Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rea5rmed 2004
1989 ))
(( Reaffirmed
Indian Standard
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR
CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
Fifth Reprint MARCH 1998
UDC 666.972.1.031.1
BUREAU
OF
MANAK BHAVAN,
Gr 6
INDIAN
STANDARDS
Fehcary
1983
IS:10262-
1982
(Reaffirmed
1989)
Indian Standard
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR
CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
Cement and Concrete Sectional Committee, BDC 2
CJtairman
Rafmsmting
DR H. C. VXEIVESVABAYA
Cement Research Institute of India, New Delhi
Members
ADDITIONAL DI~~OTOB,SFANDARD~ Research, Designs & Standards Organization
( Ministry of Railways ), Lucknow
(B&S)
DEPUTY DIBXOTOB,STANDARDI
SHE1 d BPY.!:&~r
)
Lamon & Toubro Ltd, Bombay
SE& ri~nrau N. MA~ANI ( Altemtts )
SH~I S. IL BANE~JEE
National Test House, Calcutta
SERI R. N. BANEAL
Beas Designs t+gan.zzation, Nangal Township
DR N. S. BHAL
Structt~rengmeerrng
Research Centre ( CSIR) ,
CHIEB ENCUNEER( DES~NE)
EXEO~TIVZQ EN~IN~PER
( DELU~NS) III ( Altmuts )
CHIEF ENOINEE~( PROJEOTE
)
Government
of Punjab,
DIREOTOR,IPRI ( Alternate )
Central Water Commiraion, New Delhi
DI~ECTOB(CSMRS )
DEPUTY DIBEOTO~( CSMRS )
( Alternate )
SHBI T. A. E. DSA
The Concrete Association of India, Bombay
SHR~ N. C. DUGGAL( Al&mute )
SHRI V, K. GUPTA
Engineer-in-Chief I Branch, Army Headquarters,
New Delhi
Sam S. N. PANDZ ( Allmala )
Hyderabad
Asbestos Cement
Products Ltd,
SERI A. K. GUPTA
Hyderabad
Engineering Research Laboratories, Hyderabad
Dn IQBAL ALI
The Associated Cement Companies Ltd, Bombay
SERI P. J. JAWS
M. N. Dartur 8: Co Pvt Ltd, Calcutta
Sam S. R. KUCKARNX
The Institution of Engineers ( India ), Calcutta
SHRI S. K. LAIIA
SEW B. T. UNWALLA ( Affmafr )
( Conlinucdon Poga 2 )
0
wiht
1983
18 I 10262 - 1982
( Confinucdjrom
pugs1 )
Rqmscnling
Memhers
Cent;o~r3e$lding
Dn MOEIAN RAI
DR S. S. RzHSt ( &rfnotc
SHRI K. K. NAMBIAR
SERI H. S. PABRICEA
SRRI C. S. MISHRA ( Alfnnatc)
SERI ?I. R. PHoLL
SERI Y. R. PHULL
Research
Institute
(CSIR),
In personal capacity
( Romnnolnya II First Cresreat
Park Road, Gandhinagar, Adyar, Madras )
Hindustan Prefab Ltd, New Delhi
Director
General,
Secretory
SARI M. N. NE~LAKANDHAN
Assistant Director ( Civ Engg ), IS1
( Confinasd on page 21 )
IS 8 10262- 1912
Indian Standard
RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR
CONCRETE MIX DESIGN
0. FOREWORD
0.1 This Indian Standard
was adopted by the Indian Standards
Institution
on 30 July 1982, after the draft finalized
by the Cement and Concrete
Sectional Committee
had been approved by the Civil Engineering
Division
Council.
0.2 Considerable
need has been felt for formulating
standard
recommendThe need has
ations for guidelines
on proportioning
of concrete mixes.
been further emphasized
by the importance
given to design mix concrete
Having recognized
this need, Cement and
according
to IS : 456-1978*.
Concrete Sectional Committee
decided to evolve a standard recommended
guidelines for concrete mix design.
043 The proportioning
of concrete mixes consists of determination
of the
quantities
of respective ingredients
necessary
to produce concrete
having
adequate,
but not excessive, workability
and strength for the particular
loading
and durability
for the exposure
to which it will be subjected.
Emphasis is laid on making the most economical
use of available materials
so as to produce concrete of the required attributes
at the minimum
cost,
0.4 Concrete has to be of satisfactory quality in both the fresh and hardened
states.
The task of proportioning
concrete mixes is accomplished
by the
use of certain
established
relationships
which afford reasonably
accurate
guidance for selecting the best combination
of ingredients
so as to achieve
the desirable properties
of the fresh and hardened
concrete.
Out of all the
physical characteristics
of concrete, compressive
strength is often taken as
an index of its quality in terms of durability,
impermeability
and waterTherefore,
the mix design is generally
tightness and is easily measurable.
carried out for a particular
compressive
strength of concrete, coupled with
adequate
workability,
so that the fresh concrete
can be properly
placed
In addition,
the mix proportions
are also checked against
and compacted.
the requirements
of adequate durability
for the type of exposure condition
anticipated
in service.
*Code of practice
concrete
( bird mision ).
IS : 10262 - 1982
0.5 The basic assumption
made in mix design is that the comprrssive
strength
of workable
concrete is, by and large, governed
by the waterAnother most convenient
relationship
applicable
to normal
cement ratio.
concretes is that for a given type, shape, size and grading
of aggregates,
the amount
of water determines
its workability.
However,
there are
various other factors which affect the properties
of concrete,
for example,
the quality and quantity
of cement, water and aggregates;
batching;
transportation;
placing; compaction;
curing; etc. Therefore,
the specific relationships that are used in proportioning
concrete
mixes should be considered
only as a basis for trial,, subject to modifications
in the light of experience
as well as for the particular
materials
used at the site in each case.
0.6 This standard
does not debar
methods of mix design.
0.7 For
standard
sing the
with IS
off value
the
adoption
of any
other
accepted
1. SCOPE
1.1 This standard
lays down the recommended
procedure
for desi.gning
concrete
mixes for general
types of construction
using the concreting
materials
normally
available.
The design is carried out for a desired
compressive
strength and workability
of concrete, using continuously
graded
aggregates.
This standard
does not include the design of concrete mixes
for flexural strength or when gap-graded
aggregates
or various admixtures
and pozzolana
are to be used.
1.2 All requirements
of IS : 456-1978t
and IS : 1343-1980:,
they apply, shall be deemed
to form part of this standard
otherwise
laid down in this standard.
2. DATA
in so far as
except where
basic data
are required
to be specified
for design
of a
a) Characteristic
compressive
strength ( that is, below which only a
specified proportion
of test results are allowed to fall ) of concrete
at 28 days (fck ),
b) Degree of workability
desired,
*Rules for rounding off numerical values ( raGed).
*Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete ( third r&ion
#Code of practice for prestressed concrete (jr~t reoision ).
).
GRADE OB
CONCRsra?
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
M 10
M 15
M 20
,M 25
M 30
M 35
M 40
M 45
M50
M 55
a4603
2.0
2.3
3.5
4-6
5.3
6.0
6.3
6.6
7.Q
7.4
7-7
7.8
3.3
4.5
5.6
6.3
7-O
7.3
7.6
8*0
8.4
a-7
a.8
2.5
3.6
4.3
5.0
5.3
5.6
6-O
6.4
67
6%?
NOTE - Appendix
control to be expected,
the construction site.
concrete
( &rd rrnL&o~),
IS I lo262 - 1982
deviation ) and the accepted proportion of results of strength
the characteristic strength (for ), given by the relation:
%k
tests
Wow
-fcr + t x J
where
f ek=
characteristic
s - standard
deviation,
and
t = a statistic, depending
to IS : 456-1978*
and IS : 134%1980t,
the characteristic
NOTE -According
strength isdefined
as that value below which not more than 5 percent ( 1 in 20 )
results are expected to fall.
In such case, the above equation will reduce to:
r-
-fos
+ 1.65 8
TABLE 2 VALUES
OF I
( cIou.se 2.2 )
f
ACOE~TED PROPORTION
OF Low REWJLTS
3. SELECTION
1 in 5
0.84
1 in 10
1.28
1 in 15
150
1 in 20
165
1 in40
1.86
1 in 100
233
OF MIX PROPORTIONS
of practice
of practice
0.30
0.35
040
045
0.50
0.60
WATER-CEMENT RATIO
Fm. 1
ratio.
0.30
0.35
0-m
O.&S
WATER-CEMENT
MY
~m&of
d =
B=
C9 E =
F -
om
045
RATIO
0.60
0.65
IS I 10262 - 1982
3.2 astirnation
to be expected
of Air Content
in normal
TABLE
amount of entrapped
air
) concrete is given in Table 3.
APPROXIMATE
NOMINAL MAXIMUX
OF AQQREQATE
mm
3.3 Selection
-Approximate
( non-air-entrained
SIZE
AIR CONTENT
ENTRAPPPDAIR,A~PEXCENTAOE
OB VOLuMEQFCO?UXETE
10
3.0
20
2.0
40
1.0
of Water
Content
Aggregate
Ratio
APPROXIMATE
SAND AND WATER CONTENTS
PER CUBIC
METRE
OF CONCRETE
FOR GRADES UPTO M 35
NOMINAL MAXI~IUM
SIZEOF AQDREQATE
mm
WATERCONTENT*,PER
CUBIC METIIP: OB CO~CIIETE
kg
SANI)
As
hIICRNT
40
10
208
20
186
35
40
I65
30
TABLE
APPROXIMATE
SAND
METRE
OF CONCRETE
*Water
and Table 6 )
WATERCONTENT',
PEP.
CUBIC METREOFCONCRETE
k
SAND AB PERCENTOF
TOTALAOGREQATEBY
ABSOLUTE VOLUME
10
200
28
20
180
25
content
corresponding
Or
TO'I'ALi\nc1cvonwX BY
ABSOI~U~FIXVOLUME
IS : 10262 - 1982
Crushed
1970*,
b)
4
d)
Water-cement
ratio
aggregate,
up to M 35 and is Lvsed
a)
Workability
coarse
grade
( angular
conforming
g to compacting
) coarse
factor
of grades
aggregate
c) Water-cement
ratio
to grading
of 0.80.
above
conforming
b) Fine aggregate
consisting of natural sand
zone II of Table 4 of IS : 383-lQiU*,
d) Workability
IS : 383-
to
of 0 6 ( by mass ), and
correspondin
a) Crushed
1970*,
conforming
M 35 and
IS : 383-
to
conforming
is
to grading
of 0 35 ( by mass ), and
corresponding
to compacting
factor
of 0.80.
3.4 Calculation
of Cement
Content - The cement
content
per unit
volume of concrete may be calculatrd
from the free water-cement
ratio
( see 3.1 and 3.1.1 ) and the quantity
of water per unit volume of concrete
( scle 3.3.1 ).
The cement
content
so calculated
shall
minimum
cement content
for the requirements
greater of the two values adopted
YSpecification
revision ) .
+Methods of test for aggregates
absorption
and bulking.
for concrete
be checked
against
of durability
and
from natural
the
the
( second
lS:10262c,TABLE
ADJUSTMENT
OF VALUES
IN WATER CONTENT
SAND PERCENTAGE
FOR OTHER CONDITIONS
( Clauses 3.3.4
CHANGE
IN CONDITION
FOR TABLES~
STIPULATED
5
AND
1982
AND
and 4.1 )
ADJUSTMENT
~--_--_----h_---__-__-~
Water Content
REQUIRED
IN
(1)
(2)
(3)
rfr 3 percent
or decrease
ratio
in
aggregate
*Specification
1 percent
- 15 kg/m3
7 percent
( second
ii?vision ).
3.5 Calculation
of Aggregate
Content
where
V = absolute
volume
w=
C= mass of cement
so-
specific gravity
( kg ) per ma of concrete,
of cement,
89
to total aggregate
by absolute
volume,
and coarse aggregate
( kg )
Ca a total masses of fine aggregate
per ms of concrete respectively,
and
specific gravities of saturated surface dry fine aggregate and
coarse aggregate respectively.
Siarsea
-
11
IS : 10262 - 1982
3.6 Combination
of Different
Coarse
Aggregate
Fractions -;,The
coarse aggregate used should conform
to IS : 383-1970*.
Coarse aggregates of different sizes should be combined in suitable proportions
so as to
result in an overall grading conforming
to Table 2 of IS : 383-1950* for
the particular
nominal maximum
size of aggregate.
example
of concrete
mix design
is given
ingredients
in Appendix
C.
MIXES
4.1 The
calculated
mix proportions
shall be checked by means of trial
batches.
Quantities
of materials worked out in accordance
with 3.1 to 3.7
shall comprise Trial Mix No. 1. The quantity
of materials
for each trial
shall be sufficient for at least three 150 mm size cube concrete specimens
and concrete required to carry out workability
test according to IS : 119919597.
Workability
of the Trial Mix No. 1 shall be measured. The mix shall
be carefully observed for freedom from segregation
and bleeding
and its
If the measured
workability
of Trial Mix No. 1 is
finishing properties.
different
from the stipulated
value, the water content shall be adjusted
according
to Table 6 corresponding
to the required change in compacting
With this adjusted water content,
the mix proportions
shall be
factor.
recalculated
keeping the free water-cement
ratio at the pre-selected
value
two more Trial Mixes
which will comprise Trial Mix No. 2. In addition,
No. 3 and 4 shall be made with the water content same as Trial Mix No. 2
and varying the free water cement ratio by f 10 percent of the pre-selected
value.
For these two additional
Trial Mixes No. 3 and 4, the mix proportions are to be recalculated
for the altered condition
of free water-cement
ratio with suitable adjustments
in accordance
with Table 6.
The procedure
for trial mixes is explained
by an illustrative
example
in Appendix
D, where the starting mix is arrived at according
to 3. Mix
No. 2 to 4 normally
provides sufficient information,
including the relationship between compressive
strength
and water-cement
ratio, from which
the mix proportions
for field trials may be arrived at.
Using the relationship so obtained between the compressive
strength and water-cement
ratio,
any change needed in the water-cement
ratio to get the required
target
compressive
strength may be easily obtained.
The concrete mix proportions
shall, however, be recalculated
for this changed water-cement
ratio, taking
*Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural
( iwond revision ).
tMethods of sampling and analyak of concrete.
12
fS t 10262 -1982
the water content same as that determined in Trial Mix No. 2. If the
size and special requirement of the work so warrant, the trial may be
extended to cover larger ranges of mix proportions as well as othrr variables, such as alternative sources of aggregates, maximum sizes and grading
of aggregates, and different types and brands of cements.
APPENDIX
OF QUALITY
DIFFERENT
CONTROL
EXPECTED
SITE CONDITIONS
UNDER
Conditions of Production
Degree of Control
Very good
Fresh cement from single source and regular tests, weighbatching of all materials, aggregates supplied in single
sizes, control of aggregate grading and moisture content,
control of water added, frequent supervision, regular
workabil,ity and strength tests, and field laboratory
facilities.
Good
Carefully
stored cement and periodic tests, weighbatching of all materials,
controlled
water, graded
aggregate supplied, occasional grading and moisture tests,
periodic check of workability and strength, intermittent
supervision, and experienced workers.
.
Fair
Proper storage
gates allowing
cement, water
and occasional
IS I 10262 - 1982
APPENDIX
( Clawe 3.1.1 )
METHOD OF RAPID ESTIMATION OF WATERCEMENT RATIO
B-l. Use of Fig. 2 will necessitate testing of the cement for its 28 day comand another 28 days are
pressive strength
according
to IS : 4031-1968*
needed
to obtain the compressive
strength
of concrete according
to the
As an alternative,
a rapid method of concrete mix design
trial mixes.
The procedure
which will take only 3 days for trials is described
in B-2.
is based on the use of accelerated
curing ( boiling water ) method for determination
of compressive
strength of concrete according
to IS : 9013-19787.
B-2. PROCEDURE
B-2.1 Determine
the accelerated
strength
( boiling water method ) of a
reference concrete mix having water-cement
ratio c 0.35 and workability ( compacting
factor ) c 0.80 with the cement proposed to be used,
The nominal maximum
size of aggregate
of
on 150 mm cube specimens,
the c reference concrete shall be 10 mm and fine aggregate used shail cotiform to Zone II of Table 4 of IS : 383-1970f.
B-2.2 Corresponding
cement ratio for the
Fig. 3.
to this accelerated
strength,
determine
required
target strength
of the concrete
mix proportions
of the trial mix.
according
B-2.4 Determine
the accelerated
compressive
strength
of the trial mix
( boiling water method ) and estimate the 28 day compressive
strength
with the help of correlations
between .accelerated and 28 day strengths
of
concrete, of the type of Fig. 2 of IS : 9013-1978t.
14
0.35
0.30
O-40
0.45
0.50
WATER-CEMENT
0*55
O-60
0.
AAllC
B = 15.2-18-l N/mti
( 155-185 kg/cm*
C = 18.1-21-l N/mmS ( 185-215 kg/cmS
D = 21.1-24-O N/mmS ( 215 245 kg/cm
E = 2&O-27*0 N/mms
( 245-275 kgjcmS
F = 27-O-29.9 N/mmS ( 275-305 kg/cmS
)
)
)
)
)
FIG. 3
15
KS : 16262 -
l!MJ2
APPENDIX
( Clause 3.8 )
ILLUSTRATIVE
C-O. An example
is given below:
illustrating
for a concrete
of M 20 grade
Characteristic
compressive
strength
red in the field at 28 days
Maximum
size of aggregate
b)
Cl Degree
of workability
d)
of quality
Degree
e) Type
requi-
20 N/mms
20 mm ( angular)
0.90 compacting
factor
Good
control
Mild
of exposure
Specific
gravity
3.15
of cement
c) Specific gravity
1) Coarse aggregate
2) Fine aggregate
2.60
2.60
d) Water absorption
1) Coarse aggregate
2) Fine aggregate
0.5 percent
1 *Opercent
Nil ( absorbed
moisture
also
nil )
2.0 percent
2) Fine aggregate
f)
Sieve analysis
1) Coarse aggregate
#Specjfication
for ordinary
16
cement
( third reoision )4
IS t 10262- 1982
IS Sieve
Percentage of D$rent
Fractions
h-_----_~
c-------
Analvris of Coarse
Agpegute Fraction
( Percent Passing )
I
II
Sizes
mm
20
10
4.75
2.36
100
0
2) Fine
100
71.20
9.40
0
II
40 per\cent
100 percent
Conforming
to Table 2
of IS : 3831970*
100
28.5
37
40
28.5
3.7
Remark
Fine Aggregate
( Percent Passing )
4.75 mm
100
2.36 mm
100
1.18 mm
93
600 micron
300 micron
60
Conforming
to grading
Zone III of Table 4 of
IS : 383- 1970*
12
150 micron
TARGET
Combined
I
60 percent
60
0
Aggregate
IS Sieve Sizes
C-3.
Remark
MEAN
2
STRENGTH
OF CONCRETE
OF WATER
CEMENT
RATIO
SELECTION
OF WATER
of practice
for plain
ad
reinforced
17
from
conctete
natural
( tid
sources
revSen ).
for
concrete
IS I 10262- 1982
For change in values in water-cement
sand belonging
to Zone III, the following
Change in Condition
( RPf Table 6 )
ratio, compacting
factor
adjustment
is required:
Adjustment Required in
r--__---h--__---_-~
Water Content
Percent
For decrease in water-cement
ratio
by (0.60 - 0.50 ) that is 0.1
For increase
in compacting
( O-9 - 0.8 ) that is 0.10
Required
factor
content
C-6. DETERMINATION
Water
0
0
+ 3 percent
OF CEMENT
ratio
of total
186 x 3
loo= 106 + 5.58 =
186 +
cement
2.0
f3
water
Percentage
Sand in Total
Aggregate
and
1.5
3.5
aggregate
by
191.6 l/ms
CONTENT
= 0.50
Water
191.6 1
191.6
= -5 383 kglms
0.50
content is adequate for mild exposure condition,
A of IS : 456-1978*.
Cement
This cement
ding to Appendix
C-7.
DETERMINATION
CONTENT
OF COARSE
AND FINE
accor-
AGGREGATE
and 0.98 ms pi
orfa
191.6 +
= 546 kg/ms,
c, =
A.
0.683
>
2.60
x -!1000
and
1 187 kg/ma
IS : 10262 - 1982
The mix proportion
then becomes:
Water
Cement
191.6 1
383 kg
or 0.50
Fine Aggregate
Coarse Aggregate
546 kg
1187 kg
1.42
3.09
REQUIRED
For 50 kg of cement,
a) Cement = 50 kg
b) Sand
= 710kg
c) Coarse aggregate
d) Water
1) For water-cement
of water
= 25.0 litres
of water to be added
) 1.42 1
= 25.0 + 0.77 -
1.42
= 24.35 1
e) Actual quantity of sand required
allowing for mass of free moisture
after
= 71 *O + 1.42
-
72.42 kg
Coarse aggregate:
of different constituents
Water
:
Cement :
Sand
:
Fraction I
Fraction II
24.35 kg
50.00 kg
72*42 kg
c 92.24 kg
= 61.49 kg
19
required for
ISr10262.1982
APPENDIX
( Clause 4.1 )
DETAILS
OF TRIAL
MIX
properties
of
of laboratory
.-A
p---m-----
Water
Cement
(1
1.
2.
(2)
(3)
kg
383
191.6
( W/C = 0.50 )
394.6
( W/C+
3.
358.7
( W/C*
4.
Mm
(5)
CHARACTERIBTIOB
Visual
Observation
fob!,
(8)
(6)
28-day
Compressive
Strength
(9)
N/mm%
kg
kg
kg
i53Y5
712
475
0.80
undersanded
687
458
0.9i
Cohesive
28.8
688
459
0 90
Cohesive
26.0
682
455
0.89
Cohesive
31.2
percent
564
( 33
197.3
591
= 0.55 )
Coarse
Aggregate Type
I-----?
I
II
(4)
197.3
= 0.50 )
percent
( 34
percent )
438.4
197.3
( w/c* - 0.45 )
*Water-cement
----------y
Sand
CONCRBTE
_--)L--Workability
in Terms of
Compacting
Factor
535
( 32
percent
ratio.
20
IS:10262-1982
Costiwedfroti
page 2 )
Concrete Subcommittee,
Repesentin,o
Members
c. R. ALIMCHANDANI
SHRI
M. C. TANUON (Alternate )
D E P u T Y DIIUXT~I~, STANDARDS
kRI
(B&S)
BDC 2 : 2
Stup Consultants
Lrd, Bomtay
DIRECTOR,
STAN~AI~DS ( M/C ) ( Alternate )
Engineering Research Laboratories, Hyderabad
DIRECTOR
Central Water Commission,
New Delhi
DIRECTOR
(C & MDD)
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ( C & MDD )
( Alternate )
The Concrete Association of India, Bombay
SHRI T. A. E. DSA
SHIU N. C. DUQQAL ( Alternate )
Public Works and Housing Department,
Bombay
SHRI M. P. GAJAPATHY RAO
Structural Engineering Research Centre
(CSIR),
Ssxz V. K. GHANEEA~
Roorkee
Engineer-in-Chiefs
Branch, Army Headquarters,
SHRI V. Ii. GUPTA
New Delhi
SHRI D. K. DINKAR ( Alternafe )
Associated Consulting Services, Bombay
SARI J. S.. HINQO~ANI
SEIRI A. P. REX~EDIOS(Alternate)
The Associated
Cement Companies
Ltd, Bombay
SHRI P. J. JAGUS
SHIU M. I<. VJNAYA~A (Altcrnatc 1
SHRI K. c. KAnAMoilANnANr
Engineers India Ltd, New Delhi
SRRI N. K. G~PTA ( Alternate )
National Buildings Organization,
Ntw Deihi
SllRI K. K. KIIANNA
SHRI K. S. SXINIVASAN (Alkmat~ )
Hindustan Prefab Ltd, New Delhi
SHRI G. K. MAJUMDAR
SIIRI hi. KUNDU ( AlterflUte)
The Hindustan Construction Co Ltd, Bombay
SURI P. V. NAIK
SHRI V. M. MAD~E ( Alternate )
In personal capacity ( Ramonolq~a II First Crescent
SHRI K. K. NAMBIAR
Park Roan, Gandhinogar, Adyar, Madras )
Central Road Research Institute (CSIK),
New
SURI Y. R. PnnLL
Delhi
SHRI M. R. CHATTERJEE ( Aifernote )
StrugayJaingineering
Research Centre (CSIR),
SARI A. S. PRASADA RAO
ASSISTANT
DR S. S. RE~SI
Cent;iador~,lding
Research
Institute
( CSIR ),
21
BUREAU
OF INDIAN STANDARDS
Headquarters
Mar& Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, NEW DELHI 110002
Telephones: 323 0131,323 3375,323 9402
Fax : 91 11 3234062,Ql
11 3239399, 91 11 3239362
Telegrams : Manaksanstha
(Common to all Offices)
Telephone
Central Laboratory :
Plot No. 20/Q, Site IV, Sahibabad
6-77 00 32
201010
Regional Olfices:
Central
*Eastern
337 66 62
60 36 43
160022
Southern
3237617
twestern
MUMBAI 400093
23523
15
632 92 95
Branch Offices::
Pushpak,
Nurmohamed
21 01 41
641037
8-28 88 01
121001
8-71 19 96
201001
54 11 37
781003
500001
21 68 76
Behind
Leela
201083
37 29 25
117/418 B, Sarvodaya
55 40 21
40 36 27
751001
639 49 55
Road,
550 13 46
380001
Cinema,
Naval
Ktshore
Road,
23 89 23
52 51 71
26 23 05
Institution of Engineers
Approach,
_ Reprography
32 36 35
621
17
271085
695034
309 65 28
222 39 71