It provides the general comments, advantages, and disadvantages of each signal. An impulse signal provides direct insight into system dynamics but is difficult to apply without saturation. A step signal is most severe but easy to apply and interpret, while a ramp signal is less severe than a step. A sinusoidal signal is useful for investigating steady state frequency domain response but may be time consuming and unrealistic to apply across a range of frequencies.
F(s) General comments Advantages Disadvantages (t) 1 Limiting case of pulse of unit area as width -->0 Direct estimate of sys dynamics s.s. operating Difficult to apply a time impulse with sufficient energy to give a response detectale in !noise" without saturating part of sys 1 1#s $est insight for transient response studies %ost severe disturance possile &onventionally normalised to unit mag 'asy to apply (esults easy to interpret &an detect !transport" lag &an detect presence of non- linearities ) using diff. step si*es s.s. operating point changed %ay lead to unacceptaly large step due to !noise" +ery small variations in shape of response have large effect on higher order terms in model t 1#s , -tep change in velocity Less severe than step fn %ore relevant than step for some sys e.g. those possessing high input inertia
t , ,#s . -tep change in acceleration /sed when even a ramp input is too severe
sin0t 0 --------- (s , 10 , ) /sed to investigate s.s. response in fre2 domain /sed to derive model y e3perimentation (apply a range of fre2 4 oserve response in terms of amp 4 phase shift) 5ften easy to apply &onvenient for analysis &an e time consuming to apply sufficient range of fre2 6 sys may change during test %ay e an unrealistic forcing fn