2010-01-01 Zernik V Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik V Connor, Based On Copies Provided by Clerk On December 29, 2009

Dr Z
Joseph Zernik, PhD

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; fax: 801 998-0917; email: jz12345@earthlink.net
10-01-01 Review of NEFs in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) as received from US

District Court on December 29, 2009
Table 1. NEFs in Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550)

Complaint was filed March 6, 2008 against some 10 judges of the Superior Court of California, County
of Los Angeles, pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law - 42 USC §1983. It was
further alleged that conduct of such judges and others, in collusion with Countrywide and Bank of
America Corporation amounted to Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) pursuant
to 18 USC § 1961–1968. Access to NEFs was allowed only by December 29, 2009, and data from
NEFs was compiled in the table below.
Dkt # - Requested Rec'd RSA Parties & Counsel Notes

NEFs [Y/N] Digital listed as recipients of
Sig NEF by email
[Y/N]
1. Dkt #01- March 6, 2008 Y Y None 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
Verified Complaint 2. Requesting clarification
by office of the clerk
2. Dkt # Unnumbered – Y N None 1. Therefore – no valid and
March 5, 2008 Issuance effectual summonses
of Summonses were issued in this case
3. Dkt #04 – March 5, 2008 Y N None 1. Therefore – No
Notice of Reference to Magistrate had honest,
magistrate valid and effectual
authority in the case
4. Dkt #05 – March 6, 2008 Y Y None 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
Plaintiff Ex pate 2. Requesting clarification
Application for TRO by office of the clerk
5. Dkt #09 – March 6, 2008 Y N None 1. Therefore – recusal of
Reassignment Judge Letts was invalid
and ineffectual
6. Dkt #10 – March 7, 2008 Y N None 1. Therefore- Recusal of
Reassignment Magistrate Nagle was
invalid and ineffectual
7. Dkt #14 – March 21, Y N 1. John W Patton - 1. March 21, 2008 Minutes
2008 Minutes by Judge jwp@paslaw.com by Judge Virginia
Virginia Phillips Phillips – denying the
TRO were dishonest,
invalid and ineffectual.
8. Dkt #27 – March 31, Y N 1. John W Patton 1. March 31, 2008 Minutes
2008 Minutes by jwp@paslaw,com by Magistrate Carla
2. Michael L Wachtell
Magistrate Carla mwachtel!@buchalter.com
Woehrle, ordering
Woehrle 3. Sarah L Overton Plaintiff to execute
Summonses were
Page 2/5 January 01, 2010
soverton@cmda-law.com Summonses were

dishonest, invalid, and
ineffectual
9. Dkt #33 – April 18, 2008 Y N 1. John W Patton 1. April 18, 2008 Minutes
Minutes by Magistrate jwp@paslaw,com by Magistrate Carla
Carla Woehrle mwachtell@buchalter.com
Woehrle, in re: Motion
3. Sarah L Overton to Dismiss were
soverton@cmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and
ineffectual.
10. Dkt #43 – POS for Y Y 1. John W Patton 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
Summonses Returned jwp@paslaw,com
2. Michael L Wachtell 2. Requesting clarification
Executed mwachtell@buchalter.com by office of the clerk
3. Sarah L Overton
soverton@cmda-law.com 3. Notice that such entry
was in re: Summonses
that were never
effectually issued.
4. Notice that such entry
was in re: Summonses
that were adulterated by
Pro Se Clerk Chris
Sawyer.
11. Dkt #57 – May 15, 2008 Y N 1. John W Patton 1. May 15, 2008 Minutes
Minutes by Magistrate jwp@paslaw,com by Magistrate Carla
Woehrle, in re: Ordering
3. Sarah L Overton Plaintiff not to file
soverton@cmda-law.com anything in court were
ineffectual.
12. Dkt #59 – May 22, 2008 Y Y 1. John W Patton 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
Reply on Motion to jwp@paslaw,com
Dismiss mwachtell@buchalter.com by office of the clerk
3. Sarah L Overton
soverton@cmda-law.com
13. Dkt #62 – First Y Y 1. John W Patton 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
Amended Complaint jwp@paslaw,com
mwachtell@buchalter.com by office of the clerk
3. Sarah L Overton
14. Dkt #63 – June 6, 2008 Y N 1. John W Patton 1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by
Minutes by Magistrate jwp@paslaw,com Magistrate Carla
Woehrle, in re: Finding
3. Sarah L Overton Moot Plaintiff’s Ex
soverton@cmda-law.com Parte Application for
Reconsideration of June
6, 2008 Order not to file
anything in court were
ineffectual.
15. Dkt #68 – Motion to Y Y 1. Kathryn E DiCarlo 1. RSA Sig – incomplete

dismiss First Amended kdicarlo@cmda-law.com
2. Sarah L Overton 2. Requesting clarification
Complaint. SQverton@cmda-law.com by office of the clerk
3. John W Patton Jr
jwp@paslaw.com
4. Michael L wachtell
mwaGhtell@buchalter.com
16. Dkt #69 – Motion to Y Y 1. Kathryn E DiCarlo 1. RSA Sig – incomplete
dismiss kdicarlo@cmda-law.com
2. Sarah L Overton 2. Requesting clarification
SQverton@cmda-law.com by office of the clerk
3. John W Patton Jr
jwp@paslaw.com
17. Dkt #70 – June 6, 2008 Y N 1. Kathryn E DiCarlo 1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by
Minutes by Magistrate kdicarlo@cmda-law.com Magistrate Carla
2. Sarah L Overton
Carla Woehrle SQverton@cmda-law.com
Woehrle, in re: Motions
3. John W Patton Jr to Dismiss were
jwp@paslaw.com dishonest, invalid, and
4. Michael L wachtell ineffectual.
18. Dkt #77 – June 6, 2008 Y N 1. John W Patton 1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by
Minutes by Magistrate jwp@paslaw.com Magistrate Carla
Woehrle, in re: Motions
3. Sarah L Overton to Dismiss were
soverton@cmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and
4. Jenna Moldawsky ineffectual.
Jenna.moldawsky@bryancave.com
5. Kathryn E DiCarlo
kcticarlo@cmda-law.com
19. Dkt #102 – March 18, Y N 1. John W Pat ton 1. March 18, 2009 Order by
2009 Order by Judge jwp@pa.slaw.com Judge Virginia Phillips,
2. David J Pasternak
Virginia Phillips djp@paslaw.com
denying Plaintiff’s
3. Michael L wachtell Request to Disqualify
mwachtell@buchalter.com Magistrate Carla
4. Sarah L Overton Woehrle for a cause was
soverton@Cmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and
5. Jenna Moldawsky j enna.
moldawsky@bryancave com
ineffectual.
kdicarlo@cmda-law.com
20. Dkt #103- March 31, Y N 1. John W Patton 1. March 31, 2009 Notice
2009 Notice by jwp@paslaw.com by Magistrate Carla
Magistrate Carla djp@paslaw.com
Woehrle of Filing R & R
Woehrle 3. Michael L wachtel] was dishonest, invalid,
mwachtell@buchalter.com and ineffectual.
4. Sarah L Overton
5. Jenna Moldawsky
jemna.moidawsky@bryancave.com
21. Dkt #104 – March 31, Y N 1. John W Patton 1. March 31, 2009 R & R
2009 R & R by jwp@paslaw.com by Magistrate Carla
Magistrate Carla djp@paslaw.com
Woehrle to Grant
Woehrle 3. Michael L Wachtell Motions to Dismiss was
mwachtel@buchalter.com dishonest, invalid, and
4. Sarah L Overton ineffectual.

5. Jenna Moldawsky jenna.
moldawsky@bryancave.com
22. Dkt #105 – April 9, 2009 Y Y 7. David J Pasternak 1. April 9, 2009 Plaintiff’s
Plaintiff’s Requests djp@paslaw.com Requests for Judicial
8. Jenna Moldawsky
jenna.moldawsky@bryancave.com
Notice of Perverted
9. John W Patton Jr Discrepancy Procedures.
jwp@paslaw.comı
kdicarlo@cmda·law.com
mwachtell@buchalter.com
12. Sarah L Overton
soverton@cmda-Iaw.com
23. Dkt #106 – April 24, Y N 1. John W Patton 1. April 24, 2009 Order by
2009 Order by Judge jwp@paslaw.com Judge Virginia Phillips,
Virginia Phillips cljp@paslaw.com
Adopting R & R was
3. Michael L wachtell dishonest, invalid, and
mwachtell@buchalter.com ineffectual.
Sarah L Overton
soverton@cmda-Iaw.com
4. Jeru1a Moldawsky
kdicarlo@cmda-Iaw.com
24. Dkt #107 - April 24, Y N 1. John W Patton 1. April 24, 2009 Judgment
2009 Judgment by Judge jwp@paslaw.com by Judge Virginia
Virginia Phillips cljp@paslaw.com
Phillips, was dishonest,
3. Michael L wachtel) invalid, and ineffectual.
mwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton
4. Jenna Moldawsky
Notes:
1. On December 29, 2009, upon appearance in person at the Office of the Clerk, Records Department,
Records, request was filed for access to only 24 out of over 100 records in Zernik v Connor et al.
2. On December 29, 2009, upon appearance in person at the Office of the Clerk, Records Department,
Records Supervisor Dawn Bullock provided printouts for 24 out of 24 NEFs, which were requested
in writing on that date.
3. None of the requested NEFs contained a complete RSA-encrypted digital signature.
4. Of the 24 requested NEFs, only 8 were found to include truncated RSA-encrypted digital signatures,
and requests for clarifications were filed with the Clerk of the Court.
5. NEFs for the following critical records included no RSA-encrypted digital signatures at all:
a. Issuance of Summonses
b. Assignments and Reassignments to Judges

c. Assignments and Reassignments to Magistrates
d. All Minutes which were examined.
e. Order Denying Disqualification for a Cause
f. Notice and Report and Recommendation by Magistrate.
g. Order Adopting Report and Recommendation by Judge
h. Judgment by Judge.
6. It was likely that upon investigation the same results would be found in:
a. Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) – habeas corpus petition of jailed Richard Fine - also treated
by Magistrate Carla Woehrle, albeit – with Judge John Walter. Access to NEFs was
requested on both September 18, 2009 and December 29, 2009, but was denied both times.
b. In re: Fine (2:09-mc-00129) – disciplinary procedure against jailed Richard Fine – by
Presiding Judge Audrey Collins. Access to NEFs was requested on December 29, 2009, but
was denied .
7. It was alleged that findings summarized in the table above documented the alleged fraud and deceit
in operation of PACER & CM/ECF.
8. It was further alleged that installation, with no authority, of alleged fraudulent docketing, access, and
case management systems in the US courts, during the first decade of the 21st century, amounted to
serious large-scale abuse of the Human Rights of all those who live in the United States by the
judiciary branch of the United States government – through denial of fair and impartial hearings.
9. It was further alleged that conditions prevailing in the United States Courts as a result of the
installation of PACER & CM/ECF amounted to serious violation by US Government of ratified
International Law – failure to maintain competent National Tribunals for protection of Human
Rights and rights pursuant to the Constitution of this country.
10. Complaint will be filed with FBI Director Robert Mueller III, January 1, 2010, and copied to House
and Senate Judiciary Committees.
Linked Records:
1. NEFs in Zernik v Connor et al, as received from office of the Clerk of the Court.
http://inproperinla.com/09-12-29-nefs-in-zernik-v-connor.pdf
2. Declaration of Joseph Zernik in re: Visit to the US District Court, LA, office of the Clerk of the Court
on December 29, 2009.
http://inproperinla.com/09-12-31-declaration-req-for-us-crt-la-records-n-response-nefs-s.pdf

2010-01-01 Zernik V Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik V Connor, Based On Copies Provided by Clerk On December 29, 2009

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2010-01-01 Zernik V Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - CM/ECF - Table Summary of NEFs in Zernik V Connor, Based On Copies Provided by Clerk On December 29, 2009

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD

10-01-01 Review of NEFs in Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) as received from US

Table 1. NEFs in Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-01550)

Dkt # - Requested Rec'd RSA Parties & Counsel Notes

soverton@cmda-law.com Summonses were

15. Dkt #68 – Motion to Y Y 1. Kathryn E DiCarlo 1. RSA Sig – incomplete

4. Sarah L Overton ineffectual.

b. Assignments and Reassignments to Judges

You might also like