Congress of the United States
‘Washington, BE 20515
‘March 4, 2015
8. Todd Jones, Director
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
‘99 New York Avenue, NE
‘washington, DC 20226
eae Director Jones:
\We are writing to express our serious concern with the “ATF Framework fr Determining Whether
Certain Projectiles are ‘Primarily Intended for Sporting Purposes’ Within the Meaning of 18 UC.
921{2\7)C," Issued on February 23, 2015,
‘The proposed “Framework” purports to establish an “objective” test for determining whether certain
projectiles otherwise considered “armor piercing” under federal aw qualify for an exemption allowing
them tobe lawfully manufactured, Imported, and sold on the cvllan market in the United States. The
“Framework,” however, establishes an unduly restrictive standard, does not comport with the letter or
spirit ofthe law, and wil interfere with Second Amendment rights by disrupting the market for
ammunition tat law abiding Americans use for sporting and other legitimate purposes.
‘As you know, the ban on “armor piercing” ammunition was created by the Law Enforcement Ofcers
Protection Act (LEOPA) of 1986, The Act was conceived to protect police offices from the hazards
presented by solled "armor piercing” projectiles-rignaly designed for law enforcement and military
‘se—that canbe fred from handguns and penetrate the sort of soft body armor typically worn by police
officers.
‘To do this, LEOPA bans various sorts af non-lead projectiles or projectile “cores that ‘may be" used in
handguns. As LEOPA's authors ealizee, however, bullets fied from mast common rifle cartridges can
penetrate soft body armor, and some rife bullets canbe loaded into ammunition for handguns.
‘Congress therefore incorporated an exemption into LEOPA for projectiles “which the Attorney General
finds [are] primarily intended to be used fr sporting purposes" to protect ordinary fle ammunition
‘rom being swept up in the ban.
“The "Framework" fs intended to answer the question of how the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives (ATF) willmake “sporting purposes” determinations. It creates a two-prong tes. Fst,
[ATE willexempt 222 caliber projectile. f the projectile weighs 40 grains or less AND is loaded into‘®
rimfre cartedge” Second, ATF will exempt other projectiles if they are “loaded into a cartridge for
"which the oniy mandgun that is eadiy avaiable inthe orainar channels of commercial rade single
shot handgun.” Even then, ATF-uner ths supposedly “objective” test ~ “retains the discretion to deny
“any application fora sporting purposes exemption f substantial evidence exits that the ammunition i
not primarily intended for such purposes.”The effect ofthese restrictive interpretations are untenable. For example, since 1886 ATF has
considered the MESS 5.56» 45mm cartridge to be “exempt” under the sporting purposes tes (although
its core contains a substantial amount of lea, alsing questions about its clasifiation as “armor
piercing in the frst place), ATF has row rescinded that exemption because repeating handguns that fre
the MBSS round are commercially available. Yet this round is amongst the most commonly used in the
‘mast popular fle design In America, the AR-5. Milions upon milions of MSS rounds have been sold
and used in the US, yet ATF has not even alleged ~ much less offered evidence ~that even one such
‘ound has ever been fred from handgun at a police officer. The idea that Congress intended LEOPA to
ban one of the preeminent rifle cartridges in use by Americans fr legitimate purposes i preposterous.
‘While the banning ofthese popular cartridges is the most visible and immediate effect of ATFs shifting
policy, the "Framework" has other serious implications. t wil, for example, inhibit the development and
tse of rile ammunition containing non-lead material, even as efforts are afoot both at the federal and
state levels to impose bans or restrictions on lead ammunition, The eventual collision ofthese trends
could result in drasticaly reduced options for lawful ammunition uses.
Neither LEOPA nor any other provision of federal aw is intended to restrict the development of
‘ammunition or handgun that were designed and intended to be used by private cizens for legitimate
purposes. Instead, LEOPA shouldbe construe in accordance with the American tradition of lawful
firearms ownership, as protected by the Second Amendment. The tem “primarily intended tobe used
for sporting purposes” should be broadly understood to incorporate the many legitimate uses
‘Americans make oftheir firearms including target practice, hunting, organized and casuel competition,
‘raising and skills development, and instructional activites.
‘The “Framework” does nat comport with LEOPA's meaning and intent and should be abandoned. ATF
should refocus its efforts on serious threats to law enforcement officers from specialy designed armor
Piercing projectiles that are intended for use inthe sort of handguns commonly carried and concealed
by criminals, Under no circumstances should ATE adopt a standard that wil ban ammunition that is
‘overwhelmingly used by law-abiding Americans fr legitimate purposes.
Of adltional concern is the manner in which ATF issued the proposed “Framework.” The Administrative
Procedures Act (APA) (5 US.C. 523) requees that “general notce of proposed rulemaking shallbe
published inthe Federal Register.” To date, the "Framework" has not been published in the Federal
Register
In order for Congress to more fully understand the rationale behind the Framework” please respond to
the folowing questions by March 13, 2085:
3) How does ATF determine what constitutes the “core” ofa projectile that has more than one
lisrete component or section beneath an outer jacket and upon what provision of law or other
principle is that determination based?
2) Why did the ATF not publish the proposed “Framewor" inthe Federal Register 35 require by
the APA?
3) Under the “Framework,” what other rounds is the AT considering regulating as armor piercing
ammunition?Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Jason
Cervenak, Senior Counsel, of the House Judiciary Committee at 202-225-3951,
Sincerely,
Qi khdits
Bob Gooulatte, Chairman
{Committee on the Judiciary
US. House of Representatives
bonne
Sensenbrenner, Chairman
sube@mmitte on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Securty and investigations
‘Committee on the Judiciary
Us. House of Representatives
Additional Member signatures attached.vs Moy Wiybe 1» 220 Royce
sss Pale. deBimlo_ ag ote Maton
. ——_ win o Make, Color0
2
3
4
is
16
”
1B
19
20
n
2
23
24
25
26
a
28
23
30
a1
32
2
3
35
36
37
38
39
a
a
a
Paul Gosar
Dan Benshek 1.0,
Tea Yoho
Randy Weber
Scott Destarais
Tom Marino
David “Phi” Roe, M.D
David 8. Mckinley, PE
en Buck
Ralph Abraham
Scott Rigel
Joseph A. Pitts
Jackie Walorski
Bruce Polqula|
Mike Bishop
chard Hudson
Mark Amodel
Bob Gibbs
Frank Guinta
John Ratcliffe
Aichard Hanna
Doug LaMalfa
candice s. il
Mike Rogers
‘wilt Hurd
‘Thomas Massie
Garret Graves
‘Chuck Feichmann
Bradley Byrne
John Moolenaar
Jeff Duncan
Tim Wale
Mia tove
Jeff Denham
Chris Gibson
Rodney Davis
Brian Babin
Ron Desants|
Scott Tipton
yan Zinke
Tom Price, MO.
Blake Farentholé
Bill Posey
gagesese
Mark Meadows
Bill Floces
Rick Crawford
Billsohnson
Dan Newhouse
Ron Kind
Doug colins
Jeff Fortenbersy
Mike Ketly
sim Jordan
Andy Hares, M..
Mike Bost
Randy Neugebauer
ill Huizenga
Renee Elmers
Seott Perry
Patrick Tiber
Alex Mooney
French Hill
Mo Brooks
Roger Wiliams
Diane Black
Jason Smith
Mackwayne Mullin
‘Tim Huelskamp
Morgan Gefith
Rob Bishop
Glenn "GT" Thompson
Robert Hurt
Joe Heck
Kevin Yoder
Jim Bridenstine
Robert Pttinger
Barry Loudermile
Kevin Brady
‘Gregg Harper
Jeff hile
Dave Brat
David Schweiker
David Rourer
Cresent Hardy
Larry Bucston
Mike Pompeo87
88
89
90
91
92
93
95
97
98
100
a0
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
0
an
a2
a2
13
ae
us
us
118
a9
120
a2
2
123
12a
225,
126
a7
128
x29
Tom Emmer
Rick Alen
David Valadio
Devin Nunes
Steve Stivers
Daniel Webster
Chris Collins
Jaime Herrera Beutler
Pete Olsen
4. Randy Forbes
Paul Cook
Duncan Hunter
Mike Conaway
Steve Pearce
Tim Walberg
John Kine
Blaine Luetkemeyer
Robert Latta
Stephen Fincher
Rob wittmas
Tom cole
Gene Green
Doug Lambeen|
Ted Poe
Lamar Smith
Austin Scott
Mike Simpson
Marlin tutaman
Keist Noem
Tom Graves
Kenny Marevant
Don Young
Dana Rohrabacher
John Culberson
Steve Chabet
Leonard Lance
Michael Burgess
Ed whithle
Colin Peterson
steve king
Joba Shimkus
Joe Wilson
‘Advan Smith
130
a1
132
a3
134
as
136
37
a8
139
140
aa
182
143
aaa
145,
146,
7
148
49
150
a1
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
362
163
164
165
166
167
168
169)
x70
wm
m
Darel isa
Bill Shuster
Marsha Blackburn
Tin Murphy
“Tom Meclintock
John Carter
Lynne Wes:moreland
‘Mac Thornserry
Charles Dent
Jeb Hensering
Pete Sessions |
‘ver Buchsnon
Mark Sanferd
Peter Rostam
Louis Gobmert
Vicky Hartder
Joby Duncan (8)
Matt Salmon
Virgina Fox
John Fleming
Joe Barton
Henry Custer
Patrick Mesemry
Walter Jones
Frank Lobiondo
Tom Reed
Randy Hultgren
Ea Royce
‘Sam Johnson
‘Tom Rooney
‘Ander Crenshaw
ken Calver
Jason Chafete
Michael R.Turner
steve Scale
Cynthia tums
Brett Gute
‘Mike Coffman
‘aron Schack
Glenn Grathman
Evan Jenkins
George Helding
Luke Messera7
a5
176
a7
178
179
280
181
122
183
14
as
186
17
188
19
190
191
a2
193
194
195
196
397
198
19
200
201
202
203,
208
205,
206
207
208
208
210
an
22
23
na
as
‘Mario Diaz-Balart,
Ryan Costello
Ear, "Buddy’ Carter
‘Ann Wagner
Patick Meehan
‘Martha Roby
Chis Stewart
Mark Walker
‘ann Kirkpatrick
CCatny MeMortis Rodgers
Roe Blum
Tor Rice
Barbara Comstock
‘curt Clawson
Dennis Ross
Robert Aderholat
Mimi Walters
Ike mecaut
steve Russell,
Lot Baretta
steve Knight
Martha MeSally
Steve Womack
David Joyce
‘Adam Kinzinger
eth Rothfus|
‘chrles Boustany
Trey Gomy
‘susan Brooks
Brice Westerman
krit Paulsen
Justia Amash
Kay Granger
Todd Young,
John Kateo
Paul Ryan
sean Duffy
Brad Wenstrup
Andy Barr
Sam Graves
Dive Reichert
kevin Mecarthy
Mick Mulvaney
Frank Lucas
Hal Rogers
Sanford Bishop
Tent Franks
Greg Walden
Fred Upton
Xevin Cramer
fed Ribble
Jody Hce
Raul Labrador
lynn Jenkins
Bily tong
Dave Trott
Robert Woodal
chard Nugent
David Jolly
Todd Rokta
Jeha Mica
Lee Zein