You are on page 1of 1

James Rachels : The Debate over Utilitarianism

What I expect to learn :

I expect how two people debate Utilitirianism.

Review :

Right actions produce good, and that well is one thing only happiness.The author mentioned that
considerations in your mind makes relevant priorr to your subjected act. It is taken by a reason
without hesitations to exclude the adequately moral perspective.Happiness is not seeking for
something that should not only be considered.Smart is right in his line of defense against the
utilitarianism the utilitarianism should be considered also The classical utilitarianism is defined by
first actions are judge soley in virtue of their consequences, that right actions have the best
consequenses. The improtance of nuances would not be difficult in some aspects if you will do
respects the individual privacy. It will consider the things which are good by themselves but if ony
ig the night actions would they done. Eventually actions are complying to be defensible if they
know what the consequences they do the others are. No one's happines is to be counted as more
improtant than anyone else, independently. and in their own right. When looking for a friend we
don't consider that friends make us happy, but rather we are actually seeking for happiness and
that having friends is the key to our happiness. Taking into consideration on your past actions that
you have done is also improtant in making up for your future.

What I have learned :

I learned that Happiness is not seeking for something that should not only be considered by
anything.

Interogative questions :

1.) What is Debate over Utilitarianism.


2.) How do you assess the action of consequences
3.) What will you get after knowing your consequences.
4.) What is Act-Utilitarianism.
5.) What is Independenlt debate Utilitarianism