This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Update No. 5 February 7, 2010 1. Smelt v. United States of America (C.D.Cal. Case No. 8:2009-cv-00286) (challenged federal DOMA, and at an earlier stage, constitutionality of Prop. 8, at Compl., ¶ 29. As of August 2009, plaintiff attorney Richard Gilbert planed to refile the lawsuit.) • 03/09/09 Complaint • Commentary • 06/11/09 OJ Motion to Dismiss • 06/11/09 California Attorney General Motion To Dismiss • 08/24/09 Judge David Carter's dismissing the case 2. Bishop et al v. State of Oklahoma et al (N.D.Okl. 4:2004-cv- 00848) (challenges both federal DOMA and Oklahoma's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage) • first amended complaint, filed 08/10/09 • 06/06/09 ruling by 10th Circuit, remanding "the case for entry of an order dismissing [state constitutional] claims" because plaintiffs lack standing to sue • 447 F.Supp.2d 1239 (N.D. Okla. 2006) (summarized here) • Bishop v. USA, No. 4:04-cv-00848 (Okla. N. Dist.), brief by Department of Justice supporting motion to dismiss, file 10/13/09 • Bishop v. USA, No. 4:04-cv-00848 (Okla. N. Dist.), dismissal by Judge Terence Kern of Oklahoma as a party, filed 11/24/09 • News 3. Bonilla et al. v. Hurst et al.(E.D.La. 2:2009-cv-03445) • 04/02/09 Complaint • News