64 views

Uploaded by api-239131622

save

- XPS intro
- Physics - Particles and Waves
- How a Battery Circuit Works
- Lecture_6
- 11Atomic Physics 227-257
- 01-Electron, Photon and X-ray-(Theory).pdf
- Color. Therapy.the.History
- A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FACEBOOK ZUCKERBERG'S NET WORTH DATA FROM BLOOMBERG BILLIONAIRES INDEX CONFIRMS THE WORK FUNCTION FOR WEALTH GENERATION
- EM1.pdf
- Photon App
- 09_H1Phy_AJC_Prelim_P2
- Lenger Bajpai Drexel Homeopathy
- mynotes-nobook
- A Second Look at Microsoft After the Historic Quarterly Loss
- A Scientist's Guide to the Spiritual
- seniorproject
- demystifying quantum mechanics
- on einstein’s 1905 paper
- Sanguni2012 NA 26
- QuanTen
- Definitions to Learn
- JAMP_2016032114303695
- engineering
- CH02_WorkedSolutions
- Cellphone Radiation
- Tracing the past of a quantum particle
- page 3 part 2-individual unit
- 1401.0520v2
- 594066df-0e3b-4bc8-ae65-17f94e2d7389
- QED - Def
- QUINTERO - Diseño de una planta de reciclado de Tereftalato de polietileno (PET), con una producc....pdf
- Apresentacao Final
- k5 - Supervisi Klinis - Pendidikan Biologi 2018
- Presentasi Preeklamsi.pptx
- Team Management Draft 2.docx
- Guia_Estudio_de_Riesgo__Analisis_de_Riesgo_.pdf
- Naturales
- PEMBERITAHUAN KECACINGAN.docx
- 2018-09-02
- Blog Indonesia Entrepreneur Rizka Wahyu Romadhona,- Pemilik Lapis Bogor Sangkuriang Oleh-oleh Khas Bogor
- Kesetimbangan Momen Gaya
- 00677.pdf
- Cuatro Elementos Para Disenar Un Sistema de Cuidados
- fsdq
- Atrevete a Ser Diferente
- Classless Ad&d
- Estatuto de Cataluña 2006.pdf
- Biografias de Presidentes
- ANATOMI IKAN DAN FUNGSINYA
- ORACIÓN DE PROTECCIÓN CON LA SANGRE DEL SEÑOR JESÚS.docx
- 08.16-valvula balance.pdf
- Enterococo Minsal 23-09-2013
- Bebicina apa de mare.xlsx
- Amicizia è Volare - 001 Flauto (1)
- ConstructionTolerancesGuide-Version 2.pdf
- 1900-3803-entra-13-01-00236.pdf
- 1_1_1969.pdf
- 291272424 Laporan Hasil Study Banding
- sheetmetal
- Sesión 7 Liderazgo Trascendental
- phys lect eng lssbt 3
- progr 5a clil 2
- il piccolo antropologo
- coulomb and field
- our solar system
- integrazione verbale n 1
- force and vector
- gauss-law
- 2 programma convegno (2)
- newtons laws
- attestato rethink news vero
- salvador dali
- phys lect eng lssbt 1 (1)
- grease gb ita
- allegati miur aoodgper registro ufficialeu 0017849 01-12-2014
- ddg 401 2014
- programmazione degli interventi clil nelle classi 5
- progetto clil
- density
- tbw food sayings
- preface to lyrical ballads
- mediterrenean diet keeps you happier
- chapter-5-dinner-is-served
- programmazione degli interventi clil nelle classi 5
- classroom phrases

You are on page 1of 12

2. The corpuscular interpretation of light

Ermanno Amata

Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali

INAF

Via del fosso del cavaliere, 100

00133 Roma

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

UV source

**The photo-electric effect: the experiment.
**

In 1902 Philipp Lenard published some interesting experimental

results on the photo-electric effect.

L

M

i

Experimental setup.

Vacuum tube with two electrodes, L and M connected to an

electric circuit. A variable UV source hits L with its radiation.

Possibility to apply a voltage between L and M and to reverse it

ΔV = VM - VL

i = current intensity.

I1,2 = intensity of UV radiation.

A is an amperometer, V is a voltmeter.

When ΔV>0, a current will flow in the circuit towards M. It is

straightforward to interpret this current as due to electrons being

emitted by L and collected by M.

+

**I2 = 2I1 When ΔV<<0, all electrons extracted from L will be repelled by
**

I1

-ΔVa

**M’s negative potential. Therefore, no current will flow in the
**

circuit.

ΔV

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

UV source

The photo-electric effect: the experimental results.

L

M

When ΔV>>0, all electrons extracted from L are collected by M,

so that, even if ΔV further increases, the current intensity will not

change (saturation current).

The saturation current is found to be proportional to the intensity

of UV radiation.

When ΔV approaches 0, the current i decreases; i then falls to 0

when ΔV → - ΔVa

ΔVa does not vary with the radiation intensity.

i

I2 = 2I1

I1

-ΔVa

ΔV

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

**The photo-electric effect: Kmax does not depend on radiation intensity.
**

L

M

**Let us now consider in some detail what happens when ΔV =-ΔVa
**

and an electron leaves L to reach M.

In order for an electron to reach M, it needs to be emitted with

enough initial kinetic energy. We call this energy KL. The potential

energy of the electron will be UL.

**The electron will move in an electrostatic potential from potential VL to potential VM and will be decelerated.
**

As the electron reaches M, its kinetic energy will be 0 and its potential energy will be UM.

Conservation of total energy tells us that KL + UL = UM

As we know that U = q V and q = -e, we can write

KL = -e VM + e VL = e(VL- VM) = -e ΔV = e Δva

In conclusion, by measuring the stop potential Δva we obtain a measure of the maximum kinetic energy of

the electrons extracted from L.

This energy, which we call Kmax, does not depend on the intensity of the radiation hitting L, as the stop

potential does not either. Instead, it varies from metal to metal.

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

**The photo-electric effect: new ideas are needed
**

The figure on the left shows a plot of Kmax for sodium

as a function of frequency.

Similar plots can be drawn for other metals.

We notice that there is a cutoff frequency, fmin, below

which no photo-electric effect occurs.

As frequency increases from fmin, Kmax increases

linearly.

We now know enough to draw some surprising conclusions.

In fact, when physicists tried to explain the experimental results concerning the photoelectric effect, they ran

into two major problems.

1. Classical wave theory forecasts that the kinetic energy of photoelectrons should increase with the intensity

of the UV beam. On the contrary, Kmax is independent of the UV intensity.

2. According to wave theory, the photo-electric effect should take place for any frequency, provided that light

intensity is high enough. Instead, for each metal we find a characteristic cutoff frequency .

Similarly to what had happened a few years earlier for black body radiation, physicists were in bad

need of a new paradigm to explain experimental data.

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

The photo-electric effect: Einsteins’s bold hypothesis.

The solution to this problem came from Albert Einstein. He clearly drew inspiration from the new ideas

which had been recently proposed by Max Planck to explain black body radiation.

We recall that, although Planck quantised the energy in the black body cavity, he still treated the radiation as

an electromagnetic wave.

Einstein moved a big step forward and proposed that the energy of a light beam travels through space in

concentrated bundles, called photons, which behave like particles, but do not bear a mass.

He wrote for the energy of a single photon the following formula:

E = hf,

where f is the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation and h is just Planck’s constant.

Many years later, Millikan, who did a lot of experimental work to check Einstein’s theory of the photoelectric effect, commented that Einstein’s hypothesis was “bold, not to say reckless!”

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

**The photo-electric effect explained through Einstein’s hypothesis.
**

Having quantised light in photons, Einstein then proposed that, when a metal is hit by a beam of ultraviolet

radiation, at a given time only a photon will interact with a single electron of the metal.

According to this hypothesis, an electron can gain enough energy to leave the metal only if

h f ≥ We

where We is the work needed to extract an electron.

This yields, that there exists a minimum frequency below which the photo-electric effect does not occur:

fmin = We/h

This conclusion is in accordance with experimental results.

Let us now consider an electron extracted from the metal by a single photon which gives it all its energy.

Clearly, if we neglect possible interactions with nearby metal ions, the electron will emerge with energy

E = h f - We

which can also be written as

Kmax = h f - We , or as

Kmax = h(f - fmin )

This is also in agreement with experimental data: the maximum frequency of the extracted photon

increases linearly with frequency and depends only on frequency (whatever is the number of photons

impinging on the metal, i.e. whatever is the light intensity).

In spite of the success of Einstein’s theory of photo-electric effect, the concept of light made of photons was

opposed by many great physicists for years (Planck, Lorentz and Millikan included), until Compton…

**The Compton effect
**

Peak at λ’ > λ

**Peak at the wavelength
**

emitted by the X-ray tube

**In 1923 Arthur H. Compton published a paper
**

on the scattering of X-rays from electrons.

Compton's original experiment made use of

molybdenum K-alpha x-rays, which have a

wavelength λ=0.0709 nm. These were

scattered from a block of carbon and observed

at different angles with a Bragg spectrometer.

In the figure on the left we see a scheme of the

experiment for a scattering angle of 90°.

**Compton observed a peak corresponding to the original wavelength of X-rays emitted by the tube, but, close
**

to it in wavelength, he got a second peak, at longer wavelength, which was completely unexpected.

He measured the wavelength shift and got Δλ = λ’ – λ = 0,22 x 10-11 m.

He also found that similar peaks appeared at all angles around the carbon target and noticed that Δλ varied

with the angle following a sort of cosine law.

He then performed the same experiment using X-rays of different wavelengths.

He found that, for each scattering angle, Δλ was always the same, with no dependence upon wavelength.

The secondary peak at longer wavelength cannot be explained by the classical theory of

electromagnetism. In fact, Maxwell’s equations tell us that all electrons in the graphite should oscillate at the

frequency of the incident radiation; therefore, they should emit exactly the same frequency (i.e. wavelength)

which is shot towards them.

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

**The momentum of Einstein’s photon
**

We have seen, in the discussion of the photo-electric effect, that Einstein quantised electromagnetic radiation

and postulated the existence of photons.

According to Einstein’s idea, photons behave like particles, but do not have a mass.

However, it is possible to define for them a quantity which plays an essential role in the description of the

dynamics of any particle, i.e. the momentum, often indicated with the letter p.

In classical mechanics, given a particle of mass m and velocity v, its momentum is the vector

p=mv

In the following, we shall consider just the intensity of the momentum vector and shall use the symbol p.

In order to extend its definition to the case of a photon, which is a massless particle, Einstein made use of an

equation of his special relativity, relating energy to momentum of a particle, i.e.

**where m0 is the rest mass of the particle and c is the speed of light.
**

As for the photon m0 = 0, Einstein concluded that a photon possesses a quantised momentum

p = E/c = hf/c

Instead, in special relativity, the usual expression for the momentum for a particle which has a rest mass m0 >

0, is

**Compton’s explanation of the effect which is named after him.
**

y

hf’/c

(hf’/c) sin φ

x

(hf’/c) cos φ

E0_ph= hf

p0_ph= hf/c

E0_el= mec2

p0_el= 0

hf/c

pelcosθ

pelsinθ

**Hereafter, suffix 0 refers to
**

initial values (before the

collision), while suffix f refers

to final values (after the

collision).

**The incident photon has an energy E0_ph = hf and a momentum p0_ph = hf/c. It bumps into a target electron
**

and transfers to it some energy and some momentum: after the collision, the photon frequency will be f’.

As both energy and momentum must be conserved, we must write

E0_ph + E0_el = Ef_ph + Eel

p0_ph + p0_el = pf_ph + pel

The second equation is in vectorial form, i.e. it corresponds to two scalar equations, along the x and y axes.

Compton solved this system of three equations; then, used the λ= c/f relation and obtained the formula to

calculate the wavelength of the scattered photon:

λ’ = λ + (h/mec) (1-cosφ)

i.e.

Δλ = λ’ – λ = (h/mec) (1-cosφ)

This formula closely reproduced experimental data.

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

**The φ = 90° case
**

Peak at λ’ > λ

**Let us derive Compton’s result for φ = 90°, as in this case the three equations
**

written in the previous slide take a rather simple form.

We expect to obtain Δλ = λ’ – λ = (h/mec) (1-cos90°) = h/mec.

We start from the two equations concerning momentum

p0_ph _x = pf_ph_x + pel_x

These two equations tell us that momentum

must be conserved both along x and along y.

p0_ph _y = pf_ph_y + pel_y

where x and y refer to the two axes.

**Peak at the wavelength
**

emitted by the X-ray tube

**As φ = 90°, p0_ph _y = pf_ph_x = 0, so that the two equations can be written as
**

p0_ph _x = pel_x and -pf_ph _y = pel_y i.e.

pel_x = hf/c

and

pel_y = -hf’/c .

pel_x

**At this point, we recall that f ~ f’, so that we can write that pel_x ~ -pel_y. = |pel_y|.
**

We conclude that θ ~ 45°, so that the kinetic energy of the electron can be written as

K = ½ mev2 = me2 v2/2me = p2/2me = (h2f 2/c2+ h2f ’2/c2)/2me ~ (2h2f 2/c2)/2me = h2f 2/mec2

pel_y

45°

We can now rewrite the conservation of energy, which readily tells us that the decrease of photon energy is

equal to K:

h f - h f’ = h2f 2/mec2

We now recall that f= c/λ, so that we can change to wavelengths and obtain c/λ - c/ λ’ = h/me λ 2

Finally, we multiply both sides by λ’ λ /c, so that

Δλ = λ’ – λ = (h/mec) (λ’ λ/ λ2 ) ~ h/mec

q.e.d.

**The Compton effect: conclusions
**

Peak at λ’ > λ

**Let us summarise Compton’s results.
**

At each scattering angle, Compton observed a

peak corresponding to the original X-ray

wavelength and a second peak, at longer

wavelength, which was completely unexpected.

**Peak at the wavelength
**

emitted by the X-ray tube

**He found that, for each scattering angle, Δλ
**

was exactly the same, with no dependence upon

the wavelength.

**The secondary peak at longer wavelength cannot be explained by classical electromagnetism.
**

By treating X rays as Einstein’s photons (i.e. assigning to them energy and momentum as predicted by

Einstein’s relativity theory), Compton found the formula to calculate the wavelength of the scattered photon:

λ’ = λ + (h/mec) (1-cosφ)

i.e.

Δλ = λ’ – λ = (h/mec) (1-cosφ)

This formula closely reproduced experimental data.

Nobody could now deny that Einstein’s photon was real!

We still have to explain the peak at the original wavelength.

These are photons which are scattered by inner electrons, which are tightly bound to the atom, so that the

whole atom, which is much more massive than a single electron, does not recoil much. As a result, the energy

of the photon undergoes only a very small change, which is not detected by the experiment!

Two last remarks: the Compton effect also occurs when an energetic photon hits any elementary particle; in

astrophysics it is possible to observe the “inverse Compton effect”, in which an electron hits an X ray photon.

Lectures delivered at the Liceo Scientifico Statale Bruno Touschek, Grottaferrata, on February 16, 17 and 18, 2015.

- XPS introUploaded byquzalbash
- Physics - Particles and WavesUploaded byGowrisankar Rao
- How a Battery Circuit WorksUploaded byJC Munguia Castañeda
- Lecture_6Uploaded bymrio2
- 11Atomic Physics 227-257Uploaded byeamcetmaterials
- 01-Electron, Photon and X-ray-(Theory).pdfUploaded byprajal4511
- Color. Therapy.the.HistoryUploaded byemmanuel333
- A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FACEBOOK ZUCKERBERG'S NET WORTH DATA FROM BLOOMBERG BILLIONAIRES INDEX CONFIRMS THE WORK FUNCTION FOR WEALTH GENERATIONUploaded byVj Laxmanan
- EM1.pdfUploaded byAyorinde T Tunde
- Photon AppUploaded byJuancho Mesa
- 09_H1Phy_AJC_Prelim_P2Uploaded byDewan Olin Chotepadae
- Lenger Bajpai Drexel HomeopathyUploaded byrpbajpai
- mynotes-nobookUploaded bygeopaok165
- A Second Look at Microsoft After the Historic Quarterly LossUploaded byVJLaxmanan
- A Scientist's Guide to the SpiritualUploaded byJohn Joseph Petrovic
- seniorprojectUploaded byapi-335669850
- demystifying quantum mechanicsUploaded bymrbubos
- on einstein’s 1905 paperUploaded byoussama gassab
- Sanguni2012 NA 26Uploaded byEvilásio Souza
- QuanTenUploaded byAngelo Martinez
- Definitions to LearnUploaded byGrace Luo
- JAMP_2016032114303695Uploaded byrahmawatirais
- engineeringUploaded byAshish Yadav
- CH02_WorkedSolutionsUploaded byJeff
- Cellphone RadiationUploaded byRenita Hapsari
- Tracing the past of a quantum particleUploaded bydssgss
- page 3 part 2-individual unitUploaded byapi-405442771
- 1401.0520v2Uploaded byM del Rocío
- 594066df-0e3b-4bc8-ae65-17f94e2d7389Uploaded byCharan Teja Devarapalli
- QED - DefUploaded byfrbrun

- phys lect eng lssbt 3Uploaded byapi-239131622
- progr 5a clil 2Uploaded byapi-239131622
- il piccolo antropologoUploaded byapi-239131622
- coulomb and fieldUploaded byapi-239131622
- our solar systemUploaded byapi-239131622
- integrazione verbale n 1Uploaded byapi-239131622
- force and vectorUploaded byapi-239131622
- gauss-lawUploaded byapi-239131622
- 2 programma convegno (2)Uploaded byapi-239131622
- newtons lawsUploaded byapi-239131622
- attestato rethink news veroUploaded byapi-239131622
- salvador daliUploaded byapi-239131622
- phys lect eng lssbt 1 (1)Uploaded byapi-239131622
- grease gb itaUploaded byapi-239131622
- allegati miur aoodgper registro ufficialeu 0017849 01-12-2014Uploaded byapi-239131622
- ddg 401 2014Uploaded byapi-239131622
- programmazione degli interventi clil nelle classi 5Uploaded byapi-239131622
- progetto clilUploaded byapi-239131622
- densityUploaded byapi-239131622
- tbw food sayingsUploaded byapi-239131622
- preface to lyrical balladsUploaded byapi-239131622
- mediterrenean diet keeps you happierUploaded byapi-239131622
- chapter-5-dinner-is-servedUploaded byapi-239131622
- programmazione degli interventi clil nelle classi 5Uploaded byapi-239131622
- classroom phrasesUploaded byapi-239131622