You are on page 1of 10

FIELD EDUCATION SEMINAR II

SOCIAL WORK 4442
SW 4442 001 CRN 23433 (1 credit hour)
Althea M. Grant
Office Hours: by arrangement
Room 43 Thompson Home
Email: ad9444@wayne.edu
Office number: 313-577-9886 cell number: 313-706-0876
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Understanding the learning experience through critical reflection on field and course work.
Social Work 4442 Field Education Seminar II is a one credit hour seminar held concurrently with
SW 4998 Field Practice II (5 credits) during the winter semester. Students MUST be enrolled in
SW 4998 Field Practice II in order to earn credit for this course. Social Work 4442 BSW Field
Education Seminar II continues to facilitate students’ understanding of the learning experience
through critical reflection on field and courses. The course helps students reflect on their field
experiences and to draw from their course content, all of which help define them as social work
professionals.

COURSE COMPETENCIES AND PRACTICE BEHAVIORS FOR THIS COURSE
COMPETENCIES
2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly
Practice Behaviors:

Advocate for the client access to the services of social work; practice Personal reflection and
self-correction to assure continual professional development; attend to professional roles and
boundaries; demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance and communication;
engage in Career long learning; use supervision and consultation
2.1.2 Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice
Practice Behaviors:
Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide
practice; make ethical decisions by applying standards of the NASW Code of Ethics;
tolerate ambiguity in resolving conflicts; apply concepts of ethical reasoning to arrive at

1

principled decisions
2.1.3 Apply Critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments
Practice Behaviors:
Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research based
knowledge, and practice wisdom; analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention and
evaluation; demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with
individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues
2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice
Practice Behaviors:
Gain sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal bias and values in working
with diverse groups; recognize and communicate the importance of difference in shaping life
experiences
2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice
Practice Behaviors:
Advocate for human rights and social justice; Engage in practice that advance social and
economic justice
2.1.6 Engage in research- informed practice and practice informed research
Practice Behaviors:
Use research evidence to inform practice; Use practice to inform scientific inquiry
2.1.7 Apply Knowledge of human Behavior and the social environment
Practice Behaviors:
Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the process of assessment, intervention and evaluation;
Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment
2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver
effective social work services.
Practice Behaviors:
Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being; Collaborate with
colleagues and clients for effective policy action
2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice
Practice Behaviors:
Continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and
technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services; provide
leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the
quality of social service
2.1.10 Engage, assess, intervene and evaluate with individuals, families, groups,
organizations and communities
Practice Behaviors:
(a)
Engagement:
Substantively and affectively prepare for action with individuals, families, groups,
organizations and communities; use empathy and other interpersonal skills; develop a

2

mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes
(b) Assessment
Collect, organize, and interpret client data; assess client strengths and limitation develop
mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives; select appropriate intervention
strategies
(c) Intervention
Initiate actions to achieve organizational goals; implement prevention interventions that
enhance client capacities; help clients resolve problems; negotiate, mediate, and advocate for
clients; facilitate transitions and endings
(d) Evaluation
Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions
11 Analyze the impact of the urban context on a range of client systems, including practice
implications
Practice Behaviors:
Examine the distinct characteristics of the urban context and apply the analysis to social work
practice.
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
It is expected that students effectively utilize field instruction by:
a. identifying own learning needs, areas of difficulty, and feelings of discomfort
b. continuing to take responsibility to prepare and plan for supervision
c. continuing to accept, integrate, and apply guidance and feedback received from field
instructor
d. continually re-evaluating the development of practice skills in light of field and
classroom instruction
GRADING AND ASSIGNMENTS
Assignment
Module 1 Discussion Board
rubric
Module 2 Reflections blog
rubric
Module 3 Group ethics
activity rubric
Module 4 Blog rubric
Module 5 Article discussion
rubric
Module 6 Community blog
rubric
Module 7 Self assessment
blog rubric
Evaluation of Practice paper

Percenta
ge
10%

Related Course
Competency
Competency #1

10%

Competencies #1, #3,
#10
Competencies #1, #2,
#3, #10
Competency #1, #3,
#7, #10
Competencies #3, #4,
#7, #10
Competencies #10,
#11
Competencies #1, #3,
#10
Competency #1, #3,

10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
30%

3

rubric
TOTAL

#10, #11
100%

GRADING POLICY:
Students may pass the course with a grade of D but must maintain a C average during the junior
and senior year. (See Undergraduate Bulletin, Wayne State University
http://www.bulletins.wayne.edu/ubk-output/index.html)
GRADE DISTRIBUTION:
100-95 A

94.9-90 A-

89.9-87 B+

86.9-83 B

82.9-80 B-

79.9-77 C+

79.9-77 C+

76.9-73 C

72.9-70 C-

69.9-67 D+

66.9-63 D

62.9-60 D-

ORGANIZATION OF THE COURSE
This is the second of two field seminar courses for BSW students. It is a one credit hour course
composed of lecture and discussion with seven online modules. The course meets bimonthly.
The first module begins Monday, January 12 and the last module ends Sunday, April 12, 2015.
Like the first seminar, the focus of the course is to continue to help students integrate their
coursework learning with their experiential learning in the field practicum. The students are
required to participate in discussion about field placement and the integration of coursework and
fieldwork. Through lecture discussions, case presentations, and discussion blogs, students learn
about professional social work practice with an emphasis on critical thinking, self-awareness,
ethics and values, and culturally responsive practice with an emphasis on human rights and
social justice.
The sessions are organized around the following areas:








Responsibility and ethics in Social Work
Relationships and boundaries
Group dynamic exercises
Observation, encouraging, paraphrasing, and summarizing skills
Conversation versus interview
Reflecting feelings and integrating skills
Confrontation
Understanding of community
Social Work in urban settings versus rural settings

ROLE OF THE STUDENT AND INSTRUCTOR
Two or more absences will result in a student being asked to withdraw from the course and may

4

impact student standing in the BSW program. Students are expected to attend all online class
modules. Students are expected to be prepared at class time for discussions based on assigned
readings as class participation enhances the learning experience. Assignments must be received
by the identified day. For further details about the role of a student, see the University’s
“Statement of Obligations of Faculty and to the Instructional Process” in the Wayne State
University Graduate Bulletin. http://www.bulletins.wayne.edu/fib/fib2d.html
The instructor will closely monitor all postings, offer additional questions to guide discussions
and help maintain focus if the class has difficulty focusing on the topics. All assignments must
be completed on Blackboard and not submitted by email to the instructor.
The instructor will respond to student questions that are not related to the assignments by email.
The grade points will be posted in the Grade Center within a reasonable time period after the
deadline of each assignment.
At the end of module four, the instructor will email to each student personal feedback on their
progress in the seminar.
Members of the class, including the instructor, will request confidentiality of others as not to
repeat or share personal, professional, or assignment related issues discussed or disclosed in
class.
POLICIES FOR THIS COURSE
Assignments must be received by the identified deadline dates in the Course Calendar that is
located in the course menu on the Blackboard home page. To complete all assignments and the
required responding posts, the online modules of this course will require adherence to the periods
specified in the Course Calendar.
Students who are late in their postings will lose points for each assignment in accordance with
the Grading Rubrics associated with each assignment. The Grading Rubrics’ button for the
course is located in the course menu on the Blackboard home page. There is no extra credit for
assignments in this course. There is no opportunity to resubmit assignments after assignments are
graded. For a missed session at instructor’s discretion, (considered only in extreme cases – life
events beyond one’s control), student may be allowed an optional make-up assignment (i.e., a 3-5
page paper with minimum of 3 sources and using APA format focusing on topic covered on
session missed OR another assignment identified by the instructor). Students who elect this
option and successfully complete the makeup assignment will receive partial points (minus late
points indicated in the grading rubric) for missed session. Students who miss a second session
and who did a first make-up will not have an option for a second make-up – these students would
lose all points for the second missed session. Students who miss more than two classes and do
no make-up work should drop the class.
Being a responsible student in a seminar entails regular class attendance and active class
participation with consideration for others. When students participate actively in class
discussions, learning is enhanced. To be able to participate actively and with relevance to the

5

course subject matter, it is important that you log into each class as soon as the assignment is
available. It is the student’s responsibility, whether present or absent, to keep abreast of
assignments and class discussion.
Academic honesty is expected therefore, all submitted work must be original. The presentation of
another’s words or ideas as one’s own, without giving credit to the source with a properly noted
citation, is regarded as plagiarism. Any work that is submitted in this class found to contain
portions that are plagiarized will receive a ZERO.

COURSE LEARNING MODULES
Module
I




Content
Introduction and orientation to the course
Student introductions
Review of course syllabus
Discussion on field assignments: learning
plan, process recordings, evaluations

II


Personal reflections from field placement
Personal performance outcomes

#1. #3. #10

III


Responsibility and ethics in Social Work
Relationships and boundaries

#1, #2, #3, #10

IV

#1, #3, #7, #10

Observation, encouraging, paraphrasing, and
summarizing skills
Conversation versus interview

V


Reflecting feelings and integrating skills
Confrontation

#3, #4, #7, #10

VI


Understanding of community
Social Work in urban settings versus rural
settings

#10, #11

VII

Field Instructor Assessment of Student
Competencies (FIASC)
Licensing and professional development
Transition – Employment, Graduate School

#1, #3, #10


6

Competencies
#1

COURSE REQUIREMENTS
1. Evaluation of Practice Paper
30 points
a. The paper will be graded based on content covered, clarity, and grammar. It is
due Monday, March 9, 2015 by 11:59 pm. This is an evaluation of your practice,
building on the competencies and information gleaned from the first semester.
This report will continue to address performance outcomes related to the field
placement settings as students will focus on application, analysis and reflection
when considering practice. A written report, minimum of 5 pages must be
submitted using the outline below focusing on application, analysis and reflection
when considering practice at the field placement setting. The following content
must be addressed:
How do I evaluate my practice with client or group
or community systems? (Pick one system)
How do I know that what I do with client or group or
community systems has an impact? (Pick one
system)
What skills do I need in order for me to work in my
current field placement setting?
Are the population and field of practice a good fit for
me? Why or why not?
What can I do to improve my social work practice
with client, or group or community systems?
How have my experiences at this agency contributed
to my knowledge of ethical social work practice?
How has this placement helped me to understand the
values of the social work profession and how has it
assisted me in the development of ethics for social work
practice?
WSU STUDENT RESOURCES
Students with disabilities
http://studentdisability.wayne.edu/rights.php.
Academic integrity and student code of conduct
http://www.doso.wayne.edu/assets/codeofconduct.pdf
Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) at Wayne State:
http://www.caps.wayne.edu/
TEXTS AND REQUIRED MATERIAL
Required

7

5 points
4 points
4points
4 points
4 points
4 points
5 points

(All students are able to download the manual from the School’s web site)
The Field Education Manual, 7th Edition (2013). Wayne State University School of Social Work.
Recommended
Birkenmaier, J. M., and Berg-Weger, M. (2011). Practicum Companion for Social Work:
Integrating Class and Fieldwork, the (3rd Edition) (Connecting Core Competencies). Allyn &
Bacon.
Sweitzer, H. & King, M. (2004). The Successful Internship: Transformation and Empowerment
in Experiential Learning. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
REFERENCES
Arkin, N. (1999). Culturally sensitive student supervision: Difficulties and challenges. The
Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 1-16. doi:10.1300/J001v18n02_01
Baker, D. R., & Smith, S. L. (1987). A comparison of field faculty and field student perceptions
of selected aspects of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 5(4), 31-42.
doi:10.1300/J001v05n04_04
Baum, N. (2011). Social work students' feelings and concerns about the ending of their fieldwork
supervision. Social Work Education, 30(1), 83-97. doi:10.1080/02615471003743388
Bogo, M. (2010). Achieving competence in social work through field education. University of
Toronto Press.
Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2005). Clinical Supervision in Social Work: A Review of the
Research Literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1-2), 49-67. doi:10.1300/J001v24n01_04
Caspi, J. and Reid, W.J. (2002) Educational Supervision in Social Work: a task-centered model
for field instruction and staff development, NY: Columbia U.P.
Catalano, S. J. (1985). Crisis intervention with clinical interns: Some considerations for
supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(1), 97-102. doi:10.1300/J001v03n01_08
Chui, E. T. (2010). Desirability and feasibility in evaluating fieldwork performance: Tensions
between supervisors and students. Social Work Education, 29(2), 171-187.
doi:10.1080/02615470902912219
Dolgoff, R. Loewenberg, E.A., Harrington, D. (2009) Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice,
Brooks/Cole.
Fortune, A. E., Feathers, C. E., Rook, S. R., & Scrimenti, R. M. (1988). Student satisfaction with
field placement. The Clinical Supervisor, 6(3-4), 359-381. doi:10.1300/J001v06n03_25
Fortune, A. E., & Kaye, L. (2002). Learning opportunities in field practica: Identifying skills and

8

activities associated with MSW students' self-evaluation of performance and satisfaction. The
Clinical Supervisor, 21(1), 5-28. doi:10.1300/J001v21n01_02
Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field
education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and
performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 111-124.
Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. D. (2004). Regression, self-disclosure, and the teach or treat dilemma:
Implications of a relational approach for social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal,
32(4), 431-449.
Garthwait, C. (2005). The Social Work Practicum: A Guide and Workbook for Students. Allyn
and Bacon, Boston.
Gelman, C. (2004). Anxiety Experienced by Foundation-Year MSW Students Entering Field
Placement: Implications for Admissions, Curriculum, and Field Education. Journal of Social
Work Education, 40(1), 39-54.
Gelman, C., Fernandez, P., Hausman, N., Miller, S., & Weiner, M. (2007). Challenging endings:
First year MSW interns' experiences with forced termination and discussion points for
supervisory guidance. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(2), 79-90. doi:10.1007/s10615-0070076-6
Hay, K., & O'Donoghue, K. (2009). Assessing social work field education: Towards
standardising fieldwork assessment in New Zealand. Social Work Education, 28(1), 42-53.
doi:10.1080/02615470802020881
Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., Kuppens, S., & Ferrell, L. W. (2011). The signature
pedagogy of social work? An investigation of the evidence. Research on Social Work Practice,
21(3), 363-372.
Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field
instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135-169. doi:10.1080/07325220802490828
Johnson, A.K.( 2000). The Community practice pilot project: integrating methods, field,
community assessment, and experiential learning. Journal of Community Practice. 8(4): 5-25
Kanno, H., & Koeske, G. F. (2010). MSW students' satisfaction with their field placement: The
role of preparedness and supervision quality. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(1), 23-38.
doi:10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800066
Lazar, A., & Eisikovits, Z. (1997). Social work students' preferences regarding supervisory styles
and supervisor's behavior. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(1), 25-37. doi:10.1300/J001v16n01_02
McNeece, C. A., & Thyer, B. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of
evidence-based social work, 1(1), 7-25.

9

Noesen, J. (1999). The intern and the challenging client. Smith College Studies in Social Work,
70(1), 27-45.
Reisch, M., Jarman-Rohde, L. (Spring/Summer 2000). The future of social work in the United
Sates: implication for field education. Journal of Social Work Education. 36(2): 201- 214.
Regehr, C., Regehr, G., Leeson, J., & Fusco, L. (2002). Setting priorities for learning in the field
practicum: A comparative study of student and field instructors. Journal of Social Work
Education, 38(1), 55-65.
Royce, D., Dhooper, S. & Rompf, E. (2010) Field Instruction: A Guide for Social Work Students.
NY: Allyn and Bacon
Sun, A. (1999). Issues BSW interns experience in their first semester's practicum. The Clinical
Supervisor, 18(1), 105-123. doi:10.1300/J001v18n01_07
Smith, S. L., & Baker, D. R. (1988). The relationship between educational background of field
instructors and the quality of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 6(3-4), 257-270.
doi:10.1300/J001v06n03_19
Triezenberg, G. E. (1984). Learning magic: Social work internship and beyond. The Clinical
Supervisor, 2(4), 43-51. doi:10.1300/J001v02n04_05
Urdang, E. (1999). Becoming a field instructor: A key experience in professional development.
The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 85-103. doi:10.1300/J001v18n01_06
Urdang, E. (1995, August). Self-perceptions of the beginning field instructor: The experience of
supervising a social work intern. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 56
Vonk, M., & Thyer, B. A. (1997). Evaluating the quality of supervision: A review of instruments
for use in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(1), 103-113. doi:10.1300/J001v15n01_08
Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social
work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327-339.

10