Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fes we ae in an oscillatory universe and ify < pax we are in & monotonic expanding one. 48 The age of the universe We can write felt and using eqns (4:13) and (4:20)-(4.23}: & auf + 1 = 2a)The age ofthe universe where we have writen x for R/Ro. I qo = Osta = to if gn = 1/2, = 20/3 For 0 < gy < 1/2, and qo > 1/2, the substitutions x= Sat? 6, and x == sia respectively, allow eqn (4.25) to be evaluated. The age ofthe univers i es than i illstated i or equal to the Hubble time in all models: the esnon for this 11. Thus if Ho = 100 kms! Mpc“, the age ofthe universe is es than oF caus! 19.98 % 1d? year, This is somewhat less than the best current eximates of the age of our Galaxy (Section 37). For this reason the value Ho = 50 km 5 Mpc is adopts im the remainder of this bookMe The big bang models 49° Horizn Paris sve obcerved from those that We cannot yet OW anil ase metones sim int view At fist Uy ate een wih Ye ose Ehe expansion of the universe i slowing down (q=0) the Teashift of any particular glany decreases with Gime. Soa ae ine orion at ine tis of order sot encompassed auch smaller von of mater at early tines Tes thos something ofa paradox that when we look ae Geromave background in two opposite directions, conditions are identical seein 10 despite he two regions neve having yet ber n easel conic Ths qr often eld the horizon problem (sce Section 5.4. 4.10 Problems 41 Show by means of the substations 4:26) in (4.25) thatthe age of the universe stistes tke 4 k= nf 201-2) Find the age of the universe if Ho = 66 kin st Mpc and $% = 0.1. If pa 3 10! yeurs, and 0.1 << Gy < I, what is the permissible range of He Stow that q is constant in the Milne and Finstein-de Sitter models. 443. Show thatthe Friedmaan ego (egn (4.13) has the soltion Qyr(2¥ — sin2W) ead 2(8% = 1"? and exo Q(eosh2¥ where ranges overall real values5 Early stages of the big bang SA. Universe with matter and radiation SS far we have construcied models of universes filled only with matter. Altwoogh Taciaton contributes less than {per cent of the average enerzy per unit volume in fhe universe atthe present epoch it plays a crucial and dominant roe in the exe We can study the evolution of a universe containing matter and radiation by applying the frst lw of thermodynamics o an element ofthe substratum, Ths tines the same answer as applying the full fld equations of general relay The fist Law of thermodynamics states that the change in energy of an expanding system equals the work done by the pressur ae = —pev oo were Ep. V are the energy, pressure, and volume of the element ‘We now use Einstein's equation E=M where Mf includes both the contribution ofthe matter andthe mass eau the radiant enemy, Le E=(n+P é demity of the matter, pi he mass density ofthe radiation vad i he total mass density of mate lume of an element ofthe sobsratim is proportional to Aygo ere) 6” This is the fundamental equation relating the density and pressure in a universe and radiation. ifthe pressure ofthe matter can be neglected, eqn (8-4) reduces 10 4 (oni) =0 and 0 fy c& R~ as before (eqn (4.10)stages ofthe big bang pie] WO ie a 4 aR) +a oan oo p= exo ROO/Ro) 62) When this is suhstitoted in eqm (4.12), assuming k=O, we find RE xR Feox R™, which imosrates to Ret 68) This characterizes the motion of a radistion-dominated universe in its arly stages, since the term in egn (4.13) in kc* becomes negligible if Rs sulficiedly Universe containing matter and radiation It we negleet the contribution of matter tothe pressure, so tha p= p then eg 5.4) becomes dj eared (el (aR) =0. » Seek) + gg OR) 69 I we assume strict conservation of mater, Le we neglet any conversion of aiter to radiation, then each of the two tems in eqn (59) will be separately 280: dees 4 a R= i Soni) =0, GR)=0 ) and s0 = pu shR/Ro) * 6.10) em = Pl R/ Re)The freboll i However small the current value ofthe ratio ofthe density of radition to matter prof teurent value ~ 10"), there Was an epoch in the past, given by Rs ean och that p, > fa fOC R < Rep nd > fe fOr R & Rey. Radiation would have been the dominant form of ene have been vali Wecall epochs such that, > fe the radiation dominated era and epochs such at early epochs, and eqn (58) woul that pu > py the marrer-dominated er $2. The fireball [At the present epoch radiation traverses the universe freely, with only a sna probability of being scattered by ga or dust. In adtion to occurring in galas Eich mateal may be spread more or less uniformly throughout space, bu s Hable distances see p50 enuovsly that a photon i likely to travel seve fefore being scatred oF absorbed, We say that the universe is transparent or pticeliy thin atthe preset epoch, Its easy fo see that this was not always so. “The pica size of a galay is 10 kpe, while the averaze spacing between galaxies I of onder 1 Mpe. It we run the universe backwanls through a change Zin the Seale factor of 100, without galaxies altering, Le Z = Rla)/R(t) = 106 chen the planes would all have been touching. Tis makes i key tha the bn tp int galaxies occured during epochs such that 100 > Z ~ 1. Of course, palais ould not remain analteed during this “rewind of the universe, We would se th dunt falling back i the srs fem which it has blown out. andthe stars dissolving fino the gas clos from which they formed. The loms from which our complex en down into hydrogen with an admixtre of misty derives would have brok miverse was onthe helium. We donot ave any direct evidence on how smooth the i of gale mages at epochs such that Z > 100, batt is natural to consider Picuse ofa fay uniformly distibutes gas of hydrogen and helium, sponed with he Jesiyimepslaries which are to condense into the galanies. We shall discos the pecblem of how galaxies may have formed in the nest chapter All the while that we ae runing the universe backwacts, the and hence the temperature, of the radiation is building up, by eqn (5.10). Sooner or lter the pas wl start to be significantly heated by the radiation, The enscil reaches about 3000 K, for ‘enerey density moment comes when the temperature of the m w suri 19 become ionized. This brings into ply the enormous the wansparency of the then the hyde Scattering power office lectons and puts an end t We call his moment the epoch of decoupling eer in thermal equilibria. This snd mater. Prior to this, they are locked tos arty stages of the big ong cans thatthe radiation has the Panek blackbody specinam (Seti 14) s0 ie see ewes coy ey 0) 4s Oe exp(hv/AT)—1 «Tt (5.12) ner 7 is the radiation tempersture, and then eqn (5.10) implies that 7, 1/RO). G13) As R-» 0,77, > 00, which explains the use of the tenn fireball to deseribe this. cell thick phase ofa big-bang universe. Since there i thermal eqilibium Port the epoch of decoupling, the temperature ofthe mater isthe same as that (ofthe radiation Ta=Te uy) |What happens afer the epoch of decoupling? Certainly eqn (5.14) will no longer hold andthe matter will con! off rapidly. However, it turns out thatthe effec of the tepamion of the universe on the radiation is to preserve its blackbody spectrum, srt the radiation temperature continuing to fall according to eqn (5.13) (see Ex x 5.1. This provides the most natural explanation ofthe 2.7 K blackbody microwave i background ration described in Seetion 1.8. A more detailed summary of the ‘servations is shown in Fig, 5. The discovery ofthis radiation provided the mest. ' Specacular confirmation to date ofthe hot big-bang picture of the univers. The OBE salt, launches in 1989, provided a super) confianation ofthe blackbody ‘ature ofthe microwave background spectrum (Fig 51h). \ Now, ftom eqn (5.13) we can identify the epoch of decoupling as \ Z = Rl) /RC) = 3000/27 ~ 1000. The density of matter at this time would have been x ~ (10")'Pa0~ 10 kg m-> (assuming fa,9 ~ 10-2” kz m-), about 1000 times the average density of mater inside our Galaxy Coincidentally, the ertcal epoch separating the raation-dominated from the |) matter dominated eras (Section 5.1) is also about Z~ 1000 for rao~ | 10-7) kg m-?. Hence for Z > 1000 we can use R(@) cc (eqn (5.8) and foe 1000 > 2 > I we ean use R(t) o¢ 7 (eqn (4.19). In Figs 5.2and 5.3, which show the variation of the energy densities and temperatures of mattr and radiation with epoch, we use the Inter right up to Z = 1, for illntration.wavelength (em) tackground ean (Wikia® 198) The sales ‘Hoven emphasae oy wavelet Ral Jes pat fe spire The COL snes: re fg. 51) sa sd eave neh ek Oe ec ae ef en ato encod level he nema rea cyanogen a ees Tei rita! ty ems for the galaxy, winch is arger tan the exrgslactic ar at wavelengths Jones than 30 man ster 400 53. Helium production ‘When the temperature vss between 10" K and 10° K, some proportion of the hydeogen was converted by thermonuclear fasion into helium, the exact amount depending on the density of the matter during this phase. For Pag ~ 10-*7 kg m9, pal = 10K) ~ 10°" ke and i s found chat the faction of matter converted to helium would be almost exactly the 24 percent by mass that we need £0 explain the composition of our Galaxy (Fg, $4 and Table 5.1). This provides a second major success for bis bang cosmology. ‘We have pushed the fireball scenario back o within | second of the big bans. Extapolating what is known shout elementary particles, we ean get even closef the big bang as) tut we should bear in mind that even the most optimistic imerpretation of the (0.002 percent isotopy ofthe blackbody radiation guarantees our simple isocopic ‘models only back to Z~ 10%, so we are treading on thin ice et us now Look at the evolution ofthe universe during the fireball phase in ‘more deal. For any particular elementary particle of mass, there isan epoch at hich the temperature 1s sueh that KI'~ me? Prior to this epoch a collision between to photons can result in the creation of a particle par, the particle and its anipartete. The thermal eqibrium between matter and radiation ensures that when AT me? there are roughly as many particles ofthis type as photons. When the temperature drops below mc2/k, particle pairs can no longer be created and the panicles and antipanicls rapidly annihilate, provided they are abundant ough to collide frequen The elementary partiles ean be subdivided into the lighter panicles which da not take part in strong muclear interactions, or leptons (neutrinos, electrons ‘muons, and tauons and their antparticles), and the hadrans, which do. Hadrons can be further subdivided into baryons (protons, neutrons, and the wostale tbyperons) and mesons. Te eiical temperatures fr the hadrons ae > 10" K and this phase ofthe universe is known ax the hadron era. What the hadron era was like depends on what is the comet theory for strong interactions. There woul have boen a great varity of particles in thermal equilibrium. with each other, inclding photons, leptons and, possibly, mesons and nucleons (Le, neurons and protons) and their antiparticles. Acconding to the quark theory of song iersetions the hadrons would then have been broken down into free quarks. “The subsequent history of the fireball can be divided into four regimes: (@) T~ 10 K (~ 10s) muons anibilae: muon neutrinos and antes tsinos decouple from everything else (©) T-< 10! K(7> 001 5) the neutron-proton mass difference (1.3 MeV. comesponding to T'=15x 10! K) begins to shift the stall nucleonicHelium production ‘Table £1. Relative cosmic abundances ofthe most common elements Thiel valve Sun slat closer and oer ol tars Ponty eb “0 Blue compat gates 2“ ost pmol vale a Hydrosen 1 Catton Magncsam Sion Sulphur contamination towards more protons and fewer neutons, through equilibrium of the weak ineracon processes pte, ntetsopt1 [aburanoe by mass) Babee by ras io tean density of waivers) Fig. 55. The mas facto of clemers ‘He, e, 7H eign, nd Fanci calls sseconef he pie sy ef be waver, copa ih over noni values xe) A deetay stared 102 kgm seem coheed The connor aks er te The neuton-poton equilibrium rato is determined by the temperature Ny/Np = expt x 10°°/7) 615) AtT~ 10 K(@~ 1) electron neutrinos and antineutrinos start to decouple from everything ese (6) T ~5 x 10? K (¢~ 4s): elecwons and positrons annihilate with each other and this, opether with the cooling of the neutinos by the expansion of the ‘mivere, leads tothe virual“ieering-owt of the nentron-proton ratio. The only remaining process is neutron decay (> p-+ €- + Ve, decay) and the resulting fraction of neurons to all nucleons is x (Ne +N) * 0.16 exr(-1/10" 5). 616) the photon temperature 10 ‘The annihilation ofthe electrons snd positrons 14 times that of the neutrinos (see Fig. 53) (@) T~ 10? K (2~ 10° see); nucleosynthesis begin, yielding *He and a trace (of 7H (deuterium), "He, "Li, and other clements (see Fig. 5.5). Namber densities ‘ar 100 low to allow moclei to be bit up direc in many-body collisions likeThe very early universe » 2n-+2p—~He. Instead complex nucle most be built up in sequences of tw body reactions like n+p H AH He +n eta +p HR He +n The crucial step 38 the formation of deuterium which, because ofits low binding cnerey (2.2 MeV), is destroyed a8 soon 2 it is made until the temperate op wo~ 10K ‘The absence of stable mclides with stomic numbcr A = and & means tha very litle production of elements heavier thin hela takes place. Almost all nevtrons end up in “He mack, which have by fr the all nucle: with A <5. Nucleosynthesis tums off the decay of mt the value just before the onset ist binding encrgy of neutrons and fixes the nestron-proton ra ucleosynthesis, Aer nucleosynthesis is over, we have essontally nothing left ut fee protons and helium nucle, so the mas-fraeton i dhe frm of helium is Simply tice the fraction of neutrons to all nucleons just before the onset of . This depends weakly on the density of mater in the rcleosynthesis, Universe and hence the time tht the neutros decay according to eyn (5.1) Devierum, om the other hand, is very scnstve 10 iy because its final abundanc is controlled by the processes which destoy i, and the cross-section for these reactions is proportional to, The observed primondil abundances of heim deuterium, and lithium imply (ace Fig. 5.5) tha te denstyof the universe toda in the form of baryons is given by Finally, when the tempersture drops to 3000K (1~3 x 10° year), the temperatre of the matter becomes 100 low to keep hydrogen ionized. Protons and electrons combine to form neutral stom of hydrogen, The matter therefore suvdenly becomes transparent to radiation, and mre and radiation decowpe Te proces of recombination’ is so rapid hat there are no significant distortions the Blackbody specrum during this phase and, as discussed in Section 52, the Subsequent expansion of the universe preserves the blackbody form of the Spectrum. while changing the temperature according to eqn (5.13) SA The very early universe m ofthe universe from a ime In the previous section we discussed the evout 10 seconds after the big bang onwards, at which time the temperature i 01 K. The physics of matter under these conditions is well understood from fret accelerator experiments Pit to this epoch we start extrapolating into the realm of less well-established physic.9 arly sages of the big bang According wo the current view of the nature of Kaden they’ ars made Up of gta of quarks, of which there are six different Kinds or Mavoure': up and Tr crange an! charmed, top and ton. The proton is composed of two up coe und one down quatk, while the neutron is €omposed of one UP and two. etn quarks, "The atoctive fore, which holds the quarks tether, is provided te nutites known as “gloons’, and the detsled theory ofthis fores is known as uantum ebromodynamics (QCD), The name arses because another propery of ‘tfarks has been given the name “colour” (@ quark eam exist in one of three possible colour states) Att 10's (7 ~ 10" K), quarks and their antiparieles annihilate eaeh cut, fd tei eid corbin to fr prot and netons im gil ombers Pec urhe pooh thee would have been a sup of quarks leptons, and their rating feck father to +~ 10" (F~ 101°) it is believed dat the ccetumapnets fore and the weak nuclear force (he one responsible for ‘iay) weuld have been combined int a single fore, the electroweak force four to this epoch. At this cpoch a phase wansiion occurs in which the etc ore sp inthe to furs hat we know today. The theory of he ‘Scare uncon, developed by Weinberg and Salam, has been confimed Sn acleatorexperimats at CERN by the detection ofthe W and Z particles ype wo be responsible forte ore ‘nach skier round we can extrapolate back a further 23 powes fen in si 110° s prior fo which time its proposed thatthe stone mocea force (esponsle for holding protons and nctons together in the acl of os) andthe elesoweak force woul! have ben snifed int the grand wie fore, Grand Unied Theorie (GUTS) pric thatthe proton wll decay on a timescale of abot 10°" years and sensitive experiments sre under Way 1 it this prediction Tn 1981 Alam Guth suggested tha the phase transition associated with the break-up ofthe grand unified force could leave the universe (or our potion of it sf least) in state of “false vacuum. in which the vacuum bas a colossal enersy= ‘ensity essocited with it. This vacuum eneray-density acts ike a cosmical repulsion (see Section 8.2) and the universe embarks on an exponential expansion ‘whic inflates the universe by the incredible factor 10, or pethaps even noc, in a very bret instant of time. The inflationary period ends when the vacin energy density transforms into matter and radiation and the expansion of the Universe continues as described above. Inflation permits « solution of honzon’ problem (Section 4.9) because regions of the universe seen in opposite iretions on the sky through the microwave background, although not in ‘communication with each ater today, would have Beem in communication before the inflation began. The inflation also solves what is known as the “fatness problem. Today we know that the density parameter lies in the range 0.03 < 25 <2, which scome quite a broad range of possibilities. However at 11 s after the big bang the quantity [1 ~%l, which measures how much the‘The very carly univers a bniverse deviates from flatness, would have been smaller than 10°! and at = 10-5 s it would have had to be smaller than se to eing fat at early time ‘The inflationary phase Jeaves the universe in th fequted very fat state and infact predicts that he average density ofthe niverse tody would be within one par in 10° ofthe critical value (og 4.24 Several diffrent versions of how inflation oecured ave now heen propose ne period of exponential expansion i the very (0-2, The universe therefore ave evolved tothe kind The esental common feature iarly sages ofthe big bang coy unvese,wtch ots the hom and ates oles Hower ee Se ey nih se ere occa te a ; Eatrapolating back still further in time, at ?~ 10 s we reach what is known ae ve we a quan theory of ry red etapa cee time Athough mich fo gone at pedi 3 a a trv and ey ily he es iin hee a gta het of hs ype yet Te mest eel of he ems eee nayening theory of Gren std Sehware: Races nly ht won eat wil eer bo tna ‘Gor curent picture ofthe evolution of the universe is ilustated in Fig. 56, Isotrupy of the microwave background The high degree of isotropy of the microwave background radiation both on the la lar seales has profound consequences for out picture ofthe univers. Let us consider the various kinds of anisotropy we might have expected land summarize the present observational situation for e 361", 24-hour, oF “dipole anisotropy ‘The combined effects of the Earth's motion round the Sun, the Sun's mation round the Golaxy, the Galaxy's motion within the Local Group, the Local Group's motion with respect tothe Virgo cluster, and the Virgo cluster’ random ‘motion with respect to the substratum shonld result in the Earth having a net ‘motion with respect to the fundamental cosmolosical frame of reference or substrotum, Even i the microwave background radiation were perfectly isotropic ‘with respect to the cosmological frame, it should show a characteristic dipole snisotropy dic to the effect of the Doppler shift on the intensity observed a the Earth For radiation with a blackbody spectrum characterized by a temperature 7, the observed intensity would still have blackbody spectrum but with temperate (8) depending on direction according to T(0) = Ty + v coss/a/tt — 2/2) 6.18) where @ isthe angle between the direction of observation and that of the Earths motion with respect to the substratum and i the Fan's speed. The radiation ‘appears ho'ter in the direction the Earth is travelling towards and colder in the ‘opposite direction. Observations made with a telescope fixed on the Earth's sutfce will show a pesidicity every 24 hours of sdereal time correspondine £9 an angular scale of 360 ‘This ype of anisotropy was deected in 1977 by a group ftom the University of CCalfomia, Berkeley, using a U2 aircraft, and confirmed by groups from Princeton and Florence using high alitude balloons. When comected for the Hien w0 Deel o 01% 9 eeIsonropy of the microwave background 9 Eath’s motion rund the Galaxy amd our Galey's motion trough the Loa Group. the elociy, of the Local Gop wih respect 10 the microwave Foran eli by COE 2-222 bene ina decree tp Gate coordinates 1 : Tis seemed a fist 19 be a diverting lag Mouah qe Howeve otfcs Based on rte surveys of TAS enlaces hae speed for our random mation Shown that this motion ean be understood a x resul of the combined atrastion of Targe clusters of galaxies within 100 Mpc of us, provided thatthe total value o {9p is close to 1. Comparison with ega (5.17) implies that over 95 percent ofthe mater in the universe would then ave to be noo-baryonic 180r, 12-hour, or “quadrapole" anisotrop IP the universe were rotating or shearing (ie. expanding anisctopically) then we tight expect a large seale anisotropy in which the background looks hotter er Golder than average in two opposite directions on the sky. No such effect is ‘Served and, apart from the dipole anisotropy mentioned above, the microwave tuckground i itopic on the large scale to an accuracy of 0.001 per cent, Small-scale anisotropte Since the universe i clearly inhomogeneous on mass scales coresponding galasics and clusters of galates, say 10°-10" Mo, we expect that, a the epoch Of recombination, density perturbations were present which could then grow tnder te inflacnce oftheir own gravitation, For galaxies to have formed ty th preset epoch in a universe composed of norm, baryonic mater. we need the Emplitude of these protogzlactic density perturbations tobe A/o > 0.1 perc the cosmological density parameter p= 1, and 3) per cent if 2)=0.1. The comesponding temperature Muctuations in the observed back ground radiation would he AT/T ~ 10-* on angular scales from 0.5’ wo 20. By 1960 observational limits gave A7/T <5 x 10°S on angular scales from 3! 10 1, inconsistent with the condition for galaxy formation in a purely baryonic universe meres therefore focused on modcs in which most ofthe matte in the ‘universe isin some dark, non-baryonic frm, which would have decoupled from the radiation at a much carer epoch than the baryonic matter. Noo-baryonie mater can be broadly divided into two types: cold dark matter in which the Pumtcls are slowly moving atthe cpoch when they decouple from the ratation nd hot dark matter in which the particles are moving at speds close to the ypecd the fediation, A example of hot dark matter \wonld be a neuirino wth non-zero rest mass. No examples of cok ark matter are ‘known, bur particle physicists have posited he exisience of particles which would be candidates, lke the axion and dhe neutralino Tn 1992, the Cosmic Background Explores (COBE) team announces that they ha detected small-scale anisottopies in the microwave background radiation onaEarly stages of the big bam i of 10°. The amplitude of these fluctuations i about 1% 10-* andthe seale T ihe fctuations crcesponded to stustures 1000 Mp in sie lay far Tanger fa any structure We have been able to study 10 date at the present epock abscguem, ground-hased and balloon-bome expetiments baye confiried the COBE result and extended it 10 smaller scales. The next generation of space: ne experiments should be able to detect these fluctuations on the: sale of alaies ad clusters ‘The detection of these fluctuations is a milestone for cosmology. Because we fan now test differen scenarios for the mature of the dark matter and for the formation of galaxies. The fctuations may well have their origin at the infiaionary epoch, only 10° sec after the big hang. The Sunyaer-Zeldovich effec The hot gas in rch clusters of galaxies interacts with the photons ofthe cosmic microwave background by Compton scattering, with the result that towards a ‘ster the background looks cooler than average at long wavelengths and hotter than average at short wavelengths. The magnitude ofthis effect is about 0.001 K. 3 has been messured towards a number of clusters 56 ‘The evolution of density fluctuations during the fireball We can discuss a density fluctuation as a coherent entity only fom the moment When it ies entirely within che horizon (Section 4.9) Prior to that the diferent pps ofthe fluctuation could not bein communication with each other. 1 Ms(0) i the mass within the horizon at time 1, then MyO cx plea xt during the radaton-dominated era since p oc Rt, and R oc? (Section 5.1). At the transitional epoch from the sadiaion- 19 matterdominated cra8, tay Mi) ~ 108( 29?) ?Mo, 100, 50 fluctuations on the mass scales of galaxies and clusters come within the horizon during dhe cadiation- ‘dominated era. Baryon fluctuations then remain frozen at approximately their inal amplitude uni recombination because the radiation and matter are locked together by Thomson drag. Non-baryenie matter fluctuations, on the other hand row seal throughout this phase, with (\p/) 7 forall seals. ‘There are four types of density factuation: (2) adiabatic, which behave like sound saves, and in which the photon snd matter Aucuations vary wether: (6) loothermal, im whieb the matter density is perurbed but the temperature is not (ie. we have mater Muctuations in a woiform photon bath): () isentropic, it which matter and radiation vary with opposite phases so tat dhe total enesey ensty remains constant; (8) turbulent, which are large-scale tes in the coupled matter and rationDistortions of the microwave backeround specirum 1 was found by Silk that adiabatic foctations with M <2 10°C (292) 4M, 20) where = (@p/100), are damped out during the ralison-dominated era by Photon diffusion out of overdense regions into underdease ones. Turbulent Fietustions are also damped out on lower mics scales. In this case the energy ssoiated withthe damped out perturbstions my have the elec of distorting the radiation ffom Planckian form (see next sctin). Zeldovich and Harrison independeody postulated that the amplizde of density pemurbations at the moment they come within the horizon is p/p ~ 10 fadepcndent of massscale (he scale-free hypothesis). It can be shown thatthe fesiling matter density fucustions at the epoch of recombination, on a Scales, is then of the for p/p = 10-*U4/MiCea) (2 The Harsison-Zeldovich density flactution spectrum has been very successful in sccounting for the observed hierarchy of galaxy clustering. The detailed tvolution of the spectrum of density Hictustions depends on the cosmological araneters and on the nature of the non-baryenie mater in the universe. One of is of an inflationary phase att © 10-* sin the very flettations of the Base he successes ofthe hypothe sly universe is that such models can generat Zeldovich form 57. Distortions of the microwave background spectrum Ir energy is injected into the radiation field at erty epochs, fr example by the fisipation of adiabatic or turbulent density fluctuations, the spectram of th adiation may be expected 10 undergo distortion from a blackbody form. Th rater wil be higher than that of the radiation and nea temperate of th Compton scatering will then boost the p frequencies). Bremsstshlong radiation from th rising low-energy photons, and ifthe heat injection occurs at carly enough sum atthe new, higher hot gas will partly ln the fpochs may even succeed in restoring a blackbody 5p temperature of the malt ‘Compton distoron athe background spoctam may also oecurafer the ep of recombination if for example. a5 the result of the formation of galaxies or (quasar, the intergalactic gas (assuming some exists) i einized “The observed spectrum ofthe microwave background measured by the COBE sotlite Fig, 5-1) 8 Planckian to an curacy of 1 percent over the wavelength any distortion must be extremely soll This also rules Ou rificant population of pre-galactic objec radiating Sabmillimete manclengths. Any possibility tht the microwave background is duc to radiation from relatively local dust grains i also| } ; ‘ss arly stages ofthe big bane 58 Problems 5.1 Show that the substation »’ = »/Z nto the expression forthe intensity of Phekbody radiation Iv) given by ega (1-2) results inablackbody spectrum rerespondiny o a temperature 1” = 7/2. Give an interpretation of this result 52 Lett be the epoch of electron-pesitron anntiltion when T= 5 x 10° K, fd let my be the epoch when T= 10" K and fusion of helium begins. CCalclate tad fp forthe two cases fa) the universe i radiation-dominated for 1< 3 x 10° yrs then mater< donated uni the present epoch (i = 10" yrs): (op the universe is radiation-dominated for r < fy, then matter-dominated til the present epochs IFX, —¥, 05 at — ti, calcula the neutron abundance at f assuming neutron deca’ according to eqn (5-16) fora time (fs ~t), for the two cases (ay, (). Heace deduce the heliam abundance in each case, assuming all Surviving neutrons are used to make heliur-t muclei (2 neutrons + 2 rotons). ‘Comment on the significance of these reals for the observed universe6 From the fireball to the present 6.1 Before galaxies formed recombination 2 000 musks the moment when baryonic The epoch « : matter eat last ble to evolve independently of the radiation. A region where th hate hes a slighily higher density than average will have is expemsion slowed Gown and twill stan to separate out fom the surrounding matter. If the inital Gensity excess Ap/p is large enough, the expansion of the fragment will ventaaly be halted by its sel-gravity and it wil collapse together to form 2 nent. The time for fala or chsterof galaxies depending onthe mass of the fe this expansion and collapse is 1 gg/1000)-27(A.p/0) 37 yours 6 so the srongest perturbations form frst Iasi curently believed to he the ease, non-baryonic matter perturbations are present and have already evolved significany by the epoch of recombination, then at ecombination the baryons will tar to fall nt the potential wels defined by the nombaryonie peruhations. The baryonic density fluctuations quickly atch up the norrharyonic fluctuations in amplitude and the two types of mate perturbation then evolve tozetier (Fi, 6.1) The detled evolution of the density uctation spectrum depends on the re ofthe dark mater. Figure 62 cosmological density parameters and on th scales at Inte shows the form of the density Auctuation spectrum on diferent ch of which sas niall from a spectur ies for thre different scenarios « Harison-Zeldovieh form. On large sale, the spectrum has th ‘of hot dark matter particles has ap/p Mf” in each ese. Free steaming sompletely suppressed structure on small scales in this eae he epoch of recombination can form into aby Jeans. The for sound Density flacations present at galaxies provided they satisly an iosporant riterion discover {ime seal for gravitational contraction must be less than the time-scale f Giherwise pressure forces will prevent the waves 10 cross the irregularity lapse. This means thatthe size of the fuctuation must be greater than the Gintance wavelled by a sound wave in one free-fall time (~ (Go) ') na, and pi the density of wnte Ly, i the Hans length, isthe velocity ofm the fireball tothe presentFormation of galaxies and clusters is ip. 63) My ~ (gh) 63 than this, iF amy are present, wil collapse directly on a mass scale slightly mplte their collapse in a few milion yeas. They mi black boles or might fragment into stars. One proposal is that this might Be lobular custers. Another is shat this might zive bi elements. Tis is of massive stars which prodice radiation and beay dest stars in out Galaxy, which te way of explaining the metals present in the never seem 10 be found with a heavy element abundance < 10~* relative 1 Hydrogen If there was a pregalacic generation of radiating obpects, whether sas eccoting blak holes, then they might have the effect of reionizing the ‘maining gus. The falar to detect any distoions 1 tbe Planckian spectra of only Knit the a he micrawave background by COBE does, howeve ation that ean have been emited by pregaactic objects. 62. Formation of galaxies and clusters background, We saw in There a severl pictures of galaxy and wrth the high degree of isotropy of the microm Seaton 55 that this isotopy eliminates the possibility that ealLong ea Tig 64 The obsered dey fcnaton spur on diferent eles deve fam TEAS gay ri ituners a fom the COME mictsave cpanel Puce. The cna odes re TENSE Stow pot rd cl dak mater fined de mater slid eure and fora serge colt were formed by gravitational means in a porely baryonic universe. The main current theories are: (a) adiabatic fluctuations in a cold dark mater universe: the col dark matt condenses in lumps on small scales which aggregate together to form galaxy halos, in the cores of which the baryonic matter setles to auke the visible parts of falavies Galaxies then cluster together under the influence of gravity to form Clusters and superclustes "botoci-up" scenario) (©) adiabatic fluctuations in a ot dark matter universe: the largest mass structres (Guperclustrs) form frst as “pancakes” and then fragment 10 give galaxies (top-down? scenario). Adiabatic Tuctations in a baryonic universe follow similar evolution, but would require too large fluctuations in the ‘microwave background to be consistent with observations. (c) isothermal fuctuations, in which matter uctuatons ae superimposed on a uniform ridition field are now considered unphysical, but isentropic Jiuctuations, in which the total energy density remins uniform, have been ‘advocated by Peebles as a possible baryonic universe model. These result in 4 bottom-up scenario. Other adhoc models inchide the cosmic explosion scenari@, in which the observed voids ae duc to astrophyscally generated explosions, ¢ ‘in quasars, and galaxies form in the resulting shock fonts; and cosmic strings, iInergatactic gas tn lasers 01 wich galaxy formation is aided by Tinea tpological defects leftover fom phase transitions in the very carly universe The density Muctuation spectrum observed on large scales allows us to istinguish between these different scenarios. It scems that ro simple seenario an ft both the COBE microwave background floctations and the tatstis of Targe-scale galoxy esting (sce below). Scenarios that are being pursued atthe moment inchude & model with bots hot sn cold dark matter (mized dark mater tee Fig. 64), a lou-S cold dark mater model with non-zero cosmological Gonstant (sce Chapter 8), and cold dark matter models in which the initial perturbation spectrum is er than the Harrison-Zeldovieh form, ‘The chustering of galaxies can he described by the defined a the excess probability of finding galaxy ata distance 7 From a random galaxy dp = nfl + cerV 6 wvheren is the average number-density of galaxies and dV a small clement o Volume. Peebles and coworkers found from studies of « variety of galaxy slags thal where r is in Mp. ‘Nusirical simulations of galaxy clustering show that eqn (65) is indeed roughly shat would be expected if the Muctuation spectrum. at recombination the form (5.1). Once protozalactic fragments star to Separate out from the surrounding’ Bs proceeds daring the thei alimate fate depends on how efficiently star format stars before th ollapse phase. Wall the gas im te fragment has formed int ragment collapses together, then a elliptical galaxy is formed. Otherwise adi f gas supported by cenifugal force and surrounded by an extended ellipsoidal Component is formed. Le. «spiral galaxy. Models have becn constructed whi cccount in deal for he luninosity and colour distbutions, the rotation curves, ind metal abundance gradients seen in te diferent galaxy (ype itis now belived tat imeractions and mergers hetween galaxies play a maj role inthe evolution of galaxies, Many litical and lenticular glans (perhaps a) may have been the fest of mergers of gavrich systems 623 Intergalactic gas in clusters “The discovery that rich clusters of galaxies are powerful X-ray emitters dae to hot (10° K) imergalacic gas as important implications for galaxy evoluGon. The ized gon in these CIMSer SOUceS ‘bat faction of Xray line emission due t0 demonstrates not oly the presence of the hot, Bremsstrahlung-emiting also shows thet mach of tis gas bas been processed in stellar intrirs. Theelie 0 From the fveball to the present { inecanivme have been proposel for geting this poses gs St he ' cise hare tea eeerona ven wis Boh a8 Ot Of ‘ aareey he second is based on tidal iteration between wo galaxies during a } Fa nd vee the tipping of gs om he glen : i } cls eco An iat ges er the scion of he ener We ee nachos eae er sigan amt of Wb? ye i the csr initially, or one of the other mechanisms fo have ¢ been operating first. ‘Srpping of gas fom spiral glenies in clusters is promising explanation of i o the orn of lenticular (S0) eslaxies, but there is stil bate about whether all rocufars are gas demuded spirals in origin (probably nod Clusters of galaxies at Tange redchift do seem to show a higher proportion of blue, presumably spiral fluxes than siular clusters at the present epoch. Most nich clusters at the |) preseat epoch are composed predominantly of ellipticals and lenticular. 6A. ‘The masses of galaxies and clusters ‘We saw in Chapter 4 that whether the universe keeps on expanding indefinitely, ‘ Lo“ ‘oc uliately falls bock together into a second fireball, depends on whether the Sherage density of mater is less than or greater than the enfical value pes ~ 5 10/50} ke m 66 (cquivalent to y = Ly the Einssin-de Sitter value—Scetion 47), We now try to determine the average density of malter in galaxies and in other possible fons. “To find the average density of matter in galaxies We frst need to determine the average mass ofa galaxy and then muliply by the average number of galaxies per unit yolume, detemnined by galaxy counts (Scetion 7.8). ‘A variety of methods have to be usd to determine galaxy masses, depending on the galaxy type. Spirals Most ofthe matesal in the dise of spirals is moving in sm approximately eieular orbit in a balance between centrifuge force and gravity. Hence for matenal far fut from the centre of the galaxy Vir~ GMiP oe Mx VG oo) “The rotation curve V(r can be determined by observing the Doppler-sift! 21 ~ cmline of neural hydrogen (Fig. 6.5). However, we see that for MS the roation Sey curve does not drop dovn inthe outer pats of the galaxy as predicted by eqn (6:7), pointing tothe existence of a substantial halo af nod-tuminoes material sumounding the visible galaxy, containing 90 per cent cf the total mass of the zalaxy. A simile argument applies to our own Galaxy. Theoretical arguments Show that dise galaxy would be unstable to the formation of « ber unless &The masses of galaxies and clusters Fe. 65 (a) The tac veloc nities = ie t a massive halo sarounds the dis, It is not known what form the mass inthis halo takes, but it could be dwarf stars of very low luminosity (brown dwar), black or exotic particles like axions on ipricats theorem, which tells us dat jonal energy. oF Here we have to use what is known as the virial for a system in equilbrium 2 x kinctic energy — ravi MV" ~ GM /r whic is equvaler to eqn (6.1). We estimate the average Kinetic veray per unit mass from the Doppler spreading of the emission lines in theaa “ From the fireball fo the present spectrum of the ucteus of the galaxy. Again we find that elipcals ae eed Dy a halo of dark rater, containing 90 per cent oF the fal mass of Mass-tolight rat By obsening the ratio of mass to light for galaxies of diffeent pes, © in Se oa uote, we ea eatimate the masses of individual galaxies from their total Tots, Ite ratio x determined over the optically visible extent of galaxy, tiupea sala of M/L ~ 310, in solar units. 4 found fr spas and 10-80 for ‘iifmeals However tbe virial theorem applied to binary galaxies, and to groups Sf eaanica, pics M/L~ 100, supporting the concept that spiral galaxies are resided By massive halos of low-luminosity material, in the form of vac Ninrs black holes oc any other material that does not contribute significantly to the light of the galaxy ‘Methods (b) and (@) can be used to estimate the masses of clusters of galaxies The virial theorem becomes M=HWic, 63) wshere the averages indicated by bars are over all he galanes inthe cluster, and r ‘ow refers to the distance between the gnlaxies. Typical masses ae in the range TO!-10!" Mo, and typical mean densities inside clusters are 10% kg m [Discrepancies between methods (b) and (c), with vinal theorem masses up 10 ten times preater than visible masses (M/L ~ 100 —500), again sosgest ‘missing matter’ Both extended X-ray emission from rich clusters and the appearance of radio “tis within clusters that there i intergalactic gas in clusters (Section 2.11). Recent maps of this pas with the ROSAT satellite have suggested thatthe mass of this gas is significantly ereater than the mass in the cluster galaxies and: may ceonstitute as much as 30 percent of the dynamical estates ofthe total mass of the cluster. If users are representative ofthe average distrbution of matter in the universe, this would imply that S% must be <1, singe we know the contnbution of haryons tothe density ofthe univers is oaly 0.05(50/tip). For 12) — 1, we requite either thatthe dynamical estimates of total cluster mass are tuiderestimated, or tht the X-ray gas masses are overestimates, o¢ that baryons are somehow funneled tothe cores of rich elusters 63. The average density of matter in the universe due to galaxies ‘The luminosity function of galasies, ie. the duinber of galaxies per unit volume having luminosities in the range (L.L+ dL), can be well represented by HU) AL = (L/L) expl-L/L,) a 9) where 6, sw constant, L, =3.2 10" Lg, and @ = 1.25, Estates ofthe totalThe average density of mater pS: luminosity density of galaxies in the bloc band lic in the range M/L = 100, we fi S215 107 Mpe-> (assuming Ho = 50 peo ~ 5 10-2Fy/S0)? em (610) or Qjq~ 0.1, with an uncertainty of at least a factor of 2 cither way. Thi atimate is a factor of 10 below the critical value (eqn 66). It is however comparable ‘with the density of baryonic matter derived from primonia Tie, 66 shows the rcative contribution tothe average density ofthe universe of galaxies of diferent masses. Most of the mass comes inthe form of high-mass fulaxis, 10!-10! Mc. The curve has been extrapolated right down t isolated lobular duster, although it snot certain tht the eure docs not peak up ain at this level An important development of the past dei large-aca jhay redshift surveys, which allow large-scale dymamcal estimates of Redshift surveye based on the IRAS 6) jm survey have been espocially lay samples covering the whole sas been the growth ‘hy and unaffected by extinction by dust. These surveys have been used 10 map the galay density distebution and hence estimate both by caleulating the met tttaction ofthe galaxies and clusters within 150 h- Mpe and comparing this by comparing the peculiar relies of the peculiar velocity of our Galaxy, amd Susie inthe field with that predicted from the galaxy density dsribution, From oth qypes of study. values of { close 0 the cftical value of 1 awe been generally found.0 From the fireball 10 the present 66 Some other possible forms of matter rie best candidate for matter with a signifieant fiction of the! ential density vo) is imengalactc gas, since we do not expect enlany formasion 16 ew 1) pos cent effcient process. This will be discussed in the next seston, Some jssed below ther possible forms a Although Fig, 646 suugests that the contribution from dwarf galaxies to the sven density of matter in the universe is small, very few of these objects are ren in fact all ae in the Local Group) so their number density is very svcrauin. The estimate of Fig. 6 would have to be out ba factor of mace than 100 to aive at the ntcal density, Whether intergalactic globular clusters ond exist is sill unknown. A direct measurement of the optical isolated background radiation might help to decide this. Compact objects and quasars The simplest view about quasars and other compact objects (eg. N-galaxies) is that thoy represent outbuss in the nuclei of galaxies. As such, their contibution to the average density of matter would already have been inchuded in eqn (6.10) Even if they are a distinct class of object from galaxies, quasars make a negligible contribution to the average density of matter, unless a significant proportion of them are “local” objects with intrinsic redshifts Dead galaxies and black holes “The normal types of galaxy surveyed in Section 2.6 ean be expected to retain their present sppeurance for ime much longer than the Hubble time. However, thore isthe possiblity ofan earlier generation of galaxies now no longer visible due to exhaustion of stellar nuclear energy sources (they would have 0 have formed only missive stars). These dead galaxies would now be in the form of cluster of ncutron stars ar black holes. ‘related possibility is tha song density ductutions present in the very eaely universe led tothe formation of primordial black holes. Hawking has introduced the concept of very Tow-mass black holes, of mass down to 10-* kg, and shown that these wold rapid evaporate and explode thugh x quantum gravitational effect close tothe black hole's event horizon (the boundary between events that ‘we an in principle observe and those that we ean never observe). A blackhole of mass M evaporates trough the radiation of photons, elementary partles, and ravitons, on time-scale 1040 ~ 10" (Af/10"? 4g)" yeas ipSome other possible forms of matter 7 “The effect of Hawking radiation i therefore negligible for black holes of solar and salactic mass. A black hae of 10" ke should be exploding now ins burs of fumna rays and oer particles. Our flue to detect such events an Tit from the observed gamma-ray background pot strong bounds on the contabution such objects to the density of mater in the universe at th {@<10-*), However, black holes in the mass range 10! kg-10" Mg could comsihute a small fraction (~ 1 percent) ofthe entical dons Planets, rocks, and dust Only weak limits can be placed on the amount of tniverse. Ifthe ity of the grains 10° kg my and their Contibution to fndct to be able 10 see a Hubble distance without drastic absorption, the grain 1 average density of the universe is given by eqn (6), then in teed to be larger than 1 mm: vere ms ae the radius and numiber density ofthe grains. Thus there is no real ‘Observational Timi on the amount of rane inthe universe in the frm of larg Aust, rocks, oF planets, We mentioned biely in Section 53 that cosmic neutrinos and an-newtinos pected to become decoupled from mater and radiation a an early stage inthe reball. The expected eneczy density is shout 20 percent ofthat of photons i negligible compared to matter ai the present epoch, This neatrino fx is mpltely undetectable with present techniques Section 1.3). Neutrinos coukt Theories wich sek to unify the forces of physics during the vey early universe have no dial in generating new particles, which may be capable of supplying fics which are moving slowly a the Hie they decouple from the radiation old dark matter, for example sxions or neutralinos. Searebes ae under way’in nergy atthe present posh’ curren gravitational wave detector are too insensi5 From the fireball 0 the present 1 the microwave background implies that test this, However, the {soropy ‘oat madation wok have to have wavelengths smaller than § Mp it oniibuted the ential density svdensity of cosmic TayS pais about the same as 10 kg nr? 6 x 10°" kg «a ven this value may hold only within our Galaxy. In fact eosmicsray nucle with Cocrgies 10" eV are confined to our Galaxy by its magnetic field, so are “Gimostcenaialy of Galactic onigin. And the average enerby density of cosmic-ray ‘ectom must he less than a thousandth of the local value, otherwise inverse Compton interaction With the microwave beckground and integrated stright photons would ive too large an X-ray background (Section 1.4), However, the hiaherenergy cosmic-ray nuclei leak out of our Galaxy in only about 3 x 10° yearn (his can be deduced from the abundance of the coxmic-ay-ereated ‘ements Li, Be, B), so the density (eqn (6.13)) may well be universal. Ii is, then we eannot have itergelactic gas a the enicl densiy (egn (6.6), since () would heat it up so much that too many X-rays would be produced, and (i the production of X-rays from cosmie ray secondary 2° meson fecay would exceed the observed background in the range 50-100 MeV. 6.7 Intergalactic (and intercluster) was {there iss uniform intergalactic (and itercluster) gas with a density comparable to the ential density (eqn (6.6), then rather stringent limits ean be set on is physical Amie hydrogen (Hh) This would be observable by the following (a) 2l-om absorption : flue to se this in the ratio galaxy Cy A and in other radio galaxies shows thatthe density oF intergalactic neatal hydrozen is fm, < 10° ke a () 2L-om emission: again, this has not been observed. (o) Soft Xray absorption: an Xray photom wonizes hydrogen (or helium) som, which then recambines, but emits less energetic photon. The opacity of hydrogen for < 912 A is proportional 10 (/912)°, and failure to se= absorption down to SOA shows that pny < 107 kg miAergalactc (amd intercluster) £23 109 (@) Lyman absorption: a trough should appear on the short wavelength sid ‘of te Lyman line at 216A. For quasars this is conveniently red shied it the visible range, and the absence of such 2 trough shou that for uniformly distributed stomic hydrogen py <10- ken However a forest of absorption lines is often detected in the spect fedshift quasars shortward of Lyman a and these arc believed to he duc Penssive distibution of low-density neural bydroren clouds, but with an Cverage density well below the critical value (2 ~ 0.003) Ionized hydrogen (Bu ‘Wear likely have T > 10° K since a colt jnizad gas recorines very guicly and iovizing mechanisms, eg. ulravilet photons or cosmic rays produced by filaies and quasi end to eat the gas to. The reheating of th Excured too soon afer decoupling (Section $2), since observable distortions in th 27K Hackhoy spectrum would have heen proce’ Ta bot ionized gas free electrons moving under the influence of each other lecostatc Fields rade free-free (or thermal Bremsstrahlung) radiation. The rounds give strong limits on the temperature observed radio and X-ray bo Radio (20 ex): the gas can only have been heated to 10°10" K at redshifts 100 Hard X-rays (E> 1 ¥eV): T<3x 10" K if p= pes, The 1-100 keV background fas been attributed to 4 x 10 K gas with p~ 0 Sms (sce Section Soft X-rays (E = 0.25 keV): there isa detection of as with hut this is dac to a helo of hot gas round our own Galaxy. This hot interglasti ms atemuaes the ight from distant sources (but not the integrated background) by Thomson (‘e.fre-electon) seatering, by a factor exp(—".), Where Other neak effet ac the absorption of low-frequency ruio waves, (Faraday) rotation of the plane of polarization of distant soures af there is also an intergalactic magnetic field, and a fequency-dependent ime I in the arava of Tht from variable source (dispersion). Inergalacic molecular hydrogen would be expected to absorb ravinlt radiation in the Lyman and Werner bands. The abeence of an absorption troushFrom the fireball tothe present the short-va Je of Lyman w shows that molecular hydrogen cannot wake up u very significant faction of the mater inthe universe altiough Has ae pec recopnized tat it aes wp a major part OF the ga in our Gaby. 68. Problems of the Local Group (Table 115 p 4) agree with | a you think of for less than perfect agreement? il theorem (ga (63) 1 the Local Group of galaxies assure otal velocity of the galaxies ie v/3 times the radial velocity). How well docs the virial theorem mass agree with the foal observed mass, and why?7 Observational cosmology 74 Introduction The isotropic 2.7 K blackbody radiation, th: similarity between the ages of galaxies and the age sundsnce, and th fnivene all support the big-bang models derived from general relaivi gical principle, Can we tes these models in more de eration param assuming the cosmo In particular, can we determine the curent valve ofthe {Sertion 47) and thereby deduce what the future ofthe universe willbe? In his thupter we look ata variety of cosmological tests, all using discrete s radiation that have been applied t try to answer this question. The answer tum fut to be inextricably bound up with the evolution of the diferent classes of diseret soure in the universe. “The min tests involve comparing luminosity and diameter distance (Section 3.2) with redshift. source counts (Sections 17 and 3.5). and integrated tackeround radction (Section 1.8). It was rado-source counts that fst showed that strong evolution mst affect some populations of source 72. Newtonian theory Suppose that we ate in an expanding Newtonian univene, in a uclidean ometry. The Kght from a source distance d receding with veloity v = H {Gohere Ho is the Hubble constant—Section 3.3), will sutfer a Doppler shi pre Ae, ve ado, Ay are the wavelengths ad frequencies of emission and The flux fom the source is rete to its luminosity by the inverse-square aw sad the apparent angulis size 0 (ra) of an object of linear sie is given bya 2 Observational cosmology rhe number of sources per teradian ith distances e Because of the effets of Special relativity. z 73. Special relativity cosmology: the Milne model | pi We now take into account the effects of special relativity, but neglet the effets Sy arovitation, I we consider particles moving with the substratum, obsecving hem from an inertial frame, then there are no forees acting on them so they all move with uniform velocity with respect to cach other. A fundamental observer ‘Ting on onc of these prticles continues to use Euclidean space coordinates, and Tneasures te velocity Of a particle at position vector ra time £t0 be (The tnly motion consisient with the cosmological principle tums out to be vir.) =r/t oo) rom eqn (4.8) this comesponds to taking R() ccf, a8 we expect from Section. jensen! 4.6). All pales would have been atthe ongin at ¢=0 and then expand out isotopically with uniform velocity The Doppler shift ean be shown to be ae 7 on (which agrees withthe Newtonian expression (7.2) provided u/c 1), and the flay from & distant source is novr given by erry 8) where ris the distance ofthe source at the moment of emission, the factor 2 {aking acount ofthe various special relativistic effects ofthe source its apparent brightness. Ifthe Signal i received at time it was emitted at ime |) fy —r/e, and eae (7.8) implies that P= ult —r/e), 0€ r= uty/(L+V/0). Eqn (7.8) becomesGeneral relativistic cosmology: the redshift Fig 74 Thora ml gts feeds eee aera ing eqn (77). The number of sources per strata, with redshift factors less than or equal 10 Z is found to be 1 NZ) = noler)*@2/8 — 182 — nz), where mp i the local number density of sources atthe present epoch, ‘Attbough the Milne model could be a reasonable approximation st the prsest epoch (we savin Section 4.6 tha all general relativity models with A = —1 tend forthe Milne model fr large) it cannot he vali back to = 0, since the densi of matter becomes infinite as 1» 0 so that gravitational effects cannot be neglected 74. General relativistic cosmology: the redshift Our stn ae ae O( "spats rsintoag), together withthe fact that for two events (7.8.04). (7-+Ar,8-+0.6-+89, fr di) connected by a light signal, the interval ds=0 ection 44) Consider a photon emited by a source a Qa me so thatthe event of emission ts (cfu, 6,2) and support thatthe photon is received by an observer at th Gis at tne so thatthe event of cbnervation is (0, 8 to) (22 Fi. 7. ‘Eicarly the Hight signal cavels in e radial straight line, by symmetry, s0 a = dg = and RNa at =0=6F for any clement ofthe light ray joining Q 10 O, or oat aus >pservational coamology oc an incoming signal. Integrating this rom 1 16°0 elt KO chose to bea co-moving coordinate (Section 4.5), 0 that at the source is still defined by r= (it change in distance ie “ee scale factor RC). The left-hand side oF (7-13) therefore ie with ime fora particular souree-cbserver pair, Now considera val signal emited by Qvat Sine f+ le, and SuppOSE this Tater signal is feoeived by O at fo + dig, Then eqn (7.13) becomes Now roca tha (a aay a RO) this later signal. Subtracting eqn (7.14) ffom (7-13), Ned ak ie _ dy * (1.13) RU) Rw) oy (assuming de/ter @a/to <1). Now suppose the to events of emission correspond to consecutive wave cress (Fig, 72). Then iz 0.18) ye Re) re io _ Rl) _ I the universe has expanded so that (a) > R(t), then there isa redshift (<> 0). IE we could observe ight which was emitted from a source at te =0, $0 a ii.) =0, it would be redshifed to infinite wavelength, However, asthe universe is opaque for R()/2R(p) < 10-> (Section 5.2), we know that we ean observe no sources ith redshift greater than 1000. Wg. 72 The editing of sgh ave fom tan sou7S Luminosity distance “Tocaleuat the Hux fom a distance source Q. consider aspherical surface r = tuom | centred om Q, passing through the observer O. Then the element of area at O Se) detncd by the Four pains (0, ¢), (0+ 2, 2), (0.4 + dd) (9-42, 6+ dp), will fq subtend a solid angle m= sino a9 a0 10 (se Fig. 73). To calculate the arc ofthis clement we note that the ‘proper fisance (eas determined by radsr methods) between 1wo events is given by (at) so the aca ofthe element is RUts)rod9 Raa Sin 46 = Rey 2. ay For a unit area, an =(RRy The energy emited per second into 42 is PAA, so the lux received by O per unit eee 7.18) me where one fate, 2~!, is needed because the photons arive with less energy than6 Observational cosmology », because the photons ‘ they set out with (since E = /nv) and the second factor i a bel tan ey of by eam (9) 1 Sen ano mince (qs A, ean 8) tps Dn = Rat a ; | G19) is related to the reshit by eqns (7-13) and (716) Baga (7.13) ean Be sin, ite r irk=0, 720) eee ps aye RR if A =0 Ger Section 8.2), Ir ean then be shown th Dian = ral2A%oe + (Qo ~ Hey T + ME — VM. (720) To the fst onder in 2 1 simply have the Hubble law Dn but the fll expression (7.21) depends on the cosmological density parameter 2 which we can therefore hope to determine by observing Dis). Tn terms of magnitudes (Sestion 32), Dun) © ope ye + (@ — 20TH 1 = M4 51g (co/10 pe) +5 lg ee M722) a 1.6 ‘The K-correetion In the discussion above P and S represen the total energy pe second emitted by the source and the total eneeey per second per unit area received by an observer. Jn practice we are usually observing in some relatively narrow band of wavelengths. Let P(e be the energy emitted per second in the frequency range (1, ¢ +d) and suppose the corresponding energy recived atthe top of the Earth's atmosphere is S(sy)dbs, where t_ = Zp. Then by ean (7.18) ‘where Din is defined by eqn 7.19), $0 (0p) = Pow9Z)Z/Di 23) Now suppose thatthe Earth's atmosphere, the tlescope and the detecting system result in fraction ¢() ofthe energy incident on the atmosphere at fequency Y) being recordedir Observational cowmolony Roost Fig 75 fore K ognine venus est for na gals 00d approximation to assume a power-law spectrum P(v) « ¥* and then eqn (7.23) becomes eae "Dim an Stun) = Poo and eqn (726) becomes x 25(e 1) tg+2). 028) since Z= 142 [Exact m—z curves for different valves of go = 95/2 are shown in Fig. 74 compared with the observed magnitude redshift elation fore brightest galaxies in 103 clusters. The best value of go is qe — 16404 729) oowever, the trie uncertainty is far larger since galaxies are probably changin their luminosity with ime. If galzxies were more luminous inthe past (@ue 10 tore rapid formation rate of bright tars, for example) then a smaller value of go ‘s appropmate, and vice versa. One important effect is galaxy cannibalism, where the most massive galaxies in a cluster grow by merging with other galaxiesDiameter distance fs “The scaner of the point in Fig. 74 about the mean line arses because these sulaics donot have enacly the same luminosity. If we plot ll galaxies in such a ‘Engram the seaneris enormous, since the absolute magnitude of galxies ranges ver at least 12:magnitudes (a factor of 100 000 inthe optical luminosity P). The ne is tue for quasars, assuming their redshifts ae cosmological. Clearly we Cannot use the magnitule-redshift diagram forall galaxies, or for quasars, to etermine 2 However, another class of objects that has eon used to apply this testi the radio galaxies. By taking deep photographic plates atthe posiions of radio puree, some very faint galaxies have been found, some of which have redshifts fpprecably larger than the most distant cluster in Fig 7.4, Figure 7.8 shows th infrared Kemapnituds versus redshift for radio guxie. 74 Diameter distance Consider an object of size ! at distance r= rp, subtending an angle 56 at the Gizin Fig 7.6) From the metric (eqn (7.1), the proper distance between the ends ofthe object Res 030) by definition, 50 wuz oan From eqn (3.5), the diameter distance is then Dein =Beiz? “Tis has been applic to bright galaxies in clusters (Fig. 77) the quoted vale of 0 wots 0.3, This teat can also be applied to rch clases of galaxies, which seem we hive a core of welldefined linear size (Fig. 78), with the formal result o> 2030.8 However, tis can be alflected by dynamical evolution of eaters Novice tht all the thsorctical curves, exept that for qo =O, g0 through = rninimurn in 56, afer which 89 stars v0 increase with redshift. It would be an Tnportant test of these models actualy tose this happening, Since the minimum aera fairly lage redshift, urless ge is wozeasonaby large, the best hope for testing this ies inthe quasars. Figure 79 showa a plot ofthc average radio size of Compost radio sources in quasars and radio-galaxis against redshift, There is Fie Th Antje f sie {whiny an ag 3 oe Sere.bald open ig 74 Ange dame seit hag for clam of eeeicn ‘remarkably good agreement with the theoretical eurve (eqn7.25) for 2) = 1. and thore does seem to be evidence forthe expected minimum inthe 9 ~z relation However, the posibilty of evolution in the radio-souree population makes this an uncertain way of determining 2amber counts of sources 1 emo 78 Number counts of sources Consider a population of sources uniformly and randomly diseibuted throngh the matter in the universe, like the currants in 8 pudding. The number density of provided the probability of apiece of mater being a source is independent of “The proper volume of the element at Qis (Fig. 710). av = Fara. Rrsin dg a39 ey and for | seof a spberical shel The mumber of sources in 1 sof this shell i den OR Pdr __mREPAr_ =e)? eyby egns (4.11) and (7.32 ), where mo = ml). ee ae eee cee Mo) = ml |) ioe a3) “This can then be combined with egn (7.18) to give (S), the mumber of sources per steradion that are brighter than S, assuming all sources have the same Iuoniosity. Tris found that forall 5, go. Figure 7.11 shows optical counts of galzxies. The observational uncertainties and an ignorance of galtxy evolution make the determination of qa impossible Counts of radio sources (Fig. 712) are appreciably steeper than any of the ‘theoretical eurves, implying that strong evolutionary effects must be preset. The sources (mostly quasars and radio galanies) must ether have been more luminous inthe past, or the probability of a source being alight must have been grenter. Optical and near infrared counts of normal galaxies Deep B-band counts of galaxies are too steep at faint magnitudes for passively evolving models, which allow only forthe evolution of the stars in the galaxies ‘The redshift distibution for deep galaxy samples fits the non-evol¥ing model and there is no alto high redshift as would he expected for minosity evolution, so wwe need either density evolution due to mergers or « new population of rapidly evolving dwarf galaxies. This faint galaxy excess is not seen inthe infrared K band, so the galsxies combating to the excess must be bluer than average. The infrared F-band counts also show an excess andthe absence of ail a high redshift to the <-disuibution suppons the rapidly evolving cart pice if the cosmological constant (sce Chapter 8) A = 0. Altsmatively a model withMumber counts of sources % = so j Fig. 741 Guiry conte By had Radio, optical, and X-ray counts of active of radio galaxies and radio-loud uminosty’ evolution, in which the Radio source counts imply stoag evolu quasars. The evolution ss close 10 a pare dn2) = 017) 35) with vex Optical surveys of (predominantly radiouict) quasars also show strong a ohith i also close toa pure luminosity evolution of the same formiesqwm ey Fg. 712 Couns fo sources, erp wih eet cari fr diferent pl cane) ca forthe teiy st moe bon cave se Seton.) showing eng ewer fossa ee Deep X-ray eouts made with the ROSAT satellite are dominated by quasars and also show strong evolution. Far infrared and ratio counts of stars galaxies Redshift surveys of IRAS 60 jim galaxies show clear evidence for stron evolution at @ similar rate to that seen in quasars and radio galaxies. Source ‘counts at 60 jum also show strong evidence for evolution, cause ofthe strung eorelation between fa infrared and radio luminosity for spiral galaxies, sub-mly radio source counts at [4 GH and redshift surveys of faint samples of radio sources can provide powerful constrains on the evolution ‘ofthe tabost galaxy population. Below 1 mly the dominant population of radio- sources is strbust galaxies and they seem to be undergoing strong evolution at rate similar to egn (7.35).Tre tuminosity-volume test ns Table 7.1 Some of the great catalogues of moder astronomy Ops 1 The reference catalog of bright glass Compe by Gand Ade Vaucolcus, this compris exenllthe gales rom he [Now Gre sod Ines Catsloprs (NGC snd IC") of nebulae, mtn ted oe (Gencal Calogue of Willa and John Hert! contin information on 2509 palais, fendi comple to aboat Ith maznitce 2 The Zutcky catalogue of ga ‘Cone by F. 2wicky and coworker it corsis 31 O00 galaxies in he nother eniapere higher than mp = 157 its 9700 chistes of sala. 3 The Abel ealog of rch cles of palsies ists 2700 este shin eases {@) 2ety Bis of compart planes: () Ary catlogee of peculiar lass) Infra TRAS Poot Source Catalog of souces detected a 12,25, 60, and 100 pm The mos likely mechanism fr driving the evolution in these different types of scive galaxy is interactions between galaxies or mergers, which can conceniate fas towards the nuclei of galaies, feeding a black hole there, and causing burt 79 The laminosity-volume test These evolutionary effects can ako be scen vividly by means of te luminosin= ty-disiance and source-count test nto lume test, which combines the laminos al test, provided a comple sample of sources down 10 nthe sample wit Hux S for some chosen single, more po sone ling ux level Sin 8 availabe. For a source nd redshift swe can calculate the aminostyP fom eqn (7.18) Senmologicel model. Sources of this luminosity should then be uniformly126 Observational cosmalony 0 os 4 ig 7A3 Thc hissy lene tet The dition o manoctuomatic rao mins (et 178 ‘Ma spuint V/V for a quar (ast 4) i i gles all da) in he eed hd ‘Cie cade frat sce (oe Table 7.1 wah sl mgd ight 195, {ssn an forthe more Torino ao zai non uf, sheng hat ese popalsons aye ‘Ranged ex popers drama wih ie The olcltoas hae ber pegged nthe Mle ‘mol y= 0) istributed with respect tothe co-moving volume, V(2) (ie when the effect ofthe expansion ofthe universe is allowed for) Of course, there will be a redshift zaux lt which «source of this luminosity P would disappear out of the sample (ts flux would drop below Sac f0rz > tax SO in fact we ean test this uniformity only for 0 < VG) < Vena ‘say. In practice itis best to calculate V/V. fr each ‘source in the sample and then look at the distibution of luminosity with respect to V/V. Figure 7.13 shouts such distributions for radio galaxies and for quasars in the third Cambridge eatlogue of radio sources (see Table 7.1; p. 125). The isuibucions for quasars and forthe sore luminous radio galaxies are strkinaly nonuniform (more sources sre found at large values of V/V), showing that cvolitionary effects are present, Similar reslts are obtained for other values of 4Integrated backs 7.410 Integrated background radiation “The intensity of the integrated background radiation from a population of sources rf, SANS) Worst 036) Using eg (7.12): forall modelsre omersationa cosmolony : sve the inert ofthe background in the eaueney range || ale! 3! Tov) then 10) = net Poth an oy Bee ye pies taka, wing Mie ota ta ‘observed backround, Radio background “The main contribution i fom the Milky Was, butt can be shown thatthe scep- spectrum (mean spectral index a ~ 0.8—Section 14; p. 16) extragalactic sources Contribute an intensity of about 10-28 W mr? Ht se! at 178 MH, about 10. nore than that predicted assuming n0 evolution, This confirms that | je evolution has to be present, as was Suggested by dhe source count Microwave and infrared background “The dominant observed background in the microwave region is the 27 K blackbody radiation, Duc tothe foreground radiation from the Earth's atmosphere and the emission from interstellar and interplanetary dust, we have anly upper Timits a the moment on the infrared background. The predicted contribution from. at ‘ella dust in galaxies and from starburst galaxies is shown in Fig. 7.14 Optical background ‘The predicted integrated background from the starlight im galaxies falls well below the observational limits. The problem is that the brightness ofthe Tight from the Earth's atmosphere (for ground-based observations), from zodiacal light, and from the starlight of the Milky Way together swamp out the cosmic background. Possible changes with time in the uminosiies af galaxies duc to stella evolution lead to uncertainties in the theoretical curves Utiravioet and sot X-ray background ‘Observations from satellite: and rockets show the existence of background radiation emission concentrated towards the Galactic plane, probably duc to starlight catered by dustin the ultraviolet and t emission from hot (10°10 K) Jmecstellar gas at soft Xray wavelengths. At high Galactic latitudes an Isotropic component can be scen which might be due to a hot intergalactic ‘medium (~ 10* K) with the closure density (St = 1). However, the ultravioletInuegrated backround radiation 2 pockround at high Galactic latitudes may well be scattered starlight and the soft Xray background i probably due to a halo of hot gas suounding our Gal The extragalactic background in the wavelength range 100-912 A is observable due 10 interstellar absorption, Hard X-ray and gamma-ray backe The Einssin satellite es found that the largest contribution to the 1-3 keV background is from quasars. Other clases of discrete source which are known to make & signifcam contribution to the 2-10 keV background are clusters of falanies (~10 percent) and emission line gclaies (~30 per cent). These results fhave been confirmed by the ROSAT mission ‘Over the range 2-130 keV the background can be fed by thermal ‘Bremsuralung from abot (4.4 x 10° K) intergalactic gas (C2 = 0.46), bat there js considerable difficulty in accouating forthe enerey to hea his $25 An addtional contribution to the backsround will be inverse Compton radation (Seaton 1.4: p16) fom nornalgalanies, from radio galexies, and from Puasa, due t the interaction ofthe relativistic electrons responsible fr thei on with the photons of the blackbody. radiation i fields in these objects are surprisingly Tow, the radio synchrotron radia However, unless the ms ontibution to the background is likely to smal. The y-ray background shows a considerable enkancement towards the Gali plan, and this is believed to be duc othe decay of 1°mesons erated by high cperey cosmic rays ploughing through the interstellar eas of our Galaxy. The Table 7.2. Properties of selected cosmological models amy ile as eS Suadyatn30 Observational cosmology ‘tropic component of the background is probably from mice, More exotic possibilities ane Hawking radiation decay due to mattet-antimatter annihilation smain conteibation oth quasars and Seyfert from primordial black holes) and Gpilogue, p. 149) 7A1 Problems 71 Work out the detailed predictions of te tests describe in this chapter for the cases go =041/ 72. Fore universe with k= 0, RU) = Ro(t/bf where n-= 1, use eqns (7.16) and (7.20) to deduce that ry = (eo /(1 — Ro) = (1+ 99. For n= 2/3, deduce thatthe proper distance to a quasar at redshift z= Sis crol6 — 61/3. 7.3. Show that for a population of sources with the sme linear size, in the Finstein-de Sitter model there is a minimom observed angular diameter at 5/4,8 Other cosmological theories 81 Introduction So far we have described the standard zencral relativistic, iotopic, hemogensous, tot bigehung models and their conzoquences, In this chapter we lok at some cratve ideas both within and outside the framework of general relativity int we look athe consequences of mchidin a non-2er9 ‘cosmological’ tem, pera relativity, For histor in the field equations of reasons We give an fccount ofthe steady state theory. We look at some thoon the praviational ‘constant’ G varies with time, and at anhowopic and ‘within general relativity. We mention the cosmological mpi tO unify the some f ervity in which neous mod tions of “grand unified” theories, which at magnctic, and weak forces of physics, and we discuss models which Trang slogethe. Finally we look ito Eddington's “mg umbers and the ‘anthopie” principle 2. General relativistic models with the A-term When Einstin orginally put forward his general theory of relativity, he included he socalled cosmological term. This distances into an allrachon of repulsion is obmerved an additional term in the field equations, tmotfies the law of gravitation at lar ‘dacctly proportional to distance, = Ar, A constant. No such he solar system, or in the stuctare of our Galaxy, so A rast be very smal This cera term would have an effect only om the scale of clusters of galaxies o ith all he basic principles that ed Einstein w his fk Tostant of iteration), but i is usually Set equal ble. However it The A-tenn is consistent w equations (iti effecvely a zero by rlativits in onder to Keep the theory as simple 8 po Tends {0 come new cosmological possbites, which we will now snvst “The equations forthe seake factor R(?), (2.12) and (4.13) (p. 67), which ae 1 principle, become derived trom the field equations assuming the cosmological B= —anGooR/3P + AR @) BP = bxGpeRi/3k— ke + A = GE. @ =0, s0 behaviour Fins we see that the A-term does not have any effect near A <0 and A>0 near the ‘big bang’ is unaliered. We consider the cases> Other cosmological theories Fig AL 9 <0 modes aco ‘bas tobe finite for ito remain a ral number, and there exists an Re such that Gla) 0, ie. RO when R—Re. Eqn @.1) then shows that R-o 1k <0, > 0 forall R, to We have a monotonic expanding univers, the only difference from those with A= 0 being that at large ,? ~ AR*/3, 50 Rocexpl(A/3)""4) 3) If k=0, ps =0, A> 0 we have the de Sitter model, for which eqn (8:3) holds for all IW = there i a critical value of &, Ac, such that R =O and i =O ean both fy be satisted simultaneously. From eqn (81), = 0 implics R= ReldxGpa/ NV? = Rey BY, co) and then oqo (8.2) implies that 0 = GxGax)* es) ep pk) Tis means that there isthe possibifty of static medel of the universe, with =R., A= No, forall time f, provided AxGp. = he) 69) and since p> 0, k must be postive for this to happen. This isthe Einstein staticGeneral relativistic models withthe Stem 13 model, the fist solution of general relativity to be fou ‘cosmological principle By staying the funetion G(R) (eqn (82)) a6 function of R, we ca see what other possible A> 0, k= +1, models there are (Fig. 8.2), Clearly G(R) -> 20 both foe R-—> Oand for R > 00, and reaches minimum a R, with GAR) > oF <0 according as A> oF < AL RSA; G(R) > Oa R, so we have a monotonic expanding universe again A=A, Apart fom the Einstein static model, there are two models that approach this ‘Gompatcally.comesponding to the two branches of G(R) — see Fig. 82. One Tpands out gradually fom the Einstein sate at ¢= —o and then tums into an nthe usual big bang exponential expansion (eqn (8.3)-The other expands out f nd then tends asymptotically tothe Bintein model as r > v0. These ar called the Eiddingion-Lematre models (Fig. 83), ELI and EL2 WA —A,( +e), e 1, we have the Lemaire motes. Fora long period of time Ris close to Re and the cosmological ep a traction ae stin balance. Finally the epusion wens and the expansion coninses azn The solution with R = Ry isan here are no solutions for Ri < R < Rs (Fig. 8 bounces’ under the ‘ucillating” model. In the one with R> Re, the univGeneral relativistic models with the Nterm 83. Otwervable consequences ofthe Aterm “The Eioscin static model canbe eliminated irsmecistly since it does at predic ‘redshi. There remain two models which do not originate in a big bang, the FL2 (Fig. £3) and “bounce’ models. In each case there would be a maximum redshift defined by 1+ tune = Ro/Resa and in the bounce models more distant objects would show a blueshift If quasar redshifts are cosmological then zeus = S “The Lemaire models permit ages of the univ time ty (the EL2, bounce, and de Siter mov models have postive curvature (sce Fig. 46, p the intriguing possiblity of seving al the ay round the universe, and even of fecing a ghost Milky Way (oormally light does not have time to make this ‘Grcumavigation, and therefore there isa horizon—Section +9), So far we have to evidence that this is happening. Actually since in general relativity the large Seale topology ofthe univer is not specified, ghost mages could in principle arse in any model, Another effect ofthe long ‘coasting’ period Fig 8.5) is that there would be a concentration of objects with redshifts given by far greater than the Hubble have infinite ages). Since these 72) and are spatially finite, there 1+2~Ry/R. For models with non-zero A, and neglecting radiation, the age ofthe univers can bbe writen +(Qo/2—aoah1 observations show that the Hubble time, 1, is less than the age of the universe, thon we would be forced to conclude that A > 0. We could still 1 retain a lat model of the universe (K =O), as required by inflation, provided dot = 1 where Ag = 4/348, For example, for k = 0, Q% =1-%=005 01 02 03 O5 1 fof =149 128 1.08 0.96 083 067 The best evidence for nonzero A would be if the parameters 2/2 and ¢ were unequal atthe present epoch, since eqns (81) and (420)-(4:22) imply that A/S = H3[(So/2— 40) ep r ‘We have soon tht the observed matter in galaxies corresponds to $9 ~ 0.1 (eon (68), whereas the maynitude-cedshift text for bright calaxes gave qo ~ 1, but Doth these estimates are far too uncerain to be interpreted as implying A #0. "Toe optical depth for gravitational lensing of distant quasars by intervening alanis isa sensitive function ofthe geometry ofthe universe and so can provide ‘seful constraints on the value of A. The present evidence from the redshift listibution of lensed quasars favours ho = A/34 < 0.95, “The condition A = A., which defines the Eddington-Lemaltre modes, can be shown to be equivalent Ga/2—¢— 1) =219/2F(2/2-4) as) “The zones of the diferent models in the -g diagram are shown in Fig, 8.6 B.A. The steady state cosmology ‘This was put forward in 1948 by Bondi, Gold, and Hoyle. The cosmological principle was strengthened to the ‘perfec? cosmolasical principle: the universeThe steady state cosmology 7 presets the same appearance to all fundamental observers a al times ‘An immediate consequence ofthis i that the Hubble ime must be a constant, = R/R, constant for all Thos Recespi/e, or R= Ryexplt—)/s. 9) A second consequence is thatthe density of matter is constant, to maintain this we must have cootinaous creation of matter ata steady rate per unt volume aR) =e 8.10) It can aho be shown thatthe thee-spaces 1 = constant havea tee dimensional corvature, knov as the Gaussian curvature, of /R(), which would depend on time unless k= 0. ‘We have therfore shown thatthe steady sate metic is expe POND (ae +a? +42, a1) and this isthe sume ax that for the de Sitter model (Section 8.1). If fcld equations similar to those of general relativity are used, but with a era term representing the creation of matter its found tha SxGpr'/3=1. « which with r~2x 10" years gives ~'5> 10-2 kg or, about 10 times Fighcr than the density of matter in galaxies (gn (6.10)) The remainder could be 10° K (Section made up of ionized intergalactic hydrogen at a temperature Gs). The comesponding creation rae (of, presumably, cold. neutral, uniform hydrogen) is the undetectable 10- kg mr? s!. The magnitde-redshft ration forthe steady state theory is the same a for the de Siter mode m= A+ Sig +2) en (here Ais constan), equivalent to qo = —1. whic is ater improbable from the date on bright cluster galaxies (Fig. 74, p. 117), bearing in mind that 0 The numberof sources per seradian out to redshift 238 yfaroree am nding N(S) curve is fatter than —1.5, wheress the radio-source p. 124)Other cosmological theories Tie final blow for the stealy state theory was the isotopic 27 K Blacbody scat oe ahich no convincing explanation was predced, whereas foe Bie Mescoser,iechould be remembered that i 1948, dhe accepted estima oF he ticnois tins war only 2 10" years oly 10 percent of the age of our Gul, Seni sme cosmology’ provided an eleeant Way oUt of that difficulty, now ‘Houle aad colaeators have, by analogy with some ofthe coment inflationary wed. 4 modification of the seady sate theory whereby the were ona steal state on the large sale but some regions, inching the one Sve find ouselves in, undergo an evolutionary phase 85 ‘Theories in which G changes with time Theories of this type were fist proposed by Milne, Dirac, and Jontan. More recently Brans and Dieke, Hoyle and Naika, and Dirac have put forward more labora theories ofthis type. "A vasiation of G with time has a considerable effect on the evolition of the arth and Sun and on the orbits of the moon and planets. I gravity has changed appreciably over the lifetime ofthe Fath, the radius ofthe Bath might have been “fected. I has been suggested tha the continents al fitted togetteat one time en {smuch smaller Earth As the gravitational constant reduced, the Earth expanded to its present size and the continents were forced spat Also a star in its hhydrogen-burming phase, like the Sun, has huminosity Lad’, (ss) nd so would have been appreciably brighter in the past i Gdocreases witht The cffeet ofthis on life on Earth would be enhanced by the fat thatthe Earh must bbe moving away from the Sun if G is declining. If G oc, then the temperature of the Earth is 7x P™, assuming thatthe Ean always absorbs the same fraction ‘of the incident energy from the Sun. Paleoclimatologists argue tat the ux of Solar energy at the Earth’s surface can have varied bite over the Earth's history [A slightly lower solar flux results in the Earth becoming completely covered with ice, which can then only be removed by a very substantial rise in the Solar fs. ‘This argument seems to be inconsistent even withthe standard (G ~ constant ‘mod, since the Sun is expocte to have inereased its luminosity noticeably over the Farth’s lifetime, The existence of life on Earth three thousand million years ‘ago limits the Earths surface temperature to well below th boiling point of Water at that time. And too fasta decline in G would lead to the Sun's having already become a red giant 'A varying G leads to a variation in the Moon's distance and period, and measurements of these led to the most reliable limits on the variation of G obtained to date. The ofits of the planet are also modified, and this could show ‘up in radar time-delay experimentsTheories in which G chonges with time “The upper limit onthe variation of G fom these solar system arguments is now IG/G| = 3x 10" y and this is sufficient to conflict with the simplest varying G models, in which Gort assuming the Hubble constant Hy = 5 x 10°" yr, However, there fre many problems of interpretation associated with these experiments and more Sensitive measurements are highly desirable, Ut should alo be emphasized that Some theories in which G varies also predict other changes (to preserve enerzy ‘conservation, for example) which can mask the above effects [Even stage limits on G follow if*He and 7H are believed to be synthesized in the fireball phase ofa hot big bang. 16/6, < 10° ‘The Bran-Dicke cosmology represents the simplest extension of general Fetvity, Ih addition to the teosor gravitational field represented by the meuic tenvor (Section 44), there i a scalar id (the granitationel ‘constant ) which is function of time caly Beans and Dicks ke A — 0 and seek to satisfy Mach’s principle, that loca onal elt ofthe et ofthe inerial properties shouldbe determined by the pravia matter inthe universe, by ting a ~ Ym 16) “The moves forthe case k= 0 are particularly simple, since Rat, Gor @=2 +0430), 1=2) and wis “coupling constant” between the scalar field and the peometry. © — 9° tives the Einstin-de Sitler model, Nowe thit for general , Got? = constant Disa’s 1937 theory is obtained by seting © = ~2/3. ‘The Brans-Dicke theory makes slightly diferent predictions fom elatvity forthe deecion of ight by the Sum and fr the perihelion advance of & the ‘Nordvod" effet (« ener planet. However, analysis ofthe nar ranging dat f Trcakdown in the equivalence principle) gives a limit for that the modes fle neghgibly fom chose of general relativity G/G < 10" yr, And if beliam is syathesized in the big bang. there i 29 even stronger limit, o> 100 Tn the Hoyle and Narkar and Din (197 serbia advance tests would give the same results Saviadon of G aries Fecause there are two tmescals, ‘o> 29, which means (and 73) toores the Tight deflection nd encral relativity. The omic sexe and Coamologial time, which wo Songer coincide.40 Other cosmological theories 186 Anisotropic and inhomogeneous universes, chaotic eosmolORy. te fet that isotropy together with the Copernican principle hat We ae HOt i sect pce) impics fomozeneity, and dhe high degree of is0UORY of the eave background radiation, made it natal 1 investiga isotopic and nomogencoun meals. However, the universe is clearly homogeneous on mass Fes up tat last those of galaxies ad clusters and we have seen in Chapter 6 Tat cigmihcant density imeyularites must have been present at Very early times Wweoen of coune, tke the rather supine view thatthe universe was erated with Y nmoth and isotropic structure on the large scale, but with just sufficient “lesctue on the sil eae to evalye t the universe of galaxies and clusters that vio see nou. A inore interesting hypothesis is > suppose tat the universe began o sate of regulanty apart from small and inevitable ‘statistical’ fluctuations {We might then hope that these could, in ime, grow to form galaxies and chistes, This point of view has been called “quiescent” cosmology. A more dramatic speculation was pat forward by Misner and has acquired the rae of ‘chaotic’ cosmology’ the present universe would have arisen whatever he inital conditions The idea is tit no matte how anisotropic and inhomogenz0us the universe was initially, gravitation and other physical processes would have ‘auned it to evolve tothe present stat, after long enough time: The mechanism originally suggested by Misner to smooth out th initial non ‘uniformity in the matter distibation was neutrino Viscosity, but it has now been shown that this cannot remove arbitrary anisotropy nor any inhomogeneity over scale of | Mo, A more promising mechanism for damping out the anisotropy has bhoen advocated by Zeldovich and other Soviet cosmologists, The rapidly changing gravitational fied during the very earliest moments after the big bang (10s <1 10-5) leads to. spontaneous. creation of panicle pairs and radiation a the expense of gravitational energy (analogous to Hawking radiation from black holes see Section 6.6). Anisotropy and inhomogeneity might be smoothed out because of the ational creation occurring in regions where the nergy is higher. Unfortunately there appears t0 be no experimental means of testing such ideas ‘An objection that bas been raise to chaotic cosmology is thatthe erasure of aubitrary amount of primordial chaos mast be paid for By an appropriate quantity Of radiation entropy. This 18 measured by the number of pliotons pes baryon, ~ 10° atthe present epoch, which seers a very Jow value in ths context, 8.7 Grand unified theories and inflation “The suovess of the Weinberg: Salama unification ofthe weak and electromsnetic imterocions based ypom the “SU2) x UC)’ group and the development of the ‘quark theory of strong interactions based on the group SU(3) hes led Pati and Salam, Georgi and Glashow, and others, to propose “grand” unified theories t0 unify the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions. Even more amiiiousEaddingion’s magic numbers sncories of everything’ which unify al these interactions with erovity ae als being investigated The grand unified theories fa J%.| of the SUG) sroup, have some interesting consequences for cosmology. Thes ich the simplest is described by the stuctare falc]! Greones atterapt to place quarks on the samc footing 3s clectrcaly charged moh) paricles like the electon, and fr this to be possible quarks mast beable te cn tef) Ghunge into electrons and positrons, Because of this possibility the proton can se decay by transformation of is three interior quarks into a positron and a pion. “Tis takes about 10" years on average but by studying alae mass of materia i is hoped to test this im a few years time. This non-conservation of baryon ‘gauge particles or “Higgs mr) requires the existence of sipeshcavy particles (either fons?) of mass ~ 10"°GeV/e In the very exrly ivenc (T> 10° K, Pe 1075.) when the energy of a photon is comparable with the rest mas can be penny of there superhey pariccs, the baryon non-conserving proces ey important and can convert at intial universe with an arbitrary tevel into one with just the excess of baryons that we see today ns and anharyons ann of baryons | {per 10° photons. At the epoch when ba T= 10" K), we are left with & universe composed predominant observed Tn Section $4, 1 gave a bret universe goes through a phase of proto ‘ery early universe. Because this solv Secnuio is very popular with cosmologists and particle phy hand count ofthe inflarionary scenario, in whi! 4 exponential expansion during the horizon and flazness problems, this 88 Eddington’s magic mumbers ington remarked that if you work out the = radius of univers ‘assed clacton radius ~ A/c you have two huge dimensionless numbers of th then a this tut ir would be surprising if this were 2 coincidence. I Gee + mumber can be deduced: Pape whichis roughly the squ snivere, if