Rai, ardeep Rai
Assoiates 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 860 San Franiso, CA 94104 ame: SIGH, RAJIDR
Department Jusice
Executive Oce r Immgraon Reew
Board of Immigrtion Apels Oce of the Cerk
5107
Leesburg Pike, Sute
Fals Chch. Vgna
SIC Oie o Chie Counse -AZ P
Box 2158 Phoenix, AZ 802 A 20593-843 Date o this notie: 1 /20/2015
cosed s a copy of the Bod's decso ad orde te aboe-rerenced case. nclore
b M N
Scerel,
[
G
c
a
Doa Carr Ce Cerk
k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Rajinder Singh, A205 935 843 (BIA Jan. 20, 2015)
SINGH, RAJINDER A2093843 ICE 170 E. HANNA ROAD #366 ELOY AZ 8122 Name: INGH RAJINER
US Departmet Jtce
xecuve Oce r Imraon Reew
Bor o Immgro Ape Oce of he Cerk
5 /07
Leebrg Pke Site
2000
a hh gia
20530
HS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel EAZ PO Box 218 Phoenix AZ 8002 A 2093843 Date of this notice 1/20/201
ncoed a cop o he Boad decon n he aoe-erenced cae Th cop s en proded o ou a a coure You aoe or repreenaive ha ee erve wh hs deco pursuan o
8
F
.R
§ 1292(a) I he aached decon orer ha o e eoe om he Uned Sae o a an Imaon Jue deco orden ha ou e removed an peon evew o he atached decion u e led w and receved he appopae cou o appea whn
da o e dae o e decson coure
b M, Nl P
cee Donna ar he ek
:
Cite as: Rajinder Singh, A205 935 843 (BIA Jan. 20, 2015)
U.s:Deparment
of
uice
Decson o the Board o maon Appals , Executive Ofce r Imigration Reviw Fas Church Vrga
20530
Fie: A205 935 843 -Eloy, rizona I re JDER SNGH N REMOVAL PROCEEDNGS MOTON Date ON BEHAF O ESONDEN Hdeep ai, Esqe CAON: Reopeig OER:
JAN 2 0 15
he poceedgs is mae were ast bere e Boad o Juy 28, 014. O November 25, 204, e espodet led the moo to reope ow bere e Board alegg ieecte asstace of o cousels e espodet as compied, i , wt the process equsite to sseig such a clam.
See generally Matter of Compean Bangaly
&
J-EC-,
25 &N Dec
I
(G 2009);
Mater of Loza,
19 N Dec 637, 639640 (B 188) e espodet as provided detaied adats settig h the bses r hs sseo of eectve assstace of cousel; edece of e ageets d paets both the Uited States ad abroad to mer cousels; evidece of epresetatio by e cousels; b compts ed agast oe of e aoeys i two deet jurisdctios, alia ad ex; adese ioao o the press relatig to a idvidu associated w er cousel who aso played a p te represetatio of the respodet; ad, a press epo amg the idvdual wo te respodet met at e detetio cete wo efeed him to er couse. e espodet paid substial es to a aoey, reed to im by a didul at the Eloy detetio cility, who, with te assistace of oe aoeys, appeed oceedgs o behalf of the espodet, ut ultmatey fled to le a applcatio elef by the deadie set esutig e respodet's abiit to seek the relief of ayum the ted States The Depamet of Homead Secuity has ot respoded to te moto We accept te respodet's detaed davit, wch we accept as e uoses of s moto
(see Najabadi
v.
Holder
59 F3d 983, 994
(9
Ci 2010)) ve te circsces detailed i te espodet's afdat, we d at a aeqate sowg of due diigece as bee made, at equtable tolg s appoate d that eoeg shold be gated.
See Avaan
v
Holder,
646 F3d 672 9 Cr 20) O ema, e espodet shal ave he opoity to aply y elef hch he may be ee Accodgly, e espodets moto to eoe is grated ad the recod is emaded e poceegs cosstet th is deciso
Cite as: Rajinder Singh, A205 935 843 (BIA Jan. 20, 2015)
Reward Your Curiosity
Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.