Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Failure Criteria
Dirk Eberlein
dirk.eberlein@hbm.com
www.hbm.com
19.03.2008, Folie 1
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 2
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 3
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
The
Thedirections
directionsof
ofthe
thegrids
gridsdo
do
not
nothave
haveany
anyeffect
effecton
onthe
the
results!
results!
19.03.2008, Folie 4
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
b
Strain measurement in three directions a,b,c
19.03.2008, Folie 5
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Measuring grid a, b, c
19.03.2008, Folie 6
Spider8-30
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
1 / 2
E a + c
E
=
1
2
2 (1 + )
( a b ) + ( c b )
2
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 8
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
b (45):
+74,1 m/m
19.03.2008, Folie 9
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
E a + c
=
1
2
2 (1 + )
( a b )2 + ( c b )2
N
N
190
000
2 47,1 10 6 + 175,7 10 6
2
mm
mm
1 0,25
2
2 (1 + 0,25 )
190 000
1 / 2 =
( 47,1 10
1 = 33,2
N
mm
19.03.2008, Folie 10
74,1 10
) + (175,7 10
6 2
2 = 0,7
74,1 10
6 2
N
mm 2
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Z
only for 0/45/90 degree rosettes
N
Z 0 (+ )
N > 0 (+)
1 o
0 +
2
Z > 0 (+)
N 0 ()
1
180 o
2
Z 0 ()
N < 0 ()
1
180 o +
2
Z < 0 ()
N 0 (+ )
1
360 o
2
19.03.2008, Folie 11
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
: auxiliary angle
> 0 (+ )
0 ()
= 5,03
19.03.2008, Folie 12
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Z 0 (+ )
N > 0 (+)
1 o
0 +
2
Z > 0 (+)
N 0 ()
1
180 o
2
Z 0 ()
N < 0 ()
1
180 o +
2
Z < 0 ()
N 0 (+ )
1
360 o
2
19.03.2008, Folie 13
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
1
180 o
2
1
180 o 5,03 o
2
1
180 o
2
87,5 o
19.03.2008, Folie 14
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Angle
= 87,5
19.03.2008, Folie 15
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
1 / 2
E a + b + c
E
1
2 a b c
2
=
+ ( b c )
1
3
1+
3
3
3 ( b c )
= arctan
2 a b c
19.03.2008, Folie 16
Z
N
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 17
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Strain
StrainGauge
GaugeRosette
RosetteChains:
Chains:55Rosettes
Rosetteson
on
every
everycarrier:
carrier:Who
Whohas
hasthe
thetime
timeto
tocalculate
calculate
this
thisby
byusing
usingaasheet
sheetof
ofpaper
paperand
andaapencil?
pencil?
19.03.2008, Folie 18
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 19
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
1 2
( ) =
sin(2 )
2
2
y
1 + 2
2
x
1
19.03.2008, Folie 20
x ( ) =
(1 + 2 ) + (1 2 ) cos(2)
y () =
(1 + 2 ) (1 2 ) cos(2)
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
y
1
2
x 1
19.03.2008, Folie 21
2 = 0
x , y do exist in every direction,
with exception of =0.
Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
1 = -2
y= - x
x 1
19.03.2008, Folie 22
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
What do we know?
The principal stresses and
their direction as the result of
the strain gage measurement
Material characteristics,
took from books
19.03.2008, Folie 23
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Mb
Mt
Mt
FN
FN
Mb
2
K
K ...
V
V
19.03.2008, Folie 26
Material
design values
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
K
V
Compared
V zul
19.03.2008, Folie 27
K
=
S
S = Safety factor
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Elastic limit
Breaking strength
Fatigue limit
Fatigue strain
Fatigue live
19.03.2008, Folie 28
Rp0,2
Re
Rm
sch
W
D
(0,2%-strain limit)
(elastic limit)
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Rm
ReH
ReL
Rm
Rp0,2
19.03.2008, Folie 29
0,2%
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Material characteristics
Rm
Rp0,2
dF, b0,2
F, 0,4
breaking strength
elastic limit
Liquid Flow limit (In case of bending)
Liquid Flow limit (In case of torsion)
Took from: Dubbel
19.03.2008, Folie 30
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 31
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 32
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
VV == max
=
max = 11
19.03.2008, Folie 33
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
ductile materials
failure caused by: slide fracture because of high
shear stresses
in case of brittle materials: pressure stresses will
cause slide fracture
VV == 2
2max
max
1.Case : 1 0; 2 0 v = 2 max = 1
2.Case : 1 0; 2 0 v = 2 max = 1 2
max ... Highest value of shear stress
19.03.2008, Folie 34
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
ductile materials
the energy needed for the deformation compared
with the one in case of an uniaxial stress state is:
V = + 1 2
2
1
19.03.2008, Folie 35
2
2
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
19.03.2008, Folie 36
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
V zul
K
=
S
static stress
pulsating stress
alternating stress
19.03.2008, Folie 37
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Static Stress
19.03.2008, Folie 38
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Pulsating Stress
19.03.2008, Folie 39
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Alternating Stress
19.03.2008, Folie 40
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
Matrial Characteristics
Dirk Eberlein
Failure Criteria
www.hbm.com
Thank you
Dirk Eberlein
Tel. 06151/803-763
19.03.2008, Folie 42
dirk.eberlein@hbm.com
Dirk Eberlein