Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6/1/10
Dear Craig,
Please find following advice relating to the minimum set back between two rows of solar panels in
order to ensure high levels of performance.
Introduction
When two or more rows of panels are set on raised frames, there arises the likelihood of the
foremost row of panels shading rear rows. Depending on the amount of shading, this can
significantly reduce output from the system as a whole, as entire strings of panels can drop out and
be bypassed. In worst case, this can stress system components and lead to early failure.
The amount and impact of shading significantly depends upon the row spacing, panel inclination,
roof pitch, and orientation and length of the rows. The impact of shading also depends on the array’s
string configuration.
Panels are most likely to shade the row behind when the sun is low in the sky, as occurs in late
afternoon and early morning, particularly in winter. At these times the suns intensity is not so great,
so loss of power due to shading at such times – a premise explored in this document. Consequently,
some shade may be considered acceptable.
An example is provided below in an illustration of a 1.5kW system with 2.34m set-back, as pictured
at 1030h on the midwinter solstice. Shading of the rear two rows would result in performance loss.
The graph below shows the impact of shading on a north-west facing system at 1530h on midwinter
solstice. Note on the rightmost diagram, which shows (in orange) impact of shade on the system
throughout the day, losses due to shading are disproportional to the amount of array that is shaded
(black).
Minimum Recommended Set Back
The minimum recommended set back between panels required to ensure low levels of shading is
presented below for two panel orientations (landscape with panel edge 0.8m and portrait panel
edge 1.6m), and three angles of panels. A spreadsheet is also attached that will assist in calculating
the minimum setback for any north-facing array. The set back is defined as the distance between
the front of two panels, not the gap between the rear of one panel and the front of the next.
A simulation was performed of the performance of the first three arrays, each 10.9 kW in size with
two rows of Solon 170W panels configured as 8 strings and connected to a SMC10000 inverter. This
configuration understates the likely effect of shade as loss of one string is minor when compared to
the 8 strings available (in practice only 4-5 would be used), and only half of the array is ever shaded
because there are only two rows. The results are presented in the table below.
System 10° pitch 2.34 20° pitch 3.01 30° pitch 2.34
setback setback setback
Annual Performance 17142 kWh 17699 17780
(Mildura)
Losses due to shading 0.5% 0.9% 1.5%
Comparison to ideal 4.9% 1.9% 1.4%
This indicates that large gaps between rows of panels with higher inclination is more favourable than
smaller panel inclination with small gaps between rows.
10 kW System (2 rows) 30° pitch 30° pitch 30° pitch 30° pitch,
2.34 3.01 3.58 No Self
setback setback setback Shading
Annual Performance (Mildura) 17554 17747 17780 18030
(kWh/year)
Losses due to shading 2.7% 1.7% 1.5% 0%
The result of using less than minimum setback is quite small on a long multi-string array with 2 rows.
However, this is principally because multi-sting arrays are less susceptible to shade, and only half of
the rows are ever shaded. The table below looks at the other extreme, a small 1.5 kW single-string
array arranged in rows of 3 (9x170W Solon panels with a SB1700 inverter).
Also consider that an array with shade that covers only the bottom row of cells on panels in
landscape format generally will perform better than an array with shade on the bottom rows of cells
on panels in portrait format, due to the bypass diodes in each panel. For similarly reasons, strings
should preferably not span rows.
Ultimately, whilst orienting the panels in landscape format reduces the minimum set-back between
rows, more framing and end clamps are likely to be needed, raising system costs.
Summary
In summary,
• A minimum row-to-row distance (set back) of 3m is advised for standard 1.6m high panels
inclined at 30°, or 1.5m set back for panels of 0.8m height.
• Smaller set-backs are possible, but not preferable on arrays with less than 3 strings.
• On constrained roofs, smaller set-backs are preferred to lower inclinations, unless set-backs
of <2.3m are required.
• The cost increase in rows with panels in landscape-orientation is typically not justified unless
on a highly-constrained roof.
• Some roofs require specific design optimisation, particularly if constrained or not north-
facing.
Kind regards,
Warwick Johnston
Manager
SunWiz