You are on page 1of 4
 
Chavez, Nicolas Chavez
&
Vako LP
   
Executive Oce r Immgatin Reew
Board of Imigaion peals qce ofhe ek
5107 /brg Pk we 200 Fas Chuc m 3
10830 N. Central Expressway, Suite 400 Dallas
TX
75231 OHSIC ffc of Cef Counse A 12 E John Carpenter Fwy Ste 500 rving
TX
75062-2324 Name: TRRESMRAES JSE A 200895-241 Date of ts notice 1/ 9/2015
nclosed s  cpy

 the Bod' don nd dr n e b-erened ce. nosr
P Mb: Hl, vd B
Snerely,
D
O
C
Dnn C f erk
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jose Torres-Morales, A200 895 241 (BIA Jan. 29, 2015)
 
US Department of Justice
Executiv Oce r Imiation Review Decision of he Board o Iigration Appeals Fas Churc, Virgiia
03
File
00
895 241
-
Daas, TX Date: In re JOSE TOR-MORLES
I
REMOVAL PROCEEDNGS APPE D MOTION ON BEHAF OF RESPNDENT  Nco Chavez Esqure ON BEALF F DHS Pa B. er III Chef Counse
JAN
2 9 15
A
appea om he Imgration Judge's decson in this case s cueny pendng bere e Board o mmgration ppeas ("Boad) he arties hae now ed a joint moton o adnisratey cose ese proceedngs he moon w be granted nd e proceengs adnisratey cosed I eie py to ts case wishes to reistae he proceedngs a wrtten request o renstate he proceedngs may be ae to the Bod he Board w take no her acton n e case uness a reuest s receed om one of te aies he reues mus be submitte drecty o  the Cerks Oce whou e ut with ceication o serce on he opposng pary Accordngy the owng order w be enered OER The prceedngs bere he oard o mmration peas in ths case are admnsratiey cosed R E O
Cite as: Jose Torres-Morales, A200 895 241 (BIA Jan. 29, 2015)
 
'}
Q':4
 _
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATIN COT
llOO
COMMERCE STSUITE 6Q
r
 DALLAS TX 754
\

t,
 
-     "
IN THE REMVAL CASE F
CS!O
 A20895-24 TRRESMRALES SE RESPNDENT
.  �-:
�.·,
[�
DERS f the Crt's Decisin and rders entered n This memrandm is slely for te the parties The oral r written indings Deisin the officil opinion in his case ( } Bth paries waivd issane f a forml oral decision in he case
The 
r qd
 
otd
REMOVD
from he Unied States to 
l
 
 
(
}
in bsenti
Respondent's applicatin fr VOLNT DEPARTUE was DENIED and respondent was rdered remved   in alternative t the espndens appliatin fr VLTAR DEPARTURE was GRTED ntil pon psin a volnary departre bnd in the ant of $  DHS within five siness days frm he date f his Order, with an alternte Order of removal t or Respondent shall present t DHS wihin
( ) thirty days ) sixy dys fro the date f this rder all necessary trvel dcments for vlntary deparre Rsponents appliation fr ASUM was ( ) granted ) withdrawn wih predice. ) denied (  sbect to the NUAL CA nder the INA sectin 7(a ) ( ) Respondent knowingly filed a FRIVOLOUS asylm appliatin Respondents applicatin for WITHHOLDIN of remval nder INA section 4(b) (3) as
(
}
granted ( denied ( witdra with predice. Respondents applicatin fr ITHHLDING of reval nder the Tortre Cnventin was ( ) granted ( ) denied witdrawn with predice Respndents applcation fr DEFERL f real nder the Trtre Cnvenin was ( granted ( denied ( withdrawn with predice Respndents applicaion for CCELLATION of reval nder section ( 3 {b of NACRA, ( 24A{) ) 4A{b) () ( 4A(b (2) f the INA was (
)
granted
(
} denied withdrawn wi prejdice ·If granted it was rdered ha he DHS isse all appropriate docents neessary t ive effect to this rder Respondent { is ( ) is nt sbet to the NUAL CAP nder INA secion 24A(e Respondent's applicain for  WAIVER nder he INA section
was ( granted ( ) denied ( ) wi
Sf
drawn r { The condiions imposed by ) her INA sectin 16 n he rendens permanen residen sas were reoe. Respodens pplicaton for
AJUSMENT
o ss nder section o the ) INA ) NACARA { ) · was ) grne ) denied ) whdr wih
pr j.uq
 
c
If rnted
i
was rdered hat DHS isse all pprpriae do«
s necessary to give effect to this rder
·'
'   
)
,
'; \
.
-(
.
i. ·
 
  ;·
:�

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505