. .
&
..
E
(....)
()
2 85-95%
2035
> 592
400
2013
382
350
300
250
2000
150
200
150
100
1985
40
50
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2035
http://www.idf.org/home/index.cfm?node=264
2012
Centers for disease Control and prevention (CDC)
2000 2011
lifetime 39,6%
lifetime 40,2%
40%
52
12%
24%
40% -2
65%
U.K. Primary Care Database: 87098 (21798 II, 65300 normal)
2004-2010
R= 2,13
R=2,42
R=3,23
R= 4,7
DCCT
Kumamoto
UKPDS
9 7.2%
9 7%
8 7%
63%
69%
17-21%
54%
70%
24-33%
60%
65%
41%
16%*
HbA1C
*p=0.052
UKPDS: 10 ( 20 ),
CVD
CVD DCCT-EDIC
DCCT: 6,5 , EDIC: 12
CVD endpoints
42%:
p = 0,01
MACE
57%:
p = 0,01
(-)
(-)
-
Position Statement ADA EASD 2012
-
-
-
2013
SU
TZD
DPP-4
GLP-1
SU
+
TZD
DPP-4
GLP-1
TZD
+
SU
DPP-4
GLP-1
DPP-4
+
SU
TZD
GLP-1
+
SU
TZD
TZD
DPP-4
GLP-1
TZDs
( DPP-4
GLP-1)
Lancet 2011;378:182-197
. BARI2D
vs :
56536 . Fu=8
HR= 0,33
] IV (DPP-IV)**
Vildagliptin
Sitagliptin
Saxagliptin
Linagliptin
] Glucagon-like peptide-1 *
Liraglutide
GLP-1*
(Exenatide)
**
DPP-4 inhibitors
Metabolism
Elimination route
Sitagliptin
(100 mg qd)
~ 121/2 h
Max. ~97%;
> 80% 24 h postdose
Not appreciably
metabolised
Renal
Vildagliptin
(50 mg bid)
~ 2h
Max. ~ 97%;
> 80% 12 h post
dose
Inactive metabolite
(hydrolysis, in
kidney, liver,
elsewhere: p450
independent)
Metabolism (parent)
Renal
(parent and
metabolite)
Saxagliptin
(5 mg qd)
~ 21/2 h (parent)
~ 3 h (metabolite)
Max ~80%;
> 70% 24 h postdose
Active metabolite
(hepatic, via p450
3A4/5)
Metabolism (parent)
Renal
(parent and
metabolite
Alogliptin
(25 mg qd)
~ 21 h
Max ~90%
~ 75% h post-dose
Not appreciably
metabolised
Renal
Linagliptin
(5 mg qd)
~ 12 h ( effective 1%)
~ 100 h (terminal
1%)
Max ~ 90%
~ 85% 24 h postdose
Not appreciably
metabolised
Biliary
(< 6% via kidney)
RCTs
Saxagliptin vs placebo:
SAVOR-TIMI 53: 16492 CVD , Fu= 2,2
NYHA baseline
saxagliptin vs placebo
SAVOR TIMI 53
A] Glucagon-like peptide-1 *
Liraglutide
GLP-1*
Exenatide BD QW
Lixisenatide
* -
GLP-1
Exendin-4,
-
50%
GLP-1. DPP-IV.
In vivo x 3-4 h.
, HbA1c
20gr (-0,69%)
(-0,75%).
HbA1c 0,7-1,0% 1-3 kg
,
&
[Distiller LA et al. Diabetes, 2008;
57 (suppl. 1): A154-A158]
: 25% 35%
2,5% ( 7,9%
)
Lixisenatide vs Liraglutide.:
profile
Lixisenatide vs Liraglutide:
28
(ORs)
2 RCT
Exenatide QW
Exenatide QW
Exenatide QW
()
:
,
-
Exenatide QW
2
Medisorb
CO2 1
1
2
2
67 2
H Exenatide QW
, HbA1c
1,3% 1,9%
4 *
<1%
(5%
ExQW)
(, , )
* H Exenatide QW ,
. Exenatide QW ,
.
H 8
218 RCTs 77950
SGLT-2
- SGLT2
SGLT-2
vs placebo:
HbA1c
45
SGLT-2 vs :
45
SGLT-2
Liraglutide 3mg
SCALE study
3731
.
500cal. /. 2:1 Liraglutide
3mg vs placebo. Fu = 56
Lira. 8% 2,6%
. Placebo 4,2 cm
( 2,5cm placebo)
Lira
(LDL, HDL)
ICE/ENDO 2014
( FDA)
JAMA 2014;312:955
Sept.2014
:
Degludec PEGylated lispro
Degludec
PEG - Lispro
profile Degludec
Degludec ( ) vs Glargin:
BEGIN:FLEX T1: 52 Fu
Degludec vs glargine:
BEGIN: FlexT1
liraglutide vs insulin
degludec vs Deglira in
type 2 diabetes
DUAL-1
Adding liraglutide or
rapid-acting insulin to
insulin degludec in
type 2 diabetes
GLP-1 +
vs basal bolus:
GLP-1 +
vs basal bolus:
Editorial
It has been a 20-year journey, but
the combination of GLP-1 agonist
and basal insulin has finally
arrived as a more powerful and
safer alternative to insulin in the
management of type 2 diabetes
L. A. Young, J. B. Buse
,
,
(SenSerter).
, ,
72 (3 )
,
2 .
closed-loop
( )
vs :
5
NM504:
504: ,
30 .
504 Placebo 28
To
Statement ADA 2014
<140/ 80 mmHg ()
LDL
<100 mg/dl ()
.LDL
>40+ .. ()
LDL>100 . ()
-<150 mg/dl
DL
- 1C <7%
1C (<6%)
(25)
5-7%
150 min/ .
90 min/ .
CVD
PREDIMED study: 7447 . Fu= 4,8
CVD
PREDIMED study: 7447 , Fu=4,8
Intervention group
CVD
HUNT study: 53837 , Fu = 12
S. Dali:
!!!!!!
!!!!!!