Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matthew D. Cham, MD
David F. Yankelevitz, MD
Claudia I. Henschke, PhD,
MD
Published online
10.1148/radiol.2342021656
Radiology 2005; 234:591594
Thromboembolic Disease
Detection at Indirect CT
Venography versus CT
Pulmonary Angiography1
Abbreviation:
DVT deep venous thrombosis
1
Author contributions:
Guarantors of integrity of entire study,
D.F.Y., M.D.C., C.I.H.; study concepts
and design, D.F.Y., C.I.H.; literature
research, M.D.C., D.F.Y., C.I.H.; clinical studies, D.F.Y., M.D.C.; data acquisition, M.D.C., D.F.Y.; data analysis/
interpretation, M.D.C., D.F.Y., C.I.H.;
statistical analysis, C.I.H., M.D.C.,
D.F.Y.; manuscript preparation, denition of intellectual content, editing, revision/review, and nal version approval, M.D.C., D.F.Y., C.I.H.
RSNA, 2005
RSNA, 2005
Pulmonary embolism is a life-threatening disease that affects between 40 000 and 200 000
patients annually in the United States alone (13). Pulmonary embolism is a well-recognized sequela of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities (4,5). Findings of
studies have shown that inadequately treated DVT is associated with recurrent pulmonary
embolism (6 8). To accurately diagnose thromboembolic disease in patients suspected of
having pulmonary embolism, several investigators have developed helical computed tomographic (CT) protocols that depict both pulmonary embolism and lower extremity DVT
(9,10). This technique has been referred to as combined CT pulmonary angiography and
indirect CT venography.
Indirect CT venography allows examination of the pelvis and lower extremities by using
only the contrast material already in circulation from the preceding CT pulmonary
angiography, thus obviating additional contrast material, which is associated with both
traditional and direct CT venography (9,10).
The addition of indirect CT venography to the standard CT pulmonary angiographic
591
minutes to perform, potentially obviating a separate lower extremity examination that can further delay the tur
naround time of results (9,10). In our prior
study, we compared indirect CT venography with lower extremity sonography in
116 patients and found a disagreemen
t
rate of only 3% (11). Authors of a doubleblinded prospective study involving 70
consecutive patients undergoing both
lower extremity sonography and combined CT pulmonary angiography and
indirect CT venography reported a sensitivity and specicity of 100% and 97
%,
respectively, for indirect CT venography
(12). Authors of other nonrandomized
retrospective studies have reported sensi
tivities of 71%94% and specicities o
f
93%94% for indirect CT
venography
(13,14).
Several investigators have also note
d
that, like CT pulmonary angiography, indirect CT venography also has the potential to provide alternative nonvascular
diagnoses for the patients clinical pre
sentation (1517). The widespread use of
this examination has been further supported by studies in which a moderately
good interobserver agreement, a consi
stently high level of venous enhancement, and a low radiation risk were r
eported (18 21).
Authors of several large prospecti
ve
multicenter studies have found that the
addition of indirect CT venography to
the basic CT pulmonary angiographi
c
protocol increased the diagnosis of
thromboembolic disease by 15%38%
(11,17,22).
Another consideration in the increasingly common use of combined CT pu
lmonary angiography and indirect CT
venography is the optimization of the indirect CT venographic portion of the examination. From a technical standpoint, it
is necessary to consider two important pa
rameters: the time delay prior to initiatin
g
indirect CT venography and the sectio
n
intervals. We previously evaluated t
he
former and found that the 2-minute delay
following CT pulmonary angiography produced near maximum opacication in the
majority of patients (11). Consideration o
f
the latter necessitates obtaining infor
ma-
Imaging
Our imaging protocol was the standard
hospital protocol used for routine clinical
care, without modications. All patients
underwent combined CT pulmonary angiography and indirect CT venography. A
Findings of the examination were categorized as inconclusive when poor examination quality resulted in a nondiagnosEach study had been read by one of six tic impression.
attending chest radiologists (including
D.F.Y. and C.I.H.). Each attending radiolStatistical Analysis
ogist had at least 10 years of experience.
The parameter of interest was the increFor both CT pulmonary angiography and
mental increase in detection of thromboindirect CT venography, thrombi were
dened as low-attenuating partial or embolic disease when combined CT pulmonary angiography and indirect CT
complete intraluminal lling defects surrounded by a high-attenuating ring of venography was performed versus when
enhanced blood and were seen on at least only CT pulmonary angiography was pertwo consecutive transverse images. If formed. The 99% condence interval for
only one transverse image demonstrated this incremental increase was calculated by
a lling defect, then a thrombus would using the standard approach.
not be diagnosed. Thrombus length was
measured by counting the number of
RESULTS
consecutive images on which the deep
venous thrombus was visible. Because a
A typical example of a deep venous thrombus
section width of 10 mm was used for
at indirect CT venography is shown in Figure
indirect CT venography, each image rep1. Among the rst 378 consecutive patients,
resents 1 cm of the thrombus length.
Image Interpretation
Radiology
Radiology
February 2005
Cham et al
Indirect CT
Venography
Positive for DVT
Negative for DVT
Inconclusive for DVT
Total
Positive for
Pulmonary
Embolism
Negative for
Pulmonary
Embolism
Inconclusive
for Pulmonary
Embolism
Total
100
139
4
43
1263
24
5
12
0
148 (9)
1414 (89)
28 (2)
243 (15)
1330 (84)
17 (1)
1590 (100)
with DVT in the absence of pulmonary embolism and the ve (0.3%) patients with
DVT and nondiagnostic CT pulmonary anFigure 2.
Radiology
Volume 234
Number 2
593
17.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
al. Indirect CT venography following CT pulmonary angiography: spectrum of CT ndings. J Thorac Imaging 2002; 17:1827.
Coche EE, Hamoir XL, Hammer FD, et al. Using dual-detector helical CT angiography to
detect deep venous thrombosis in patients
with suspicion of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic value and additional ndings. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 2001; 176:10351039.
Garg K, Kemp JL, Russ PD, Baron AE. Thromboembolic disease: variability of interobserver
agreement in the interpretation of CT venography with CT pulmonary angiography. AJR
Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:10431047.
Bruce D, Loud PA, Klippenstein DL, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: how much venous enhancement is routinely obtained? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;
176:12811285.
Szapiro D, Ghaye B, Willems V, et al. Evaluation of CT time-density curves of lower-limb
veins. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:164169.
Rademaker J, Griesshaber V, Hidajat N, et al.
Combined CT pulmonary angiography and
venography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis: radiation
dose. J Thorac Imaging 2001; 16:297299.
Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, et al. Deep
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
594
Radiology
February 2005
Cham et al